Frozen Shoulder Impormasyon

Ang pahinang ito ay isinalin ng makina at hindi pa nasusuri ng isang doktor. Ang bersyong Ingles ang siyang opisyal.

Ano ang nararamdaman mo

Ang frozen shoulder (frozen shoulder) ay karaniwang nagsisimula bilang malalim at mapait na sakit na unti-unting lumalala sa loob ng mga linggo imbes na biglaang lumitaw. Para sa karamihan ng mga tao, ang sakit ang pinakamasahol na bahagi sa simula, at madalas itong pinakamasakit sa gabi. Hindi na maaaring matulog sa gilid na iyon, at ang pagkakaroon ng hindi sapat na tulog ay isa sa pinakapagod-pagod na bahagi ng buong kondisyon.

Pagkatapos, nagsisimula nang mahigpit ang balikat. Humahawak ka sa seatbelt, umabot sa mataas na shelf, o bumalik sa bulsa, at ang braso ay simpleng humihinto. Ang nagpapaiba sa frozen shoulder mula sa karamihan ng mga problema sa balikat ay ang hindi lamang pag-iingat laban sa sakit ang nagdudulot ng katigasan — ang balikat ay tunay na hindi gumagalaw, kahit na itataas ng ibang tao ang iyong braso. Ang pagkawala ng kakayahang paikutin ang kamay palabas, parang pagbukas ng pinto o pagpasok ng braso sa manggas, ang pinakakaraniwang senyales.

Karamihan sa mga tao ay nasa pagitan ng 40 at 60 taong gulang. May ilang nakakalala ng maliit na pagbangga bago ito; marami naman walang anumang paliwanag. Mas karaniwan ito kung mayroon kang diabetes o kondisyon sa thyroid, at kung naranasan mo na ito sa isang balikat, may bahagyang pagkakataon na sundan ito ng kabilang balikat sa huli.

Ano ang nangyayari talaga

Ang iyong balikat ay nasa loob ng isang mangkok na matigas na tisyu na tinatawag na kapsula. Karaniwan, ang mangkok na ito ay maluwag at nababagay, na dahilan kung bakit ang balikat ay nakakagalaw nang higit pa sa anumang ibang kasukasuan sa katawan. Sa frozen shoulder, ang kapsula ay namamaga at pagkatapos ay nagkakapal at nagkokontrakt, kaya ang mangkok ay nag-iipit. Ang espasyo sa loob ng kasukasuan ay maaaring maging kalahati o mas mababa sa kanyang normal na laki.

Sa kabila ng lumang pangalan na "adhesive capsulitis," wala talagang nakadikit sa loob ng kasukasuan. Walang katulad ng pandikit na adhesions. Ang tisyu ay naging masikip, na isang tunay na naiiba nang problema, at ito ang dahilan kung bakit ang ilang mga doktor ay nagsasabi na ang kondisyon ay dapat lamang tawaging isang kontraktura — pagkakasikip — ng balikat.

Bakit ito nagsisimula ay hindi pa lubos na naiintindihan, at tama ang pagiging tapat na sabihin ito. Mayroong magandang ebidensya na hindi ito purong lokal na problema sa balikat. Ang mga pag-aaral ng inherited risk ay nagpapakita na ang type 1 diabetes ay tunay na nagdudulot ng frozen shoulder imbes na magkaroon lamang ng koneksyon dito, at ang koneksyon ay dumadaan sa blood sugar imbes na sa bigat o mechanical load. Ang mga pagbabago sa tisyu ay tila katulad ng Dupuytren's disease sa kamay, kaya madalas silang magkasama sa parehong tao.

Maging tapat kung gaano katagal ito kailangan

Malaki ang posibilidad na mabasa mo na ang frozen shoulder ay self-limiting at gumagaling nang buo sa loob ng humigit-kumulang labindalawang buwan hanggang dalawang taon. Gusto naming maging direkta sa iyo: mas tiwala-tiwala ang paalalang ito kaysa sa ebidensya na sumusuporta dito.

Ang ideya na dumaan ang kondisyon nang maayos sa tatlong yugto — freezing, frozen, at thawing — ay nagmula sa isang maliit na pag-aaral na inilathala noong 1975, kung saan iniiwan ng mga pasyente ang kanilang mga braso sa mga sling ng hanggang siyam na buwan. Hindi naaakal, ang mga balikat na ginamot sa paraang ito ay naging matigas at pagkatapos ay lumuwag muli kapag pinayagan na ang paggalaw. Kapag pumuntahan ng mga mananaliksik ang lahat ng available na pag-aaral, hindi nila mahanap ang magandang ebidensya na ang mga hindi ginagamot na balikat ay maaasahang dadaan sa mga yugtong ito at magtatapos sa normal. Sa katunayan, walang pag-aaral na ipinakita na ang mga tao ay bumabalik sa isang sinusukat, tunay na normal na saklaw ng paggalaw nang walang gamutan.

Ang ipinapakita ng ebidensya ay mas kapaki-pakinabang, at ito ang: karamihan sa pagpapabuti na iyong makakakuha ay karaniwang nangyayari nang maaga, at pagkatapos ay bumabagal at tumitigil ang pag-unlad. Maaaring permanenteng platea ito. Depende sa kung aling pag-aaral ang iyong basahin, nasa pagitan ng isang katuwa at kalahati ng mga tao ang mayroon pa ring kaunting sakit o katigasan ng ilang taon pagkatapos, bagama’t para sa karamihan sa kanila ay mild ito at hindi hadlang sa kanilang paggawa ng gusto nilang gawin.

Wala sa mga ito ang ibig sabihin na hindi ka magagaling. Karamihan sa mga tao ay nagpapabuti nang malaki. Ibig sabihin nito ay ang "hintayin mo lang, aayusin nito ang sarili" ay hindi neutral na payo, at may makatwirang dahilan upang gamutin ang sakit nang aktibo imbes na simpleng tanggapin ito.

Ano ang maaari naming gawin dito

Sa Mater Private Hospital Rockhampton, ipapaliwanag ni Dr Kieran Hirpara ang mga pagpipilian batay sa kung alin ang mas nakakaabala sa iyo — ang sakit o ang katigasan — imbes na subukang ilagay ka sa isang numero na yugto.

Ang steroid injection sa kasukasuan ang pinakamalakas na suportadong gamot para sa yugto ng sakit. Sa napakalaking dami ng pananaliksik, ito ang iisang gamot na maaasahan na nagdudulot ng pagkakaiba sa sakit at kakayahan na nararamdaman ng mga pasyente, at ito ay gumagana sa loob ng unang ilang linggo. Ang tunay nitong limitasyon ay ang benepisyo ay humihina sa loob ng apat hanggang anim na buwan. Binibigyan ka nito ng kaginhawaan, tulog, at kakayahang magtrabaho sa balikat — hindi ito nagpapagaling sa katigasan.

Ang mga ehersisyo at physiotherapy ay dapat gawin, na may realistikong inaasahan. Ang isang simpleng programang ehersisyo sa bahay ay may sukatan na halaga. Ang maaaring magpabigla sa iyo ay hindi tila mahalaga kung gaano ka lakas ang pagpilit: ang mga pag-aaral na kumparahin ang matibay na paghuhugot hanggang sa dulo ng saklaw laban sa banayad na galaw na walang sakit ay hindi nakakita ng pagkakaiba sa mga resulta sa anim at labindalawang buwan — at, mapagkumbabang, walang ebidensya na ang mas matibay na pagpilit ay nagdudulot ng pinsala. Kaya’y gumawa sa loob ng kaya mong tahasin. Ang pakikibaka laban sa matinding sakit ay hindi ipinakita na nagpapabilis ng anumang bagay.

Ang hydrodilatation, kung saan inilalagay ang likido upang i-stretch ang kapsula mula sa loob, ay malawakang ginagamit at mababa ang panganib. Ang pananaliksik dito ay tunay na halo-halo: ang isang malaking pagsusuri ay nakakita na ito ay tumulong kaunti sa sakit ngunit hindi sa galaw, ang isa ay nakakita ng kabaligtaran. Ito ay isang makatwirang pagpipilian, ngunit hindi namin ito ipagmamalaki nang sobra.

Ang manipulation under anaesthetic ay nangangahulugang paggalaw ng balikat sa buong saklaw habang tulog ka, upang i-stretch ang matigas na kapsula. Sa pinakamalaking trial na kumparahin ang mga pangunahing gamot, ito ay lumabas bilang ang pinakamabuting halaga ng pagpipilian sa kabuuan.

Ang keyhole capsular release ay kinabibilangan ng pagsugpo sa matigas na kapsula sa ilalim ng direktang paningin sa pamamagitan ng operasyon, imbes na i-stretch ito hanggang sa ito ay mabali. Ang pangunahing benepisyo nito ay ito ay karaniwang pinakamatibay: sa mga publikadong serye ng operasyon, bihira ang pagbabalik ng katigasan pagkatapos ng release, samantalang pagkatapos ng manipulation, ang isang makabuluhang bahagi ng mga balikat ay nagiging matigas muli at nangangailangan ng pangalawang prosedura. Sa malaking trial sa UK, ang mga taong naging bahagi ng release ay ang pinakamababa sa tatlong grupo na nangangailangan ng anumang karagdagang gamot. Dahil ito ay isang operasyon, may kaunting mas mataas na panganib kaysa sa mga alternatibo at mas mahal, at dapat mong inaasahan na mas masakit sa unang ilang linggo kaysa sa isang taong naging bahagi ng manipulation — ang maagang pagkakaiba ay nagkakatumbas sa loob ng humigit-kumulang anim na buwan.

Mahalagang malaman: sa trial na iyon, ang lahat ng tatlong paraan ay nagtapos sa loob ng ilang puntos sa isa’t isa sa isang taon. Ito ay tunay na magandang balita, dahil ito ay nangangahulugang ang desisyon ay maaaring gawin base sa kung ano ang angkop sa iyo, sa iyong ibang kondisyon sa kalusugan at sa iyong mga sitwasyon, imbes na sa isang pagpipilian na malinaw na mas maganda.

Paano karaniwang inuunahan ni Dr Hirpara ang mga ito. Hindi ka sasabihing tanggapin ito sa isang nakatakda na bilang ng buwan bago anumang maaaring alayin. Sa praktikal na pamamaraan, karaniwang inirerekomenda niya ang steroid injection muna, dahil para sa maraming tao, ito ay sapat na binabawasan ang sakit upang magpatuloy sa buhay habang ang balikat ay nagse-settle. Kung ang injection ay hindi nagbigay ng sapat na ginhawa, handa siyang alayin ang capsular release mula sa puntong iyon — hindi niya kinakailangan na maghirap ka muna sa loob ng siyam o labindalawang buwan. Dahil sa kung gaano ka-shaky ang "laging nagse-resolve sa sarili" na pagpapagaan, walang maraming sens na gastusin ang isang taon sa sakit upang malaman kung saan pupunta ang iyong kaso.

Ano ang inaasahan

Kung ikaw ay tatanggapin ng injeksyon, inaasahan na bababa ang sakit sa loob ng unang isang o dalawang linggo. Gamitin ang panahong ito upang panatilihin ang paggalaw ng balikat.

Kung ikaw ay tatanggapin ng manipulasi o capsular release, ang karamihan sa range of motion na muling makukuha mo ay mabilis na babalik — karaniwan sa loob ng unang apat hanggang anim na linggo — at karaniwang walang malaking pagbabago pagkatapos ng tatlong buwan. Mahalaga ang maagang paggalaw, at karaniwang nagsisimula ang pisikal na terapiya sa loob ng isang o dalawang araw pagkatapos ng prosedura. Ang karamihan ay bumabalik sa trabahong katulad ng opisina sa loob ng isang hanggang tatlong linggo.

Kung ikaw ay may diabetes, makatwiran na inaasahan ang mas mabagal at bahagyang hindi ganap na paggaling kumpara sa average, at mahalagang malaman na ang injeksyon ng steroid ay maaaring magdulot ng pagbabago sa iyong asukal sa dugo sa loob ng ilang araw. Sabihin sa amin kung mahirap ang iyong kontrol, dahil binabago nito ang aming rekomendasyon.

Ang paggaling ay sinusukat sa mga buwan, hindi linggo, anuman ang landas na iyong pupuntahan. Ang pinakamagandang ginagawa mo ay patuloy na gamitin ang braso sa loob ng komportableng limitasyon at panatilihin ang proteksyon ng iyong tulog.

Kailan kumonsulta sa doktor

Kumonsulta sa iyong doktor kung ang sakit sa balikat ay gumigising sa iyo sa gabi o hindi nawawala kahit ilang linggo ng pahinga, at tanungin nang espesipiko tungkol sa frozen shoulder kung ang balikat ay naging talagang mahirap galawin imbes na masakit lamang.

Humingi ng mas maagang pagsusuri ng espesyalista kung hindi mo maikikita ang iyong kamay palabas, kung mayroon kang diabetes, kung ang balikat ay nakakaapekto sa iyong trabaho o pagmamaneho, o kung ang sakit ay seryoso na upang pigilan ka na matulog. Walang benepisyo sa paghihintay ng matagal bago masuri ang sakit.

Maghanap ng agad na medikal na atensyon kung ang balikat ay naging mainit, pula, at pamamaga, kung pakiramdam mo ay masama o may lagnat kasama nito, kung may malaking kahinaan o pangangati sa braso, o kung ang sakit ay nagsimula sa isang pagkabagsak o pinsala. Ang mga katangiang ito ay nagpapahiwatig na hindi ito frozen shoulder kundi isang bagay na nangangailangan ng mas mapanuring pagsusuri.

Mas malalim na pagsusuri

Ang seksyong ito ay lumalampas sa kailangan mo para sa iyong mga desisyon tungkol sa paggamot. Ito ay nandito dahil ang frozen shoulder ay isa sa mga kondisyon kung saan ang mga sinasabi sa mga pasyente at ang aktwal na ipinapakita ng mga pananaliksik ay nagkalayo na, at may mga taong mas gusto nitong makita ang lohika kaysa hilingin na maniwala lamang.

Ano ang talagang nangyayari sa kasukasuan

Ang kapsula ay isang manggas ng collagen na nakapalibot sa kasukasuan. Sa frozen shoulder, ito ay namamaga at pagkatapos ay fibrotic — dumarami ang mga selula na tinatawag na fibroblasts at naglalagay ng siksik na bagong collagen, at ang ilang sa kanila ay nagkakaroon ng pagbabago patungo sa myofibroblasts, na kayang aktibong magkontrakt. Ito ang pangunahing pagkakaiba sa karaniwang peklat: hindi lamang kumakapal ang tisyu, kundi humihigpit din ito. Maaaring bumaba ang dami ng kasukasuan mula sa karaniwang 10–15 mL patungo sa 3–4 mL.

Ang parehong ugali ng selula ay nangyayari sa Dupuytren's disease sa kamay, kaya't madalas na magkasama ang dalawang kondisyon sa parehong tao, at kaya rin ng isang surgyano ng balikat ang nagsabing ang kondisyon ay dapat lamang baguhin ang pangalan sa contracture ng balikat imbes na "capsulitis" [1]. Sa kabila ng lumang pangalang "adhesive capsulitis", ang mga surgyano na tumitingin sa loob ng kasukasuan ay hindi nakakakita ng anumang adhesions.

Bakit mas mahina ang batayan ng kwento ng "tatlong yugto" kaysa sa itsura nito

Maraming makababasa na ang frozen shoulder ay dumadaan sa mga yugto ng freezing, frozen, at thawing. Ang modelo na ito ay inilathala noong 1975. Nang pagsaliksikin ng mga mananaliksik ang pinagmulan nito, natuklasan nila na nalito ang may-akda sa mga sanggunian para sa dalawang magkakaibang mas maagang papel, at — higit pa rito — na ang mga pasyente niya ay naka-sling sa kanilang mga braso hanggang sa siyam na buwan. Ang balikat na hindi gumagalaw sa ganitong tagal ay nagiging matigas, at nagiging maluwag kapag pinayagan nang gumalaw. Ang mga "yugto" ay maaaring bahagyang ilarawan ang paggamot imbes na ang sakit.

Isang sistematikong pagsusuri na layuning subukan ang modelo ay hindi nakahanap ng ebidensya para dito, at nakahanap ng kabaligtaran ng inaasahan nito: ang karamihan sa pagpapabuti ay nangyayari maaga at unti-unting bumabagal, imbes na lumalaki hanggang sa huling yugto ng thawing [2]. Hindi rin kayang tiyak ng mga kliniko ang yugto kung alin ang kasalukuyang nararanasan ng isang partikular na balikat — ang mga nagsulat ng pamantayang depinisyon ay kinikilala sa kanilang mga publikasyon na ang datos upang kumpirmahin ito "ay wala."

Ang istatistika ng paggaling, at bakit mayroon itong dalawang napakabagong sagot

Ang madalas na binabanggit na numero ay 94% ng mga tao ang gumaling nang walang gamot. Ito ay mula sa isang tunay na pag-aaral, ngunit kinukuha nito lamang ang mga pasyente na hindi nagpakonsulta at bumalik para sa follow-up. Karamihan sa orihinal na grupo ay pumili ng gamot o umalis. Kapag binibilang ang lahat, ang parehong datos ay nagbibigay ng humigit-kumulang 26% [3]. Ang "galing" ay nangangahulugan din na nasa loob ng 10 degrees ng kabilang balikat — at sa ilang mga pasyente, ang kabilang balikat ay yaman na rin.

Ang pinakamalaking long-term follow-up ay nagpakita na 41% ay mayroon pa ring sintomas sa loob ng apat na taon, at — ang bahaging dapat malaman — ang pag-unlad ay halos tumitigil pagkatapos ng tatlong taon imbes na magpatuloy nang walang katapusan [4].

Isang kondisyon sa buong katawan ito, hindi lamang sa balikat

Isang malaking pag-aaral sa hehnetya ang nakahanap ng limang rehiyon ng DNA na may kaugnayan sa frozen shoulder, at gamit ang isang teknika na kayang hiwalayin ang sanhi mula sa pagkakataon, ipinakita nito na ang type 1 diabetes ang tunay na sanhi nito imbes na kasabay lamang nito. Ang sobrang timbang ay hindi — kapag inakala na ang diabetes, nawala ang ugnayan sa timbang. Ito ay nagpapahiwatig na ang asukal sa dugo, imbes na mekanikal na karga, ang nagpapaunlad [5].

Ano ang sinasabi ng ebidensya sa pisyoterapiya

Ito ang bahaging pinakamahalaga na dapat malaman kung ikaw ay tumatanggap o nagbibigay ng serbisyo sa pisyoterapiya. Isang Cochrane review na nag-umpisa ng 32 trials at 1,836 tao [6]. Tatlong natatanging paghahambing ang lumalabas.

Kumpara sa steroid injection, mas masama ang resulta ng hands-on physiotherapy sa maagang yugto. Sa head-to-head trial, anim na linggo ng passive mobilisation at supervised exercise ay nagdulot ng 26 puntos na mas kaunting pagpapabuti sa sakit at 25 puntos na mas kaunting pagpapabuti sa function sa pitong linggo kumpara sa isang injection. Kapag sinusuri kung ang mga tao ay naramdaman na maraming pagpapabuti o gumaling na, ito ay 46% para sa physiotherapy kumpara sa 77% para sa injection — humigit-kumulang isa pang taong nakatulong para sa bawat apat na na-inject. Sa loob ng anim hanggang labing-isang buwan, napuno na ang agwat at hindi na mahalaga ang pagkakaiba.

Hindi mahalaga kung gaano katindi ang iyong pagtulak, gaano kadalas, at anong teknik ang ginamit. Isang 100-pasienteng trial ang nagkumpara ng matibay na end-of-range mobilisation laban sa banayad na pain-free mobilisation at hindi nakahanap ng makabuluhang pagkakaiba sa anumang labindalawang resulta sa anim o labing-isang buwan — sakit, sakit sa gabi, function, bawat plane ng galaw, kalidad ng buhay. Isang 120-pasienteng trial na nagbago ng frequency ng end-range mobilisation (higit sa dalawang beses sa isang linggo, linggo-linggo, mas kaunti kaysa linggo-linggo) ay nakahanap ng pagkakaiba sa abduction na mas mababa sa walong degrees, lahat ay hindi magkaiba sa estadistika mula sa zero. Ang mga head-to-head na paghahambing ng teknik — anterior versus posterior glide, PNF versus conventional exercise, dumbbells versus bare-handed — ay halos lahat ay hindi makabuluhan. Nakakapagpahinga, walang palatandaan na ang pagtatrabaho sa end range ay nakakasama.

Ang pinakamalaking structural na agwat: walang trial na kailanman ang nagkumpara ng manual therapy plus exercise laban sa walang treatment. Kaya habang maaari nating sabihin na ang physiotherapy ay hindi malinaw na mas maganda kaysa sa isang injection, at ang mga detalye kung paano ito ipinamamahagi ay tila hindi nagbabago nang marami, walang taong aktwal na nagpakita kung gaano karami sa pagpapabuti ang mangyayari pa rin.

Dalawang kapaki-pakinabang na caveat. Ang tunay na high-quality trial sa review ay tumitingin sa physiotherapy pagkatapos ng joint distension, at nakahanap na ito ay walang epekto sa sakit, function o kalidad ng buhay — ngunit ito ay nagpapabuti sa kung gaano karaming tao ang nagbigay ng sariling rating na gumaling na, at nagdagdag ng humigit-kumulang 13 degrees ng abduction sa anim na linggo, na nawala na sa anim na buwan. At sa malaking UK trial, ang physiotherapy arm ay inalay na kasama ang hands-on stretching papunta sa stiff range, ngunit ang kanyang sariling mga rekord ay nagpapakita na ang manual mobilisation ay ginamit lamang sa 11–27% ng mga pasyente at supervised stretching sa isang tao lamang. Ang aktwal na ipinamamahagi — at ginawa nang maganda kumpara sa surgery sa isang taon — ay edukasyon, isang injection, banayad na supervised movement at isang home programme.

Gaano katagal bago maramdaman na mas maganda, at may kinalaman ba ang uri ng pagpapalaya sa resulta

Oras. Pagkatapos ng pagpapalaya, ang median na pasyente ay umabot sa threshold na "totoong pag-unlad ito" sa humigit-kumulang isang buwan, at sa threshold na "tanggap na sa akin ang aking balikat" sa humigit-kumulang apat na buwan [14]. Ang oras ng pagkawala sa trabaho ay umaabot sa median na walong linggo, bagaman malawak ang saklaw — isa sa apat ay bumalik sa loob ng apat na linggo, tatlo sa apat ay bumalik sa loob ng labindalawa [15].

Ang manipulación ay mabilis na nagbabalik ng galaw. Ito ang tapat na kapalit sa itaas na bentahe ng tibay: ang manipulación ay nagbabalik ng saklaw ng galaw nang mas maaga, at ang pagpapalaya ay hindi talaga nakakapanlaban hanggang sa humigit-kumulang markang anim na buwan, pagkatapos nito ay hindi na magkakaiba ang dalawa sa anumang pinagsamang sukatan. Isang maliit na paghahambing ay natagpuan pa nga na ang manipulación lamang ay nagtapos na may pinakamahusay na panlabas na pag-ikot [16].

Gaano karaming kapsula ang dapat hiwain ay isang tunay na tanong, at ang sagot ay "mas kaunti kaysa sa iyong iniisip". Isang pagsusuri na nagpools ng 18 pag-aaral, 629 pasyente at 811 balikat ay nagpaghambing sa tatlong teknik: pagpapalaya lamang sa harap at ilalim ng kapsula, pagdaragdag ng likod nito, o paggawa ng buong ikot. Ang konklusyon nito ay ang mas kaunting pagpapalaya ay nagbigay ng mas magandang marka ng pag-andar at sakit, na ang pagdaragdag ng posterior na pagpapalaya ay bumibili ng maagang panloob na pag-ikot na hindi tumatagal (bagaman nagbibigay ito ng matibay na pagtaas ng pag-yuko), at ang buong 360-degree na pagpapalaya "maaaring hindi magbigay ng karagdagang benepisyo". Ang mga rate ng komplikasyon ay hindi magkaiba sa tatlo [17]. Ang dalawang randomised na pag-aaral ng posterior na extension ay natagpuan ang parehong pattern — mas mabilis na maagang paggaling, walang pagkakaiba sa anim na buwan. Kaya ang mas malaking operasyon ay hindi awtomatikong mas maganda.

Ang paggawa ng pareho nang sabay ay hindi ang sagot. Sa iisang tatlong-way na paghahambing, ang pagdaragdag ng manipulación sa isang pagpapalaya ay nagdala ng pinakamataas na rate ng pagkawala ng panlabas na pag-ikot — 18%, kumpara sa 7% para sa manipulación lamang at 2% para sa pagpapalaya lamang [16].

Ano ang aktwal na natuklasan ng pinakamalaking pagsubok sa paggamot

Isang pagsubok sa UK ang nag-randomize ng higit sa 500 katao sa estrukturadong pisyikal na terapiya na may suntok, manipulasyon sa ilalim ng anastesya, o keyhole surgery. Sa loob ng isang taon, ang lahat ng tatlong opsyon ay nasa loob ng ilang puntos ng isa't isa — mas mababa sa pagkakaiba na mapapansin ng isang pasyente [7]. Ito ay tunay na kapaki-pakinabang na balita: ibig sabihin nito ay ang pagpili ay maaaring gawin base sa kung ano ang angkop sa iyo at sa iyong mga pangangailangan, imbes na ang isang opsyon ay malinaw na mas maganda.

Ang pagkakaiba ng tatlo ay nasa gaano kadalas kailangan ng iba pang gamutan pagkatapos. Sa pagsubok na iyon, kailangan ng karagdagang gamutan ang 4% pagkatapos ng release, 7% pagkatapos ng manipulasyon, at 15% pagkatapos ng pisyikal na terapiya [7]. Ang manipulasyon ang lumabas na pinakamabuti sa halaga bawat yunit ng benepisyo; ang release ang pinakamahal at nagdulot ng pinakamaraming seryosong komplikasyon sa pagsubok, bagaman ang mga ito ay bihira sa kabuuan.

Manipulasyon o pag-release — ang tanong tungkol sa pagbalik

Dito nagkakaiba nang husto ang dalawang operasyon, at ito ang dahilan kung bakit maaaring gabayan ka ng isang doktor sa pag-release kahit magkapareho ang mga headline outcome scores.

Ang manipulasyon ay humihigpit sa kapsula hanggang sa ito’y mabasag, at hindi laging sa kung saan mo pipiliin ang basag. Sa pinakamalaking serye — 792 balikat na sinundan sa loob ng 17 taon — kailangan ng pangalawang manipulasyon sa 17.8%, at sa mga taong may uri 1 na diyabetes, ito ay tumataas sa 37.9% [9]. Ang pinakamahabang pagsubaybay, sa average na 13 taon, ay nagpakita na 19.2% ang kailangan ng paulit-ulit na manipulasyon at 31.3% ang nag-ulat ng pagbalik sa anumang punto [10]. Dalawang bagay ang nagpapababa sa halaga nito: halos lahat ng pagbalik ay nangyayari sa unang taon (pagkatapos ng limang taon, ang rate ay nasa ilalim ng 2%), at ang paulit-ulit na manipulasyon ay gumagana nang katumbas ng unang isang [9][10].

Ang release ay naghihiwalay sa kapsula nang may layunin, sa ilalim ng panonood. Ang pagkakaroon ng kailangan ng operasyon ay malaki ang pagbaba: isang serye na sinundan sa mean na limang taon ay nag-ulat ng walang reoperations sa 32 pasyente, na may iisang pagbalik sa isang taong hindi nakumpleto ang rehabilitation [11]. Ang meta-analysis na nag-iipon ng walong pag-aaral at 768 pasyente ay hindi nagpakita ng makabuluhang pagkakaiba sa pagitan ng dalawang operasyon para sa sakit, function, o galaw, ngunit tinalakay na ang grupo ng manipulasyon ang kailangan ng mas maraming karagdagang injeksyon, na nagkonklusyon na sa mas mahabang pagsubaybay, "maaaring maranasan ng grupo ng MUA ang mas maraming pagbalik" [8].

Dalawang tapat na caveat. Una, ang malaking pag-aaral tungkol sa manipulasyon at pagbalik ay karamihan ay galing sa praktis ng isang doktor, kaya hindi sila magkakaparehong independenteng kumpirmasyon. Pangalawa, ang release ay hindi buong pagbawi rin: isang serye na sinusukat laban sa kabilang balikat ng pasyente mismo ay nagpakita na ang mga tao ay nasa mga 77–79% ng magandang balikat dalawa hanggang anim na taon pagkatapos [12], at sa isang cohort na hindi kasama ang mga diyabetiko, habang halos lahat ay umunlad sa makabuluhang halaga, 11–22% ay hindi pa rin itinuturing ang kanilang balikat na katanggap-tanggap sa anim na buwan [13].

Kaya ang tapat na buod ay ito: para sa paggawa ng balikat na gumagalaw at komportable, ang dalawa ay katumbas, at ang manipulasyon ang mas murang paraan doon. Para sa pagpapanatili ng ganito, ang ebidensya ay nagpapasok sa release. Ang pagkakaibang ito ay pinakamahalaga kung mayroon kang diyabetes, kung sobrang tigas ng balikat, o kung mayroon ka nang nakaraang manipulasyon na hindi tumagal.

Mga Sanggunian

[1] Bunker T. Oras na para sa bagong pangalan para sa frozen shoulder — contracture ng balikat. Shoulder Elbow. 2009;1(1):4-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-5740.2009.00007.x [2] Wong CK, Levine WN, Deo K, Kesting RS, Mercer EA, Schram GA, et al. Natural na kasaysayan ng frozen shoulder: katotohanan o imbensyon? Isang sistematikong pagsusuri. Physiotherapy. 2017;103(1):40-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2016.05.009 [3] Vastamäki H, Kettunen J, Vastamäki M. Ang natural na kasaysayan ng idiopathic frozen shoulder: isang pag-aaral na may 2 hanggang 27 taong followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(4):1133-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2176-4 [4] Hand C, Clipsham K, Rees JL, Carr AJ. Matagal na resulta ng frozen shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17(2):231-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.05.009 [5] Green HD, Jones A, Evans JP, Wood AR, Beaumont RN, Tyrrell J, et al. Isang genome-wide association study ang nakakakita ng 5 loci na may kaugnayan sa frozen shoulder at nag-implicate ang diabetes bilang isang sanhi ng risk factor. PLoS Genet. 2021;17(6):e1009577. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009577 [6] Page MJ, Green S, Kramer S, Johnston RV, McBain B, Chau M, et al. Manual therapy at ehersisyo para sa adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(8):CD011275. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011275 [7] Brealey S, Northgraves M, Kottam L, Keding A, Corbacho B, Goodchild L, et al. Mga surgical treatments na kumpara sa maagang structured physiotherapy sa secondary care para sa mga adultong may primary frozen shoulder: ang UK FROST three-arm RCT. Health Technol Assess. 2020;24(71):1-162. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta24710 [8] Zhao Y, Yang T, Feng C, Li L, Pang L, Zhao S. Arthroscopic capsular release kumpara sa manipulation under anesthesia para sa refractory frozen shoulder: isang sistematikong pagsusuri na may meta-analysis. Orthop Surg. 2024;16(7):1517-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14077 [9] Woods DA, Loganathan K. Pagbabalik ng frozen shoulder pagkatapos ng manipulation under anaesthetic (MUA). Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B(6):812-7. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.99B6.BJJ-2016-1133.R1 [10] Fairclough A, Waters C, Davies T, Ali A, Woods D. Matagal na pagbabalik ng frozen shoulder pagkatapos ng manipulation under anaesthesia. Shoulder Elbow. 2023;15(2):173-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732211070007 [11] Ranalletta M, Rossi LA, Zaidenberg EE, Bertona A, Tanoira I, Maignon GD, et al. Midterm outcomes pagkatapos ng arthroscopic anteroinferior capsular release para sa paggamot ng idiopathic adhesive capsulitis. Arthroscopy. 2017;33(3):503-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2016.08.024 [12] Mardani-Kivi M, Hashemi-Motlagh K, Darabipour Z. Arthroscopic capsular release ng frozen shoulder: mid-term results. Clin Shoulder Elb. 2021;24(3):172-7. https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2021.00311 [13] Pasqualini I, Tanoira I, Hurley ET, Ranalletta M, Rossi LA. Ang arthroscopic capsular release ay nakakamit ng clinically significant outcomes sa mga pasyente na may adhesive capsulitis. Arthroscopy. 2024;40(4):1081-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2023.08.083 [14] Pasqualini I, Rossi LA, Oyem PC, Tanoira I, Ranalletta M. Oras na kinakailangan upang makamit ang clinically significant outcomes pagkatapos ng arthroscopic capsular release. Orthop J Sports Med. 2024;12(11):23259671241275653. https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241275653 [15] Sedlinsch A, Berndt T, Rühmann O, Lerch S. Convalescence pagkatapos ng arthroscopic capsular release sa frozen shoulder. J Orthop. 2020;20:374-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2020.06.013 [16] Schoch B, Huttman D, Syed UA, et al. Surgical treatment ng adhesive capsulitis: isang paghahambing ng manipulation, capsular release at pareho. Cureus. 2020;12(7):e9032. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.9032 [17] Sivasubramanian H, Chua CXK, Lim SY, Manohara R, Ng ZWD, Prem Kumar V, et al. Arthroscopic capsular release upang gamutin ang idiopathic frozen shoulder: gaano karaming release ang kailangan? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021;107(1):102766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2020.102766


Evidence & references

This is the clinical evidence summary written for health professionals. It is technical, and it lists the research this page was built from. You do not need to read it to understand your treatment or to make a decision about it.

Overview

  • Frozen shoulder management guidelines provide evidence-based guidance and identify key areas for future research [2].
  • Magnetic resonance imaging findings in frozen shoulder should not replace clinical judgments regarding prognosis and treatment decisions [7].
  • Clinicians should monitor frozen shoulder patients with diabetes more closely and offer further treatment if pain or lack of function persist long-term [8].
  • Different treatment strategies for frozen shoulder may be appropriate depending on the location [9].
  • A strict definition of recalcitrant idiopathic frozen shoulder is needed to prevent unnecessary interventions, as current data should not be interpreted as a plea for surgery in patients with a mean symptom duration of 4 months [10].
  • The variety of participants, methods, interventions, and outcomes across trials provides limited new evidence to inform the non-surgical management and treatment of frozen shoulder [14].
  • Patients with a poor outcome or recurrent symptoms after manipulation under anaesthetic (MUA) should be offered a further MUA, with an expectation of a good outcome and a low complication rate [17].
  • Early surgical intervention might shorten the overall duration of symptoms in frozen shoulder and is not associated with inferior clinical outcomes compared with late surgical intervention [19].
  • There is insufficient evidence to reliably recommend a single treatment approach for frozen shoulder [32].
  • Further treatment was indicated in 41% of patients who could not tolerate more than 20 mL of injection during hydrodilatation [34].
  • Recurrence of frozen shoulder was more common in primary (33%) versus secondary (16%) cases [34].
  • Arthroscopic capsular release is a suitable option for refractory primary frozen shoulder syndrome, leading to faster and long-lasting recovery [35].
  • Manipulation under anaesthetic (MUA) and arthroscopic capsular release (ACR) are both good treatment options for primary frozen shoulder [70].
  • MUA is simpler but carries risks of serious complications, whereas ACR may be safer if performed by experienced surgeons and is convenient for patients with combined rotator cuff tears [70].

Anatomy & Pathophysiology

  • Primary (idiopathic) frozen shoulder consists of three phases: pain, stiffness, and thawing [3].
  • Secondary frozen shoulders may not exhibit all three phases and may not follow the exact chronology of primary frozen shoulder [3].
  • The pain phase of primary frozen shoulder involves a gradual onset of diffuse shoulder pain that is progressive over weeks to months [3].
  • Pain in the initial phase is usually worse at night and exacerbated by lying on the affected side [3].
  • Reduced arm use due to pain leads to stiffness [3].
  • The stiffness phase begins when patients restrict movement to seek pain relief and usually lasts 4 to 12 months [3].
  • During the stiffness phase, patients experience difficulty with activities of daily living, such as men accessing back pockets or women fastening brassieres [3].
  • A dull ache is present nearly all time during the stiffness phase, especially at night, often accompanied by sharp pain during range of motion at or near new endpoints [3].
  • The thawing phase lasts for weeks or months, during which motion increases and pain diminishes [3].
  • Without treatment, motion return in the thawing phase is gradual and may never objectively return to normal, although most patients subjectively feel near normal [3].
  • Frozen shoulder is characterized by progressive pain and stiffness that usually resolves spontaneously after about 18 months [4].
  • Histological features of frozen shoulder are reminiscent of Dupuytren’s disease, with active fibroblastic and myofibroblastic proliferation in the rotator interval, anterior capsule, and coracohumeral ligament [4].
  • Conditions particularly associated with frozen shoulder include diabetes, Dupuytren’s disease, hyperlipidaemia, hyperthyroidism, cardiac disease, and hemiplegia [4].
  • The etiology of frozen shoulder is still not known and understanding of the pathogenesis is limited [15].
  • Frozen shoulder is a poorly understood condition that typically involves substantial pain, movement restriction, and considerable morbidity [12].
  • The pathophysiology of frozen shoulder is complex, involving various pathophysiologic mechanisms [62].
  • A systematic review summarizes the tissue pathophysiology of primary frozen shoulder [25].
  • Primary frozen shoulder is defined by total elevation restricted to 135° or less [20].
  • In primary frozen shoulder, motion restriction is localized to the humero-scapular joint [20].
  • Primary frozen shoulder excludes cases with post-traumatic conditions, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, hemiplegia, or other obvious changes explaining the range of motion decrease [20].
  • Secondary frozen shoulder involves decreased range of motion following a traumatic lesion, including soft tissue injury, intra- and juxtaarticular fractures, and other upper limb fractures [20].
  • Symptomatic subjects with frozen shoulder demonstrate substantial kinematic deficits during humeral range of motion [44].
  • Patients with frozen shoulder present with altered shoulder muscle activity and kinematics [78].
  • Pathomechanics of frozen shoulder are characterized by glenohumeral motion limitations, high tension in the anteroinferior glenohumeral capsule, and altered scapular motion [75].
  • The scapulohumeral rhythm (SHR) of the affected shoulder is inversely related to the severity of limitation of shoulder range of motion, suggesting a compensatory pattern [80].
  • The anatomical structure of passive shoulder restraints has no impact on the difference in passive joint position sense values between external and internal rotation in frozen shoulder [59].
  • The thickness of the inferior glenohumeral joint capsule in the 80° scapular plane elevated arm position is a highly reliable and valid method for assessment [79].
  • Imaging is an essential tool for evaluation of patients with shoulder pain to understand the extent of injury [37].
  • X-rays in frozen shoulder are normal, and their main role is to exclude other causes of pain and stiffness [4].
  • Post-traumatic stiffness may persist for some months after severe shoulder injury but is maximal at the start and gradually lessens, unlike the pattern of frozen shoulder [4].
  • Disuse stiffness can occur if the arm is nursed overcautiously, such as following a wrist fracture, but lacks the characteristic pain pattern of frozen shoulder [4].
  • Complex regional pain syndrome may follow acute trauma or be seen in patients with myocardial infarction or stroke, presenting features similar to frozen shoulder [4].
  • Rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis can affect the shoulder and develop bilaterally, with diagnosis usually obvious on X-ray [4].
  • Shoulder stiffness is a typical outcome after bone or soft tissue injuries around the shoulder, including contusions, subluxations, dislocations, acromioclavicular joint injuries, clavicle and scapula fractures, and proximal humerus fractures in the elderly [61].
  • Repetitive, low-level trauma can cause localized contractures leading to motion loss in specific patterns [61].
  • Isolated posterior capsular contracture is the most commonly described localized contracture causing motion loss [61].
  • Surgical procedures such as anterior or posterior capsulorrhaphy, inferior capsular shift, and rotator cuff surgery can result in limitation of motion [61].

Classification

  • Frozen shoulder is a specific, painful, and debilitating condition affecting patients mainly in middle age [6].
  • Most patients clinically diagnosed with primary frozen shoulder had undiagnosed systemic abnormalities and/or intra-articular pathologies [5].
  • 18F-FDG PET/CT is clinically relevant in diagnostically challenging cases, such as distinguishing the first phase of frozen shoulder from subacromial impingement [11].
  • Health professionals manage frozen shoulders differently for different phases of the condition [16].
  • Primary frozen shoulders are defined by total elevation restricted to 135° or less [20].
  • In primary frozen shoulder, the restriction of motion is localized to the humero-scapular joint [20].
  • Primary frozen shoulder is diagnosed when no findings in case history, clinical examination, or radiological examination explain the decrease in range of motion [20].
  • Cases with post-traumatic conditions, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, hemiplegia, and other obvious changes are excluded from primary frozen shoulder classification [20].
  • Secondary frozen shoulder is characterized by decreased range of motion following a traumatic lesion [20].
  • Associated injuries in secondary frozen shoulder include soft tissue injury to the shoulder region, intra- and juxtaarticular fractures, and other fractures of the upper limb [20].
  • Frozen shoulder is classified into three consecutive stages according to Reeves [20].
  • Stage 1 of frozen shoulder is characterized by pain [20].
  • Stage 1 of frozen shoulder has a duration of 10 to 36 weeks [20].
  • In Stage 1 of frozen shoulder, there is no difference between men and women, no difference between affected dominant and nondominant shoulders, and no correlation with age [20].
  • In the early stages of frozen shoulder, there is a full range of movement under anesthesia [20].
  • Classification of frozen shoulder was found to be controversial [38].
  • There are lower rates of agreement among Japan Shoulder Society (JSS) members than American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) members for the definition of primary frozen shoulder [43].
  • There are lower rates of agreement among JSS members than ASES members for the classification of primary and secondary frozen shoulder [43].
  • There are lower rates of agreement among JSS members than ASES members for the divisions of secondary frozen shoulder [43].
  • There is disagreement among shoulder specialists regarding terminology for frozen shoulder [57].

Clinical Presentation

  • Frozen shoulder is a specific, painful, and debilitating condition that primarily affects patients in middle age [6].
  • Frozen shoulder is a common disease that causes significant morbidity [21].
  • Frozen shoulder is characterized by severe shoulder pain and functional restriction [24].
  • Frozen shoulder has considerable economic impact [28].
  • Frozen shoulder typically involves substantial pain, movement restriction, and considerable morbidity [12].
  • Frozen shoulder affects approximately 4% of the general population [24].
  • Frozen shoulder affects up to 59% of patients with diabetes mellitus [24].
  • The disease duration of frozen shoulder varies between 1 and 3 years [24].
  • The clinical course of primary (idiopathic) frozen shoulder consists of three phases: pain, stiffness, and thawing [3].
  • Primary frozen shoulder is characterized by progressive pain and stiffness which usually resolves spontaneously after about 18 months [4].
  • In Phase I (Pain), patients experience a gradual onset of diffuse shoulder pain that is progressive over weeks to months [3].
  • The pain in Phase I is usually worse at night and exacerbated by lying on the affected side [3].
  • In Phase II (Stiffness), patients restrict movement to seek pain relief, leading to stiffness that usually lasts 4 to 12 months [3].
  • During Phase II, patients have difficulty with activities of daily living, such as men reaching back pockets or women fastening brassieres [3].
  • In Phase II, a dull ache is present nearly all the time, especially at night, often accompanied by sharp pain during range of motion at or near new endpoints [3].
  • In Phase III (Thawing), motion increases and pain diminishes over weeks or months [3].
  • Without treatment, motion return in Phase III is gradual and may never objectively return to normal, though patients often subjectively feel near normal [3].
  • The natural history of frozen shoulder involves pain that increases in severity, prevents sleeping on the affected side, and subsides after several months [4].
  • As pain subsides in frozen shoulder, stiffness becomes more prominent and persists for another 6–12 months if untreated [4].
  • Movement is gradually regained in frozen shoulder but may not return to normal [4].
  • Patients with frozen shoulder are typically aged 40–60 years [4].
  • Patients with frozen shoulder may give a history of trauma, often trivial, followed by pain [4].
  • Physical examination of frozen shoulder usually reveals slight muscle wasting and tenderness [4].
  • Movements in frozen shoulder are always limited, and the shoulder may be extremely stiff in severe cases [4].
  • X-rays in frozen shoulder are normal; their main role is to exclude other causes of pain and stiffness [4].
  • Post-traumatic stiffness is characterized by stiffness without much pain that is maximal at the start and gradually lessens, unlike the pattern of frozen shoulder [4].
  • Disuse stiffness occurs if the arm is nursed overcautiously and lacks the characteristic pain pattern of frozen shoulder [4].
  • Complex regional pain syndrome may follow acute trauma or occur in patients with myocardial infarction or stroke, presenting features similar to frozen shoulder [4].
  • Rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis can affect the shoulder bilaterally and are usually obvious on X-ray [4].
  • Primary frozen shoulder excludes cases with post-traumatic conditions, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, hemiplegia, or other obvious changes in history or examination [20].
  • Secondary frozen shoulder involves decreased range of motion following a traumatic lesion, such as soft tissue injury or fractures of the upper limb [20].
  • Stage 1 (pain) of frozen shoulder lasts 10 to 36 weeks [20].
  • In Stage 1 of frozen shoulder, there is no difference in presentation between men and women, affected dominant and nondominant shoulders, or correlation with age [20].
  • Frozen shoulder following COVID-19 vaccination may present with clinical features similar to idiopathic frozen shoulder [39].
  • Frozen shoulder can occur after COVID-19 vaccination [41].
  • Frozen shoulder is particularly associated with diabetes, Dupuytren’s disease, hyperlipidaemia, hyperthyroidism, cardiac disease, and hemiplegia [4].
  • MR findings in frozen shoulder should not replace clinical judgments regarding further prognosis and treatment decisions [7].
  • Unusual stiffness and pain in the shoulder of a young female patient suggests a wide range of disease entities, including infection [23].
  • Misdiagnosing shoulder tumors as frozen shoulder syndrome is likely to cause a significant delay in making a correct diagnosis [40].
  • A detailed clinical history and examination is critical in the assessment of a painful, stiff shoulder to avoid misdiagnosis of conditions like malignant shoulder girdle tumours [1].

Investigations

  • A detailed clinical history and examination is critical in the assessment of a painful, stiff shoulder [1].
  • The term frozen shoulder should be reserved for a well-defined disorder characterized by progressive pain and stiffness which usually resolves spontaneously after about 18 months [4].
  • The histological features of frozen shoulder are reminiscent of Dupuytren’s disease, with active fibroblastic and myofibroblastic proliferation in the rotator interval, anterior capsule and coracohumeral ligament [4].
  • Patients may give a history of trauma, often trivial, followed by pain that gradually increases in severity and often prevents sleeping on the affected side [4].
  • Pain begins to subside after several months, but stiffness becomes more problematic; untreated stiffness persists for another 6–12 months before movement is gradually regained, which may not return to normal [4].
  • Clinical examination usually reveals slight muscle wasting and tenderness, with always limited movements and extreme stiffness in severe cases [4].
  • X-rays are normal in frozen shoulder, and their main role is to exclude other causes of pain and stiffness [4].
  • Disuse stiffness may occur if the arm is nursed overcautiously, such as following a wrist fracture, and lacks the characteristic pain pattern of frozen shoulder [4].
  • Complex regional pain syndrome may follow acute trauma or be seen in patients with myocardial infarction or stroke, and its features can be similar to those of frozen shoulder [4].
  • Both rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis can affect the shoulder, with diagnosis usually obvious on X-ray, and rheumatoid arthritis may present with characteristic generalized symptoms and signs [4].
  • Unusual stiffness and pain in the shoulder of a young female patient suggests a wide range of disease entities, from simple frozen shoulder to infection [23].
  • Routine use of shoulder MRI scans in patients with frozen shoulder but without suspicion of additional pathology may not be indicated [31].
  • Imaging is an essential tool for evaluation of patients with shoulder pain, and understanding the extent of an injury with imaging is key to successful management [37].
  • Physicians should re-examine frozen shoulder patients with repeated plain radiographs and further imaging, especially MRI, if conservative therapy fails [56].
  • MR arthrography reveals characteristic findings in patients with frozen shoulder [58].
  • T2 signal hyperintensity and axillary capsule thickening are characteristic of the early stages of frozen shoulder, although MRI alone cannot completely define the disease stage [71].
  • The burning sign is an abnormal finding that appears in dynamic MRI of severe frozen shoulder [73].
  • Dynamic MRI semiquantitatively demonstrated a reduction in abnormal blood flow and improvement in clinical results after manipulation under cervical nerve root block (MUC) in patients with frozen shoulder [77].
  • Clinical improvement in patients with frozen shoulder was associated with a decrease in the coefficient of enhancement (CE) in the glenohumeral synovium following intraarticular injections of hyaluronate [81].
  • There may be a causal relationship between hypothyroidism and frozen shoulder [85].
  • Patients who underwent image-guided (ultrasound) injections had statistically significant greater improvement in shoulder pain and function at 6 weeks after injection compared to blind injections [86].
  • MR imaging of patients with severe frozen shoulder after MUC showed 29 capsule tears, 4 labrum tears, and 15 bone bruises of the humeral head [87].

Treatment

Non-Operative Management

  • Treatment for frozen shoulder aims to improve pain and function through a shared decision-making process, utilizing a step-up approach from conservative measures to invasive treatments if symptoms persist [28].
  • Health professionals manage frozen shoulders differently depending on the phase of the condition [16].
  • There is limited evidence of the effectiveness of different forms of treatment used for frozen shoulder, with many studies carrying a moderate to high risk of bias and omitting details of symptom duration or condition phase [74].
  • The variety of participants, methods, interventions, and outcomes across trials provides limited new evidence to inform non-surgical management [14].
  • Conservative treatment is effective for the treatment of frozen shoulder regardless of the severity of symptoms [45].
  • Intra-articular steroid injection is effective and safe for frozen shoulder, relieving pain, improving functional performance, and increasing range of motion [48].
  • Multisite corticosteroid injection therapy is more effective than single intra-articular injection in terms of pain relief, restoration of motion, and functional status for primary frozen shoulder [46].
  • Both multisite and single glenohumeral injections of corticosteroid are effective in patients with primary frozen shoulder [49].
  • Ultrasound-guided administration of corticosteroid injections into the glenohumeral joint increases the likelihood of successful injection but does not improve clinical outcomes at 12 weeks compared with blind administration [52].
  • Ultrasound-guided multisite injection is a nonsurgical treatment technique for frozen shoulder that emphasizes correct injection sites [72].
  • Hydrodilatation has emerged as a potential nonsurgical option in the management of frozen shoulder, but its role has yet to be fully clarified [60].
  • Management of frozen shoulder stage II to III using hydrodistension and a guided exercise programme by physiotherapists in primary care is an effective non-operative treatment strategy [66].
  • Recurrence of frozen shoulder after hydrodilatation was more common in primary (33%) versus secondary (16%) frozen shoulder [34].
  • A central nervous system-focused treatment approach is being evaluated in a randomized clinical trial to compare effectiveness against standard medical and physical therapy care [42].
  • The comparative effectiveness of low-level laser therapy versus muscle energy technique is being evaluated in a randomized controlled trial to determine the optimal treatment approach for frozen shoulder related to diabetes [47].

Operative and Procedural Management

  • Secondary frozen shoulder may be more recalcitrant to conventional conservative treatment [64].
  • The study on arthroscopic capsular release timing adds information for shared decision-making but should not be a plea for surgery for patients with a mean duration of symptoms of 4 months; a strict definition of recalcitrant idiopathic frozen shoulder is needed to prevent unnecessary interventions [10].
  • The arthroscopic 360° release is an effective and safe treatment modality for severe or recalcitrant frozen shoulder [53].
  • A combination of limited capsular release and manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) for primary frozen shoulder is a safe and effective procedure resulting in marked improvement in pain, function, and range of motion [55].
  • The mid-term outcomes of transcatheter arterial micro embolization (TAME) for frozen shoulders resistant to conservative treatments are encouraging and warrant further evaluation [50].
  • Manipulation under anesthesia versus physiotherapy treatment in stage two of a frozen shoulder is being evaluated in a randomized controlled trial to provide evidence on the best treatment strategy [51].
  • Different treatment strategies for frozen shoulder may be appropriate depending on the location of pathology [9].

Complications

  • Frozen shoulder is a painful and debilitating condition [6].
  • Frozen shoulder causes significant morbidity [21].
  • The natural history of primary frozen shoulder consists of three phases: pain, stiffness, and thawing [3].
  • Primary frozen shoulder usually resolves spontaneously after about 18 months [4].
  • Without treatment, motion return in primary frozen shoulder is gradual and may never objectively return to normal [3].
  • In the long term, 41% of patients with frozen shoulder report some ongoing symptoms [30].
  • Postoperative frozen shoulder is a serious complication after shoulder surgery with an incidence of 11% [54].
  • Preoperative frozen shoulder negatively affects functional outcomes, including range of motion, at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair [33].
  • Preoperative frozen shoulder positively affects rotator cuff healing [33].
  • Patients with diabetes should be monitored more closely for frozen shoulder, as they may experience persistent pain or lack of function long-term [8].
  • An age between 46 and 60 years is a statistically significant risk factor for developing frozen shoulder after simple arthroscopic shoulder procedures [29].
  • A previous history of contralateral frozen shoulder is a statistically significant risk factor for developing frozen shoulder after simple arthroscopic shoulder procedures [29].
  • Most patients clinically diagnosed with primary frozen shoulder have undiagnosed systemic abnormalities and/or intra-articular pathologies [5].
  • Recurrence of frozen shoulder after manipulation under anaesthetic (MUA) can occur, but late recurrence is uncommon [22].
  • Patients with poor outcomes or recurrent symptoms after MUA can be offered a further MUA with an expectation of good outcome and low complication rate [17].

Recovery

  • Phase I (Pain) involves a gradual onset of diffuse shoulder pain that is progressive over weeks to months [3].
  • Pain in Phase I is usually worse at night and exacerbated by lying on the affected side [3].
  • Phase II (Stiffness) usually lasts 4 to 12 months [3].
  • During Phase II, patients restrict movement to seek pain relief, leading to difficulty with activities of daily living such as reaching back pockets or fastening brassieres [3].
  • Phase II is accompanied by a dull ache present nearly all the time, especially at night, and sharp pain during range of motion at or near new endpoints [3].
  • Phase III (Thawing) lasts for weeks or months, during which motion increases and pain diminishes [3].
  • Without treatment, motion return in Phase III is gradual in most patients [3].
  • Objective motion may never return to normal, although most patients subjectively feel near normal due to compensation or adjustment in activities of daily living [3].
  • Frozen shoulder affects approximately 4% of the general population and up to 59% in patients with diabetes mellitus [24].
  • In the long term, 59% of patients with frozen shoulder have normal or near normal shoulders [30].
  • 94% of patients with spontaneous frozen shoulder recover to normal levels of function and motion without treatment [69].
  • Idiopathic frozen shoulder is a self-limiting condition in which symptoms subside and full shoulder movement returns within a maximum of two years from the onset of symptoms [88].
  • Long-term outcome after manipulation under anaesthetic (MUA) for frozen shoulder is favourable with late recurrence being uncommon [22].
  • Patients with poor outcome or recurrent symptoms after MUA should be offered a further MUA with the expectation of a good outcome and a low complication rate [17].
  • Arthroscopic capsular release leads to a faster and long-lasting recovery in patients with refractory primary frozen shoulder syndrome [35].
  • The long-term results of arthroscopic capsular release in frozen shoulder were confirmed in 255 patients [36].
  • MUA in stage 2 frozen shoulder results in a faster recovery of range of motion and improved functional outcome compared to physiotherapy alone in the short term [68].
  • MUA in stage 2 frozen shoulder can be considered safe compared to physiotherapy alone in the short term [68].
  • Early surgical intervention might shorten the overall duration of symptoms in frozen shoulder [19].
  • Early surgical intervention is not associated with inferior clinical outcomes when compared with late surgical intervention [19].
  • Timing has a significant influence on the outcome of manipulation for frozen shoulders [90].
  • Diabetes is a poor prognostic factor for the conservative treatment of frozen shoulder [82].
  • Male sex is a poor prognostic factor for the conservative treatment of frozen shoulder [82].
  • Simultaneous bilateral involvement is a poor prognostic factor for the conservative treatment of frozen shoulder [82].
  • Subsequent bilateral involvement is a poor prognostic factor for the conservative treatment of frozen shoulder [82].
  • A longer duration of symptoms recorded at the first visit is a poor prognostic factor for the conservative treatment of frozen shoulder [82].
  • Preoperative frozen shoulder negatively affected most functional outcomes, including range of motion, at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair [33].
  • Preoperative frozen shoulder positively affected rotator cuff healing after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair [33].

Key Evidence

  • [L4] A detailed clinical history and examination is critical in the assessment of a painful, stiff shoulder. [1] (10.1186/1477-7800-2-2)
  • [L1] This updated guideline provides evidence-based guidance for managing frozen shoulder and identifies key areas for future research. [2] (10.1177/17585732251335955)
  • [L4] Most patients clinically diagnosed with primary frozen shoulder had undiagnosed systemic abnormalities and/or intra-articular pathologies. [5] (10.5397/cise.2018.21.2.82)
  • [Paper] Frozen shoulder is a specific, painful and debilitating condition effecting patients mainly in middle age. [6] (10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.02.009)
  • [L4] MR findings in frozen shoulder should not replace clinical judgments regarding further prognosis and treatment decisions. [7] (10.1007/s00167-015-3887-y)
  • [L2] If high-quality studies can confirm the findings of this review, then clinicians should monitor frozen shoulder patients with diabetes more closely and offer further treatment if pain or lack of function persist long-term. [8] (10.1016/j.arrct.2021.100141)
  • [L5] Different treatment strategies for frozen shoulder may be appropriate, depending on the location. [9] (10.1016/j.jse.2018.03.010)
  • [L5] The study adds information for shared decision-making but should not be a plea for surgery for patients with a mean duration of symptoms of 4 months; a strict definition of recalcitrant idiopathic frozen shoulder is needed to prevent unnecessary interventions. [10] (10.1177/2325967120903710)
  • [L2] This is clinically relevant in diagnostically challenging cases, for instance in the first phase of frozen shoulder, which can be difficult to distinguish from subacromial impingement. [11] (10.1007/s00167-020-05937-2)
  • [L5] Frozen shoulder is a poorly understood condition that typically involves substantial pain, movement restriction, and considerable morbidity. [12] (10.1016/j.math.2014.07.006)
  • [L1] The variety of participants included/excluded in trials and the variety of methods, interventions and outcomes used across the trials provided limited new evidence to inform the non-surgical management and treatment of people with frozen shoulder. [14] (10.2340/16501977-2578)
  • [L4] The etiology of frozen shoulder is still not known and our understanding of the pathogenesis is limited. [15] (10.3109/03009749009096786)
  • [L4] Health professionals manage frozen shoulders differently for different phases of the condition. [16] (10.1111/j.1758-5740.2010.00073.x)
  • [L4] Patients with a poor outcome or recurrent symptoms of a frozen shoulder after a MUA should be offered a further MUA with the expectation of a good outcome and a low complication rate. [17] (10.1302/0301-620x.99b6.bjj-2016-1133.r1)
  • [L3] Early surgical intervention might shorten the overall duration of symptoms in frozen shoulder and is not associated with inferior clinical outcomes when compared with late surgical intervention. [19] (10.1016/j.jse.2020.07.023)
  • [L4] Frozen shoulder is a common disease which causes significant morbidity. [21] (10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.263)
  • [L3] Long-term outcome after MUA for frozen shoulder is favourable with late recurrence being uncommon. [22] (10.1177/17585732211070007)
  • [L5] Unusual stiffness and pain in the shoulder of a young female patients suggests a wide range of disease entities, from simple frozen shoulder to (albeit rarely) infection. [23] (10.1016/j.radcr.2020.08.006)
  • [L1] This systematic review presents a summary of what is currently known about the tissue pathophysiology of primary frozen shoulder. [25] (10.1186/s12891-016-1190-9)
  • [L4] Frozen shoulder is a painful and debilitating condition with considerable economic impact; treatment aims to improve pain and function through a shared decision-making process, with a step-up approach from conservative measures to invasive treatments if symptoms persist. [28] (10.1177/1758573215601779)
  • [L3] An age of between 46 and 60 years and a previous history of contralateral frozen shoulder were statistically significant risk factors. [29] (10.1302/0301-620x.97b7.35387)
  • [L3] In the long term, 59% of patients had normal or near normal shoulders and 41% reported some ongoing symptoms. [30] (10.1016/j.jse.2007.05.009)
  • [L4] Therefore, routine use of shoulder MRI scans in patients with FS but without suspicion of an additional pathology may not be indicated. [31] (10.1016/j.jseint.2022.05.009)
  • [L1] There is insufficient evidence to reliably recommend a treatment approach for frozen shoulder. [32] (10.1136/bmj.i4162)
  • [L3] Preoperative frozen shoulder positively affected rotator cuff healing but negatively affected most functional outcomes, including ROM, at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. [33] (10.1177/2325967120934449)
  • [L4] Further treatment was indicated in 41% of patients who could not tolerate more than 20 mL of injection, and recurrence was more common in primary (33%) versus secondary (16%) frozen shoulder. [34] (10.1177/17585732221124914)
  • [Paper] In patients with refractory primary frozen shoulder syndrome, arthroscopic capsular release emerges as a suitable option that leads to a faster and long-lasting recovery. [35] (10.1016/j.eats.2015.06.004)
  • [L4] The long-term results of arthroscopic capsular release in frozen shoulder were confirmed in 255 patients. [36] (10.1186/s13018-018-0758-5)
  • [L4] Imaging is an essential tool for evaluation of patients with shoulder pain; understanding the extent of an injury with imaging is key to successful management. [37] (10.1016/j.csm.2013.03.009)
  • [L4] However, classification of frozen shoulder was found to be controversial. [38] (10.4055/cios.2020.12.1.60)
  • [L4] Frozen shoulder following COVID-19 vaccination may present with clinical features similar to those of idiopathic frozen shoulder. [39] (10.1016/j.xrrt.2023.09.013)
  • [L2] Misdiagnosing shoulder tumors as frozen shoulder syndrome is likely to cause a significant delay in making a correct diagnosis. [40] (10.1016/j.jse.2009.05.010)
  • [L4] Frozen shoulder can occur after COVID-19 vaccination, and musculoskeletal specialists should be aware of this diagnosis to identify and treat such patients early. [41] (10.1016/j.jseint.2022.02.013)
  • [Paper] The trial aims to compare the effectiveness of a CNS-directed treatment program versus standard medical and physical therapy care on outcomes in participants with frozen shoulder. [42] (10.1186/s13063-019-3585-z)
  • [L4] The survey shows lower rates of agreement among the JSS members than the ASES members for the definition of primary frozen shoulder, the classification of primary and secondary frozen shoulder, and the divisions of secondary frozen shoulder. [43] (10.1016/j.jos.2018.12.012)
  • [L4] Symptomatic subjects demonstrated substantial kinematic deficits during humeral range of motion. [44] (10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00359-9)
  • [L3] Conservative treatment is effective for the treatment of frozen shoulder. [45] (10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101149)
  • [Commentary] Multisite corticosteroid injection therapy is more effective in terms of pain relief, restoration of motion, and functional status than single intra-articular injection for the treatment of primary frozen shoulder. [46] (10.1016/j.arthro.2021.02.028)
  • [L2] The findings of the study may provide evidence on the efficacy of these interventions and most likely, the optimal treatment approach for frozen shoulder related to diabetes, which may guide clinical practice. [47] (10.1186/s13018-024-04735-7)
  • [L1] Intra-articular steroid injection is effective and safe for frozen shoulder, relieving pain, improving functional performance, and increasing range of motion. [48] (10.1177/0363546516669944)
  • [L1] Both treatments were effective in patients with primary frozen shoulder. [49] (10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.069)
  • [Abstract] The mid-term outcomes of TAME for frozen shoulders that were resistant to conservative treatments are encouraging and warrant further evaluation. [50] (10.1016/j.jse.2016.11.031)
  • [L2] Successful completion of this trial will provide evidence on the best treatment strategy for patients with a stage two frozen shoulder. [51] (10.1186/s12891-017-1763-2)
  • [L1] In patients with frozen shoulder, US-guided administration of corticosteroid injections into the glenohumeral joint increased the likelihood of successful injection but did not improve clinical outcomes at 12 weeks compared with blind administration. [52] (10.2106/jbjs.21.01007)
  • [L4] The arthroscopic 360° release is an effective and safe treatment modality for severe or recalcitrant frozen shoulder. [53] (10.1016/j.jseint.2024.07.006)
  • [L2] Postoperative frozen shoulder is a serious complication after shoulder surgery, with an incidence of 11%. [54] (10.1007/s00402-016-2589-3)
  • [L4] A combination of limited capsular release and MUA for the treatment of primary frozen shoulder is a safe and effective procedure resulting in marked improvement in pain, function and range of motion. [55] (10.1177/1758573215578590)
  • [L4] Physicians should re-examine frozen shoulder patients with repeated plain radiographs and further imaging, especially MRI, if conservative therapy fails. [56] (10.1016/j.jse.2011.07.026)
  • [L4] This survey summarized the trend in prevalent practices regarding frozen shoulder among shoulder specialists and senior shoulder surgeons of SESI, revealing strong consensus on imaging and nonoperative management but disagreement on terminology and specific surgical complications. [57] (10.1177/23259671221118834)
  • [L4] MR arthrography reveals characteristic findings in patients with frozen shoulder. [58] (10.1148/radiol.2332031219)
  • [L3] The anatomical structure of passive shoulder restraints has no impact on the difference in passive joint position sense values between external and internal rotation. [59] (10.1186/s12891-016-0971-5)
  • [L5] Hydrodilatation has emerged as a potential nonsurgical option in the management of frozen shoulder, but its role has yet to be fully clarified. [60] (10.1302/2058-5241.2.160061)
  • [L5] This scoping review outlines the complexity of the pathophysiology of frozen shoulder and provides a comprehensive overview of pathophysiologic mechanisms. [62] (10.1186/s40634-020-00307-w)
  • [L4] Secondary frozen shoulder may be more recalcitrant to conventional conservative treatment. [64] (10.1016/j.jor.2015.01.030)
  • [L4] This service evaluation demonstrates that management of frozen shoulder stage II to III, as conducted by physiotherapists in a primary care setting utilizing hydrodistension and a guided exercise programme, represents an effective non-operative treatment strategy. [66] (10.1177/1758573217701063)
  • [L1] MUA in stage 2 frozen shoulder can be considered safe and results in a faster recovery of range of motion and improved functional outcome compared to physiotherapy alone in the short term. [68] (10.1016/j.jseint.2023.11.004)
  • [L4] We found 94% of patients with spontaneous frozen shoulder recovered to normal levels of function and motion without treatment. [69] (10.1007/s11999-011-2176-4)
  • [L5] MUA and ACR are good treatment options for primary frozen shoulder; MUA is simpler but carries risks of serious complications, while ACR may be safer if performed by experienced surgeons and is convenient for patients with combined rotator cuff tears. [70] (10.5397/cise.2020.00311)
  • [L5] T2 signal hyperintensity and axillary capsule thickening are characteristic of the early stages of frozen shoulder, although MRI alone cannot completely define the disease stage. [71] (10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.05.002)
  • [L5] This technique is presented for the nonsurgical treatment of frozen shoulder, emphasizing correct injection sites. [72] (10.1016/j.eats.2022.06.020)
  • [L4] The burning sign is an abnormal finding that appears in dynamic MRI of severe frozen shoulder. [73] (10.1016/j.jse.2016.06.003)
  • [L2] There is limited evidence of the effectiveness of different forms of treatment used for frozen shoulder, with many studies evaluating treatment effects carrying a moderate to high risk of bias and omitting details of the duration of symptoms or the phase of the condition. [74] (10.1111/j.1758-5740.2010.00067.x)
  • [L5] Pathomechanics of the frozen shoulder characterised by glenohumeral motion limitations should be considered complicated, as confirmed by high tension in the anteroinferior glenohumeral capsule and altered scapular motion. [75] (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.04.003)
  • [L4] Dynamic MRI semiquantitatively demonstrated a reduction in abnormal blood flow and improvement in clinical results after MUC in patients with frozen shoulder. [77] (10.1016/j.jseint.2021.12.007)
  • [L4] Patients with frozen shoulder presented with altered shoulder muscle activity and kinematics, and one-session of heat and manual muscle release showed beneficial effects on shoulder muscle performance, kinematics, mobility, and pain. [78] (10.1186/s12891-017-1867-8)
  • [L3] The thickness of the inferior glenohumeral joint capsule in the 80° scapular plane elevated arm position was shown to be a highly reliable and valid method. [79] (10.1016/j.jseint.2024.06.004)
  • [L4] SHR of the affected shoulder is inversely related to severity of limitation of shoulder range of motion, which suggests a compensatory pattern. [80] (10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.09.004)
  • [L4] Clinical improvement in patients with frozen shoulder was associated with a decrease in the coefficient of enhancement (CE) in the glenohumeral synovium. [81] (10.1007/s00776-004-0766-7)
  • [L2] Diabetes, male sex, simultaneous bilateral involvement, subsequent bilateral involvement, and a longer duration of symptoms recorded at the first visit were identified as poor prognostic factors for the conservative treatment of frozen shoulder. [82] (10.1016/j.jos.2019.03.011)
  • [L2] Our MR analysis suggests that there may be a causal relationship between hypothyroidism and frozen shoulder. [85] (10.1186/s12891-024-07826-y)
  • [L1] Patients who underwent image-guided (ultrasound) injections had statistically significant greater improvement in shoulder pain and function at 6 weeks after injection compared to blind injections. [86] (10.1186/1471-2474-12-137)
  • [L4] MR imaging of patients with severe frozen shoulder after MUC showed 29 capsule tears, 4 labrum tears, and 15 bone bruises of the humeral head. [87] (10.1016/j.jse.2015.06.019)
  • [L4] In the great majority of patients idiopathic frozen shoulder is a self-limiting condition, in which symptoms subside and full shoulder movement returns within a maximum of two years from the onset of symptoms. [88] (10.2106/00004623-197860040-00030)
  • [L4] In the great majority of patients idiopathic frozen shoulder is a self-limiting condition, in which symptoms subside and full shoulder movement returns within a maximum of two years from the onset of symptoms. [89] (10.2106/00004623-197860040-00029)
  • [L4] Timing has a significant influence on the outcome of manipulation for frozen shoulders. [90] (10.1016/j.jos.2020.11.002)

References

[1] Lessons learnt from the painful shoulder; a case series of malignant shoulder girdle tumours misdiagnosed as frozen shoulder. International Seminars in Surgical Oncology. 2005. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7800-2-2

[2] British Elbow and Shoulder Society patient care pathway: Frozen shoulder. Shoulder & Elbow. 2025. DOI: 10.1177/17585732251335955

[3] Campbell S Operative Orthopaedics 4 Volume Set. ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION WITH BONE-PATELLAR TENDON-BONE GRAFT > PRIMARY FROZEN SHOULDER.

[4] Apley And Solomon S Concise System Of Orthopaedics And Trauma. ADHESIVE CAPSULITIS (FROZEN SHOULDER).

[5] Is the Frozen Shoulder Classification a Reliable Assessment?. Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow. 2018. DOI: 10.5397/cise.2018.21.2.82

[6] Frozen shoulder – A stiff problem that requires a flexible approach. Maturitas. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.02.009

[7] Correlations of magnetic resonance imaging findings with clinical symptom severity and prognosis of frozen shoulder. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3887-y

[8] Diabetes as a Prognostic Factor in Frozen Shoulder: A Systematic Review. Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2021.100141

[9] Comparative proteome analysis of the capsule from patients with frozen shoulder. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.03.010

[10] What Is the Right Timing for Arthroscopic Capsular Release of a Frozen Shoulder? Letter to the Editor. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2020. DOI: 10.1177/2325967120903710

[11] The role of 18F‐FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of frozen shoulder. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-05937-2

[12] Frozen shoulder contracture syndrome – Aetiology, diagnosis and management. Manual Therapy. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2014.07.006

[14] Clinical effectiveness of non-surgical interventions for primary frozen shoulder: A systematic review. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2019. DOI: 10.2340/16501977-2578

[15] Frozen Shoulder: Current Concepts. Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology. 1990. DOI: 10.3109/03009749009096786

[16] Managing Idiopathic Frozen Shoulder: A Survey of Health Professionals' Current Practice and Research Priorities. Shoulder & Elbow. 2010. DOI: 10.1111/j.1758-5740.2010.00073.x

[17] Recurrence of frozen shoulder after manipulation under anaesthetic (MUA). The Bone & Joint Journal. 2017. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.99b6.bjj-2016-1133.r1

[19] Does the timing of surgical intervention impact the clinical outcomes and overall duration of symptoms in frozen shoulder?. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.07.023

[20] Classifications And Scores Of The Shoulder. Classifications of frozen shoulder.

[21] Frozen shoulder: A systematic review of therapeutic options. World Journal of Orthopedics. 2015. DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.263

[22] Long-Term Outcomes Following Manipulation Under Anaesthetic for Patients with Primary and Secondary Frozen Shoulder. Shoulder & Elbow. 2021. DOI: 10.1177/17585732211070007

[23] Subscapularis pyomyositis presenting as shoulder stiffness mistaken as frozen shoulder in young female: a case report. Radiology Case Reports. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2020.08.006

[24] Frozen Shoulder. 2024.

[25] The pathophysiology associated with primary (idiopathic) frozen shoulder: A systematic review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2016. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-016-1190-9

[28] Frozen Shoulder. Shoulder & Elbow. 2015. DOI: 10.1177/1758573215601779

[29] Frozen shoulder after simple arthroscopic shoulder procedures. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2015. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.97b7.35387

[30] Long-term outcome of frozen shoulder. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.05.009

[31] Is routine magnetic resonance imaging necessary in patients with clinically diagnosed frozen shoulder? Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in frozen shoulder. JSES International. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.05.009

[32] What is the most effective treatment for frozen shoulder?. BMJ. 2016. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i4162

[33] Effect of Preoperative Frozen Shoulder on Clinical Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2020. DOI: 10.1177/2325967120934449

[34] Recurrence of the frozen shoulder after hydrodilatation, what is the true incidence?. Shoulder & Elbow. 2022. DOI: 10.1177/17585732221124914

[35] Primary Frozen Shoulder Syndrome: Arthroscopic Capsular Release. Arthroscopy Techniques. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2015.06.004

[36] Clinical outcome of arthroscopic capsular release for frozen shoulder: essential technical points in 255 patients. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2018. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-018-0758-5

[37] Imaging of the Shoulder with Arthroscopic Correlation. Clinics in Sports Medicine. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.csm.2013.03.009

[38] Definition, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis of Frozen Shoulder: A Consensus Survey of Shoulder Specialists. Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.4055/cios.2020.12.1.60

[39] Frozen shoulder after COVID-19 vaccination versus idiopathic frozen shoulder: similar clinical features and functional improvement at 1-year follow-up. JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2023.09.013

[40] Tumors masked as frozen shoulders: A retrospective analysis. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.05.010

[41] Frozen shoulder after COVID-19 vaccination. JSES International. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.02.013

[42] A central nervous system-focused treatment approach for people with frozen shoulder: protocol for a randomized clinical trial. Trials. 2019. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3585-z

[43] Representative survey of frozen shoulder questionnaire responses from the Japan Shoulder Society: What are the appropriate diagnostic terms for primary idiopathic frozen shoulder, stiff shoulder or frozen shoulder?. Journal of Orthopaedic Science. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2018.12.012

[44] Shoulder kinematics in subjects with frozen shoulder11No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2003. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00359-9

[45] Conservative Treatment for Frozen Shoulder Is Effective Regardless of the Severity of Symptoms. Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101149

[46] Editorial Commentary: Corticosteroid Injections and Physical Therapy Are Effective First-Line Treatments for Frozen Shoulder. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.02.028

[47] Comparative effectiveness of low-level laser therapy versus muscle energy technique among diabetic patients with frozen shoulder: a study protocol for a parallel group randomised controlled trial. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2024. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04735-7

[48] Intra-articular Steroid Injection for Frozen Shoulder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials With Trial Sequential Analysis. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2016. DOI: 10.1177/0363546516669944

[49] A Multisite Injection Is More Effective Than a Single Glenohumeral Injection of Corticosteroid in the Treatment of Primary Frozen Shoulder: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.069

[50] Mid-term outcomes of prospective clinical trial of transcatheter arterial micro embolization (TAME) for resistant frozen shoulder. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.11.031

[51] Manipulation under anesthesia versus physiotherapy treatment in stage two of a frozen shoulder: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2017. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1763-2

[52] In Frozen Shoulder, US-Guided Versus Blind Administration of Intra-Articular Corticosteroid Injections Increased Accuracy of Injections but Did Not Improve Clinical Outcomes at 12 Weeks. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2021. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.21.01007

[53] The clinical course and outcomes following arthroscopic frozen shoulder 360° release. JSES International. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.07.006

[54] Incidence and prognostic factors for postoperative frozen shoulder after shoulder surgery: a prospective cohort study. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-016-2589-3

[55] Limited capsular release and controlled manipulation under anaesthesia for the treatment of frozen shoulder. Shoulder & Elbow. 2015. DOI: 10.1177/1758573215578590

[56] Glenohumeral joint tuberculosis that mimics frozen shoulder: a retrospective analysis. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.07.026

[57] Trends in Practice Among Shoulder Specialists in the Management of Frozen Shoulder: A Consensus Survey. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2022. DOI: 10.1177/23259671221118834

[58] Frozen Shoulder: MR Arthrographic Findings. Radiology. 2004. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2332031219

[59] Shoulder proprioception – lessons we learned from idiopathic frozen shoulder. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2016. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-016-0971-5

[60] Indications for hydrodilatation for frozen shoulder. EFORT Open Reviews. 2017. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.160061

[61] Rockwood And Matsen S The Shoulder. Arthroscopic Management of Prearthritic and Arthritic Conditions of the Shoulder and the Postarthroplasty Shoulder > Secondary Frozen Shoulder.

[62] The puzzling pathophysiology of frozen shoulders – a scoping review. Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics. 2020. DOI: 10.1186/s40634-020-00307-w

[64] The management of secondary frozen shoulder after anterior shoulder dislocation – The results of manipulation under anaesthesia and injection. Journal of Orthopaedics. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2015.01.030

[66] The effectiveness of ultrasound guided hydrodistension and physiotherapy in the treatment of frozen shoulder/adhesive capsulitis in primary care: a single centre service evaluation. Shoulder & Elbow. 2017. DOI: 10.1177/1758573217701063

[68] Improved range of motion after manipulation under anesthesia versus physiotherapy for stage two frozen shoulder: a randomized controlled trial. JSES International. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.11.004

[69] The Natural History of Idiopathic Frozen Shoulder: A 2- to 27-year Followup Study. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 2012. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-2176-4

[70] Arthroscopic capsular release versus manipulation under anesthesia for primary frozen shoulder. Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow. 2020. DOI: 10.5397/cise.2020.00311

[71] Can magnetic resonance imaging distinguish clinical stages of frozen shoulder? A state-of-the-art review. JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.05.002

[72] Ultrasound Guıded Multisıte Injectıon Technıque in the Treatment of Frozen Shoulder. Arthroscopy Techniques. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2022.06.020

[73] Characteristics of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of idiopathic severe frozen shoulder. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.06.003

[74] An Overview of Factors Relevant to Undertaking Research and Reviews on the Effectiveness of Treatment for Frozen Shoulder. Shoulder & Elbow. 2010. DOI: 10.1111/j.1758-5740.2010.00067.x

[75] Pathomechanics of glenohumeral capsule and scapula in idiopathic frozen shoulder: a study using a three-dimensional finite element model. JSES International. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.04.003

[77] Reduction of abnormal blood flow in frozen shoulder after shoulder manipulation under ultrasound-guided cervical nerve root block: semiquantitative analysis using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. JSES International. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.12.007

[78] The immediate effect of muscle release intervention on muscle activity and shoulder kinematics in patients with frozen shoulder: a cross-sectional, exploratory study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2017. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1867-8

[79] Inferior glenohumeral joint capsule thickness in frozen shoulder via ultrasonography. JSES International. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.06.004

[80] Three-dimensional scapular kinematics and scapulohumeral rhythm in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis or frozen shoulder. Journal of Biomechanics. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.09.004

[81] Synovial response to intraarticular injections of hyaluronate in frozen shoulder: a quantitative assessment with dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Orthopaedic Science. 2004. DOI: 10.1007/s00776-004-0766-7

[82] Is frozen shoulder completely resolved at 2 years after the onset of disease?. Journal of Orthopaedic Science. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2019.03.011

[85] Causal associations of hypothyroidism with frozen shoulder: a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2024. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07826-y

[86] Image-guided versus blind corticosteroid injections in adults with shoulder pain: A systematic review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2011. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-137

[87] Magnetic resonance imaging and short-term clinical results of severe frozen shoulder treated with manipulation under ultrasound-guided cervical nerve root block. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.06.019

[88] Brief Note The Natural History of 'Idiopathic' Frozen Shoulder. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1978. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-197860040-00030

[89] The natural history of 'idiopathic' frozen shoulder.. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1978. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-197860040-00029

[90] Does the timing of shoulder manipulation under ultrasound-guided cervical nerve root block for frozen shoulder affect the clinical outcome?. Journal of Orthopaedic Science. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2020.11.002