Osteoarthritis sa Siko Impormasyon In-depth

Ang pahinang ito ay isinalin ng makina at hindi pa nasusuri ng isang doktor. Ang bersyong Ingles ang siyang opisyal.

Ang iyong nararamdaman

Ang arthritis sa siko ay karaniwang nagsisimula bilang pagkirot sa pinakadulo ng iyong paggalaw, kapag itinuwid mo nang lubos ang iyong braso o ibinaluktot ito nang husto. Ang gitna ng paggalaw ay madalas na nananatiling komportable sa simula. Maraming tao ang nakakapansin ng pagsabit, pag-click, o pag-lock sa siko, na sanhi ng maliliit na piraso ng buto o gristle (tinatawag na loose bodies) na lumulutang sa joint. Ang mga bony spur (tinatawag na osteophytes) ay nabubuo sa paligid ng joint at pisikal na humaharang sa huling ilang digri ng pagbaluktot at pagtuwid.

Ang lubos na pagtuwid ng braso ay madalas na unang nawawala. Ang mga gawaing nangangailangan ng tuwid na siko ay nagiging mahirap: pag-abot sa mataas na istante, pagdadala ng tray nang nakaunat ang braso, o pagtulak sa sarili paitaas mula sa upuan. Ang pagpihit ng iyong forearm upang pumihit ng screwdriver o door handle ay karaniwang nananatiling maayos hanggang sa huling bahagi. Habang lumalala ang kondisyon, ang sakit ay maaaring kumalat sa gitna ng paggalaw at magsimulang makaabala sa iyo sa panahon ng pang-araw-araw na aktibidad sa halip na sa mga dulo lamang.

Ang pananakit sa gabi ay hindi tipikal sa ganitong uri ng arthritis. Kung ang iyong siko ay gumigising sa iyo sa gabi na may malalim at tumitibok na kirot, banggitin ito sa iyong surgeon, dahil maaari itong magturo sa ibang sanhi na dapat suriin.

Ang kondisyong ito ay pinakakaraniwan sa mga kalalakihan sa kanilang edad na limampu na gumawa ng maraming taon ng mabigat na manual work, bagaman naaapektuhan nito ang malawak na range ng edad. Maaari rin itong sumunod sa isang lumang pinsala sa siko tulad ng fracture o dislocation, kung minsan ay pagkalipas ng maraming taon. Sa halos kalahati ng mga tao, ang arthritis ay umiipit din sa isang nerve (ang ulnar nerve) sa loob ng siko, na nagiging sanhi ng pangingilig o pamamanhid sa ring finger at kalingkingan.

Kung ang alinman dito ay pamilyar, ang isang plain X-ray ay karaniwang unang hakbang. Malinaw nitong ipinapakita ang mga bony spur at loose bodies, at madalas na ang joint space mismo ay mukhang mas preserved kaysa sa iyong inaasahan.

Ano ang aktwal na nangyayari

Ang iyong siko ay isang hinge na may twist. Pinapayagan ka nitong itiklop at ituwid ang iyong braso, at pinapayagan din nito ang iyong forearm na umikot upang maibaling ang palad pataas o pababa. Ang ibabaw ng joint ay karaniwang nababalutan ng isang makinis na layer ng cartilage, na gumagana nang katulad ng lining sa isang door hinge: ang lahat ay dumudulas nang tahimik.

Sa elbow arthritis, ang lining na iyon ay napupudpod. Tumutugon ang buto sa pamamagitan ng pagpapalaki ng mga bony spur (osteophytes) sa paligid ng mga gilid ng joint. Ang mga spur na ito ay nagsisilbing parang doorstop: pisikal nilang hinaharangan ang huling ilang degrees ng pagtiklop at pagtuwid, kaya naman nararamdaman mong matigas ang iyong paggalaw sa mga dulo. Ang maliliit na fragment ng buto o cartilage ay maaari ring mabali at lumutang sa loob ng joint (loose bodies). Nasasabit ang mga ito sa pagitan ng mga gumagalaw na surface, na nagiging sanhi ng pagsabit, pag-click, o pag-lock na maaaring napansin mo.

May twist ang kondisyong ito. Sa maraming joints na may arthritis, ang buong surface ay napupudpod nang pantay. Sa siko, ang pagkapudpod ay madalas na nakapokus sa isang panig ng joint (ang outer part, kung saan ang buto ng iyong forearm ay nakikipagdugtong sa dulo ng buto ng iyong braso), habang ang hinge part sa gitna ay nananatiling relatibong maayos. Iyan ang dahilan kung bakit ang X-ray ay maaaring magmukhang mas mabuti kaysa sa nararamdaman mong mga sintomas, at kung bakit ang sakit ay madalas na nagsisimula lamang sa mga extremes ng paggalaw bago kumalat sa gitna habang mas maraming cartilage ang nawawala.

Ang capsule sa paligid ng joint, isang sleeve ng matigas na tissue, ay humihigpit din sa paglipas ng panahon. Nagdaragdag ito sa paninigas. Kung ang mga spur at mahigpit na capsule ay pumipitpit sa ulnar nerve sa loob ng iyong siko, magkakaroon ka ng tingling o pamamanhid sa iyong ring at little fingers na inilarawan kanina.

Hindi ibig sabihin ng lahat ng ito na nasisira na ang iyong siko. Ibig sabihin nito ay ang mga joint surface, ang mga spur, at ang mahigpit na capsule ay nagbabanggaan, at ang layunin ng gamutan ay pakalmahin ang kombinasyong iyon.

Ano ang maaari naming gawin tungkol dito

Si Dr Kieran Hirpara, isang upper-limb surgeon sa Mater Private Hospital Rockhampton, ay nagsisimula sa mga opsyon na hindi gaanong invasive na angkop sa iyong kondisyon. Ang mga pasyente ay karaniwang nirerefer sa aming klinika ng kanilang GP; kung iminungkahi ng isang physiotherapist na magpatingin sa amin, kakailanganin mo pa rin ng referral mula sa iyong GP upang maging eligible para sa Medicare rebate. Sa iyong unang pagbisita, kukuha kami ng history, susuriin ang iyong siko at mag-aayos ng imaging kung kinakailangan. Para sa isang matagal nang problema na tulad nito, karaniwan kaming nagsisimula sa non-operative care bago isaalang-alang ang surgery.

Ang unang hakbang ay madalas na mga bagay na maaari mong gawin nang mag-isa. Ang pagbabago sa kung paano ka nagtatrabaho o nagsasanay, upang ang iyong siko ay hindi paulit-ulit na nabibigatan sa dulo ng range nito, ay maaaring magpakalma ng mga sintomas. Layunin ng physiotherapy na panatilihing gumagalaw ang joint at palakasin ang paligid nito. Ang mga hakbang na ito ay maaaring magbawas ng sakit, bagaman mas kaunti ang nagagawa nito para sa paninigas na dulot ng mga bony spur na humaharang sa paggalaw. Bigyan muna ito ng sapat na pagkakataon bago isipin ang surgery.

Ang mga gamot sa sakit at anti-inflammatories ay maaaring makatulong sa iyo sa panahon ng flare-up at gawing mas komportable ang physiotherapy. Pinapakalma nito ang mga sintomas sa halip na baguhin ang arthritis mismo.

Ang surgery ay napag-uusapan kapag ang mga hakbang na ito ay hindi nagbigay sa iyo ng sapat na ginhawa, o kapag ang paninigas, pag-lock o pag-catch ay nakakasagabal na sa pang-araw-araw na buhay. Ang layunin ng operasyon ay alisin ang mga bony spur at loose bodies na humaharang sa paggalaw at i-release ang tight capsule sa paligid ng joint. Madalas itong magagawa sa pamamagitan ng maliliit na hiwa gamit ang camera (keyhole surgery), o sa pamamagitan ng open incision kung mas advanced na ang arthritis. Kung aling opsyon ang angkop sa iyo ay depende sa kung gaano kalala ang mga pagbabago, sa iyong edad, sa iyong kalusugan at sa kung ano ang kailangang gawin ng iyong siko. Pag-uusapan namin ito nang detalyado kasama ka at magdedesisyon tayo nang magkasama.

Ano ang dapat asahan

Ang arthritis sa siko ay isang pangmatagalang kondisyon, ngunit hindi nito kailangang pigilan ka sa paggawa ng mga bagay-bagay. Sa simula, ang mga simpleng hakbang ay madalas na nakakapagpawi ng sakit. Ang pagbabago sa paraan ng iyong pagtatrabaho, pagpapanatiling gumagalaw ng joint at paggamit ng mga anti-inflammatory ay maaaring magbigay ng tunay na ginhawa habang ang arthritis ay nasa maagang yugto pa lamang. Ang paninigas na dulot ng mga bony spur ay mas mahirap alisin nang walang operasyon, kaya ang ilang limitasyon sa iyong paggalaw ay maaaring manatili kahit na mawala na ang sakit.

Kung ang mga hakbang na iyon ay hindi sapat, layunin ng operasyon na alisin ang anumang humaharang sa joint. Para sa karamihan ng mga tao, nangangahulugan ito ng isang joint-sparing operation: paglilinis ng mga spur at loose bodies at pagpapaluwag ng tight capsule, sa halip na palitan ang joint. Ang mga taong sumasailalim sa ganitong uri ng operasyon ay maaaring asahan na gagana nang maayos ang kanilang siko at bubuti ang kanilang sakit, at maliit ang pagkakataon na mangailangan ng isa pang operasyon sa hinaharap. Karaniwang bumubuti rin ang paggalaw, bagaman ang ilan sa nakuhang motion na ito ay maaaring mabawasan muli sa paglipas ng panahon.

Ang replacement surgery ay ibang usapan. Bihira itong kailanganin para sa arthritis sa siko at karaniwang inilalaan para sa mga taong may malalang kapansanan, dahil ang artificial joint ay hindi tumatagal nang maayos sa paglipas ng mga taon sa mga taong mas bata o mas aktibo. Kapag ginawa ito, karamihan ng mga tao ay nakakakuha ng pangmatagalang ginhawa sa sakit at mas mabuting paggamit ng kanilang braso, ngunit mas madalas mangyari ang mga komplikasyon kaysa sa ibang mga operasyon sa siko, at ang implant ay maaaring lumuwag sa paglipas ng panahon.

Ang pagpapabaya sa kondisyon ay karaniwang hindi ito nagpapalala nang mabilis, ngunit hindi rin ito madalas na gumagaling nang kusa. Ang pag-catch at pag-lock ay maaaring magpatuloy, at ang paninigas sa mga dulo ng iyong paggalaw ay madalas na nananatili o unti-unting kumakalat sa iyong range. Ang ilang mga tao ay nakakayanan ito nang maayos sa loob ng maraming taon sa pamamagitan ng bahagyang pagbabago sa kung paano nila ginagamit ang kanilang braso. Ang iba naman ay napapansin na ang mga limitasyon ay unti-unting kumakalat sa mga pang-araw-araw na gawain.

Anuman ang landas na iyong piliin, iisa ang layunin: mababang antas ng sakit at sapat na paggalaw upang magawa ang mga bagay na mahalaga sa iyo, habang pinapanatiling bukas ang iyong mga opsyon para sa hinaharap. Ang gamutan ay iniangkop sa iyong edad, sa iyong trabaho at kung gaano na kalala ang arthritis, at tatalakayin ito ng iyong surgeon kasama ka.

Kailan dapat magpatingin

Magpatingin sa iyong GP kung ang iyong siko ay nananatiling matigas o masakit sa loob ng ilang linggo at ang mga simpleng hakbang ay hindi nakatulong, lalo na kung ang pag-lock o pag-catch ay pumipigil sa paggamit ng iyong braso sa trabaho. Humingi ng pagsusuri ng isang espesyalista kung nawawala ang iyong kakayahang ituwid o itiklop nang husto ang siko, o kung ang pangingilig at pamamanhid sa iyong ring finger at kalingkingan ay lumalala, dahil ang ulnar nerve ay maaaring maipit ng arthritis. Pumunta sa emergency department kung ang iyong siko ay mainit, mapula at namamagas kasabay ng lagnat, o kung hindi mo ito maigalaw nang husto pagkatapos ng isang pinsala. Ang mga ito ay hindi tipikal sa arthritis at kailangang masuri sa mismong araw na iyon.

Higit pang detalye

Advanced reading: the deeper science (optional)

Ang seksyong ito ay higit pa sa kailangan mo para sa iyong sariling mga desisyon sa paggamot. Ang osteoarthritis sa siko ay karapat-dapat sa karagdagang pagbabasa dahil ang operasyon na tila ang tiyak na solusyon, ang pagpapalit ng joint, gaya ng rutinang ginagawa sa balakang at tuhod, ay gumagana nang lubhang naiiba sa siko, at ang solong katotohanang iyon ang humuhubog sa buong ladder ng paggamot.

Bakit hindi default ang elbow replacement

Gumagana ang total elbow arthroplasty, ngunit hindi nito kayang dalhin ang load gaya ng ginagawa ng hip o knee replacement. Sa pagsasama-sama ng 2,118 na pasyenteng may rheumatoid arthritis, ang elbow replacement ay patuloy na nagbigay ng kasiya-siyang mga resulta, habang nauugnay sa mas mataas na implant failure at complication rates kaysa sa hip and knee arthroplasty [1].

Ang kahihinatnan nito ay isang lifting restriction na permanente sa halip na isang pag-iingat lamang sa recovery phase. Dahil ang siko ay nasa dulo ng isang mahabang lever, ang mga katamtamang bigat sa kamay ay lumilikha ng malalaking puwersa sa implant, at ang mga puwersang ito ang nagpapaluwag dito sa paglipas ng panahon.

Iyan ang dahilan kung bakit ang ladder sa siko ay inverted kumpara sa lower limb. Sa balakang, ang joint replacement ang standard na operasyon para sa advanced arthritis. Sa siko, ito ay nakalaan, pangunahin na para sa mga mas matanda at lower-demand na pasyente, at para sa inflammatory kaysa sa wear arthritis.

Ang sanhi ay kasinghalaga ng lala

Ang dalawang tao na may magkaparehong pagkapudpod ng siko ay maaaring humarap sa magkaibang prospect depende sa kung bakit napudpod ang joint. Sa 679 na pasyente, ang aetiology ng arthritis ay nakaapekto sa outcome pagdating sa mga partikular na mode ng implant failure, at ang mga pasyenteng may rheumatoid arthritis ay may mas mabuting functional outcomes kaysa sa mga sumailalim sa replacement para sa mga post-traumatic condition [2].

Karapat-dapat itong banggitin dahil ito ay kabaligtaran ng inaasahan ng karamihan, na ang joint na napinsala ng iisang injury ay dapat na mas mabuti kaysa sa isa na napinsala ng systemic disease. Ang paliwanag ay ang demand: ang post-traumatic arthritis ay may tendensiyang mangyari sa mga mas batang tao na may mas physically demanding na buhay, at ang implant ay nakakaranas ng mga puwersa na hindi nito disenyo.

Ang debridement ang operasyon na gumagawa ng karamihan sa trabaho

Para sa primary wear arthritis, ang pangunahing lunas ay hindi replacement kundi debridement, ang paglilinis ng mga bone spurs at loose bodies na humaharang sa joint sa dulo ng range nito, at ang pag-release ng tight capsule, habang hinahayaan ang mga joint surfaces sa kanilang kinalalagyan.

Ang ebidensya ay consistent. Sa 1,097 na pasyente, ang debridement ay nagresulta sa mabuting mid-term functional outcomes, na walang pagtaas sa mga komplikasyon gamit ang arthroscopic technique [3]. Sa 871 na pasyente, ang parehong open at arthroscopic osteocapsular debridement ay maaasahang nagpahusay sa flexion, extension at functional scores na may mababang complication rates [4], at isang meta-analysis ng 586 na pasyente ang nakatagpo na ang debridement ay epektibo para sa mga disabling symptoms ng primary elbow osteoarthritis na may katanggap-tanggap na complication rate [5].

Pansinin kung ano ang hinihinging gawin ng debridement. Hindi nito binabago ang surface ng joint o pinahihinto ang arthritis. Tinatanggal nito ang mga mechanical blocks sa dulo ng range, kung kaya't nakatutulong ito sa pasyenteng ang pangunahing reklamo ay hindi na tuwid o hindi na lubos na nababaluktot ang siko at masakit na sumasabit sa limitasyon, at hindi gaanong nakatutulong sa pasyenteng ang sakit ay naroon sa buong arc.

Hindi ang open o arthroscopic ang nagpapasya na katanungan

Gaya ng sa ilang operasyon sa siko, ang teknika ay nakakakuha ng mas maraming debate kaysa sa sinusuportahan ng ebidensya. Natuklasan ng mga review sa itaas na ang parehong approach ay ligtas at epektibo, at isang narrative review ng 639 na pasyente ang nagkonkludo na hindi nito matukoy kung aling procedure ang nakahihigit [6].

Ang praktikal na determinant ay kung ano ang kailangang marating. Ang arthroscopy ay mahusay sa paghawak ng trabaho sa anterior at posterior compartment; ang isang matigas na siko na nangangailangan ng malawak na capsular release, o isa na may distorted anatomy at isang nerve na dapat makita at maprotektahan, ay maaaring mas ligtas kung open.

Mga Sanggunian

[1] Chou TA, Ma H, Wang J, Tsai S, Chen C, Wu P, et al. Total elbow arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone Joint J. 2020;102-B(8):967-80. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.102B8.BJJ-2019-1465.R1

[2] Wang J, Ma H, Chou TA, Tsai S, Chen C, Wu P, et al. Outcomes following total elbow arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis versus post-traumatic conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone Joint J. 2019;101-B(12):1489-97. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.101B12.BJJ-2019-0799.R1

[3] White CHR, Ravi V, Watson J, Badhrinarayanan S, Phadnis J. A systematic review of arthroscopic versus open debridement of the arthritic elbow. Arthroscopy. 2020;37(2):747-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2020.09.005

[4] Guerrero EM, Bullock GS, Helmkamp JK, Madrid A, Ledbetter L, Richard MJ, et al. The clinical impact of arthroscopic vs. open osteocapsular débridement for primary osteoarthritis of the elbow: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020;29(4):689-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2019.12.003

[5] de Klerk HH, Welsink CL, Spaans AJ, Verweij LPE, van den Bekerom MPJ. Arthroscopic and open debridement in primary elbow osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EFORT Open Rev. 2020;5(12):874-82. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.5.190095

[6] Poonit K, Zhou X, Zhao B, Sun C, Yao C, Zhang F, et al. Treatment of osteoarthritis of the elbow with open or arthroscopic debridement: a narrative review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2318-x


Evidence & references

This is the clinical evidence summary written for health professionals. It is technical, and it lists the research this page was built from. You do not need to read it to understand your treatment or to make a decision about it.

Overview

Epidemiology and Demographics

  • Symptomatic primary osteoarthritis of the elbow affects 2% of the population [5].
  • The average age of presentation for elbow osteoarthritis is 50 years, with a range of 20 to 70 years [5].
  • Men are affected by primary elbow osteoarthritis more often than women at a 4:1 ratio [5].
  • Hand dominance and strenuous manual labor are associated with primary osteoarthritis of the elbow [5].
  • Secondary causes of elbow osteoarthritis include trauma, osteochondritis dissecans, and synovial osteochondromatosis [5].

Pathoanatomy

  • Elbow osteoarthritis is characterized by osteophyte formation, capsular contracture, and loose bodies, often with relative preservation of the joint space [5].
  • Periarticular hypertrophic osteophytes act as a mechanical block at the end ranges of flexion and extension [5].
  • Advanced elbow osteoarthritis rarely presents with joint space narrowing [5].
  • Elbow osteoarthritis typically involves the radiocapitellar joint articular cartilage preferentially, with relative preservation of the ulnohumeral articular surfaces [5].

Clinical Presentation and Evaluation

  • Patients with elbow osteoarthritis typically present with loss of terminal extension and flexion and painful catching, clicking, or locking of the elbow [5].
  • Pain in elbow osteoarthritis is typically noted at the end ranges of motion and not through the midrange [5].
  • Night pain is not typical of elbow osteoarthritis; if present, an inflammatory cause of the arthritis should be considered [5].
  • Forearm rotation is relatively preserved until later in the disease process of elbow osteoarthritis [5].
  • Ulnar neuropathy is present in up to 50% of patients with elbow osteoarthritis [5].
  • Standard AP and lateral radiographs typically show osteophyte formation at the coronoid process, coronoid fossa, radial fossa, radial head, olecranon tip, and olecranon fossa [5].
  • Radiographs of the elbow typically show preserved joint spaces at the ulnohumeral joint and mildly narrowed joint spaces at the radiocapitellar joint [5].
  • Radiographs typically underestimate the number of loose bodies present in the elbow [5].
  • CT may be useful for surgical planning of elbow osteoarthritis by allowing a detailed assessment of osteophytes and the presence of loose bodies [5].

Nonoperative Management

  • Nonoperative treatment remains the first step in the early management of elbow osteoarthritis [1].
  • Rest, NSAIDs, corticosteroid injections, and activity modification are the mainstays of nonsurgical treatment for elbow osteoarthritis [5].

Operative Management

  • Surgical indications for elbow osteoarthritis include failure to respond to nonsurgical interventions, loss of motion that interferes with activities of daily living, and painful locking or catching of the elbow [5].
  • Joint-sparing procedures such as débridement, excision of osteophytes, capsular release, and removal of loose bodies are preferred for elbow osteoarthritis [5].
  • Total elbow arthroplasty is rarely indicated for elbow osteoarthritis and is not indicated for patients younger than 65 years or physically active patients because of concerns about implant longevity [5].
  • The Outerbridge-Kashiwagi arthroplasty is a classic open procedure in which the olecranon fossa is trephinated and osteophytes are removed [5].
  • Limitations of the Outerbridge-Kashiwagi procedure include incomplete anterior release and incomplete osteophyte removal anteriorly [5].
  • Either a medial or lateral column approach can be used for open débridement, loose body removal, osteophyte resection, and capsulectomy depending upon the location of the pathology and concomitant procedures [5].
  • Contraindications for arthroscopic procedures in elbow osteoarthritis include severe contracture and periarticular heterotopic ossification [5].
  • Relative contraindications for arthroscopic procedures in elbow osteoarthritis include prior ulnar nerve transposition and prior extensive open procedures [5].
  • Osteocapsular arthroplasty refers to the arthroscopic technique for elbow joint débridement involving capsular release, loose body removal, and excision of osteophytes [5].
  • Ulnar nerve transposition and release of the posterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament should be considered for patients with less than 90° to 100° of elbow flexion regardless of the type of procedure used [5].
  • Capsulectomy and debridement through a medial trans-flexor approach is associated with a low rate of complications and is safe and effective for the treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the elbow [2].
  • Elbow arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty is a safe, efficacious treatment for patients with mild to moderate osteoarthritis [4].
  • Arthroscopic debridement based on computer simulation is recommended in the surgical management of patients with osteoarthritis of the elbow [7].
  • Arthroscopic treatment provides good short-term outcomes in primary elbow osteoarthritis and is associated with a low complication rate [9].
  • Elbow arthroscopic debridement for primary degenerative osteoarthritis results in statistically significant and clinically relevant improvement in elbow range of motion and clinical outcomes with low complication and reoperation rates [10].
  • Open elbow debridement and the Outerbridge-Kashiwagi procedure had excellent survivorship until conversion to total elbow arthroplasty and are viable options in the treatment of primary elbow osteoarthritis and post-traumatic cases [17].
  • The Outerbridge-Kashiwagi procedure is an effective and safe way of treating both posttraumatic arthritis and osteoarthritis of the elbow [21].
  • Arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty can be recommended for its favorable overall treatment outcomes for elbow osteoarthritis [23].
  • Open and arthroscopic debridement procedures seem to be safe and effective in the treatment of elbow osteoarthritis [32].
  • Surgical options for severe elbow arthritis must be tailored to cartilage integrity and bone structure, with total elbow arthroplasty generally avoided in young, active patients due to poor durability [44].

Complications

  • Deep infections in the elbow are more common than other joints treated arthroscopically, occurring in 0.8% to 2.2% of cases [5].
  • Infection related to intraoperative corticosteroid injections can manifest as a complication of elbow surgery [5].
  • Stiffness due to heterotopic ossification is a complication of elbow osteoarthritis treatment [5].
  • Hematoma formation is a complication of elbow osteoarthritis treatment [5].
  • Transient nerve palsies complicate 1% to 3% of cases, with radial and ulnar nerves being the most common [5].
  • Synovial ganglion formation is a complication of elbow osteoarthritis treatment [5].

Anatomy & Pathophysiology

Epidemiology & Demographics

  • Symptomatic primary osteoarthritis of the elbow is relatively rare, affecting 2% of the population [5].
  • The average age of presentation for primary elbow osteoarthritis is 50 years, with a range of 20 to 70 years [5].
  • Men are affected more often than women by primary elbow osteoarthritis at a 4:1 ratio [5, 36].
  • Primary osteoarthritis of the elbow tends to affect the dominant arm in males with a history of manual labor [12].
  • Posttraumatic arthritis is commonly seen after elbow injuries such as distal humerus fractures, radial head fractures, proximal ulna fractures, or elbow fracture-dislocations [6].
  • Posttraumatic arthritis can develop in response to the initial cartilage insult or secondary to residual articular incongruities from injuries [6].
  • Postinjury malunions, nonunions, or residual instability can alter kinematics and load across the elbow, predisposing it to degenerative changes [6].
  • Posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the elbow primarily affects young males [95].

Bony Anatomy & Biomechanics

  • The elbow is a trocho-ginglymoid joint consisting of medial and lateral articulations that afford bony stability [51].
  • The ulnohumeral joint is formed by the articulation of the trochlea with the ulna within the greater sigmoid notch [51].
  • The ulnohumeral joint has highly congruent anatomy through almost 180° of articular contact, with the exception of the bare area of the greater sigmoid notch which is devoid of cartilage [51].
  • The radiocapitellar joint is formed by the articulation of the capitellum and the radial head [51].
  • The radial head is a concave elliptical structure covered with articular cartilage along the radiocapitellar joint and approximately 270° of the articular margin [51].
  • The distal humeral articulation is angled 30° from the longitudinal axis [51, 19, 20].
  • The axis of rotation is 5° to 7° angulated in the coronal plane to the epicondylar axis, with the medial side more distal than the lateral side [51].
  • In full extension, 60% of axial load is transmitted through the radiocapitellar joint [19, 20].
  • The normal range of elbow flexion/extension is 0 to 150 degrees [19, 20].
  • The normal forearm pronosupination is 80 to 85 degrees in each direction [19, 20].
  • The functional range of motion for the elbow is 30 to 130 degrees for flexion/extension and 50 degrees for pronosupination [19, 20].
  • The normal valgus carrying angle of the elbow is 5 to 10 degrees for men and 10 to 15 degrees for women [19, 20].
  • The ulnohumeral articulation is a primary stabilizer of the elbow [18].
  • The radiocapitellar articulation is a secondary stabilizer of the elbow [18].

Ligamentous Anatomy

  • The medial collateral ligament (MCL) consists of anterior, posterior, and transverse bundles [19, 20].
  • The anterior bundle of the MCL is the primary restraint to valgus stress within functional elbow range of motion [19, 20].
  • The posterior bundle of the MCL is the primary restraint to valgus stress with the elbow in maximal flexion [19, 20].
  • Stability in full extension is provided by the MCL, joint capsule, and ulnohumeral articulation [19, 20].
  • The radial head functions as an important secondary stabilizer to valgus stress, particularly in medial collateral ligament–deficient elbows [79].
  • The lateral ulnar collateral ligament acts as the primary stabilizer to posterolateral rotatory instability [79].

Pathoanatomy of Osteoarthritis

  • Osteoarthritis of the elbow is characterized by osteophyte formation, capsular contracture, and loose bodies, often with relative preservation of the joint space [5].
  • Osteoarthritis typically involves the radiocapitellar joint articular cartilage preferentially, with relative preservation of the ulnohumeral articular surfaces [5].
  • Radiocapitellar degeneration is more common with increasing age [12].
  • Primary osteoarthritis of the elbow starts on the lateral side and progresses into the ulnohumeral articulation [12].
  • The posteromedial aspect of the radial head appears to be consistently involved in primary elbow osteoarthritis, with reciprocal changes seen on the capitellum [12].
  • Osteophytic change occurs predominantly in the ulnohumeral compartment of the elbow [87].
  • Joint space narrowing more frequently affects the radiocapitellar articulation than the ulnohumeral compartment [87].
  • The primary pathology of elbow osteoarthritis is loss of articular cartilage with resulting osteophyte formation on the olecranon process, coronoid process, and their respective fossae [69].
  • Secondary resultant changes in elbow osteoarthritis involve osteophyte formation along the margin of the radial head and formation of loose bodies [69].
  • Three-dimensional computational models identify unique regions of bony impingement in elbow osteoarthritis, such as between the radial head and a posterior capitellar osteophyte in extension [49].

Clinical Presentation & Evaluation

  • Night pain is not typical of elbow osteoarthritis; if present, an inflammatory cause should be considered [5].
  • Most patients with elbow osteoarthritis initially complain of pain at terminal limits of motion as a result of capsular stretch and osteophyte impingement [69].
  • Later in the disease process of elbow osteoarthritis, pain through the mid arc of motion develops as the extent of cartilage loss progresses [69].
  • Radiographs of elbow osteoarthritis typically show preserved joint spaces at the ulnohumeral joint and mildly narrowed joint spaces at the radiocapitellar joint [5].
  • Radiographs typically underestimate the number of loose bodies present in elbow osteoarthritis [5].
  • CT may be useful for surgical planning in elbow osteoarthritis, allowing detailed assessment of osteophytes and the presence of loose bodies [5].
  • In valgus extension overload syndrome, the olecranon is repeatedly and forcefully driven into the olecranon fossa during throwing, exerting shear forces on the medial aspect of the olecranon tip and the olecranon fossa [14].
  • The pathoanatomy of valgus extension overload syndrome includes chondrosis, osteophyte development on the posteromedial olecranon and humerus, and loose bodies [14].

Classification

Radiographic Classification Systems

  • The Broberg and Morrey classification system is based on osteophyte formation and joint space narrowing [12].
  • The Hastings and Retting classification system focuses on radiocapitellar wear and subluxation [12].
  • The Broberg and Morrey classification system grades elbow arthrosis as grade 0 (normal joint), grade 1 (slight joint-space narrowing with minimum osteophyte formation), grade 2 (moderate joint-space narrowing with moderate osteophyte formation), and grade 3 (severe degenerative change with gross destruction of the joint) [80].
  • The Hastings and Retting classification system was developed based on commonly demonstrated radiographic features of degenerative changes, including joint space narrowing and marginal osteophytes [13].
  • The Hastings and Retting classification system is a useful tool in predicting surgical outcome following debridement of primary elbow osteoarthritis [13].
  • Clinical and radiographic outcomes were best in patients classified as class I preoperatively and worst in those classified as class III using the Hastings and Retting system [13].
  • Both the Broberg and Morrey and Hastings and Retting classification systems demonstrated substantial intraobserver and interobserver reliability for evaluating radiographic severity of post-traumatic arthritis and primary osteoarthritis of the elbow [28].
  • The four grades of the Broberg and Morrey classification system have only fair interobserver reliability that is influenced by subspecialty and experience [80].
  • Binary rating systems for elbow arthrosis, such as "none or mild" versus "moderate or severe," resulted in moderate agreement among observers [80].

CT-Based Classification Systems

  • Kwak et al. described a CT-based method of quantifying elbow arthritis [12].
  • The CT-based classification demonstrated high correlation with the visual analog scale and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score [12].
  • The CT-based classification demonstrated moderate correlation with range of motion [12].
  • A CT-based staging system was highly reproducible and clinically feasible compared with previous plain radiograph-based staging systems for elbow osteoarthritis [34].
  • A bony landmarks classification system effectively delineated osteophyte distribution in elbow patients using three-dimensional computed tomography [56].

Other Classification Systems

  • The Larsen and Sharp classifications can reliably be used to evaluate rheumatoid arthritis of the elbow by observers of varying training levels [74].

Clinical Presentation

Epidemiology and Demographics

  • Primary osteoarthritis of the elbow is most commonly seen in middle-age males who are heavy laborers [13].
  • The prevalence of primary elbow osteoarthritis in Japanese subjects aged 50-89 years was 25.2%, with most cases being asymptomatic [8].
  • The prevalence of elbow osteoarthritis in respondents aged 40 years or older was 55.0%, with a symptomatic prevalence of 22.6% [31].
  • Older age, male sex, and a history of elbow trauma are significant risk factors for elbow osteoarthritis [31].
  • Primary osteoarthritis of the elbow accounts for 2%-3% of patients presenting with elbow arthritis [13].

Pathoanatomy

  • Advanced disease rarely presents with joint space narrowing [5].
  • Primary osteoarthritis of the elbow is unique due to relative preservation of articular cartilage and maintenance of joint space with hypertrophic osteophyte formation [25].
  • The posteromedial aspect of the radial head appears to be consistently involved with reciprocal changes seen on the capitellum in primary osteoarthritis [12].

History and Symptoms

  • Patients typically present with loss of terminal extension and flexion and painful catching, clicking, or locking of the elbow [5].
  • Pain is typically noted at the end ranges of motion and not through the midrange [5].
  • The degree of disability caused by osteoarthritis depends on the patient’s vocation and physical disability [5].
  • Clinically, primary osteoarthritis of the elbow is characterized by stiffness, pain, mechanical symptoms, and weakness [12].

Physical Examination

  • Inspection should check for prior surgical incisions and joint effusion at the lateral soft spot [5].
  • Pain during range of motion assessment is usually felt at the end ranges of flexion and extension rather than throughout the arc [5].
  • Forearm rotation is relatively preserved until later in the disease process [5].
  • Understanding whether the patient has pain throughout the arc of motion or only at terminal limits is of paramount importance for evaluation [73].

Imaging

  • Standard AP and lateral radiographs should be obtained for evaluation [5].
  • Radiographs typically show osteophyte formation at the coronoid process (anterior and medial), coronoid fossa, radial fossa, radial head, olecranon tip, and olecranon fossa [5].
  • Joint spaces at the ulnohumeral joint are usually preserved on radiographs [5].
  • Joint spaces at the radiocapitellar joint are mildly narrowed on radiographs [5].
  • Loose bodies may be evident on radiographs, which typically underestimate the number present [5].
  • CT may be useful for surgical planning and allows a detailed assessment of osteophytes and the presence of loose bodies [5].
  • CT scans with 3D reconstructions may be useful for evaluating the extent and location of disease and for surgical planning [73].
  • MRI may be useful to evaluate the status of soft tissues including the medial and lateral collateral ligamentous complexes [73].
  • Electromyography and nerve conduction studies may be useful to evaluate the degree of nerve compression and contribution to elbow pain or dysfunction [73].

Investigations

Radiography

  • Plain radiographs remain the hallmark and best screening test for elbow evaluation [18].
  • Standard views for elbow radiographs include AP and lateral views, with internal and external oblique views obtained if necessary [39].
  • In primary elbow osteoarthritis, osteophytes are typically seen on the coronoid and olecranon tips [39].
  • Loss of the concavity of the radial head, coronoid, and olecranon fossa is a radiographic finding in elbow osteoarthritis [39].
  • Loose bodies may be seen in the anterior or posterior compartments on elbow radiographs [39].
  • The ulnohumeral articular joint space is preferentially preserved in elbow osteoarthritis [39].
  • Ulnohumeral joint space loss on radiographs suggests inflammatory or posttraumatic arthritis [39].
  • CT has greater sensitivity than radiographs for the detection of osteophytes and loose bodies in primary elbow osteoarthritis [94].

Computed Tomography

  • CT is indicated for the assessment of severe osteoarthritis of the elbow to determine the location of loose bodies and osteophytes [39].
  • CT is helpful when assessing for malunion architecture and the location and pattern of osteophytes and/or loose bodies [30].
  • Three-dimensional CT is used to check for heterotopic ossification [30].
  • CT is not necessary when elbow stiffness is entirely soft-tissue related [30].
  • A CT-based staging system for elbow osteoarthritis was highly reproducible and clinically feasible compared with previous plain radiograph-based staging systems [34].
  • Three-dimensional computational models identified the locations and volumes of bony impingement in patients with osteoarthritis of the elbow [49].
  • Three-dimensional computational models highlighted unique regions of impingement, such as between the radial head and a posterior capitellar osteophyte in extension [49].
  • Pre-operative simulation results can be used as an index to determine the osteophytes to be removed during arthroscopic surgery for elbow osteoarthritis [46].

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

  • MRI is the imaging modality best suited for evaluating soft-tissue structures in the elbow, including ligaments, tendons, cartilage, and nerves [57].
  • MRI can be used to evaluate ligaments and tendons in the elbow but is rarely indicated [30].
  • Magnetic resonance arthrography is particularly beneficial in the evaluation of osteochondral lesions, loose bodies, and ulnar collateral ligament injury [57].
  • MRI may be most helpful in evaluating associated injuries including partial or complete tears of the medial collateral ligament [14].

Classification Systems

  • The Broberg and Morrey classification is based on osteophyte formation and joint space narrowing [12].
  • The Hasting and Retting system focuses on radiocapitellar wear and subluxation [12].
  • Both the Broberg and Morrey and Hasting and Retting classification systems demonstrated substantial intraobserver and interobserver reliability for evaluating radiographic severity of post-traumatic arthritis and primary osteoarthritis of the elbow [28].
  • A CT-based classification for elbow arthritis demonstrated high correlation with visual analog scale and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score [12].
  • A CT-based classification for elbow arthritis demonstrated moderate correlation with range of motion [12].

Prevalence and Demographics

  • The prevalence of primary elbow osteoarthritis in Japanese subjects aged 50-89 years was 25.2% [8].
  • Most cases of primary elbow osteoarthritis in the Japanese cohort were asymptomatic [8].
  • Primary osteoarthritis of the elbow affects less than 2% of the population [12].

Pathology and Imaging Correlates

  • Primary osteoarthritis of the elbow is characterized by stiffness, pain, mechanical symptoms, and weakness [12].
  • Radiographically, primary osteoarthritis of the elbow is highlighted predominantly by osteophyte formation and progresses with cartilage loss and joint space narrowing [12].
  • The posteromedial aspect of the radial head appears to be consistently involved in primary osteoarthritis with reciprocal changes seen on the capitellum [12].
  • Posttraumatic arthritis can develop in response to the initial cartilage insult or secondary to residual articular incongruities from injuries such as distal humerus fractures, radial head fractures, proximal ulna fractures, or elbow fracture-dislocations [6].
  • Postinjury malunions, nonunions, or residual instability can alter kinematics and load across the elbow, predisposing the elbow to degenerative changes [6].
  • Posttraumatic arthritis of the elbow is frequently associated with bone loss, making surgical treatment difficult [6].

Treatment

Nonoperative Management

  • Nonsurgical treatments can be effective for reducing symptoms but have limited effectiveness for improving range of motion limitations and pain related to impinging osteophytes [36].
  • Nonsurgical management may provide relief in early stages of elbow arthritis [35].

Surgical Indications and Goals

  • The goal of treatment for post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the elbow is to obtain a low level of pain with sufficient motion range to ensure good function, while preserving future surgical options and delaying elbow arthroplasty to the extent possible [3].
  • Surgical treatment for elbow arthritis is based on disease etiology, severity of degeneration, and patient age [11].
  • Treatment of elbow arthritis must be individualized based on etiology, severity, patient age, and functional demands [22].
  • When conservative management fails, the appropriate surgical treatment for elbow arthritis must factor in the patient’s age, activity level, expectations, degree of pathologic changes, patient health, and surgeon experience [71].

Joint-Sparing Procedures: Arthroscopic

  • Elbow arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty (AOA) is a safe and efficacious treatment for patients with mild to moderate osteoarthritis [4].
  • Arthroscopic debridement for primary degenerative osteoarthritis of the elbow results in statistically significant and clinically relevant improvement in elbow range of motion and clinical outcomes with low complication and reoperation rates [10].
  • Arthroscopic treatment of elbow osteoarthritis provides good short-term outcomes in primary elbow osteoarthritis and is associated with a low complication rate [9].
  • Arthroscopic debridement for the elbow osteoarthritis provided satisfactory pain relief, improvement of elbow motion, and good functional outcome [67].
  • Arthroscopic treatment of elbow osteoarthritis significantly improved 6-month clinical results for functional scores, pain, strength and range of motion [61].
  • Osteocapsular debridement is an effective surgical treatment option for patients with symptomatic primary elbow osteoarthritis who have failed conservative management [38].
  • Surgical debridement is an effective treatment for the disabling symptoms of primary elbow OA with an acceptable complication rate [63].
  • Arthroscopic debridement in the surgical management of patients with osteoarthritis of the elbow is recommended based on computer simulation studies [7].
  • Arthroscopic débridement for primary osteoarthritis of the elbow provides satisfactory pain relief, improvement of elbow motion, and good functional outcome [64].
  • Contraindications for elbow arthroscopy include severe contracture and periarticular heterotopic ossification [5].
  • Relative contraindications for elbow arthroscopy include prior ulnar nerve transposition and prior extensive open procedures [5].
  • Elbow arthroscopy is technically demanding, and several neurovascular structures that are at risk during the procedure include the radial, ulnar, and median nerves [36].
  • The radial nerve is at greatest risk during arthroscopic capsular release, followed by the ulnar and median nerves [68].
  • Strategies to protect neurovascular structures during arthroscopic capsular release include insufflating the joint before establishing portals, using proximally positioned medial and lateral portals in the anterior compartment, keeping the elbow flexed when establishing anterior portals, using retractors during débridement and capsulotomy, releasing the anterior capsule proximally, and avoiding cautery and shavers in the posterior medial gutter [68].

Joint-Sparing Procedures: Open

  • Capsulectomy and debridement for primary osteoarthritis of the elbow through a medial trans-flexor approach is associated with a low rate of complications and is safe and effective [2].
  • The medial approach is effective for the treatment of advanced primary osteoarthritis of the elbow, especially in patients with ulnar nerve symptoms as well as medial osteophytes [16].
  • The Outerbridge-Kashiwagi (OK) procedure is an effective and safe way of treating both posttraumatic arthritis and osteoarthritis of the elbow [21].
  • Both open elbow debridement and the OK procedure had excellent survivorship until conversion to total elbow arthroplasty and are viable options in the treatment of primary elbow osteoarthritis and post-traumatic cases [17].
  • Open and arthroscopic debridement procedures seem to be safe and effective in the treatment of elbow OA [32].
  • In the Outerbridge-Kashiwagi procedure, the olecranon fossa is trephinated and osteophytes are removed [5].
  • Either a medial or lateral column approach can be used for open débridement, loose body removal, osteophyte resection, and capsulectomy depending upon the location of the pathology and concomitant procedures to be performed [5].
  • The open lateral column (Morrey) approach is indicated for extrinsic and/or intrinsic contracture that has failed nonsurgical treatment and must be combined with a medial release when severe loss of flexion is noted [68].
  • The open medial “over the top” (Hotchkiss) approach is indicated for patients with extrinsic contractures, associated medial side heterotopic ossification, ulnar neuropathy, and/or preoperative flexion limited to 90° to 100° [68].
  • A combined approach is indicated for cases of significant elbow stiffness in which a unilateral approach is inadequate for complete elbow release, cases in which previous hardware removal is necessary, and select cases with medial and lateral heterotopic ossification [68].
  • Open debridement and radiocapitellar replacement (LRE) was performed in 24 patients with primary or post-traumatic arthritis of the elbow, with 19 total LRE and 5 hemi-LRE procedures [27].

Adjunctive Procedures

  • Ulnar nerve transposition and release of the posterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) should be considered for patients who have less than 90° to 100° of elbow flexion [5].
  • Ulnar nerve decompression/transposition and release of the posterior bundle of the MCL should be considered for patients who have less than 90° to 100° of elbow flexion [36].
  • If the elbow has less than 90° to 100° of flexion, the posteromedial band of the MCL and the posterior capsule are released to restore flexion, and ulnar nerve decompression or transposition should be considered [68].

Advanced and Salvage Procedures

  • Total elbow arthroplasty is best reserved for low demand, elderly patients who will be able to comply with the 5-lb weightlifting restriction imposed postoperatively to protect the implants from bearing wear, hardware loosening, or failure [71].
  • Interposition arthroplasty is considered for intrinsic contractures in young patients (20 to 50 years) with articular cartilage destruction in whom the anatomic architecture of the distal humerus and proximal ulna are relatively preserved [68].
  • Elbow arthrodesis is reserved for patients with painful arthritis who are not candidates for total elbow arthroplasty, especially individuals who place high demands on the upper extremities, such as manual laborers [70].
  • Elbow arthrodesis is also indicated for persistent infection, including tuberculosis, and massive upper extremity trauma seen on the battlefield [70].
  • For unilateral arthrodesis of the elbow, a position of 90 to 100 degrees of flexion is desirable to provide the most powerful grip strength [70].
  • Bilateral elbow arthrodesis rarely is indicated because of resultant functional limitations [70].
  • If bilateral elbow arthrodesis is indicated, one elbow should be placed in 110 to 120 degrees of flexion to permit the patient to reach the mouth, and the other should be placed in 45 to 65 degrees to aid in personal hygiene [70].

Complications

  • Deep infections in the elbow are more common than in other joints treated arthroscopically, with a rate of 0.8% to 2.2% [5].
  • Infection can manifest as superficial minor wound complications or deep infection [5].
  • Infection is related to intraoperative corticosteroid injections [5].
  • Transient nerve palsies complicate 1% to 3% of cases [5].
  • Radial and ulnar nerve palsies are the most common transient nerve palsies following elbow osteoarthritis treatment [5].
  • Total elbow arthroplasty is associated with substantial complication and reoperation rates [60].

Recovery

Nonoperative Management

  • Rest, NSAIDs, corticosteroid injections, and activity modification are the mainstays of nonsurgical treatment [5].

Surgical Outcomes and Survivorship

  • Elbow arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty is a safe and efficacious treatment for patients with mild to moderate osteoarthritis [4].
  • Patients with either posttraumatic or primary degenerative osteoarthritis can expect satisfactory elbow function and an improvement in pain with little chance of reoperation at the midterm of the follow-up duration after arthroscopic elbow debridement [15].
  • Both open elbow debridement and the Outerbridge-Kashiwagi procedure had excellent survivorship until conversion to total elbow arthroplasty and are viable options in the treatment of primary elbow osteoarthritis and post-traumatic cases [17].
  • Serial assessment of patients with primary elbow osteoarthritis who underwent arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty showed that clinical outcomes improved from preoperative assessment to short- and medium-term follow-up, although range of motion decreased between short- and medium-term follow-up [37].

Treatment Goals

Key Evidence

  • [L5] Nonoperative treatment remains the first step in the early management of elbow osteoarthritis. [1] (10.2106/jbjs.e.00568)
  • [L4] This approach is associated with a low rate of complications and is safe and effective for the treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the elbow. [2] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.07.018)
  • [L4] The goal of treatment is to obtain a low level of pain with sufficient motion range to ensure good function, while preserving future surgical options and delaying elbow arthroplasty to the extent possible. [3] (10.1016/j.otsr.2013.11.004)
  • [L4] Elbow AOA is a safe, efficacious treatment for patients with mild to moderate osteoarthritis. [4] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.11.018)
  • [L5] [6] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.12.014)
  • [L4] The study recommends this technique in the surgical management of patients with osteoarthritis of the elbow. [7] (10.1302/0301-620x.96b2.30714)
  • [L3] The prevalence of primary elbow osteoarthritis in Japanese subjects aged 50-89 years was 25.2%, with most cases being asymptomatic. [8] (10.1016/j.jse.2021.07.015)
  • [L4] This minimally invasive technique provides good short-term outcomes in primary elbow osteoarthritis and is associated with a low complication rate. [9] (10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.003)
  • [L1] Elbow arthroscopic debridement for primary degenerative osteoarthritis results in statistically significant and clinically relevant improvement in elbow range of motion and clinical outcomes with low complication and reoperation rates. [10] (10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.247)
  • [L5] Surgical treatment for elbow arthritis is based on disease etiology, severity of degeneration, and patient age. [11] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.12.022)
  • [L3] [12] (10.1177/17585732251327183)
  • [L4] [13] (10.1016/j.jse.2007.03.014)
  • [L3] Patients with either pathology can expect satisfactory elbow function and an improvement in pain with little chance of reoperation at the midterm of the follow-up duration. [15] (10.1016/j.jseint.2021.07.018)
  • [L4] The medial approach is effective for the treatment of advanced primary osteoarthritis of the elbow, especially in patients with ulnar nerve symptoms as well as medial osteophytes. [16] (10.2106/jbjs.d.02684)
  • [L4] Both open elbow debridement and the OK procedure had excellent survivorship until conversion to total elbow arthroplasty and are viable options in the treatment of primary elbow osteoarthritis and post-traumatic cases. [17] (10.1016/j.jse.2022.01.138)
  • [L4] The OK procedure is an effective and safe way of treating both posttraumatic arthritis and osteoarthritis of the elbow. [21] (10.1016/j.jse.2015.11.052)
  • [L5] The appropriate treatment for elbow arthritis depends on the etiology, severity, patient age, and functional demands. [22] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.02.019)
  • [L4] Arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty can be recommended for its favorable overall treatment outcomes for elbow osteoarthritis. [23] (10.1016/j.jse.2019.09.036)
  • [L4] Primary osteoarthritis of the elbow is unique due to relative preservation of articular cartilage and maintenance of joint space with hypertrophic osteophyte formation. [25] (10.5435/00124635-200802000-00005)
  • [L4] [27] (10.1016/j.jse.2011.08.071)
  • [L3] Both the BM and HR classification systems demonstrated substantial intraobserver and interobserver reliability for evaluating radiographic severity of post-traumatic arthritis and primary osteoarthritis of the elbow. [28] (10.1016/j.jse.2014.10.015)
  • [L3] The prevalence of elbow OA was 55.0% in respondents aged 40 years or older, with a symptomatic prevalence of 22.6%; older age, male sex, and a history of elbow trauma were identified as significant risk factors. [31] (10.1016/j.jse.2018.02.049)
  • [L5] However, from the data we obtained the open and arthroscopic debridement procedures seem to be safe and effective in the treatment of elbow OA. [32] (10.1186/s12891-018-2318-x)
  • [L4] CT-based staging system was highly reproducible and clinically feasible, compared with previous plain radiograph-based staging systems, for elbow osteoarthritis. [34] (10.1016/j.joca.2019.03.004)
  • [L5] Treatment of elbow arthritis must be individualized based on etiology, severity, patient age, and functional demands; nonsurgical management may provide relief in early stages, while surgical options range from arthroscopic debridement for pain at motion extremes to total elbow arthroplasty for pain throughout the arc of motion. [35] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.12.037)
  • [L4] Serial assessment of patients with primary elbow OA who underwent arthroscopic OCA showed that the clinical outcomes improved from preoperative assessment to short- and medium-term follow-up, although ROM decreased between short- and medium-term follow-up. [37] (10.1177/23259671231162398)
  • [L2] Osteocapsular debridement is an effective surgical treatment option for patients with symptomatic primary elbow osteoarthritis who have failed conservative management. [38] (10.1016/j.jse.2020.01.060)
  • [L4] Surgical options must be tailored to cartilage integrity and bone structure, with total elbow arthroplasty generally avoided in young, active patients due to poor durability. [44] (10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100736)
  • [L4] These results can be used as an index to determine the osteophytes to be removed during arthroscopic surgery for elbow osteoarthritis. [46] (10.1016/j.jseint.2026.101667)
  • [L4] Three-dimensional computational models identified the locations and volumes of bony impingement in patients with osteoarthritis of the elbow and highlighted unique regions of impingement, such as between the radial head and a posterior capitellar osteophyte in extension. [49] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.03.035)
  • [L3] The bony landmarks classification system effectively delineated osteophyte distribution in elbow patients. [56] (10.1186/s13018-025-06145-9)
  • [L4] Total elbow arthroplasty remains associated with substantial complication and reoperation rates. [60] (10.1016/j.jhsg.2026.100981)
  • [L3] Arthroscopic treatment of elbow osteoarthritis significantly improved 6-month clinical results for functional scores, pain, strength and range of motion. [61] (10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.002)
  • [L1] Surgical debridement is an effective treatment for the disabling symptoms of primary elbow OA with an acceptable complication rate. [63] (10.1302/2058-5241.5.190095)
  • [L4] Arthroscopic debridement for elbow osteoarthritis provides satisfactory pain relief, improvement of elbow motion, and good functional outcome. [64] (10.1016/j.jse.2014.01.009)
  • [L4] Arthroscopic debridement for the elbow osteoarthritis provided satisfactory pain relief, improvement of elbow motion, and good functional outcome. [67] (10.1016/s0363-5023(11)60056-7)
  • [L4] Both systems can reliably be used to evaluate rheumatoid arthritis of the elbow by observers of varying training levels. [74] (10.1016/j.jse.2016.07.074)
  • [L3] [80] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.12.043)
  • [L3] Osteophytic change occurs predominantly in the ulnohumeral compartment of the elbow, whereas joint space narrowing more frequently affects the radiocapitellar articulation. [87] (10.1016/j.jse.2006.08.005)
  • [L1] CT has greater sensitivity than radiographs for the detection of osteophytes and loose bodies in primary elbow osteoarthritis. [94] (10.1016/j.jse.2021.04.001)
  • [L5] [95] (10.1007/s00167-015-3518-7)

References

[1] Management of Elbow Osteoarthritis. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 2006. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.e.00568

[2] Capsulectomy and Debridement for Primary Osteoarthritis of the Elbow Through a Medial Trans-Flexor Approach. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.07.018

[3] Post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the elbow. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.11.004

[4] Outcomes of Elbow Arthroscopic Osteocapsular Arthroplasty. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.11.018

[5] Aaos Comprehensive Orthopaedic Review 3. Arthritis and Arthroplasty of the Elbow > I. Osteoarthritis.

[6] Elbow Arthritis. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.12.014

[7] Arthroscopic debridement in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the elbow, based on computer simulation. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2014. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.96b2.30714

[8] Prevalence and associated factors of primary elbow osteoarthritis in the Japanese general elderly population: a Japanese cohort survey randomly sampled from a basic resident registry. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.07.015

[9] Arthroscopic treatment of elbow osteoarthritis. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.003

[10] Arthroscopic Debridement for Primary Degenerative Osteoarthritis of the Elbow Leads to Significant Improvement in Range of Motion and Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.247

[11] Surgical Options for the Arthritic Elbow. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.12.022

[12] Sex-related differences in wear patterns in primary elbow osteoarthritis. Shoulder & Elbow. 2025. DOI: 10.1177/17585732251327183

[13] Primary osteoarthritis of the elbow: Lack of radiographic evidence for morphologic predisposition, results of operative debridement at intermediate follow-up, and basis for a new radiographic classification system. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.03.014

[14] Aaos Comprehensive Orthopaedic Review 3. Elbow Injuries in the Athlete* > III. Valgus Extension Overload Syndrome and Posterior Impingement.

[15] Midterm outcomes and survivorship of arthroscopic elbow debridement: a comparison of posttraumatic versus primary degenerative osteoarthritis. JSES International. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.07.018

[16] Débridement Arthroplasty for Primary Osteoarthritis of the Elbow. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2005. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.d.02684

[17] Long-term survivorship of open débridement and débridement arthroplasty for elbow arthritis: a retrospective chart review. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.01.138

[18] Orthopaedic Knowledge Update 13 Ebook Without Multimedia. Anatomy, Biomechanics, Physical Examination, and Imaging of the Elbow > Summary and Conclusions.

[19] Miller S Review Of Orthopaedics. SECTION 16 PATELLAR TRACKING IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY > ELBOW.

[20] Miller S Review Of Orthopaedics. ELBOW.

[21] The outerbridge-kashiwagi procedure for primary degenerative arthritis of the elbow vs. post traumatic arthritis. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.11.052

[22] Elbow Arthritis: Current Concepts. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.02.019

[23] Arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty for advanced-stage primary osteoarthritis of the elbow using a computed tomography–based classification. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.09.036

[25] Primary Osteoarthritis of the Elbow: Current Treatment Options. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2008. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200802000-00005

[27] Open debridement and radiocapitellar replacement in primary and post-traumatic arthritis of the elbow: a multicenter study. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.08.071

[28] Reliability testing of two classification systems for osteoarthritis and post-traumatic arthritis of the elbow. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.10.015

[30] Aaos Comprehensive Orthopaedic Review 3. Elbow Stiffness* > IV. Evaluation.

[31] The prevalence of elbow osteoarthritis in Japanese middle-aged and elderly populations: the relationship between risk factors and function. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.02.049

[32] Treatment of osteoarthritis of the elbow with open or arthroscopic debridement: a narrative review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2018. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-018-2318-x

[34] Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the computed tomography-based radiographic classification of primary elbow osteoarthritis: comparison with plain radiograph-based classification and clinical assessment. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2019.03.004

[35] Elbow Arthritis: Current Concepts. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.12.037

[36] Aaos Comprehensive Orthopaedic Review 3. Arthritis and Arthroplasty of the Elbow > Osteoarthritis.

[37] Serial Changes in Clinical Outcomes After Arthroscopic Osteocapsular Arthroplasty for Primary Elbow Osteoarthritis: A Medium-term Follow-up Study. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2023. DOI: 10.1177/23259671231162398

[38] The Clinical Impact of Different Approaches to Osteocapsular Debridement for Primary Osteoarthritis of the Elbow: A Systematic Review. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.01.060

[39] Aaos Comprehensive Orthopaedic Review 3. Imaging of the Shoulder and Elbow > II. Elbow.

[44] Management of Severe Elbow Arthritis in a Young Patient. Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100736

[46] Predicting impinging osteophytes based on pre-operative simulation results to guide arthroscopic débridement for elbow osteoarthritis. JSES International. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2026.101667

[49] Identifying the Location and Volume of Bony Impingement in Elbow Osteoarthritis by 3-Dimensional Computational Modeling. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.03.035

[51] Orthopaedic Knowledge Update 13 Ebook Without Multimedia. Anatomy, Biomechanics, Physical Examination, and Imaging of the Elbow > Anatomy > Bony Anatomy.

[56] Bony landmarks guided mapping of the osteophytes of the elbow osteoarthritis patients: a three dimensional computed tomograph based study. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-06145-9

[57] Orthopaedic Knowledge Update Sports Medicine 6. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Elbow > Introduction.

[60] Total Elbow Arthroplasty Complication, Reoperation, and Revision Rates: A Comparison Between Arthroplasty for Arthritis Versus Fracture. Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2026.100981

[61] Arthroscopic debridement for osteoarthritis of the elbow: Results and analysis of predictive factors. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.002

[63] Arthroscopic and open debridement in primary elbow osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EFORT Open Reviews. 2020. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190095

[64] Arthroscopic débridement for primary osteoarthritis of the elbow: analysis of preoperative factors affecting outcome. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.01.009

[67] Factors Affecting the Results of Arthroscopic Debridement for the Elbow Osteoarthritis. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/s0363-5023(11)60056-7

[68] Aaos Comprehensive Orthopaedic Review 3. Elbow Stiffness* > VI. Treatment.

[69] Orthopaedic Knowledge Update 13 Ebook Without Multimedia. Elbow Degenerative Conditions and Nerve Disorders > Etiologies.

[70] Campbell S Operative Orthopaedics 4 Volume Set. ARTHROSCOPIC SHOULDER ARTHRODESIS FOR BRACHIAL PLEXUS INJURY > ELBOW ARTHRODESIS.

[71] Orthopaedic Knowledge Update 13 Ebook Without Multimedia. Elbow Degenerative Conditions and Nerve Disorders > Summary.

[73] Orthopaedic Knowledge Update 13 Ebook Without Multimedia. Elbow Degenerative Conditions and Nerve Disorders > Evaluation.

[74] Reliability testing of the Larsen and Sharp classifications for rheumatoid arthritis of the elbow. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.07.074

[79] Aaos Comprehensive Orthopaedic Review 3. Anatomy of the Shoulder, Arm, and Elbow > II. Arm and Elbow.

[80] Radiographic Arthrosis After Elbow Trauma: Interobserver Reliability. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.12.043

[87] Radiographic changes at the elbow in primary osteoarthritis: A comparison with normal aging of the elbow joint. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2006.08.005

[94] Effectiveness of radiographs and computed tomography in evaluating primary elbow osteoarthritis. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.04.001

[95] Biomechanical considerations in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis of the elbow. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3518-7