Tennis Elbow Impormasyon In-depth

Ang pahinang ito ay isinalin ng makina at hindi pa nasusuri ng isang doktor. Ang bersyong Ingles ang siyang opisyal.

Ang iyong nararamdaman

Ang tennis elbow ay pananakit sa labas ng iyong siko, sa matigas na bahagi kung saan nakakabit ang mga kalamnan ng iyong forearm. Nangyayari ito kapag ang tendon doon ay napudpod at nairita. Pinakakaraniwan ito sa pagitan ng edad na 35 at 65, at nakakaapekto ito sa humigit-kumulang 3% ng mga tao.

Lalong lumalala ang sakit kapag ikaw ay humahawak nang mahigpit, nagbubuhat, o nagpipilipit. Ang pagpihit ng door handle, paghawak ng tasa ng kape, pagbuhos mula sa kettle, o pagbuhat ng shopping bag ay maaaring magdulot nito. Karaniwang masakit kapag pinipindot ang labas ng iyong siko. Ang pagtuwid ng iyong pulso o mga daliri laban sa resistance, gaya ng pagbuhat habang nakaharap pababa ang iyong palad, ay madalas ding nagdudulot ng sakit.

Ang sakit ay may tendensiyang sumiklab pagkatapos ng aktibidad, at maaaring kumirot sa gabi o paggising sa umaga. Sa paglipas ng mga linggo, maaari itong kumalat sa pang-araw-araw na buhay. May ilang tao na nakararanas ng limitasyon sa trabaho at mga sosyal na aktibidad dahil sa sakit. Humigit-kumulang 20% ng mga taong may tennis elbow ang may sakit na sapat ang tindi upang limitahan ang kanilang trabaho at pang-araw-araw na buhay.

Ang mabuting balita ay ang tennis elbow ay karaniwang gumagaling nang kusa. Ang mga sintomas ay madalas na unti-unting nababawasan sa loob ng tatlo hanggang apat na buwan, at karamihan sa mga kaso ay nareresolba sa loob ng 6 na buwan anuman ang gamot na ginamit. Humigit-kumulang 90% ng mga taong may hindi ginamot na tennis elbow ang nakararanas ng pagkawala ng kanilang mga sintomas sa loob ng 1 taon. Kahit na matagal mo nang nararamdaman ang sakit, ang iyong pagkakataon na gumaling sa susunod na taon ay nananatiling halos pareho.

Dahil karaniwan itong gumagaling nang kusa, karamihan sa mga tao ay hindi nangangailangan ng operasyon. Ang operasyon ay karaniwang inilalaan para sa maliit na porsyento ng mga tao na ang sakit ay hindi bumubuti sa ibang gamutan.

Ano ang aktwal na nangyayari

Ang masakit na bahagi ay isang tendon na tinatawag na extensor carpi radialis brevis. Ikinakabit nito ang mga kalamnan ng iyong pulso at daliri sa buto sa labas ng iyong siko. Isipin ito bilang isang lubid na nag-aangkla ng layag sa isang palo. Bawat paghawak, pagbuhat, at pagpihit ay humihila sa lubid na iyon.

Sa paulit-ulit na strain, nagsisimulang mapudpod ang lubid. Ang karaniwang proseso ng pagkukumpuni ng katawan ay hindi nakakasabay, kaya ang mga hibla ng tendon ay nagiging disorganised sa halip na malakas at nakahanay. Hindi ito pamamaga o flare-up ng inflammation, kahit na iminumungkahi ito ng pangalang "epicondylitis." Ito ay isang problema ng pagkapudpod, mas katulad ng isang naghihimulmol na lubid kaysa sa isang nasunog, at iyon ang dahilan kung bakit bumabalik ang sakit kapag ginagamit mo ang iyong kamay.

Ang pagkapudpod ay nangyayari eksakto kung saan nagtatagpo ang tendon at ang buto, at ang load doon ay tumataas kapag ang iyong siko ay diretso at ang iyong palad ay nakaharap sa ibaba. Tumutugma ito sa mga paggalaw na nagdudulot sa iyo ng sakit: paghawak, pagbuhat nang nakaharap sa ibaba ang palad, pagpihit ng hawakan. Ang sense ng iyong siko sa sarili nitong posisyon sa espasyo ay maaari ring maging hindi gaanong tumpak, at ang maliit na kalamnan sa likod ng siko ay hindi bumubukas gaya ng dapat nito kapag ikaw ay humahawak. Ito ang dahilan kung bakit ang problema ay hindi lamang tungkol sa tendon mismo. Mahalaga rin ang pag-aalaga sa iyong leeg, balikat, at buong braso, hindi lamang ang siko.

Kung ang sakit ay nagpapatuloy sa mahabang panahon at muli mong napinsala ang siko, ang isang kalapit na ligament na nagpapatatag sa joint ay maaari ring ma-strain. Maaari nitong gawing pakiramdam na hindi matatag ang siko gayundin ang pagiging masakit, at ito ay isang dahilan kung bakit ang ilang siko ay hindi gumagaling sa simpleng gamutan.

Ano ang maaari naming gawin tungkol dito

Si Dr Kieran Hirpara, isang upper-limb surgeon sa Mater Private Hospital Rockhampton, ay nagsisimula sa mga opsyon na hindi gaanong invasive na angkop sa iyong kondisyon. Ang mga pasyente ay karaniwang nirerefer sa aming klinika ng kanilang GP; kung iminungkahi ng isang physiotherapist na magpatingin sa amin, kakailanganin mo pa rin ng referral mula sa iyong GP upang maging eligible para sa Medicare rebate. Sa iyong unang pagbisita, kukuha kami ng history, susuriin ang iyong siko at mag-aayos ng imaging kung kinakailangan.

Karamihan sa tennis elbow ay gumagaling nang walang operasyon, kaya karaniwan kaming nagsisimula sa non-operative care. Maaari mong bawasan ang load sa tendon sa pamamagitan ng pagbabago sa kung paano ka humahawak, nagbubuhat at nagpi-twist sa trabaho at sa bahay. Layunin ng physiotherapy na pawiin ang sakit at ibalik ang lakas sa iyong wrist at forearm. Bigyan ito ng sapat na pagkakataon sa loob ng ilang buwan. Ang pagkakataon ng paggaling ay nananatiling halos pareho sa loob ng unang taon, kahit na matagal na ang nararamdamang sakit.

Ang mga pain tablet at anti-inflammatories ay maaaring makabawas sa sakit, bagaman maliit lamang ang ginhawang ibinibigay nito at maaari itong magdulot ng mga side effect. Ang mga injection ay isang opsyon na maaari naming talakayin. Ang Cortisone ay maaaring pawiin ang sakit sa short term. Ang Hyaluronic acid ay isang lubricating fluid na ini-inject sa paligid ng tendon. Ang Platelet-rich plasma ay gumagamit ng sample ng iyong sariling dugo, na pinoproseso upang i-concentrate ang mga healing cells, at ini-inject sa tendon. Pag-uusapan namin kung ano ang kinapapalooban ng bawat isa at kung gaano katagal maaaring tumagal ang anumang epekto bago magpasya nang magkasama kung alin ang angkop para sa iyo.

Ang operasyon ay nababanggit sa usapan kapag ang mga gamot na ito ay hindi nagbigay ng sapat na pagbuti at ang sakit ay naglilimita pa rin sa iyong trabaho o pang-araw-araw na buhay. Nililinis ng operasyon ang pudpod at frayed na bahagi ng tendon kung saan ito nakakabit sa buto sa labas ng iyong siko. Itinuturing namin itong isang shared decision, na ginagawa nang magkasama kapag nauunawaan mo na kung ano ang kinapapalooban nito at kung ano ang kaya at hindi nito kayang gawin para sa iyo.

Ano ang dapat asahan

Ang outlook para sa tennis elbow ay karaniwang mabuti, at nabasa mo na ang mga numero: karamihan ng mga siko ay gumagaling sa loob ng isang taon, anuman ang gamot na ginamit. Ang sakit ay may tendensiyang unti-unting mawala sa halip na maglaho agad nang magdamag. Sa paglipas ng mga linggo at buwan, dapat mong mapansin na ang mga flare-up ay nagiging mas maikli at mas magaan, at ang mga pang-araw-araw na paghawak gaya ng paghawak ng kettle o pagpihit ng hawakan ay nagiging mas madali. Ang pagkakaroon ng sakit sa mahabang panahon ay hindi nagpapalala sa iyong pagkakataong gumaling.

Kung ang iyong siko ay hindi gumagaling sa mga mas simpleng gamutan, ang operasyon ay isa pa ring makatwirang landas. Ang ilang mga procedure para sa matagal nang tennis elbow ay nag-uulat ng success rates na 75% hanggang 80%.

Mahalagang malaman na ang operasyon ay hindi isang garantisadong lunas. Isang maliit na bilang ng mga tao, humigit-kumulang 1.5%, ang nangangailangan ng karagdagang operasyon sa huli. Ang pagkakaroon ng tatlo o higit pang injection bago ang operasyon ay nagpapataas ng posibilidad nito. Gaya ng anumang operasyon, may mga pangkalahatang panganib gaya ng impeksyon o paninigas, at ang ilang mga procedure ay maaaring mag-iwan sa siko na bahagyang mas matigas kaysa dati.

Kaya ang tapat na larawan ay ito: ang iyong siko ay malamang na gagaling nang kusa o sa pamamagitan ng physiotherapy at mga makatwirang pagbabago sa kung paano mo ginagamit ang iyong braso. Kung hindi ito mangyari, ang operasyon ay nakatutulong sa karamihan ng mga taong nakakarating sa puntong iyon, ngunit hindi sa lahat.

Kailan dapat magpatingin

Karamihan ng tennis elbow ay gumagaling nang kusa, kaya oras ang karaniwang pangunahing gamutan. Magpatingin sa iyong GP kung ang sakit sa labas ng iyong siko ay tumagal na ng higit sa 6 na linggo, o kung pinipigilan ka nito sa pagtatrabaho o pagtulog. Humingi ng pagsusuri ng espesyalista kung ang simpleng gamutan at physiotherapy sa loob ng ilang buwan ay hindi nakatulong, o kung ang iyong siko ay pakiramdam na hindi matatag pati na rin masakit, dahil ang napunang ligament ay maaari ding bahagi ng problema. Sabihin sa iyong GP kung ilang injection na ang iyong natanggap, dahil ang tatlo o higit pang steroid injection bago ang anumang operasyon ay nagpapataas ng posibilidad ng karagdagang surgery sa hinaharap. Kung mapansin ang init, pamumula o lagnat kasabay ng sakit, magpatingin agad sa iyong GP sa halip na hintayin itong humupa.

Mas malalim na pagtalakay

Advanced reading: the deeper science (optional)

Ang seksyong ito ay higit pa sa kailangan mo para sa iyong sariling mga desisyon sa paggamot. Ang tennis elbow ay karapat-dapat sa karagdagang pagbabasa dahil isa ito sa mga kondisyon kung saan ang paggamot na tila pinaka-epektibo sa unang buwan ay ang siyang may pinakapangit na resulta sa pagtatapos ng taon.

Ang kondisyon ay karaniwang gumagaling nang kusa, nang dahan-dahan

Kung hahayaan lang, ang tennis elbow ay humuhupa. Sa pagsubok na tinalakay sa ibaba, ang grupong na-randomize na maghintay at mag-obserba lamang, walang injection, walang physiotherapy, ay muling sinuri sa ika-52 linggo, at 56 sa 62 (90%) ang nag-ulat na sila ay lubos na bumuti o ganap nang gumaling [1].

Ang pigurang iyon ang pamantayan na dapat sukatin ang bawat gamutan. Ang isang interbensyon ay may halaga lamang kung tatalunin nito ang paggaling nang kusa, at ang paggaling nang kusa ang karaniwang nangyayari.

Ang paradox ng corticosteroid

Isang mahalagang randomised trial ang naghambing sa corticosteroid injection, physiotherapy, at simpleng paghihintay, habang sinusubaybayan ang mga tao sa loob ng isang buong taon [1].

Sa ika-anim na linggo, mukhang mahusay ang injection. Iniulat ang tagumpay sa 51 sa 65 (78%) ng injection group kumpara sa 16 sa 60 (27%) ng mga naghihintay, na may number needed to treat na 2 [1].

Pagkatapos ay nagbago ito. Sa mga maagang tagumpay na iyon, 47 sa 65 (72%) ang kalaunang nag-regress. Sa ika-52 linggo, ang injection group ay signipikanteng mas malala kaysa sa physiotherapy group sa bawat outcome, at mas malala kaysa sa mga taong walang ginawa sa dalawa sa tatlong primary measures [1].

Karapat-dapat ulitin ang sariling paliwanag ng mga may-akda: pinapawi ng injection ang sakit nang napakabilis kaya muling binabalik ng mga tao ang pag-load sa isang tendon na hindi pa talaga gumagaling. Ang konklusyon ng trial ay ang corticosteroid "dapat gamitin nang may pag-iingat" sa tennis elbow, isang kapansin-pansing pahayag tungkol sa gamot na inaasahan ng karamihan na ialok sa kanila.

Ito ang dahilan kung bakit ang injection dito ay isang pinag-isipang desisyon tungkol sa short-term function, hindi isang default, at kung bakit hindi ito kapalit para sa loading programme.

Kaya ano ang sulit gawin

Tinalo ng physiotherapy ang paghihintay sa loob ng anim na linggo sa bawat sukatan, at sa ika-52 linggo ay hindi na mapag-iba ang dalawa dahil halos lahat sa parehong grupo ay gumaling na [1]. Samakatuwid, ang halaga nito ay ang mapabilis ang iyong pagdaan sa mga buwan ng pananakit, hindi ang pagbabago ng destinasyon. Kapansin-pansin, ang grupo ng physiotherapy ay humingi rin ng mas kaunting karagdagang gamutan sa proseso [1]. Dahil dito, ang makatwirang plano ay load management at isang progressive tendon programme, habang tinatanggap na ang timeline ay sinusukat sa mga buwan.

Ang operasyon ay nakalaan para sa maliit na minorya na disabled pa rin matapos ang isang tunay at matagal na pagsubok ng non-operative care. Ang dahilan kung bakit mataas ang threshold na ito ay dahil mismo sa natural history sa itaas: kapag nag-opera nang maaga, nakikipagkompetensya ka laban sa isang kondisyon na, sa siyam sa sampung kaso, ay kusang gagaling din.

Iniksyon ng cultured tendon-cell

Maaari kang alukan, o maaaring mabasa tungkol sa, autologous tenocyte implantation (ATI, ibinebenta sa Australia bilang OrthoATI), isang iniksyon ng iyong sariling tendon cells na pinalaki sa laboratoryo. Ito ay ligtas, ito ay biologically sensible, at ang mga resultang iniulat sa mga stubborn tennis elbow ay tumagal ng higit sa apat na taon. Ito rin ay sinusuportahan, sa buong pandaigdigang literatura, ng limang pag-aaral na may kabuuang 50 pasyente, kung saan wala ni isa ang may comparison group. Ihambing ito sa natural history sa itaas, at magiging malinaw ang dahilan para sa pag-iingat. Mayroong kumpletong ulat tungkol sa kung ano ang alam at hindi alam, kasama ang mga sanggunian, sa pahinang autologous tenocyte implantation.

Mga Sanggunian

[1] Bisset L, Beller E, Jull G, Brooks P, Darnell R, Vicenzino B. Mobilisation with movement and exercise, corticosteroid injection, or wait and see for tennis elbow: randomised trial. BMJ. 2006;333(7575):939. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38961.584653.ae


Evidence & references

This is the clinical evidence summary written for health professionals. It is technical, and it lists the research this page was built from. You do not need to read it to understand your treatment or to make a decision about it.

Overview

  • The term 'Tennis Elbow' is considered inaccurate by some authors [1].
  • The diagnosis of tennis elbow is often made too quickly [1].
  • Rapid diagnosis may contribute to high rates of recalcitrant complaints due to insufficient consideration of differential diagnoses [1].
  • Approximately 90% of people with untreated tennis elbow achieve symptom resolution at 1 year based on placebo or no-treatment control arms of randomized trials [3].
  • Pooled data from randomized controlled trials indicate a lack of intermediate- to long-term clinical benefit after nonsurgical treatment of lateral epicondylitis compared with observation only or placebo [4].
  • No single universally accepted protocol has emerged for the treatment of epicondylitis despite numerous available options [7].
  • Most patients with lateral epicondylitis resolve spontaneously or with standard conservative management [12].
  • Refractory cases of lateral epicondylitis may benefit from interventional therapies or surgical approaches [12].
  • Current research evidence suggests that surgery for tennis elbow is no more effective than nonsurgical treatment, based on evidence with significant methodological limitations [31].
  • There was insufficient evidence to support or refute the effectiveness of surgery for lateral elbow pain due to a small number of studies, large heterogeneity in interventions, small sample sizes, and poor reporting of outcomes [11].
  • Denervation of the elbow for management of tennis elbow is a simple safe procedure [16].

Anatomy & Pathophysiology

Anatomy

  • The pathology of lateral epicondylitis is primarily localized to the origin of the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) [51].
  • The ECRB and extensor digitorum communis (EDC) have tendinous origins and lie deep to the extensor carpi radialis longus (ECRL), which has a muscular origin [51].
  • The common extensors lie superficial to the lateral collateral ligament complex proximally and to the supinator distally [51].
  • The ECRB tendon lies superficial to the joint capsule, making it accessible arthroscopically [51].
  • The posterior interosseous nerve enters the supinator distal to the radial head [51].
  • Compression of the posterior interosseous nerve at the radial tunnel can coexist with lateral epicondylitis [51].
  • The pathologic process mainly involves the origin of the extensor carpi radialis brevis but can involve the tendons of the extensor carpi radialis longus and the extensor digitorum communis [52].
  • The anatomic basis of the injury to the extensor carpi radialis brevis origin involves hypovascular zones, eccentric tendon stresses, and a microscopic degenerative response [25].

Pathophysiology

  • Lateral epicondylitis is initiated as a microtear, most often within the origin of the extensor carpi radialis brevis [52].
  • The current consensus is that lateral epicondylitis is a degenerative process rather than an inflammatory one [25].
  • Histologic studies of lateral epicondylitis show angiofibroblastic hyperplasia [51, 52].
  • Histologic findings include neovascularization, infiltration by mucopolysaccharide, a disordered collagen scaffold, bone formation, and angiofibroblastic proliferation [51].
  • Inflammation is not usually seen in lateral epicondylitis but is likely present in the early stages [51].
  • The lesion occurs in a vascular watershed area that is relatively avascular, limiting healing potential [51].
  • Eccentric contractions of the extensor carpi radialis brevis muscle during backhand tennis swings are the likely cause of repetitive microtrauma that causes tears in the tendon and lateral epicondylitis [35].
  • The presence of hypoechogenicity and bone changes on ultrasound indicates the presence of a stressed common extensor origin-lateral epicondyle complex in elbows with lateral epicondylalgia [5].
  • Repetitive exposure to bending and straightening the elbow is a significant risk factor for lateral epicondylitis [84].
  • There is a strong association between combined physical exertion and elbow movements and lateral epicondylitis [8].
  • Biomechanical exposure involving the wrist and/or elbow at work is associated with the incidence of lateral epicondylitis [57].

Classification

  • The term "Tennis Elbow" is considered inaccurate, and the diagnosis is often made too quickly, which may explain high rates of recalcitrant complaints due to insufficient consideration of differential diagnoses [1].
  • A considerable terminological heterogeneity exists in the description of lateral elbow pain, associated with a lack of clear and recognized diagnostic criteria [30].
  • Approximately 46.5% of patients presenting with lateral-sided elbow pain are diagnosed with a condition other than lateral epicondylitis [14].
  • The findings of an epidemiologic study are consistent with the hypothesis that tennis elbow is a degenerative disease, the onset of which is hastened by overuse of the arm and elbow [13].
  • Pathologic tissue studies have noted a failed reparative process rather than active inflammation in lateral epicondylitis [25].
  • The presence of hypoechogenicity and bone changes on musculoskeletal ultrasound indicates the presence of a stressed common extensor origin-lateral epicondyle complex in elbows with lateral epicondylalgia [5].
  • Accurate diagnosis of medial epicondylitis requires distinguishing it from other elbow conditions, and treatment is guided by the specific pathologic stage of the tendon [10].
  • The arthroscopic identification of three types of Baker lesions helps the surgeon confirm the presence of pathology commonly seen intra-articularly in patients with lateral epicondylitis [68].
  • Failed surgical treatment of lateral epicondylitis is multifactorial, and distinguishing the cause is critical for appropriate management [15].

Clinical Presentation

  • The term 'Tennis Elbow' is considered inaccurate, and the diagnosis is often made too quickly, potentially explaining high rates of recalcitrant complaints due to insufficient consideration of differential diagnoses [1].
  • Lateral epicondylitis is a common, generally self-limiting tendinosis affecting patients aged 35 to 55 years [26].
  • The findings are consistent with the hypothesis that tennis elbow is a degenerative disease, the onset of which is hastened by overuse of the arm and elbow [13].
  • Almost half of the patients (46.5%) presenting with lateral sided elbow pain were diagnosed with a condition other than lateral epicondylitis [14].
  • A considerable terminological heterogeneity exists in the description of lateral elbow pain, associated with the lack of clear and recognised diagnostic criteria [30].
  • The diagnosis of lateral epicondylitis based on Japanese Orthopaedic Association guidelines requires pain in the elbow joint within 2 weeks, pain in the lateral epicondyle region on resisted extension of the wrist with the elbow extended, and tenderness in the lateral epicondyle [46].
  • Tenderness for the diagnosis of lateral epicondylitis is considered positive if observed in the lateral epicondyle or adjacent tissue up to 4 cm distal to the epicondyle and elicited by any degree of palpation [46].
  • Physical examination of the elbow should focus on functional anatomy and includes inspection, palpation, range of motion, strength, stability, and special tests [54].
  • The history is the most valuable tool to guide the clinical examination, with location, quality, context, duration, and severity of elbow pain being important for understanding pathology [54].
  • Determining the symptom trajectory (whether pain is getting better, worse, or remaining constant) is helpful when considering intervention [54].
  • Characteristic elements of the history for lateral elbow tendinopathy include pain lifting things from a bag with a pronated hand, turning doorknobs, taking milk from the fridge, shaking hands, taking a laptop out of a bag, and bumping the lateral elbow [54].
  • Physical examination maneuvers to elicit lateral elbow tendinopathy include direct palpation of the ECRB origin, the tennis elbow shear test, pain with resisted wrist or long finger extension, and the laptop test [54].
  • Imaging studies to evaluate lateral elbow tendinopathy include MRI if the lateral ulnar collateral ligament is suspected as part of the pathology and ultrasonography [54].

Investigations

Clinical Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis

  • The physical exam is directed by history and the location of the patient's pain in the anterior, posterior, medial, or lateral aspect of the elbow [49].

Imaging: Ultrasound

  • Ultrasonographic imaging of the elbow includes imaging techniques and the normal appearance of anatomic structures [44].

Imaging: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

  • The routine use of MRI for the diagnosis of lateral epicondylitis is low, although its use is associated with downstream effects [69].
  • Increased MRI signal in the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) origin is common in both symptomatic and asymptomatic elbows [70].
  • MRI can be used to evaluate ligaments and tendons of the elbow, but it is rarely indicated [45].
  • The reliability and validity of magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of chronic lateral epicondylitis has been evaluated [47].
  • Magnetic resonance evaluation of the elbow includes the review of ligament complexes [44].
  • A review of the MR appearance of osseous and soft-tissue anatomy of the elbow, as well as commonly encountered pathology including overuse injury, has been performed [44].

Imaging: Radiographs and CT

  • Plain radiographs remain the hallmark and the best screening test for the evaluation of the elbow [49].
  • Standard AP, lateral, and oblique radiographs are obtained for elbow evaluation, with serial radiography used as follow-up when heterotopic ossification is present [45].
  • CT is helpful when assessing for malunion architecture and the location and pattern of osteophytes and/or loose bodies [45].
  • Three-dimensional CT is used to check for heterotopic ossification [45].
  • CT is not necessary when elbow stiffness is entirely soft-tissue related [45].

Neurological Assessment

  • Electromyography/nerve conduction velocity studies should be performed if any question about neurologic dysfunction exists [45].
  • An assessment for ulnar nerve subluxation should be performed, as subluxation of the nerve is a relative contraindication for an arthroscopic procedure secondary to possible iatrogenic nerve injury [45].

Treatment

Non-Operative Management

  • Approximately 90% of people with untreated tennis elbow achieve symptom resolution at 1 year [3].
  • Lateral epicondylitis is usually self-limited, resolving over a 12- to 18-month period without treatment [33].
  • The probable best recommendation for treatment is oral analgesics for symptom relief, activity modification, and a plan of “waiting things out” for up to 18 months [42].
  • Corticosteroid injection has little, if any, benefit over placebo and usually does not change the natural history of the disease [42].
  • Recent data suggest that poorer results are seen in the intermediate and long term following corticosteroid injections relative to placebo [42].
  • Patients who undergo corticosteroid injection may actually be worse at the end of a year [42].
  • The significant short-term benefits of corticosteroid injection are paradoxically reversed after six weeks, with high recurrence rates [22].
  • Peri-articular hyaluronic acid treatment for tennis elbow was significantly better than control in improving pain at rest and after maximal grip testing [61].
  • Nonsurgical treatment is the mainstay of management for lateral epicondylitis, involving options such as rest, physical therapy, and injections [62].
  • Nonoperative treatment for epicondylitis has a success rate of up to 90% [66].
  • A high-repetition, low-resistance home exercise program may be useful for lateral epicondylitis [42].
  • There is wide variability of treatments offered when physiotherapy fails patients with tennis elbow [28].
  • Further investigations are needed on tendinopathies in other areas of the upper limb, including epicondylar tendinopathy [18].

Operative Management

  • There was insufficient evidence to support or refute the effectiveness of surgery for lateral elbow pain due to small number of studies, heterogeneity, small sample sizes, and poor reporting [11].
  • Greater than 90% of people with lateral epicondylitis are successfully treated nonoperatively [21].
  • Most surgical patients for lateral epicondylitis are in their fifth decade of life, have had symptoms for an average of 19 months, and have had failure of nonoperative treatment including an average of 3.1 corticosteroid injections [21].
  • The majority of patients undergoing surgery for lateral epicondylitis have surgery on their dominant elbow, with an average incidence of dominant arm involvement of 74% [21].
  • Outcomes between open and arthroscopic surgical procedures for lateral epicondylitis are comparable [42].
  • Arthroscopic treatment of lateral epicondylitis is accompanied by an increased risk of neurovascular injury and instability compared with open release of the elbow [42].
  • Good to excellent results have been achieved in 83% to 96% of patients using variations in technique for medial epicondylitis [42].
  • Poorer outcomes are reported in patients with ulnar nerve symptoms undergoing medial epicondylitis surgery [42].
  • Surgical intervention for refractory medial epicondylitis often has a high success rate with patients generally demonstrating an improvement in patient-reported outcomes and an encouraging number returning to work with limited complications [17].
  • The median time of minimum conservative management before surgery for lateral epicondylitis was six months [64].
  • Surgical intervention is reserved for patients with continued symptoms after 6 months or more of treatment [43].
  • There is no good algorithm for the type of surgical treatment that is most effective for lateral epicondylitis [21].
  • No single universally accepted protocol has emerged for the treatment of epicondylitis [7].

Complications

  • Corticosteroid injections have a short-term beneficial effect on lateral epicondylitis, but a negative effect in the intermediate term [32].
  • The significant short-term benefits of corticosteroid injection are reversed after six weeks, with high recurrence rates [22].
  • Heterotopic ossification has been reported as a complication following elbow arthroscopy for lateral epicondylitis [39].
  • Three or more preoperative injections is the most significant risk factor for revision surgery after operative treatment of lateral epicondylitis [71].
  • Short-term complication rates appear comparable between open and arthroscopic treatment of lateral epicondylitis [73].

Recovery

  • Lateral epicondylitis often resolves spontaneously, warranting considerable circumspection before embarking on treatment [19].
  • The prognosis for medial epicondylitis in occupational settings was good with a 3-year recovery rate at 81% [20].
  • Poor prognosis at 1 year of follow-up for lateral epicondylitis was related to manual work and high baseline pain [77].
  • No relation was found between the type of medical treatment given or chosen and prognosis for lateral epicondylitis at 1 year [77].
  • The annual incidence of lateral epicondylitis per 10,000 patients and the proportion of cases treated surgically remained constant from 2007 to 2014 [38].

Key Evidence

  • [Letter] The authors agree that the term 'Tennis Elbow' is inaccurate and that the diagnosis is often made too quickly, potentially explaining high rates of recalcitrant complaints due to insufficient consideration of differential diagnoses. [1] (10.1177/1758573218816086)
  • [L1] Based on the placebo or no-treatment control arms of randomized trials, about 90% of people with untreated tennis elbow achieve symptom resolution at 1 year. [3] (10.1097/corr.0000000000002058)
  • [L1] Pooled data from RCTs indicate a lack of intermediate- to long-term clinical benefit after nonsurgical treatment of lateral epicondylitis compared with observation only or placebo. [4] (10.1007/s11999-014-4022-y)
  • [L4] The presence of hypoechogenicity and bone changes indicates presence of a stressed common extensor origin-lateral epicondyle complex in elbows with lateral epicondylalgia. [5] (10.1186/1471-2342-14-10)
  • [L5] This article is a review of recently published information on elbow tendinopathy and tendon ruptures intended to assist clinicians in diagnosis and management, noting that while numerous treatment options exist for epicondylitis, no single universally accepted protocol has emerged. [7] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.01.022)
  • [L4] This study emphasizes the strength of the associations between combined physical exertion and elbow movements and lateral epicondylitis. [8] (10.1002/ajim.22140)
  • [L5] Accurate diagnosis requires distinguishing it from other elbow conditions, and treatment is guided by the specific pathologic stage of the tendon. [10] (10.1016/j.csm.2004.04.011)
  • [L1] Due to a small number of studies, large heterogeneity in interventions across trials, small sample sizes and poor reporting of outcomes, there was insufficient evidence to support or refute the effectiveness of surgery for lateral elbow pain. [11] (10.1002/14651858.cd003525.pub2)
  • [L4] Most patients with lateral epicondylitis resolve spontaneously or with standard conservative management, but refractory cases may benefit from interventional therapies or surgical approaches. [12] (10.5397/cise.2019.22.4.227)
  • [L4] The findings are consistent with the hypothesis that tennis elbow is a degenerative disease, the onset of which is hastened by overuse of the arm and elbow. [13] (10.1177/036354657900700405)
  • [L3] Almost half of the patients (46.5%) were diagnosed with a diagnosis other than lateral epicondylitis. [14] (10.1016/j.jseint.2024.08.047)
  • [L5] Failed surgical treatment of lateral epicondylitis is multifactorial, and distinguishing the cause is critical for appropriate management. [15] (10.1016/j.xrrt.2023.07.006)
  • [L2] Denervation of the elbow for management of tennis elbow is a simple safe procedure. [16] (10.5435/jaaosglobal-d-24-00352)
  • [L4] Surgical intervention for refractory medial epicondylitis often has a high success rate with patients generally demonstrating an improvement in patient-reported outcomes and an encouraging number returning to work with limited complications. [17] (10.1177/03635465221095565)
  • [L2] Further investigations are needed, not only focused on shoulder impingement or epicondylar tendinopathy, but on tendinopathies in other areas of the upper limb. [18] (10.1016/j.jsams.2015.06.007)
  • [L4] Overall, the available data suggest that lateral epicondylitis often resolves spontaneously, warranting considerable circumspection before embarking on treatment. [19] (10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.004)
  • [L2] The prognosis for medial epicondylitis in this population was good with a 3-year recovery rate at 81%. [20] (10.1097/01.jom.0000085888.37273.d9)
  • [L4] [21] (10.1097/blo.0b013e3181483dc4)
  • [L1] The significant short term benefits of corticosteroid injection are paradoxically reversed after six weeks, with high recurrence rates, implying that this treatment should be used with caution in the management of tennis elbow. [22] (10.1136/bmj.38961.584653.ae)
  • [L4] [25] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.07.019)
  • [L5] Lateral epicondylitis is a common, generally self-limiting tendinosis affecting patients aged 35 to 55 years. [26] (10.1302/0301-620x.95b9.29285)
  • [L4] There is wide variability of treatments offered when physiotherapy fails patients with tennis elbow. [28] (10.1177/1758573217738199)
  • [L1] In this SR, a considerable terminological heterogeneity emerged in the description of LEP, associated with the lack of clear and recognised diagnostic criteria in evaluating and treating patients with lateral elbow pain. [30] (10.3390/healthcare10061095)
  • [L1] Current research evidence suggests that surgery for tennis elbow is no more effective than nonsurgical treatment based on evidence with significant methodological limitations. [31] (10.1177/1758573217745041)
  • [L1] Corticosteroid injections have a shortterm beneficial effect on lateral epicondylitis, but a negative effect in the intermediate term. [32] (10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003564)
  • [L2] Lateral epicondylitis is a condition that is usually self-limited, resolving over a 12- to 18-month period without treatment. [33] (10.1007/s11552-014-9642-x)
  • [L5] [35] (10.1016/j.csm.2004.06.004)
  • [L4] The annual incidence of lateral epicondylitis per 10,000 patients and the proportion of cases treated surgically remained constant from 2007 to 2014. [38] (10.1007/s11420-017-9559-3)
  • [L4] To our knowledge, we present the first case of HO development after elbow arthroscopy for lateral epicondylitis. [39] (10.1177/1558944716668844)
  • [L3] [46] (10.1016/j.jseint.2024.01.008)
  • [L2] The results of this meta-analysis strongly support the hypothesis of an association between biomechanical exposure involving wrist and/or elbow at work and incidence of lateral epicondylitis. [57] (10.1002/acr.22874)
  • [L1] Peri-articular HA treatment for tennis elbow was significantly better than control in improving pain at rest and after maximal grip testing. [61] (10.1186/1758-2555-2-4)
  • [L5] Nonsurgical treatment is the mainstay of management for lateral epicondylitis, involving options such as rest, physical therapy, and injections. [62] (10.5435/00124635-200801000-00004)
  • [L4] [64] (10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.08.008)
  • [Paper] The article reviews the pathology, clinical presentation, and treatment options for lateral and medial epicondylitis in athletes, noting that nonoperative treatment has a success rate of up to 90% and that surgical options are reserved for recalcitrant cases. [66] (10.1016/j.csm.2010.06.009)
  • [L4] The arthroscopic identification of the 3 types of Baker lesions helps the surgeon to confirm the presence of pathology commonly seen intra-articularly in patients with lateral epicondylitis. [68] (10.1016/j.eats.2024.103142)
  • [L3] Although there is variation in the use of MRI for lateral epicondylitis and its use is associated with downstream effects, the routine use of MRI for the diagnosis of lateral epicondylitis is low. [69] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.03.025)
  • [L4] Increased MRI signal in the ECRB origin is common in symptomatic and in asymptomatic elbows. [70] (10.1016/j.jse.2016.01.033)
  • [L4] [71] (10.1016/j.jse.2016.10.022)
  • [L3] Surgical management of lateral epicondylitis varies depending on surgeons' fellowship training, and short-term complication rates appear comparable between open and arthroscopic treatment. [73] (10.1016/j.arthro.2017.04.078)
  • [L2] Poor prognosis at 1yr of follow-up for lateral epicondylitis was related to manual work and high baseline pain, whilst no relation was found between the type of medical treatment given/chosen and prognosis. [77] (10.1093/rheumatology/keg360)
  • [L4] Repetitive exposure to bending/straightening the elbow was a significant risk factor for medial and lateral epicondylitis. [84] (10.1093/rheumatology/ker228)

References

[1] In response to the letter to the editor by Dr. Dimitrios Stasinopoulos. Shoulder & Elbow. 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1758573218816086

[3] Persistent Tennis Elbow Symptoms Have Little Prognostic Value: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 2021. DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000002058

[4] Does Nonsurgical Treatment Improve Longitudinal Outcomes of Lateral Epicondylitis Over No Treatment? A Meta-analysis. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-4022-y

[5] The diagnostic validity of musculoskeletal ultrasound in lateral epicondylalgia: a systematic review. BMC Medical Imaging. 2014. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2342-14-10

[7] Elbow Tendinopathy and Tendon Ruptures: Epicondylitis, Biceps and Triceps Ruptures. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.01.022

[8] Work‐related risk factors for lateral epicondylitis and other cause of elbow pain in the working population. American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 2012. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.22140

[10] Diagnosis and treatment of medial epicondylitis of the elbow. Clinics in Sports Medicine. 2004. DOI: 10.1016/j.csm.2004.04.011

[11] Surgery for lateral elbow pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2011. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003525.pub2

[12] Current Trends for Treating Lateral Epicondylitis. Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow. 2019. DOI: 10.5397/cise.2019.22.4.227

[13] An epidemiologic study of tennis elbow. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 1979. DOI: 10.1177/036354657900700405

[14] Clinical Diagnosis Of Lateral Sided Elbow Pain: A Prediction Model To Recognise A Diagnosis Other Than A Tennis Elbow. JSES International. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.08.047

[15] Failed surgical treatment for lateral epicondylitis: literature review and treatment considerations for successful outcomes. JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2023.07.006

[16] A Comparative Study Between Denervation and Extensor Release for Management of Resistant Tennis Elbow. JAAOS: Global Research and Reviews. 2026. DOI: 10.5435/jaaosglobal-d-24-00352

[17] Surgical Techniques and Clinical Outcomes for Medial Epicondylitis: A Systematic Review. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2022. DOI: 10.1177/03635465221095565

[18] Effectiveness of the eccentric exercise therapy in physically active adults with symptomatic shoulder impingement or lateral epicondylar tendinopathy: A systematic review. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2015.06.007

[19] Management of lateral epicondylitis. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.004

[20] Medial Epicondylitis in Occupational Settings: Prevalence, Incidence and Associated Risk Factors. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2003. DOI: 10.1097/01.jom.0000085888.37273.d9

[21] Surgical Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 2007. DOI: 10.1097/blo.0b013e3181483dc4

[22] Mobilisation with movement and exercise, corticosteroid injection, or wait and see for tennis elbow: randomised trial. BMJ. 2006. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38961.584653.ae

[25] Lateral Epicondylitis: Review and Current Concepts. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.07.019

[26] Lateral epicondylitis. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2013. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.95b9.29285

[28] Management of tennis elbow: a survey of UK clinical practice. Shoulder & Elbow. 2017. DOI: 10.1177/1758573217738199

[30] Treatment, Diagnostic Criteria and Variability of Terminology for Lateral Elbow Pain: Findings from an Overview of Systematic Reviews. Healthcare. 2022. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10061095

[31] Surgery for tennis elbow: a systematic review. Shoulder & Elbow. 2017. DOI: 10.1177/1758573217745041

[32] Treating lateral epicondylitis with corticosteroid injections or non-electrotherapeutical physiotherapy: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2013. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003564

[33] Non-Surgical Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: A Aystematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. HAND. 2014. DOI: 10.1007/s11552-014-9642-x

[35] Lateral epicondylitis. Clinics in Sports Medicine. 2004. DOI: 10.1016/j.csm.2004.06.004

[38] Epidemiology and Disease Burden of Lateral Epicondylitis in the USA: Analysis of 85, 318 Patients. HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery. 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s11420-017-9559-3

[39] Heterotopic Ossification After the Arthroscopic Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis. HAND. 2017. DOI: 10.1177/1558944716668844

[42] Green S Operative Hand Surgery. Surgical Treatment > Expected Outcomes.

[43] Orthopaedic Knowledge Update Sports Medicine 6. Chronic/Overuse Elbow Disorders > Summary.

[44] Orthopaedic Knowledge Update Sports Medicine 6. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Elbow > Annotated References.

[45] Aaos Comprehensive Orthopaedic Review 3. Elbow Stiffness* > IV. Evaluation.

[46] Prevalence and factors associated with lateral epicondylitis among hospital healthcare workers. JSES International. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.01.008

[47] Campbell S Operative Orthopaedics 4 Volume Set. ELBOW, WRIST, AND HAND.

[49] Orthopaedic Knowledge Update 13 Ebook Without Multimedia. Anatomy, Biomechanics, Physical Examination, and Imaging of the Elbow > Summary and Conclusions.

[51] Aaos Comprehensive Orthopaedic Review 3. Lateral and Medial Epicondylitis > I. Lateral Epicondylitis.

[52] Campbell S Operative Orthopaedics 4 Volume Set. POSTERIOR SURGICAL APPROACH FOR QUADRILATERAL SPACE SYNDROME > ELBOW INJURIES > ELBOW TENOPATHIES.

[54] Orthopaedic Knowledge Update 13 Ebook Without Multimedia. Anatomy, Biomechanics, Physical Examination, and Imaging of the Elbow > Biomechanics > Clinical Examination.

[57] Lateral Epicondylitis and Physical Exposure at Work? A Review of Prospective Studies and Meta‐Analysis. Arthritis Care & Research. 2016. DOI: 10.1002/acr.22874

[61] Management of Tennis Elbow with sodium hyaluronate periarticular injections. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2010. DOI: 10.1186/1758-2555-2-4

[62] Management of Lateral Epicondylitis: Current Concepts. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2008. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200801000-00004

[64] Surgical management of lateral epicondylitis: a scoping review of published literature. JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.08.008

[66] Epicondylitis in the Athlete’s Elbow. Clinics in Sports Medicine. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.csm.2010.06.009

[68] Recognition and Differentiation of Baker Lesions in Lateral Epicondylitis During Arthroscopic Debridement. Arthroscopy Techniques. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2024.103142

[69] The Use and Downstream Associations of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Lateral Epicondylitis. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.03.025

[70] Incidental magnetic resonance imaging signal changes in the extensor carpi radialis brevis origin are more common with age. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.01.033

[71] Three or more preoperative injections is the most significant risk factor for revision surgery after operative treatment of lateral epicondylitis: an analysis of 3863 patients. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.10.022

[73] Trends in Surgical Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis Among Recently Trained Orthopaedic Surgeons. Arthroscopy. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.04.078

[77] Prognostic factors in lateral epicondylitis: a randomized trial with one-year follow-up in 266 new cases treated with minimal occupational intervention or the usual approach in general practice. Rheumatology. 2003. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg360

[84] Occupation and epicondylitis: a population-based study. Rheumatology. 2011. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker228