Frozen Shoulder Impormasyon In-depth

Ang pahinang ito ay isinalin ng makina at hindi pa nasusuri ng isang doktor. Ang bersyong Ingles ang siyang opisyal.

Ang iyong nararamdaman

Ang frozen shoulder ay karaniwang nagsisimula bilang isang malalim at mapurol na kirot na lumalala sa loob ng ilang linggo sa halip na lumitaw nang magdamag. Para sa karamihan ng mga tao, ang sakit ang pinakamahirap na bahagi sa simula, at madalas itong pinakamalala sa gabi. Nagiging imposible ang paghiga sa panig na iyon, at ang putol-putol na pagtulog ay isa sa mga pinaka-nakakapagod na bahagi ng buong kondisyon.

Pagkatapos ay magsisimulang tumigas ang balikat. Aabutin mo ang seatbelt, o itataas ang kamay sa isang mataas na istante, o aabutin ang bulsa sa likod, at bigla na lamang hihinto ang braso. Ang nagpapaiba sa frozen shoulder mula sa karamihan ng mga problema sa balikat ay ang paninigas ay hindi lamang dahil sa pag-iingat mo laban sa sakit — ang balikat ay talagang hindi gagalaw, kahit na may ibang tao pang mag-angat ng iyong braso para sa iyo. Ang pagkawala ng kakayahang iikot ang iyong kamay palabas, gaya ng pagbubukas ng pinto o pagsuot ng braso sa manggas, ang pinaka-karakteristikong palatandaan sa lahat.

Karamihan sa mga tao ay nasa pagitan ng humigit-kumulang 40 at 60 taong gulang. Ang ilan ay nakakaalala ng isang maliit na pagkaka-untog bago ito mangyari; marami ang walang paliwanag kung bakit. Mas karaniwan ito kung ikaw ay may diabetes o kondisyon sa thyroid, at kung nagkaroon ka nito sa isang balikat, may katamtamang pagkakataon na susunod ang isa pa kalaunan.

Ano ang aktwal na nangyayari

Ang iyong shoulder joint ay nakapaloob sa isang sleeve ng matigas na tissue na tinatawag na capsule. Karaniwan, ang sleeve na ito ay maluwag at nababanat, na siyang nagpapahintulot sa balikat na gumalaw nang higit pa kaysa sa anumang joint sa katawan. Sa frozen shoulder, ang capsule ay nagiging inflamed at pagkatapos ay kumakapal at nag-co-contract, kaya ang sleeve ay lumiliit. Ang espasyo sa loob ng joint ay maaaring humantong sa pagiging mas mababa sa kalahati ng normal nitong laki.

Sa kabila ng lumang pangalan na "adhesive capsulitis", walang anumang bagay na aktwal na nakadikit sa loob ng joint. Walang mga glue-like adhesions. Ang tissue ay humigpit, na ay isang tunay na magkaibang problema, at ito ang dahilan kung bakit ang ilang mga surgeon ay nangangatwiran na ang kondisyon ay dapat tawaging contracture lamang — isang paghigpit — ng balikat.

Kung bakit ito nagsisimula ay hindi pa rin wastong nauunawaan, at tapat na sabihing ganoon nga. Mayroong mabuting ebidensya na hindi ito purong lokal na problema sa balikat. Ang mga pag-aaral sa inherited risk ay nagpapakita na ang type 1 diabetes ay tunay na nagiging sanhi ng frozen shoulder sa halip na naiuugnay lamang dito, at ang koneksyon ay dumadaan sa blood sugar sa halip na sa timbang o mechanical load. Ang mga pagbabago sa tissue ay mukhang kapansin-pansing katulad ng Dupuytren's disease sa kamay, kung kaya't ang dalawa ay madalas na lumalabas sa iisang tao.

Pagiging tapat tungkol sa kung gaano ito katagal

Malamang na mababasa mo na ang frozen shoulder ay self-limiting at ganap na gumagaling sa loob ng humigit-kumulang labing-walong buwan hanggang dalawang taon. Gusto naming maging tapat sa iyo: ang katiyakang iyon ay mas kampante kaysa sa sinusuportahan ng ebidensya.

Ang ideya na ang kondisyon ay maayos na dumadaan sa tatlong yugto — freezing, frozen, pagkatapos ay thawing — ay nagmula sa isang maliit na pag-aaral na nailathala noong 1975, kung saan ang mga braso ng mga pasyente ay pinanatili sa mga sling nang hanggang siyam na buwan. Hindi nakakagulat na ang mga balikat na ginamot sa ganoong paraan ay naging matigas at pagkatapos ay lumuwag muli nang pinayagan na ang paggalaw. Nang bumalik ang mga mananaliksik at sinuri ang lahat ng available na pag-aaral, wala silang nahanap na mabuting ebidensya na ang mga hindi ginamot na balikat ay maaasahang dumadaan sa mga yugtong iyon at nagiging normal sa huli. Sa katunayan, wala pang pag-aaral na nagpakita ng mga taong nakabalik sa isang nasukat at tunay na normal na range of movement nang walang gamutan.

Ang ipinapakita ng ebidensya ay mas kapaki-pakinabang, at ito ay: karamihan sa pagbuting makukuha mo ay may tendensiyang mangyari nang maaga, at pagkatapos ay babagal ang pag-unlad at magle-level off. Ang plateau na iyon ay maaaring permanente. Depende sa kung aling pag-aaral ang iyong babasahin, sa pagitan ng isang katlo at kalahati ng mga tao ay mayroon pa ring ilang kirot o paninigas pagkalipas ng ilang taon, bagaman para sa karamihan sa kanila ito ay mild at hindi sila pinipigilan sa paggawa ng gusto nilang gawin.

Hindi ibig sabihin ng lahat ng ito na hindi ka gagaling. Karamihan sa mga tao ay bumubuti nang malaki. Ang ibig sabihin nito ay ang "maghintay lang, maaayos din ito nang kusa" ay hindi isang neutral na payo, at mayroong makatwirang dahilan para gamutin ang sakit nang aktibo sa halip na tiisin lamang ito.

Ano ang maaari naming gawin tungkol dito

Sa Mater Private Hospital Rockhampton, tatalakayin sa iyo ni Dr Kieran Hirpara ang mga opsyon base sa kung ano ang mas nakakaabala sa iyo — ang sakit o ang paninigas — sa halip na subukang i-classify ka sa isang numbered stage.

Ang steroid injection sa joint ay ang pinaka-supported na treatment para sa painful phase. Sa isang napakalaking body of research, ito ang iisang treatment na maaasahang nagbibigay ng pagkakaiba sa sakit at function na talagang napapansin ng mga pasyente, at gumagana ito sa loob ng unang ilang linggo. Ang tapat na limitasyon nito ay nawawala ang bentahe nito pagkalipas ng humigit-kumulang tatlong buwan. Nagbibigay ito sa iyo ng ginhawa, tulog, at kakayahang gamitin ang balikat — hindi nito pinapagaling ang paninigas (tightness).

Ang mga ehersisyo at physiotherapy ay sulit gawin, na may makatotohanang ekspektasyon. Ang isang simpleng home exercise programme ay may nasusukat na halaga. Ang maaaring ikagulat mo ay kaunti lamang ang pagkakaibang dulot ng kung gaano ka kapuwersa: isang trial na naghambing ng firm, end-of-range stretching laban sa gentle, pain-free movement ay nakakita lamang ng maliliit na pagkakaiba, na bahagyang pumapabor sa mas firm na approach para sa ilang paggalaw, at isang iba pang pag-aaral ay nakitang mas bumuti ang mga taong nag-ehersisyo nang banayad sa loob ng kanilang pain limits — at, nakakapanatag, walang ebidensya na ang pagpuwersa nang higit ay nagdudulot ng pinsala. Kaya gumalaw base sa kung ano ang kaya mong itolerate. Ang pagtitiis sa matinding sakit ay hindi napatunayang nagpapabilis sa anuman.

Hydrodilatation, kung saan itinuturok ang fluid upang i-stretch ang capsule mula sa loob, ay malawakang ginagamit at low-risk. Ang research tungkol dito ay talagang mixed: isang review ang nakakita lamang ng maliliit na epekto sa sakit at sa paggalaw, at ang iba ay nakakita ng maagang pagbuti sa ilang paggalaw kumpara sa steroid injection lamang, na hindi nagtagal. Ito ay isang makatwirang opsyon, ngunit hindi namin ito o-oversell.

Manipulation under anaesthetic ay nangangahulugang paggalaw ng balikat sa buong range nito habang ikaw ay tulog, upang i-stretch ang tight capsule. Sa pinakamalaking trial na naghahambing sa mga pangunahing treatment, ito ang lumabas na best value option sa pangkalahatan.

Keyhole capsular release ay kinapapalooban ng surgical na paghahati ng tight capsule sa ilalim ng direct vision, sa halip na i-stretch ito hanggang sa mapunit. Ang pangunahing bentahe nito ay madalas itong pinakamatagal ang epekto (most durable): sa mga nailathalang surgical series, ang recurrent stiffness pagkatapos ng release ay hindi karaniwan, samantalang pagkatapos ng manipulation, isang makabuluhang proporsyon ng mga balikat ang muling naninigas at nangangailangan ng pangalawang procedure. Sa malaking UK trial, ang mga taong sumailalim sa release ang may pinakamababang posibilidad sa tatlong grupo na mangailangan ng anumang karagdagang treatment. Dahil ito ay isang operasyon, may dala itong kaunting mas mataas na risk kaysa sa mga alternatibo at mas mahal, at dapat mong asahan na mas masakit ang pakiramdam sa unang ilang linggo kaysa sa isang taong sumailalim sa manipulation — ang maagang pagkakaibang iyon ay nagiging pantay na pagkalipas ng humigit-kumulang anim na buwan.

Mahalagang malaman: sa trial na iyon, ang tatlong approach ay nagtapos na may ilang puntos lamang na pagkakaiba sa isa't isa pagkalipas ng isang taon. Ito ay tunay na mabuting balita, dahil nangangahulugan ito na ang desisyon ay maaaring gawin base sa kung ano ang angkop para sa iyo, sa iyong iba pang kondisyong pangkalusugan at sa iyong mga sitwasyon, sa halip na sa isang opsyon na malinaw na mas mabuti.

Kung paano ito karaniwang sinusunod ni Dr Hirpara. Hindi ka sasabihan na tiisin ito sa loob ng isang fixed na bilang ng mga buwan bago may maialok na anuman. Sa praktika, karaniwan niyang imumungkahi muna ang steroid injection, dahil para sa maraming tao, sapat na nitong inaalis ang sakit upang makapagpatuloy sa buhay habang kumakalma ang balikat. Kung ang injection ay hindi nagbigay sa iyo ng sapat na relief, handa siyang mag-alok ng capsular release mula sa puntong iyon — hindi niya hinihiling na magtiis ka muna sa loob ng siyam o labindalawang buwan. Dahil sa kung gaano kawala ang katiyakan ng reassurance na "kusang gumagaling ito," walang saysay ang paggugol ng isang taon sa sakit upang malaman kung saan patungo ang iyong kondisyon.

Ano ang dapat asahan

Kung ikaw ay sasailalim sa injection, asahan na mababawasan ang sakit sa loob ng unang isang o dalawang linggo. Gamitin ang panahong iyon upang panatilihing gumagalaw ang balikat.

Kung ikaw ay sasailalim sa manipulation o capsular release, karamihan sa range of motion na mababawi mo ay babalik nang mabilis — kadalasan sa loob ng unang apat hanggang anim na linggo — at sa pangkalahatan ay kakaunti na lamang ang pagbabago pagkatapos ng humigit-kumulang tatlong buwan. Mahalaga ang maagang paggalaw, at ang physiotherapy ay karaniwang nagsisimula sa loob ng isang o dalawang araw matapos ang procedure. Karamihan sa mga tao ay nakakabalik sa office-type na trabaho sa loob ng isa hanggang tatlong linggo.

Kung ikaw ay may diabetes, makatwirang asahan ang mas mabagal at bahagyang hindi gaanong kumpletong recovery kaysa sa average, at mahalagang malaman na ang steroid injection ay maaaring makagulo sa iyong blood sugar sa loob ng ilang araw. Sabihan kami kung nahihirapan ka sa iyong control, dahil binabago nito ang aming rekomendasyon.

Ang recovery ay sinusukat sa mga buwan, hindi linggo, anuman ang rutang iyong piliin. Ang pinakamahalagang bagay na maaari mong gawin ay ang patuloy na paggamit ng braso sa loob ng mga limitasyong komportable at panatilihing protektado ang iyong pagtulog.

Kailan dapat magpatingin

Magpatingin sa iyong GP kung ang sakit sa balikat ay gumigising sa iyo sa gabi o hindi humuhupa pagkatapos ng ilang linggong pahinga, at magtanong partikular tungkol sa frozen shoulder kung ang balikat ay nagiging tunay na mahirap galawin sa halip na masakit lamang.

Humingi ng pagsusuri ng espesyalista nang mas maaga kung hindi mo maikot ang iyong kamay palabas, kung ikaw ay may diabetes, kung ang balikat ay nakaaapekto sa iyong trabaho o pagmamaneho, o kung ang sakit ay sapat na upang mapigilan ang iyong pagtulog. Walang bentahe ang paghihintay nang matagal bago ipasuri ang sakit.

Humingi agad ng medikal na atensyon kung ang balikat ay nagiging mainit, mapula at namamagâ, kung nakararamdam ka ng panghihina o lagnat kasabay nito, kung may malaking panghihina o pamamanhid sa braso, o kung ang sakit ay nagsimula sa isang pagkahulog o pinsala. Ang mga katangiang ito ay nagpapahiwatig na hindi ito frozen shoulder at tungo sa isang bagay na kailangang masidhing masuri.

Mas malalim na pagtalakay

Ang seksyong ito ay humahakbang nang higit pa sa kailangan mo para sa iyong sariling mga desisyon sa paggamot. Narito ito dahil ang frozen shoulder ay isa sa mga kondisyon kung saan ang sinasabi sa mga pasyente at ang aktwal na ipinapakita ng pananaliksik ay nagkaroon ng pagkakaiba, at may ilang tao na mas gustong makita ang pangangatwiran kaysa hilinging tanggapin ito nang may tiwala lamang.

Ano ang aktwal na nangyayari sa kasukasuan

Ang capsule ay isang sleeve ng collagen sa paligid ng kasukasuan. Sa frozen shoulder, ito ay nagiging inflamed at pagkatapos ay fibrotic, ang mga cell na tinatawag na fibroblasts ay dumadami at naglalagay ng dense na bagong collagen, at ang ilan sa kanila ay nagiging myofibroblasts, na maaaring aktibong mag-contract. Iyon ang pangunahing pagkakaiba mula sa ordinaryong scarring: ang tissue ay hindi lamang kumakapal, ito ay humihigpit. Ang joint volume ay maaaring bumaba mula sa normal na 10–15 mL tungo sa 3–4 mL.

Ang parehong cell behaviour ay nangyayari sa Dupuytren's disease sa kamay, kung kaya't ang dalawang kondisyon ay lumilitaw sa iisang tao, at kung bakit may isang shoulder surgeon na nangangatwiran na ang kondisyon ay dapat simpleng pangalanang contracture ng balikat sa halip na "capsulitis" [1]. Sa kabila ng lumang pangalan na "adhesive capsulitis", ang mga surgeon na tumitingin sa loob ng kasukasuan ay walang nakikitang anumang adhesions.

Bakit ang kuwento ng "tatlong yugto" ay mas hindi matatag kaysa sa tunog nito

Mababasa mo kahit saan na ang frozen shoulder ay dumadaan sa mga phase na freezing, frozen, at thawing. Ang modelong iyon ay iminungkahi noong 1975. Nang balikan at sinuri ng mga mananaliksik kung saan ito nagmula, natuklasan nila na nagkapalit ang mga reference ng may-akda para sa dalawang magkaibang naunang papel, at, higit na mahalaga, ang mga pasyente niya ay pinanatiling nakasabit ang mga braso sa sling nang hanggang siyam na buwan. Ang balikat na hindi naigagalaw nang ganoon katagal ay tumitigas, at lumuluwag kapag hinayaan mo na itong gumalaw. Ang mga "yugto" ay maaaring bahagyang naglalarawan sa gamutan sa halip na sa sakit.

Isang systematic review na naglayong subukan ang modelo ay walang nahanap na ebidensya para rito, at natuklasan ang kabaligtaran ng hinihula nito: ang karamihan ng pagbuti ay nangyayari nang maaga at pagkatapos ay bumabagal, sa halip na humahantong sa isang huling thawing [2]. Hindi rin maaaring magkasundo nang may katiyakan ang mga clinician kung anong yugto ang kinalalagyan ng isang partikular na balikat; inamin sa print ng mga taong sumulat ng standard definition na ang mga data upang kumpirmahin ito ay "hindi available".

Ang istatistika ng paggaling, at kung bakit mayroon itong dalawang magkaibang sagot

Ang madalas na binabanggit na pigura ay 94% ng mga tao ang gumagaling nang walang gamutan. Nagmula ito sa isang tunay na pag-aaral, ngunit binibilang lamang nito ang mga pasyenteng hindi ginamot at bumalik para sa follow-up. Karamihan sa orihinal na grupo ay alinman sa pumili ng gamutan o huminto na. Kung bibilangin ang lahat, ang parehong data ay nagbibigay ng humigit-kumulang 26% [2]. Ang "gumaling" ay nangahulugan din na nasa loob ng 10 degrees ng kabilang balikat, at sa ilan sa mga pasyenteng iyon, ang kabilang balikat ay naging frozen din.

Sa pinakamalaking long-term follow-up, natuklasan na 41% ay mayroon pa ring mga sintomas pagkalipas ng average na apat na taon, at, ang bahaging mahalagang malaman, na ang pagbuti ay malaking bahaging humihinto pagkatapos ng humigit-kumulang tatlong taon sa halip na magpatuloy nang walang hanggan [4].

Ito ay isang kondisyon ng buong katawan, hindi lamang sa balikat

Isang malaking genetic study ang nakatuklas ng limang rehiyon ng DNA na nauugnay sa frozen shoulder at, gamit ang isang teknik na kayang maghiwalay ng sanhi mula sa pagkakataon, ipinakita na ang type 1 diabetes ay tunay na nagiging sanhi nito sa halip na kasabay lamang nito. Ang pagiging overweight ay hindi, kapag isinaalang-alang na ang diabetes, nawala ang ugnayan ng timbang. Nagpapahiwatig ito na ang blood sugar sa halip na mechanical load ang nagtutulak nito [5].

Ano ang aktwal na sinasabi ng ebidensya sa physiotherapy

Ito ang bahaging pinakamahalagang malaman kung ikaw ay sumasailalim, o nagbibigay, ng physiotherapy. Isang Cochrane review ang pinagsama-sama ang 32 trials at 1,836 katao [6]. Tatlong natuklasan ang namumukod-tangi.

Kumpara sa steroid injection, mas mababa ang resulta ng hands-on physiotherapy sa simula. Sa head-to-head trial, ang anim na linggo ng passive mobilisation at supervised exercise ay nagresulta sa 26 points na mas mababang pagbuti ng sakit at 25 points na mas mababang pagbuti ng function sa ikapitong linggo kaysa sa isang solong injection. Batay sa kung naramdaman ng mga tao na sila ay lubos na bumuti o gumaling, ito ay 46% para sa physiotherapy laban sa 77% para sa injection, humigit-kumulang isang karagdagang tao ang natulungan sa bawat apat na tinurukan sa halip. Sa loob ng anim hanggang labindalawang buwan, naglaho ang agwat at hindi na mahalaga ang pagkakaiba.

Tila kaunti lamang ang pagkakaibang dulot ng kung gaano kalakas ang pagtulak, gaano kadalas, at kung aling technique ang ginagamit. Isang 100-patient trial ang naghambing ng firm end-of-range mobilisation laban sa gentle pain-free mobilisation: bumuti ang dalawang grupo, at ang mas firm na technique ay statistically mas mahusay para sa ilang paggalaw (pag-angat ng braso sa gilid sa ikatlo at ikalabindalawang buwan, pag-ikot nito palabas sa ikalabindalawang buwan), ngunit itinuring ng mga may-akda na maliit ang mga pagkakaiba [18]. Isang non-randomised na pag-aaral ng 77 katao ang nakakita ng kabaligtaran: sa loob ng dalawang taon, 89% ng mga nag-ehersisyo nang banayad sa loob ng kanilang pain limits ay may normal o halos normal na shoulder score, laban sa 63% ng mga binigyan ng intensive stretching [19]. Isang 120-patient trial na nag-iba-iba ng frequency ng end-range mobilisation (higit sa dalawang beses kada linggo, lingguhan, mas mababa sa lingguhan) ay nakakita ng mga pagkakaiba sa abduction na mas mababa sa walong degrees, lahat ay statistically indistinguishable mula sa zero. Ang mga head-to-head comparison ng technique — anterior versus posterior glide, PNF versus conventional exercise, dumbbells versus bare-handed, ay halos lahat non-significant. Nakaka-assured na wala ring senyales na ang pagtatrabaho sa end range ay nagdudulot ng pinsala.

Ang pinakamalaking structural gap: wala pang trial na naghambing ng manual therapy plus exercise laban sa walang treatment kahit ano. Kaya habang masasabi nating ang physiotherapy ay hindi malinaw na mas mabuti kaysa sa injection, at ang mga detalye kung paano ito ibinibigay ay tila hindi gaanong nagpapabago, wala pang aktwal na nagpakita kung gaano kalaki ng pagbuti ang mangyayari pa rin kahit walang treatment.

Dalawang kapaki-pakinabang na caveat. Ang tanging tunay na high-quality trial sa review ay tumingin sa physiotherapy pagkatapos ng isang joint distension, at nakitang wala itong pagkakaiba sa sakit, function o kalidad ng buhay, ngunit pinabuti nito kung gaano karaming tao ang nag-rate sa kanilang sarili bilang recovered, at nagdagdag ng mga 13 degrees ng abduction sa ika-anim na linggo, na naglaho na sa ika-anim na buwan. At sa malaking UK trial, ang physiotherapy arm ay inilarawan bilang kasama ang hands-on stretching sa stiff range, ngunit ang sarili nitong mga record ay nagpapakita na ang manual mobilisation ay ginamit sa 11–27% lamang ng mga pasyente at supervised stretching sa iisang tao lamang. Ang aktwal na ibinigay, at gumana nang kasing-husay ng surgery sa loob ng isang taon, ay edukasyon, isang injection, gentle supervised movement at isang home programme.

Gaano katagal bago ito bumuti, at mahalaga ba ang uri ng release

Timing. Pagkatapos ng isang release, ang median na pasyente ay lumalagpas sa threshold na "ito ay isang tunay na pagbuti" sa loob ng humigit-kumulang isang buwan, at ang threshold na "katanggap-tanggap na sa akin ang aking balikat" sa loob ng humigit-kumulang apat na buwan [14]. Ang oras ng pagliban sa trabaho ay tumatakbo sa median na walong linggo, bagaman malawak ang spread, isang kapat ay nakabalik na sa loob ng apat na linggo, tatlong kapat sa loob ng labintatlo [15].

Mas mabilis na naibabalik ng manipulation ang paggalaw. Iyan ang tapat na trade-off laban sa bentahe ng durability sa itaas: mas mabilis na naibabalik ng manipulation ang range, at ang release ay hindi talaga nakakahabol hanggang sa marka ng anim na buwan, kung saan ang dalawa ay hindi na mapag-iba sa bawat pooled measure. Isang maliit na paghahambing pa nga ang nakatuklas na ang manipulation lamang ang nagtapos na may pinakamahusay na external rotation [16].

Ang kung gaano karaming capsule ang dapat hatiin ay isang tunay na katanungan, at ang sagot ay "mas kaunti kaysa sa iyong iniisip". Isang review na pinagsama ang 18 pag-aaral, 629 pasyente at 811 balikat ang naghambing ng tatlong teknik: pag-release sa harap at ilalim lamang ng capsule, pagdagdag sa likod nito, o pag-ikot sa buong paligid. Ang konklusyon nito ay ang hindi gaanong malawak na mga release ay nagbigay ng mas mabuting function at pain scores, na ang pagdagdag ng posterior release ay nagbibigay ng maagang internal rotation na hindi nagtatagal (bagaman nagbibigay ito ng permanenteng flexion gain), at ang isang buong 360-degree release "ay maaaring hindi magbigay ng anumang karagdagang benepisyo". Ang mga complication rate ay hindi nagkaiba sa pagitan ng tatlo [17]. Dalawang randomised trial ng posterior extension ang nakatuklas ng parehong pattern, mas mabilis na maagang recovery, walang pagkakaiba sa loob ng anim na buwan. Kaya ang mas malaking operasyon ay hindi awtomatikong mas mabuti.

Ang paggawa ng dalawa nang magkasama ay hindi ang sagot. Sa tanging three-way comparison, ang pagdagdag ng manipulation sa isang release ay nagresulta sa pinakamataas na rate ng pagkawala ng external rotation, 18%, laban sa 7% para sa manipulation lamang at 2% para sa release lamang [16].

Ano ang aktwal na natuklasan ng pinakamalaking treatment trial

Isang trial sa UK ang nag-randomise ng mahigit 500 katao sa structured physiotherapy na may injection, manipulation under anaesthetic, o keyhole surgery. Sa loob ng isang taon, ang tatlo ay nagtapos na may ilang puntos lamang na pagkakaiba sa isa't isa, mas mababa kaysa sa pagkakaibang mapapansin ng isang pasyente [7]. Ito ay tunay na kapaki-pakinabang na balita: nangangahulugan ito na ang pagpili ay maaaring ibase sa kung ano ang angkop para sa iyo at sa iyong mga sitwasyon, sa halip na may isang opsyon na malinaw na mas mabuti.

Kung saan nagkakaiba ang tatlo ay sa kung gaano kadalas kailangan ng mga tao ng iba pang gamutan pagkatapos. Sa trial na iyon, kinailangan ng karagdagang gamutan ang 4% pagkatapos ng release, 7% pagkatapos ng manipulation at 15% pagkatapos ng physiotherapy [7]. Ang manipulation ang lumabas na pinakamahusay sa cost per unit of benefit; ang release ang pinakamahal at nagdulot ng karamihan sa mga seryosong komplikasyon ng trial, bagaman ang mga ito ay bihira sa absolute terms.

Manipulasyon o release — ang katanungan sa recurrence

Dito tunay na naghihiwalay ang dalawang operasyon, at ito ang dahilan kung bakit maaaring ituro ka ng isang surgeon tungo sa isang release kahit na ang mga headline outcome score ay magkamukha.

Ang isang manipulasyon ay ini-stretch ang capsule hanggang sa mapunit ito, at ang punit ay hindi laging napupunta kung saan mo pipiliin. Sa pinakamalaking series, 792 shoulders na sinundan sa loob ng 17 taon — isang pangalawang manipulasyon ang kinailangan sa 17.8%, at sa mga taong may type 1 diabetes, ito ay tumaas sa 37.9% [9]. Ang pinakamahabang follow-up, sa average na 13 taon, ay nakita na 19.2% ang nangailangan ng pag-uulit ng manipulasyon at 31.3% ang naglarawan ng isang recurrence sa ilang punto [10]. Dalawang bagay ang nagpapagaan dito: halos lahat ng mga recurrence ay nangyayari sa unang taon (pagkatapos ng limang taon ang rate ay mababa sa 2%), at ang pag-uulit ng manipulasyon ay gumagana nang halos kasing husay ng una [9][10].

Ang isang release ay sadyang hinahati ang capsule, sa ilalim ng vision. Ang reoperation ay kapansin-pansing hindi gaanong karaniwan: isang series na sinundan sa mean na limang taon ang nag-ulat ng walang reoperations sa 32 pasyente, na may isang recurrence sa isang tao na hindi nakakumpleto ng kanilang rehabilitation [11]. Ang meta-analysis na pinagsama ang walong pag-aaral at 768 pasyente ay nakitang magkatulad ang dalawang operasyon para sa sakit, function at paggalaw (ang maliit na long-term na bentahe sa sakit para sa release ay hindi umabot sa clinically important na laki), na may mas mataas na rate ng malubhang komplikasyon pagkatapos ng release. Napansin nito ang mas mataas, bagaman hindi statistically significant, na rate ng karagdagang steroid injection sa manipulation group, at iminungkahi na sa mas mahabang follow-up "ang MUA group ay maaaring makaranas ng mas maraming recurrence" [8].

Dalawang tapat na caveat. Una, ang malalaking pag-aaral sa manipulation-recurrence ay malaking bahagi ay nagmula sa praktis ng isang surgeon, kaya hindi sila mga independent confirmation ng isa't isa. Pangalawa, ang release ay hindi rin isang full restoration: isang series ang nakitang ang average na shoulder score ay nasa humigit-kumulang 77 sa 100 pa rin dalawa hanggang anim na taon kalaunan [12], at sa isang cohort na hindi kasama ang mga diabetic, habang halos lahat ay bumuti sa isang makabuluhang halaga, 11–22% ay hindi pa rin itinuturing na katanggap-tanggap ang kanilang balikat sa loob ng anim na buwan [13].

Kaya ang tapat na buod ay ito: para mapagalaw ang balikat at maging komportable, ang dalawa ay halos katumbas, at ang manipulasyon ang mas murang paraan patungo roon. Para manatili sa ganung kalagayan, ang ebidensya ay pabor sa release. Ang pagkakaibang iyon ay pinakamahalaga kung ikaw ay may diabetes, kung ang balikat ay napakatigas, o kung nagkaroon ka na ng manipulasyon na hindi nagtagal.

Mga Sanggunian

Advanced reading: the deeper science (optional)

[1] Bunker T. Time for a new name for frozen shoulder, contracture of the shoulder. Shoulder Elbow. 2009;1(1):4-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-5740.2009.00007.x [2] Wong CK, Levine WN, Deo K, Kesting RS, Mercer EA, Schram GA, et al. Natural history of frozen shoulder: fact or fiction? A systematic review. Physiotherapy. 2017;103(1):40-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2016.05.009 [3] Vastamäki H, Kettunen J, Vastamäki M. The natural history of idiopathic frozen shoulder: a 2- to 27-year followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(4):1133-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2176-4 [4] Hand C, Clipsham K, Rees JL, Carr AJ. Long-term outcome of frozen shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17(2):231-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.05.009 [5] Green HD, Jones A, Evans JP, Wood AR, Beaumont RN, Tyrrell J, et al. A genome-wide association study identifies 5 loci associated with frozen shoulder and implicates diabetes as a causal risk factor. PLoS Genet. 2021;17(6):e1009577. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009577 [6] Page MJ, Green S, Kramer S, Johnston RV, McBain B, Chau M, et al. Manual therapy and exercise for adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(8):CD011275. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011275 [7] Brealey S, Northgraves M, Kottam L, Keding A, Corbacho B, Goodchild L, et al. Surgical treatments compared with early structured physiotherapy in secondary care for adults with primary frozen shoulder: the UK FROST three-arm RCT. Health Technol Assess. 2020;24(71):1-162. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta24710 [8] Zhao Y, Yang T, Feng C, Li L, Pang L, Zhao S. Arthroscopic capsular release versus manipulation under anesthesia for refractory frozen shoulder: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Orthop Surg. 2024;16(7):1517-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14077 [9] Woods DA, Loganathan K. Recurrence of frozen shoulder after manipulation under anaesthetic (MUA). Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B(6):812-7. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.99B6.BJJ-2016-1133.R1 [10] Fairclough A, Waters C, Davies T, Dacombe P, Woods D. Long-term outcomes following manipulation under anaesthetic for patients with primary and secondary frozen shoulder. Shoulder Elbow. 2023;15(2):173-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732211070007 [11] Ranalletta M, Rossi LA, Zaidenberg EE, Bertona A, Tanoira I, Maignon GD, et al. Midterm outcomes after arthroscopic anteroinferior capsular release for the treatment of idiopathic adhesive capsulitis. Arthroscopy. 2017;33(3):503-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2016.08.024 [12] Mardani-Kivi M, Hashemi-Motlagh K, Darabipour Z. Arthroscopic release in adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: a retrospective study with 2 to 6 years of follow-up. Clin Shoulder Elb. 2021;24(3):172-7. https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2021.00311 [13] Pasqualini I, Tanoira I, Hurley ET, Ranalletta M, Rossi LA. Arthroscopic capsular release achieves clinically significant outcomes in patients with adhesive capsulitis. Arthroscopy. 2024;40(4):1081-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2023.08.083 [14] Pasqualini I, Rossi LA, Oyem PC, Tanoira I, Ranalletta M. Time required to achieve clinically significant outcomes after arthroscopic capsular release. Orthop J Sports Med. 2024;12(11):23259671241275653. https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241275653 [15] Sedlinsch A, Berndt T, Rühmann O, Lerch S. Convalescence after arthroscopic capsular release in frozen shoulder. J Orthop. 2020;20:374-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2020.06.013 [16] Schoch B, Huttman D, Syed UA, et al. Surgical treatment of adhesive capsulitis: a comparison of manipulation, capsular release and both. Cureus. 2020;12(7):e9032. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.9032 [17] Sivasubramanian H, Chua CXK, Lim SY, Manohara R, Ng ZWD, Prem Kumar V, et al. Arthroscopic capsular release to treat idiopathic frozen shoulder: how much release is needed? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021;107(1):102766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2020.102766 [18] Vermeulen HM, Rozing PM, Obermann WR, le Cessie S, Vliet Vlieland TPM. Comparison of high-grade and low-grade mobilization techniques in the management of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2006;86(3):355-68. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16506872/ [19] Diercks RL, Stevens M. Gentle thawing of the frozen shoulder: a prospective study of supervised neglect versus intensive physical therapy in seventy-seven patients with frozen shoulder syndrome followed up for two years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004;13:499-502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2004.03.002


Evidence & references

This is the clinical evidence summary written for health professionals. It is technical, and it lists the research this page was built from. You do not need to read it to understand your treatment or to make a decision about it.

Overview

  • Frozen shoulder management guidelines provide evidence-based guidance and identify key areas for future research [2].
  • Magnetic resonance imaging findings in frozen shoulder should not replace clinical judgments regarding prognosis and treatment decisions [7].
  • Clinicians should monitor frozen shoulder patients with diabetes more closely and offer further treatment if pain or lack of function persist long-term [8].
  • Different treatment strategies for frozen shoulder may be appropriate depending on the location [9].
  • A strict definition of recalcitrant idiopathic frozen shoulder is needed to prevent unnecessary interventions, as current data should not be interpreted as a plea for surgery in patients with a mean symptom duration of 4 months [10].
  • The variety of participants, methods, interventions, and outcomes across trials provides limited new evidence to inform the non-surgical management and treatment of frozen shoulder [14].
  • Patients with a poor outcome or recurrent symptoms after manipulation under anaesthetic (MUA) should be offered a further MUA, with an expectation of a good outcome and a low complication rate [17].
  • Early surgical intervention might shorten the overall duration of symptoms in frozen shoulder and is not associated with inferior clinical outcomes compared with late surgical intervention [19].
  • There is insufficient evidence to reliably recommend a single treatment approach for frozen shoulder [32].
  • Further treatment was indicated in 41% of patients who could not tolerate more than 20 mL of injection during hydrodilatation [34].
  • Recurrence of frozen shoulder was more common in primary (33%) versus secondary (16%) cases [34].
  • Arthroscopic capsular release is a suitable option for refractory primary frozen shoulder syndrome, leading to faster and long-lasting recovery [35].
  • Manipulation under anaesthetic (MUA) and arthroscopic capsular release (ACR) are both good treatment options for primary frozen shoulder [70].
  • MUA is simpler but carries risks of serious complications, whereas ACR may be safer if performed by experienced surgeons and is convenient for patients with combined rotator cuff tears [70].

Anatomy & Pathophysiology

  • Primary (idiopathic) frozen shoulder consists of three phases: pain, stiffness, and thawing [3].
  • Secondary frozen shoulders may not exhibit all three phases and may not follow the exact chronology of primary frozen shoulder [3].
  • The pain phase of primary frozen shoulder involves a gradual onset of diffuse shoulder pain that is progressive over weeks to months [3].
  • Pain in the initial phase is usually worse at night and exacerbated by lying on the affected side [3].
  • Reduced arm use due to pain leads to stiffness [3].
  • The stiffness phase begins when patients restrict movement to seek pain relief and usually lasts 4 to 12 months [3].
  • During the stiffness phase, patients experience difficulty with activities of daily living, such as men accessing back pockets or women fastening brassieres [3].
  • A dull ache is present nearly all time during the stiffness phase, especially at night, often accompanied by sharp pain during range of motion at or near new endpoints [3].
  • The thawing phase lasts for weeks or months, during which motion increases and pain diminishes [3].
  • Without treatment, motion return in the thawing phase is gradual and may never objectively return to normal, although most patients subjectively feel near normal [3].
  • Frozen shoulder is characterized by progressive pain and stiffness that usually resolves spontaneously after about 18 months [4].
  • Histological features of frozen shoulder are reminiscent of Dupuytren’s disease, with active fibroblastic and myofibroblastic proliferation in the rotator interval, anterior capsule, and coracohumeral ligament [4].
  • Conditions particularly associated with frozen shoulder include diabetes, Dupuytren’s disease, hyperlipidaemia, hyperthyroidism, cardiac disease, and hemiplegia [4].
  • The etiology of frozen shoulder is still not known and understanding of the pathogenesis is limited [15].
  • Frozen shoulder is a poorly understood condition that typically involves substantial pain, movement restriction, and considerable morbidity [12].
  • The pathophysiology of frozen shoulder is complex, involving various pathophysiologic mechanisms [62].
  • A systematic review summarizes the tissue pathophysiology of primary frozen shoulder [25].
  • Primary frozen shoulder is defined by total elevation restricted to 135° or less [20].
  • In primary frozen shoulder, motion restriction is localized to the humero-scapular joint [20].
  • Primary frozen shoulder excludes cases with post-traumatic conditions, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, hemiplegia, or other obvious changes explaining the range of motion decrease [20].
  • Secondary frozen shoulder involves decreased range of motion following a traumatic lesion, including soft tissue injury, intra- and juxtaarticular fractures, and other upper limb fractures [20].
  • Symptomatic subjects with frozen shoulder demonstrate substantial kinematic deficits during humeral range of motion [44].
  • Patients with frozen shoulder present with altered shoulder muscle activity and kinematics [78].
  • Pathomechanics of frozen shoulder are characterized by glenohumeral motion limitations, high tension in the anteroinferior glenohumeral capsule, and altered scapular motion [75].
  • The scapulohumeral rhythm (SHR) of the affected shoulder is inversely related to the severity of limitation of shoulder range of motion, suggesting a compensatory pattern [80].
  • The anatomical structure of passive shoulder restraints has no impact on the difference in passive joint position sense values between external and internal rotation in frozen shoulder [59].
  • The thickness of the inferior glenohumeral joint capsule in the 80° scapular plane elevated arm position is a highly reliable and valid method for assessment [79].
  • Imaging is an essential tool for evaluation of patients with shoulder pain to understand the extent of injury [37].
  • X-rays in frozen shoulder are normal, and their main role is to exclude other causes of pain and stiffness [4].
  • Post-traumatic stiffness may persist for some months after severe shoulder injury but is maximal at the start and gradually lessens, unlike the pattern of frozen shoulder [4].
  • Disuse stiffness can occur if the arm is nursed overcautiously, such as following a wrist fracture, but lacks the characteristic pain pattern of frozen shoulder [4].
  • Complex regional pain syndrome may follow acute trauma or be seen in patients with myocardial infarction or stroke, presenting features similar to frozen shoulder [4].
  • Rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis can affect the shoulder and develop bilaterally, with diagnosis usually obvious on X-ray [4].
  • Shoulder stiffness is a typical outcome after bone or soft tissue injuries around the shoulder, including contusions, subluxations, dislocations, acromioclavicular joint injuries, clavicle and scapula fractures, and proximal humerus fractures in the elderly [61].
  • Repetitive, low-level trauma can cause localized contractures leading to motion loss in specific patterns [61].
  • Isolated posterior capsular contracture is the most commonly described localized contracture causing motion loss [61].
  • Surgical procedures such as anterior or posterior capsulorrhaphy, inferior capsular shift, and rotator cuff surgery can result in limitation of motion [61].

Classification

  • Frozen shoulder is a specific, painful, and debilitating condition affecting patients mainly in middle age [6].
  • Most patients clinically diagnosed with primary frozen shoulder had undiagnosed systemic abnormalities and/or intra-articular pathologies [5].
  • 18F-FDG PET/CT is clinically relevant in diagnostically challenging cases, such as distinguishing the first phase of frozen shoulder from subacromial impingement [11].
  • Health professionals manage frozen shoulders differently for different phases of the condition [16].
  • Primary frozen shoulders are defined by total elevation restricted to 135° or less [20].
  • In primary frozen shoulder, the restriction of motion is localized to the humero-scapular joint [20].
  • Primary frozen shoulder is diagnosed when no findings in case history, clinical examination, or radiological examination explain the decrease in range of motion [20].
  • Cases with post-traumatic conditions, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, hemiplegia, and other obvious changes are excluded from primary frozen shoulder classification [20].
  • Secondary frozen shoulder is characterized by decreased range of motion following a traumatic lesion [20].
  • Associated injuries in secondary frozen shoulder include soft tissue injury to the shoulder region, intra- and juxtaarticular fractures, and other fractures of the upper limb [20].
  • Frozen shoulder is classified into three consecutive stages according to Reeves [20].
  • Stage 1 of frozen shoulder is characterized by pain [20].
  • Stage 1 of frozen shoulder has a duration of 10 to 36 weeks [20].
  • In Stage 1 of frozen shoulder, there is no difference between men and women, no difference between affected dominant and nondominant shoulders, and no correlation with age [20].
  • In the early stages of frozen shoulder, there is a full range of movement under anesthesia [20].
  • Classification of frozen shoulder was found to be controversial [38].
  • There are lower rates of agreement among Japan Shoulder Society (JSS) members than American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) members for the definition of primary frozen shoulder [43].
  • There are lower rates of agreement among JSS members than ASES members for the classification of primary and secondary frozen shoulder [43].
  • There are lower rates of agreement among JSS members than ASES members for the divisions of secondary frozen shoulder [43].
  • There is disagreement among shoulder specialists regarding terminology for frozen shoulder [57].

Clinical Presentation

  • Frozen shoulder is a specific, painful, and debilitating condition that primarily affects patients in middle age [6].
  • Frozen shoulder is a common disease that causes significant morbidity [21].
  • Frozen shoulder is characterized by severe shoulder pain and functional restriction [24].
  • Frozen shoulder has considerable economic impact [28].
  • Frozen shoulder typically involves substantial pain, movement restriction, and considerable morbidity [12].
  • Frozen shoulder affects approximately 4% of the general population [24].
  • Frozen shoulder affects up to 59% of patients with diabetes mellitus [24].
  • The disease duration of frozen shoulder varies between 1 and 3 years [24].
  • The clinical course of primary (idiopathic) frozen shoulder consists of three phases: pain, stiffness, and thawing [3].
  • Primary frozen shoulder is characterized by progressive pain and stiffness which usually resolves spontaneously after about 18 months [4].
  • In Phase I (Pain), patients experience a gradual onset of diffuse shoulder pain that is progressive over weeks to months [3].
  • The pain in Phase I is usually worse at night and exacerbated by lying on the affected side [3].
  • In Phase II (Stiffness), patients restrict movement to seek pain relief, leading to stiffness that usually lasts 4 to 12 months [3].
  • During Phase II, patients have difficulty with activities of daily living, such as men reaching back pockets or women fastening brassieres [3].
  • In Phase II, a dull ache is present nearly all the time, especially at night, often accompanied by sharp pain during range of motion at or near new endpoints [3].
  • In Phase III (Thawing), motion increases and pain diminishes over weeks or months [3].
  • Without treatment, motion return in Phase III is gradual and may never objectively return to normal, though patients often subjectively feel near normal [3].
  • The natural history of frozen shoulder involves pain that increases in severity, prevents sleeping on the affected side, and subsides after several months [4].
  • As pain subsides in frozen shoulder, stiffness becomes more prominent and persists for another 6–12 months if untreated [4].
  • Movement is gradually regained in frozen shoulder but may not return to normal [4].
  • Patients with frozen shoulder are typically aged 40–60 years [4].
  • Patients with frozen shoulder may give a history of trauma, often trivial, followed by pain [4].
  • Physical examination of frozen shoulder usually reveals slight muscle wasting and tenderness [4].
  • Movements in frozen shoulder are always limited, and the shoulder may be extremely stiff in severe cases [4].
  • X-rays in frozen shoulder are normal; their main role is to exclude other causes of pain and stiffness [4].
  • Post-traumatic stiffness is characterized by stiffness without much pain that is maximal at the start and gradually lessens, unlike the pattern of frozen shoulder [4].
  • Disuse stiffness occurs if the arm is nursed overcautiously and lacks the characteristic pain pattern of frozen shoulder [4].
  • Complex regional pain syndrome may follow acute trauma or occur in patients with myocardial infarction or stroke, presenting features similar to frozen shoulder [4].
  • Rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis can affect the shoulder bilaterally and are usually obvious on X-ray [4].
  • Primary frozen shoulder excludes cases with post-traumatic conditions, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, hemiplegia, or other obvious changes in history or examination [20].
  • Secondary frozen shoulder involves decreased range of motion following a traumatic lesion, such as soft tissue injury or fractures of the upper limb [20].
  • Stage 1 (pain) of frozen shoulder lasts 10 to 36 weeks [20].
  • In Stage 1 of frozen shoulder, there is no difference in presentation between men and women, affected dominant and nondominant shoulders, or correlation with age [20].
  • Frozen shoulder following COVID-19 vaccination may present with clinical features similar to idiopathic frozen shoulder [39].
  • Frozen shoulder can occur after COVID-19 vaccination [41].
  • Frozen shoulder is particularly associated with diabetes, Dupuytren’s disease, hyperlipidaemia, hyperthyroidism, cardiac disease, and hemiplegia [4].
  • MR findings in frozen shoulder should not replace clinical judgments regarding further prognosis and treatment decisions [7].
  • Unusual stiffness and pain in the shoulder of a young female patient suggests a wide range of disease entities, including infection [23].
  • Misdiagnosing shoulder tumors as frozen shoulder syndrome is likely to cause a significant delay in making a correct diagnosis [40].
  • A detailed clinical history and examination is critical in the assessment of a painful, stiff shoulder to avoid misdiagnosis of conditions like malignant shoulder girdle tumours [1].

Investigations

  • A detailed clinical history and examination is critical in the assessment of a painful, stiff shoulder [1].
  • The term frozen shoulder should be reserved for a well-defined disorder characterized by progressive pain and stiffness which usually resolves spontaneously after about 18 months [4].
  • The histological features of frozen shoulder are reminiscent of Dupuytren’s disease, with active fibroblastic and myofibroblastic proliferation in the rotator interval, anterior capsule and coracohumeral ligament [4].
  • Patients may give a history of trauma, often trivial, followed by pain that gradually increases in severity and often prevents sleeping on the affected side [4].
  • Pain begins to subside after several months, but stiffness becomes more problematic; untreated stiffness persists for another 6–12 months before movement is gradually regained, which may not return to normal [4].
  • Clinical examination usually reveals slight muscle wasting and tenderness, with always limited movements and extreme stiffness in severe cases [4].
  • X-rays are normal in frozen shoulder, and their main role is to exclude other causes of pain and stiffness [4].
  • Disuse stiffness may occur if the arm is nursed overcautiously, such as following a wrist fracture, and lacks the characteristic pain pattern of frozen shoulder [4].
  • Complex regional pain syndrome may follow acute trauma or be seen in patients with myocardial infarction or stroke, and its features can be similar to those of frozen shoulder [4].
  • Both rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis can affect the shoulder, with diagnosis usually obvious on X-ray, and rheumatoid arthritis may present with characteristic generalized symptoms and signs [4].
  • Unusual stiffness and pain in the shoulder of a young female patient suggests a wide range of disease entities, from simple frozen shoulder to infection [23].
  • Routine use of shoulder MRI scans in patients with frozen shoulder but without suspicion of additional pathology may not be indicated [31].
  • Imaging is an essential tool for evaluation of patients with shoulder pain, and understanding the extent of an injury with imaging is key to successful management [37].
  • Physicians should re-examine frozen shoulder patients with repeated plain radiographs and further imaging, especially MRI, if conservative therapy fails [56].
  • MR arthrography reveals characteristic findings in patients with frozen shoulder [58].
  • T2 signal hyperintensity and axillary capsule thickening are characteristic of the early stages of frozen shoulder, although MRI alone cannot completely define the disease stage [71].
  • The burning sign is an abnormal finding that appears in dynamic MRI of severe frozen shoulder [73].
  • Dynamic MRI semiquantitatively demonstrated a reduction in abnormal blood flow and improvement in clinical results after manipulation under cervical nerve root block (MUC) in patients with frozen shoulder [77].
  • Clinical improvement in patients with frozen shoulder was associated with a decrease in the coefficient of enhancement (CE) in the glenohumeral synovium following intraarticular injections of hyaluronate [81].
  • There may be a causal relationship between hypothyroidism and frozen shoulder [85].
  • Patients who underwent image-guided (ultrasound) injections had statistically significant greater improvement in shoulder pain and function at 6 weeks after injection compared to blind injections [86].
  • MR imaging of patients with severe frozen shoulder after MUC showed 29 capsule tears, 4 labrum tears, and 15 bone bruises of the humeral head [87].

Treatment

Non-Operative Management

  • Treatment for frozen shoulder aims to improve pain and function through a shared decision-making process, utilizing a step-up approach from conservative measures to invasive treatments if symptoms persist [28].
  • Health professionals manage frozen shoulders differently depending on the phase of the condition [16].
  • There is limited evidence of the effectiveness of different forms of treatment used for frozen shoulder, with many studies carrying a moderate to high risk of bias and omitting details of symptom duration or condition phase [74].
  • The variety of participants, methods, interventions, and outcomes across trials provides limited new evidence to inform non-surgical management [14].
  • Conservative treatment is effective for the treatment of frozen shoulder regardless of the severity of symptoms [45].
  • Intra-articular steroid injection is effective and safe for frozen shoulder, relieving pain, improving functional performance, and increasing range of motion [48].
  • Multisite corticosteroid injection therapy is more effective than single intra-articular injection in terms of pain relief, restoration of motion, and functional status for primary frozen shoulder [46].
  • Both multisite and single glenohumeral injections of corticosteroid are effective in patients with primary frozen shoulder [49].
  • Ultrasound-guided administration of corticosteroid injections into the glenohumeral joint increases the likelihood of successful injection but does not improve clinical outcomes at 12 weeks compared with blind administration [52].
  • Ultrasound-guided multisite injection is a nonsurgical treatment technique for frozen shoulder that emphasizes correct injection sites [72].
  • Hydrodilatation has emerged as a potential nonsurgical option in the management of frozen shoulder, but its role has yet to be fully clarified [60].
  • Management of frozen shoulder stage II to III using hydrodistension and a guided exercise programme by physiotherapists in primary care is an effective non-operative treatment strategy [66].
  • Recurrence of frozen shoulder after hydrodilatation was more common in primary (33%) versus secondary (16%) frozen shoulder [34].
  • A central nervous system-focused treatment approach is being evaluated in a randomized clinical trial to compare effectiveness against standard medical and physical therapy care [42].
  • The comparative effectiveness of low-level laser therapy versus muscle energy technique is being evaluated in a randomized controlled trial to determine the optimal treatment approach for frozen shoulder related to diabetes [47].

Operative and Procedural Management

  • Secondary frozen shoulder may be more recalcitrant to conventional conservative treatment [64].
  • The study on arthroscopic capsular release timing adds information for shared decision-making but should not be a plea for surgery for patients with a mean duration of symptoms of 4 months; a strict definition of recalcitrant idiopathic frozen shoulder is needed to prevent unnecessary interventions [10].
  • The arthroscopic 360° release is an effective and safe treatment modality for severe or recalcitrant frozen shoulder [53].
  • A combination of limited capsular release and manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) for primary frozen shoulder is a safe and effective procedure resulting in marked improvement in pain, function, and range of motion [55].
  • The mid-term outcomes of transcatheter arterial micro embolization (TAME) for frozen shoulders resistant to conservative treatments are encouraging and warrant further evaluation [50].
  • Manipulation under anesthesia versus physiotherapy treatment in stage two of a frozen shoulder is being evaluated in a randomized controlled trial to provide evidence on the best treatment strategy [51].
  • Different treatment strategies for frozen shoulder may be appropriate depending on the location of pathology [9].

Complications

  • Frozen shoulder is a painful and debilitating condition [6].
  • Frozen shoulder causes significant morbidity [21].
  • The natural history of primary frozen shoulder consists of three phases: pain, stiffness, and thawing [3].
  • Primary frozen shoulder usually resolves spontaneously after about 18 months [4].
  • Without treatment, motion return in primary frozen shoulder is gradual and may never objectively return to normal [3].
  • In the long term, 41% of patients with frozen shoulder report some ongoing symptoms [30].
  • Postoperative frozen shoulder is a serious complication after shoulder surgery with an incidence of 11% [54].
  • Preoperative frozen shoulder negatively affects functional outcomes, including range of motion, at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair [33].
  • Preoperative frozen shoulder positively affects rotator cuff healing [33].
  • Patients with diabetes should be monitored more closely for frozen shoulder, as they may experience persistent pain or lack of function long-term [8].
  • An age between 46 and 60 years is a statistically significant risk factor for developing frozen shoulder after simple arthroscopic shoulder procedures [29].
  • A previous history of contralateral frozen shoulder is a statistically significant risk factor for developing frozen shoulder after simple arthroscopic shoulder procedures [29].
  • Most patients clinically diagnosed with primary frozen shoulder have undiagnosed systemic abnormalities and/or intra-articular pathologies [5].
  • Recurrence of frozen shoulder after manipulation under anaesthetic (MUA) can occur, but late recurrence is uncommon [22].
  • Patients with poor outcomes or recurrent symptoms after MUA can be offered a further MUA with an expectation of good outcome and low complication rate [17].

Recovery

  • Phase I (Pain) involves a gradual onset of diffuse shoulder pain that is progressive over weeks to months [3].
  • Pain in Phase I is usually worse at night and exacerbated by lying on the affected side [3].
  • Phase II (Stiffness) usually lasts 4 to 12 months [3].
  • During Phase II, patients restrict movement to seek pain relief, leading to difficulty with activities of daily living such as reaching back pockets or fastening brassieres [3].
  • Phase II is accompanied by a dull ache present nearly all the time, especially at night, and sharp pain during range of motion at or near new endpoints [3].
  • Phase III (Thawing) lasts for weeks or months, during which motion increases and pain diminishes [3].
  • Without treatment, motion return in Phase III is gradual in most patients [3].
  • Objective motion may never return to normal, although most patients subjectively feel near normal due to compensation or adjustment in activities of daily living [3].
  • Frozen shoulder affects approximately 4% of the general population and up to 59% in patients with diabetes mellitus [24].
  • In the long term, 59% of patients with frozen shoulder have normal or near normal shoulders [30].
  • 94% of patients with spontaneous frozen shoulder recover to normal levels of function and motion without treatment [69].
  • Idiopathic frozen shoulder is a self-limiting condition in which symptoms subside and full shoulder movement returns within a maximum of two years from the onset of symptoms [88].
  • Long-term outcome after manipulation under anaesthetic (MUA) for frozen shoulder is favourable with late recurrence being uncommon [22].
  • Patients with poor outcome or recurrent symptoms after MUA should be offered a further MUA with the expectation of a good outcome and a low complication rate [17].
  • Arthroscopic capsular release leads to a faster and long-lasting recovery in patients with refractory primary frozen shoulder syndrome [35].
  • The long-term results of arthroscopic capsular release in frozen shoulder were confirmed in 255 patients [36].
  • MUA in stage 2 frozen shoulder results in a faster recovery of range of motion and improved functional outcome compared to physiotherapy alone in the short term [68].
  • MUA in stage 2 frozen shoulder can be considered safe compared to physiotherapy alone in the short term [68].
  • Early surgical intervention might shorten the overall duration of symptoms in frozen shoulder [19].
  • Early surgical intervention is not associated with inferior clinical outcomes when compared with late surgical intervention [19].
  • Timing has a significant influence on the outcome of manipulation for frozen shoulders [90].
  • Diabetes is a poor prognostic factor for the conservative treatment of frozen shoulder [82].
  • Male sex is a poor prognostic factor for the conservative treatment of frozen shoulder [82].
  • Simultaneous bilateral involvement is a poor prognostic factor for the conservative treatment of frozen shoulder [82].
  • Subsequent bilateral involvement is a poor prognostic factor for the conservative treatment of frozen shoulder [82].
  • A longer duration of symptoms recorded at the first visit is a poor prognostic factor for the conservative treatment of frozen shoulder [82].
  • Preoperative frozen shoulder negatively affected most functional outcomes, including range of motion, at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair [33].
  • Preoperative frozen shoulder positively affected rotator cuff healing after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair [33].

Key Evidence

  • [L4] A detailed clinical history and examination is critical in the assessment of a painful, stiff shoulder. [1] (10.1186/1477-7800-2-2)
  • [L1] This updated guideline provides evidence-based guidance for managing frozen shoulder and identifies key areas for future research. [2] (10.1177/17585732251335955)
  • [L4] Most patients clinically diagnosed with primary frozen shoulder had undiagnosed systemic abnormalities and/or intra-articular pathologies. [5] (10.5397/cise.2018.21.2.82)
  • [Paper] Frozen shoulder is a specific, painful and debilitating condition effecting patients mainly in middle age. [6] (10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.02.009)
  • [L4] MR findings in frozen shoulder should not replace clinical judgments regarding further prognosis and treatment decisions. [7] (10.1007/s00167-015-3887-y)
  • [L2] If high-quality studies can confirm the findings of this review, then clinicians should monitor frozen shoulder patients with diabetes more closely and offer further treatment if pain or lack of function persist long-term. [8] (10.1016/j.arrct.2021.100141)
  • [L5] Different treatment strategies for frozen shoulder may be appropriate, depending on the location. [9] (10.1016/j.jse.2018.03.010)
  • [L5] The study adds information for shared decision-making but should not be a plea for surgery for patients with a mean duration of symptoms of 4 months; a strict definition of recalcitrant idiopathic frozen shoulder is needed to prevent unnecessary interventions. [10] (10.1177/2325967120903710)
  • [L2] This is clinically relevant in diagnostically challenging cases, for instance in the first phase of frozen shoulder, which can be difficult to distinguish from subacromial impingement. [11] (10.1007/s00167-020-05937-2)
  • [L5] Frozen shoulder is a poorly understood condition that typically involves substantial pain, movement restriction, and considerable morbidity. [12] (10.1016/j.math.2014.07.006)
  • [L1] The variety of participants included/excluded in trials and the variety of methods, interventions and outcomes used across the trials provided limited new evidence to inform the non-surgical management and treatment of people with frozen shoulder. [14] (10.2340/16501977-2578)
  • [L4] The etiology of frozen shoulder is still not known and our understanding of the pathogenesis is limited. [15] (10.3109/03009749009096786)
  • [L4] Health professionals manage frozen shoulders differently for different phases of the condition. [16] (10.1111/j.1758-5740.2010.00073.x)
  • [L4] Patients with a poor outcome or recurrent symptoms of a frozen shoulder after a MUA should be offered a further MUA with the expectation of a good outcome and a low complication rate. [17] (10.1302/0301-620x.99b6.bjj-2016-1133.r1)
  • [L3] Early surgical intervention might shorten the overall duration of symptoms in frozen shoulder and is not associated with inferior clinical outcomes when compared with late surgical intervention. [19] (10.1016/j.jse.2020.07.023)
  • [L4] Frozen shoulder is a common disease which causes significant morbidity. [21] (10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.263)
  • [L3] Long-term outcome after MUA for frozen shoulder is favourable with late recurrence being uncommon. [22] (10.1177/17585732211070007)
  • [L5] Unusual stiffness and pain in the shoulder of a young female patients suggests a wide range of disease entities, from simple frozen shoulder to (albeit rarely) infection. [23] (10.1016/j.radcr.2020.08.006)
  • [L1] This systematic review presents a summary of what is currently known about the tissue pathophysiology of primary frozen shoulder. [25] (10.1186/s12891-016-1190-9)
  • [L4] Frozen shoulder is a painful and debilitating condition with considerable economic impact; treatment aims to improve pain and function through a shared decision-making process, with a step-up approach from conservative measures to invasive treatments if symptoms persist. [28] (10.1177/1758573215601779)
  • [L3] An age of between 46 and 60 years and a previous history of contralateral frozen shoulder were statistically significant risk factors. [29] (10.1302/0301-620x.97b7.35387)
  • [L3] In the long term, 59% of patients had normal or near normal shoulders and 41% reported some ongoing symptoms. [30] (10.1016/j.jse.2007.05.009)
  • [L4] Therefore, routine use of shoulder MRI scans in patients with FS but without suspicion of an additional pathology may not be indicated. [31] (10.1016/j.jseint.2022.05.009)
  • [L1] There is insufficient evidence to reliably recommend a treatment approach for frozen shoulder. [32] (10.1136/bmj.i4162)
  • [L3] Preoperative frozen shoulder positively affected rotator cuff healing but negatively affected most functional outcomes, including ROM, at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. [33] (10.1177/2325967120934449)
  • [L4] Further treatment was indicated in 41% of patients who could not tolerate more than 20 mL of injection, and recurrence was more common in primary (33%) versus secondary (16%) frozen shoulder. [34] (10.1177/17585732221124914)
  • [Paper] In patients with refractory primary frozen shoulder syndrome, arthroscopic capsular release emerges as a suitable option that leads to a faster and long-lasting recovery. [35] (10.1016/j.eats.2015.06.004)
  • [L4] The long-term results of arthroscopic capsular release in frozen shoulder were confirmed in 255 patients. [36] (10.1186/s13018-018-0758-5)
  • [L4] Imaging is an essential tool for evaluation of patients with shoulder pain; understanding the extent of an injury with imaging is key to successful management. [37] (10.1016/j.csm.2013.03.009)
  • [L4] However, classification of frozen shoulder was found to be controversial. [38] (10.4055/cios.2020.12.1.60)
  • [L4] Frozen shoulder following COVID-19 vaccination may present with clinical features similar to those of idiopathic frozen shoulder. [39] (10.1016/j.xrrt.2023.09.013)
  • [L2] Misdiagnosing shoulder tumors as frozen shoulder syndrome is likely to cause a significant delay in making a correct diagnosis. [40] (10.1016/j.jse.2009.05.010)
  • [L4] Frozen shoulder can occur after COVID-19 vaccination, and musculoskeletal specialists should be aware of this diagnosis to identify and treat such patients early. [41] (10.1016/j.jseint.2022.02.013)
  • [Paper] The trial aims to compare the effectiveness of a CNS-directed treatment program versus standard medical and physical therapy care on outcomes in participants with frozen shoulder. [42] (10.1186/s13063-019-3585-z)
  • [L4] The survey shows lower rates of agreement among the JSS members than the ASES members for the definition of primary frozen shoulder, the classification of primary and secondary frozen shoulder, and the divisions of secondary frozen shoulder. [43] (10.1016/j.jos.2018.12.012)
  • [L4] Symptomatic subjects demonstrated substantial kinematic deficits during humeral range of motion. [44] (10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00359-9)
  • [L3] Conservative treatment is effective for the treatment of frozen shoulder. [45] (10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101149)
  • [Commentary] Multisite corticosteroid injection therapy is more effective in terms of pain relief, restoration of motion, and functional status than single intra-articular injection for the treatment of primary frozen shoulder. [46] (10.1016/j.arthro.2021.02.028)
  • [L2] The findings of the study may provide evidence on the efficacy of these interventions and most likely, the optimal treatment approach for frozen shoulder related to diabetes, which may guide clinical practice. [47] (10.1186/s13018-024-04735-7)
  • [L1] Intra-articular steroid injection is effective and safe for frozen shoulder, relieving pain, improving functional performance, and increasing range of motion. [48] (10.1177/0363546516669944)
  • [L1] Both treatments were effective in patients with primary frozen shoulder. [49] (10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.069)
  • [Abstract] The mid-term outcomes of TAME for frozen shoulders that were resistant to conservative treatments are encouraging and warrant further evaluation. [50] (10.1016/j.jse.2016.11.031)
  • [L2] Successful completion of this trial will provide evidence on the best treatment strategy for patients with a stage two frozen shoulder. [51] (10.1186/s12891-017-1763-2)
  • [L1] In patients with frozen shoulder, US-guided administration of corticosteroid injections into the glenohumeral joint increased the likelihood of successful injection but did not improve clinical outcomes at 12 weeks compared with blind administration. [52] (10.2106/jbjs.21.01007)
  • [L4] The arthroscopic 360° release is an effective and safe treatment modality for severe or recalcitrant frozen shoulder. [53] (10.1016/j.jseint.2024.07.006)
  • [L2] Postoperative frozen shoulder is a serious complication after shoulder surgery, with an incidence of 11%. [54] (10.1007/s00402-016-2589-3)
  • [L4] A combination of limited capsular release and MUA for the treatment of primary frozen shoulder is a safe and effective procedure resulting in marked improvement in pain, function and range of motion. [55] (10.1177/1758573215578590)
  • [L4] Physicians should re-examine frozen shoulder patients with repeated plain radiographs and further imaging, especially MRI, if conservative therapy fails. [56] (10.1016/j.jse.2011.07.026)
  • [L4] This survey summarized the trend in prevalent practices regarding frozen shoulder among shoulder specialists and senior shoulder surgeons of SESI, revealing strong consensus on imaging and nonoperative management but disagreement on terminology and specific surgical complications. [57] (10.1177/23259671221118834)
  • [L4] MR arthrography reveals characteristic findings in patients with frozen shoulder. [58] (10.1148/radiol.2332031219)
  • [L3] The anatomical structure of passive shoulder restraints has no impact on the difference in passive joint position sense values between external and internal rotation. [59] (10.1186/s12891-016-0971-5)
  • [L5] Hydrodilatation has emerged as a potential nonsurgical option in the management of frozen shoulder, but its role has yet to be fully clarified. [60] (10.1302/2058-5241.2.160061)
  • [L5] This scoping review outlines the complexity of the pathophysiology of frozen shoulder and provides a comprehensive overview of pathophysiologic mechanisms. [62] (10.1186/s40634-020-00307-w)
  • [L4] Secondary frozen shoulder may be more recalcitrant to conventional conservative treatment. [64] (10.1016/j.jor.2015.01.030)
  • [L4] This service evaluation demonstrates that management of frozen shoulder stage II to III, as conducted by physiotherapists in a primary care setting utilizing hydrodistension and a guided exercise programme, represents an effective non-operative treatment strategy. [66] (10.1177/1758573217701063)
  • [L1] MUA in stage 2 frozen shoulder can be considered safe and results in a faster recovery of range of motion and improved functional outcome compared to physiotherapy alone in the short term. [68] (10.1016/j.jseint.2023.11.004)
  • [L4] We found 94% of patients with spontaneous frozen shoulder recovered to normal levels of function and motion without treatment. [69] (10.1007/s11999-011-2176-4)
  • [L5] MUA and ACR are good treatment options for primary frozen shoulder; MUA is simpler but carries risks of serious complications, while ACR may be safer if performed by experienced surgeons and is convenient for patients with combined rotator cuff tears. [70] (10.5397/cise.2020.00311)
  • [L5] T2 signal hyperintensity and axillary capsule thickening are characteristic of the early stages of frozen shoulder, although MRI alone cannot completely define the disease stage. [71] (10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.05.002)
  • [L5] This technique is presented for the nonsurgical treatment of frozen shoulder, emphasizing correct injection sites. [72] (10.1016/j.eats.2022.06.020)
  • [L4] The burning sign is an abnormal finding that appears in dynamic MRI of severe frozen shoulder. [73] (10.1016/j.jse.2016.06.003)
  • [L2] There is limited evidence of the effectiveness of different forms of treatment used for frozen shoulder, with many studies evaluating treatment effects carrying a moderate to high risk of bias and omitting details of the duration of symptoms or the phase of the condition. [74] (10.1111/j.1758-5740.2010.00067.x)
  • [L5] Pathomechanics of the frozen shoulder characterised by glenohumeral motion limitations should be considered complicated, as confirmed by high tension in the anteroinferior glenohumeral capsule and altered scapular motion. [75] (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.04.003)
  • [L4] Dynamic MRI semiquantitatively demonstrated a reduction in abnormal blood flow and improvement in clinical results after MUC in patients with frozen shoulder. [77] (10.1016/j.jseint.2021.12.007)
  • [L4] Patients with frozen shoulder presented with altered shoulder muscle activity and kinematics, and one-session of heat and manual muscle release showed beneficial effects on shoulder muscle performance, kinematics, mobility, and pain. [78] (10.1186/s12891-017-1867-8)
  • [L3] The thickness of the inferior glenohumeral joint capsule in the 80° scapular plane elevated arm position was shown to be a highly reliable and valid method. [79] (10.1016/j.jseint.2024.06.004)
  • [L4] SHR of the affected shoulder is inversely related to severity of limitation of shoulder range of motion, which suggests a compensatory pattern. [80] (10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.09.004)
  • [L4] Clinical improvement in patients with frozen shoulder was associated with a decrease in the coefficient of enhancement (CE) in the glenohumeral synovium. [81] (10.1007/s00776-004-0766-7)
  • [L2] Diabetes, male sex, simultaneous bilateral involvement, subsequent bilateral involvement, and a longer duration of symptoms recorded at the first visit were identified as poor prognostic factors for the conservative treatment of frozen shoulder. [82] (10.1016/j.jos.2019.03.011)
  • [L2] Our MR analysis suggests that there may be a causal relationship between hypothyroidism and frozen shoulder. [85] (10.1186/s12891-024-07826-y)
  • [L1] Patients who underwent image-guided (ultrasound) injections had statistically significant greater improvement in shoulder pain and function at 6 weeks after injection compared to blind injections. [86] (10.1186/1471-2474-12-137)
  • [L4] MR imaging of patients with severe frozen shoulder after MUC showed 29 capsule tears, 4 labrum tears, and 15 bone bruises of the humeral head. [87] (10.1016/j.jse.2015.06.019)
  • [L4] In the great majority of patients idiopathic frozen shoulder is a self-limiting condition, in which symptoms subside and full shoulder movement returns within a maximum of two years from the onset of symptoms. [88] (10.2106/00004623-197860040-00030)
  • [L4] In the great majority of patients idiopathic frozen shoulder is a self-limiting condition, in which symptoms subside and full shoulder movement returns within a maximum of two years from the onset of symptoms. [89] (10.2106/00004623-197860040-00029)
  • [L4] Timing has a significant influence on the outcome of manipulation for frozen shoulders. [90] (10.1016/j.jos.2020.11.002)

References

[1] Lessons learnt from the painful shoulder; a case series of malignant shoulder girdle tumours misdiagnosed as frozen shoulder. International Seminars in Surgical Oncology. 2005. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7800-2-2

[2] British Elbow and Shoulder Society patient care pathway: Frozen shoulder. Shoulder & Elbow. 2025. DOI: 10.1177/17585732251335955

[3] Campbell S Operative Orthopaedics 4 Volume Set. ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION WITH BONE-PATELLAR TENDON-BONE GRAFT > PRIMARY FROZEN SHOULDER.

[4] Apley And Solomon S Concise System Of Orthopaedics And Trauma. ADHESIVE CAPSULITIS (FROZEN SHOULDER).

[5] Is the Frozen Shoulder Classification a Reliable Assessment?. Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow. 2018. DOI: 10.5397/cise.2018.21.2.82

[6] Frozen shoulder – A stiff problem that requires a flexible approach. Maturitas. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.02.009

[7] Correlations of magnetic resonance imaging findings with clinical symptom severity and prognosis of frozen shoulder. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3887-y

[8] Diabetes as a Prognostic Factor in Frozen Shoulder: A Systematic Review. Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2021.100141

[9] Comparative proteome analysis of the capsule from patients with frozen shoulder. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.03.010

[10] What Is the Right Timing for Arthroscopic Capsular Release of a Frozen Shoulder? Letter to the Editor. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2020. DOI: 10.1177/2325967120903710

[11] The role of 18F‐FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of frozen shoulder. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-05937-2

[12] Frozen shoulder contracture syndrome – Aetiology, diagnosis and management. Manual Therapy. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2014.07.006

[14] Clinical effectiveness of non-surgical interventions for primary frozen shoulder: A systematic review. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2019. DOI: 10.2340/16501977-2578

[15] Frozen Shoulder: Current Concepts. Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology. 1990. DOI: 10.3109/03009749009096786

[16] Managing Idiopathic Frozen Shoulder: A Survey of Health Professionals' Current Practice and Research Priorities. Shoulder & Elbow. 2010. DOI: 10.1111/j.1758-5740.2010.00073.x

[17] Recurrence of frozen shoulder after manipulation under anaesthetic (MUA). The Bone & Joint Journal. 2017. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.99b6.bjj-2016-1133.r1

[19] Does the timing of surgical intervention impact the clinical outcomes and overall duration of symptoms in frozen shoulder?. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.07.023

[20] Classifications And Scores Of The Shoulder. Classifications of frozen shoulder.

[21] Frozen shoulder: A systematic review of therapeutic options. World Journal of Orthopedics. 2015. DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.263

[22] Long-Term Outcomes Following Manipulation Under Anaesthetic for Patients with Primary and Secondary Frozen Shoulder. Shoulder & Elbow. 2021. DOI: 10.1177/17585732211070007

[23] Subscapularis pyomyositis presenting as shoulder stiffness mistaken as frozen shoulder in young female: a case report. Radiology Case Reports. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2020.08.006

[24] Frozen Shoulder. 2024.

[25] The pathophysiology associated with primary (idiopathic) frozen shoulder: A systematic review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2016. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-016-1190-9

[28] Frozen Shoulder. Shoulder & Elbow. 2015. DOI: 10.1177/1758573215601779

[29] Frozen shoulder after simple arthroscopic shoulder procedures. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2015. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.97b7.35387

[30] Long-term outcome of frozen shoulder. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.05.009

[31] Is routine magnetic resonance imaging necessary in patients with clinically diagnosed frozen shoulder? Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in frozen shoulder. JSES International. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.05.009

[32] What is the most effective treatment for frozen shoulder?. BMJ. 2016. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i4162

[33] Effect of Preoperative Frozen Shoulder on Clinical Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2020. DOI: 10.1177/2325967120934449

[34] Recurrence of the frozen shoulder after hydrodilatation, what is the true incidence?. Shoulder & Elbow. 2022. DOI: 10.1177/17585732221124914

[35] Primary Frozen Shoulder Syndrome: Arthroscopic Capsular Release. Arthroscopy Techniques. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2015.06.004

[36] Clinical outcome of arthroscopic capsular release for frozen shoulder: essential technical points in 255 patients. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2018. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-018-0758-5

[37] Imaging of the Shoulder with Arthroscopic Correlation. Clinics in Sports Medicine. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.csm.2013.03.009

[38] Definition, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis of Frozen Shoulder: A Consensus Survey of Shoulder Specialists. Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.4055/cios.2020.12.1.60

[39] Frozen shoulder after COVID-19 vaccination versus idiopathic frozen shoulder: similar clinical features and functional improvement at 1-year follow-up. JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2023.09.013

[40] Tumors masked as frozen shoulders: A retrospective analysis. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.05.010

[41] Frozen shoulder after COVID-19 vaccination. JSES International. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.02.013

[42] A central nervous system-focused treatment approach for people with frozen shoulder: protocol for a randomized clinical trial. Trials. 2019. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3585-z

[43] Representative survey of frozen shoulder questionnaire responses from the Japan Shoulder Society: What are the appropriate diagnostic terms for primary idiopathic frozen shoulder, stiff shoulder or frozen shoulder?. Journal of Orthopaedic Science. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2018.12.012

[44] Shoulder kinematics in subjects with frozen shoulder11No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2003. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00359-9

[45] Conservative Treatment for Frozen Shoulder Is Effective Regardless of the Severity of Symptoms. Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101149

[46] Editorial Commentary: Corticosteroid Injections and Physical Therapy Are Effective First-Line Treatments for Frozen Shoulder. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.02.028

[47] Comparative effectiveness of low-level laser therapy versus muscle energy technique among diabetic patients with frozen shoulder: a study protocol for a parallel group randomised controlled trial. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2024. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04735-7

[48] Intra-articular Steroid Injection for Frozen Shoulder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials With Trial Sequential Analysis. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2016. DOI: 10.1177/0363546516669944

[49] A Multisite Injection Is More Effective Than a Single Glenohumeral Injection of Corticosteroid in the Treatment of Primary Frozen Shoulder: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.069

[50] Mid-term outcomes of prospective clinical trial of transcatheter arterial micro embolization (TAME) for resistant frozen shoulder. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.11.031

[51] Manipulation under anesthesia versus physiotherapy treatment in stage two of a frozen shoulder: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2017. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1763-2

[52] In Frozen Shoulder, US-Guided Versus Blind Administration of Intra-Articular Corticosteroid Injections Increased Accuracy of Injections but Did Not Improve Clinical Outcomes at 12 Weeks. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2021. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.21.01007

[53] The clinical course and outcomes following arthroscopic frozen shoulder 360° release. JSES International. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.07.006

[54] Incidence and prognostic factors for postoperative frozen shoulder after shoulder surgery: a prospective cohort study. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-016-2589-3

[55] Limited capsular release and controlled manipulation under anaesthesia for the treatment of frozen shoulder. Shoulder & Elbow. 2015. DOI: 10.1177/1758573215578590

[56] Glenohumeral joint tuberculosis that mimics frozen shoulder: a retrospective analysis. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.07.026

[57] Trends in Practice Among Shoulder Specialists in the Management of Frozen Shoulder: A Consensus Survey. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2022. DOI: 10.1177/23259671221118834

[58] Frozen Shoulder: MR Arthrographic Findings. Radiology. 2004. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2332031219

[59] Shoulder proprioception – lessons we learned from idiopathic frozen shoulder. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2016. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-016-0971-5

[60] Indications for hydrodilatation for frozen shoulder. EFORT Open Reviews. 2017. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.160061

[61] Rockwood And Matsen S The Shoulder. Arthroscopic Management of Prearthritic and Arthritic Conditions of the Shoulder and the Postarthroplasty Shoulder > Secondary Frozen Shoulder.

[62] The puzzling pathophysiology of frozen shoulders – a scoping review. Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics. 2020. DOI: 10.1186/s40634-020-00307-w

[64] The management of secondary frozen shoulder after anterior shoulder dislocation – The results of manipulation under anaesthesia and injection. Journal of Orthopaedics. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2015.01.030

[66] The effectiveness of ultrasound guided hydrodistension and physiotherapy in the treatment of frozen shoulder/adhesive capsulitis in primary care: a single centre service evaluation. Shoulder & Elbow. 2017. DOI: 10.1177/1758573217701063

[68] Improved range of motion after manipulation under anesthesia versus physiotherapy for stage two frozen shoulder: a randomized controlled trial. JSES International. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.11.004

[69] The Natural History of Idiopathic Frozen Shoulder: A 2- to 27-year Followup Study. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 2012. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-2176-4

[70] Arthroscopic capsular release versus manipulation under anesthesia for primary frozen shoulder. Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow. 2020. DOI: 10.5397/cise.2020.00311

[71] Can magnetic resonance imaging distinguish clinical stages of frozen shoulder? A state-of-the-art review. JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.05.002

[72] Ultrasound Guıded Multisıte Injectıon Technıque in the Treatment of Frozen Shoulder. Arthroscopy Techniques. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2022.06.020

[73] Characteristics of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of idiopathic severe frozen shoulder. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.06.003

[74] An Overview of Factors Relevant to Undertaking Research and Reviews on the Effectiveness of Treatment for Frozen Shoulder. Shoulder & Elbow. 2010. DOI: 10.1111/j.1758-5740.2010.00067.x

[75] Pathomechanics of glenohumeral capsule and scapula in idiopathic frozen shoulder: a study using a three-dimensional finite element model. JSES International. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.04.003

[77] Reduction of abnormal blood flow in frozen shoulder after shoulder manipulation under ultrasound-guided cervical nerve root block: semiquantitative analysis using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. JSES International. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.12.007

[78] The immediate effect of muscle release intervention on muscle activity and shoulder kinematics in patients with frozen shoulder: a cross-sectional, exploratory study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2017. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1867-8

[79] Inferior glenohumeral joint capsule thickness in frozen shoulder via ultrasonography. JSES International. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.06.004

[80] Three-dimensional scapular kinematics and scapulohumeral rhythm in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis or frozen shoulder. Journal of Biomechanics. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.09.004

[81] Synovial response to intraarticular injections of hyaluronate in frozen shoulder: a quantitative assessment with dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Orthopaedic Science. 2004. DOI: 10.1007/s00776-004-0766-7

[82] Is frozen shoulder completely resolved at 2 years after the onset of disease?. Journal of Orthopaedic Science. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2019.03.011

[85] Causal associations of hypothyroidism with frozen shoulder: a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2024. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07826-y

[86] Image-guided versus blind corticosteroid injections in adults with shoulder pain: A systematic review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2011. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-137

[87] Magnetic resonance imaging and short-term clinical results of severe frozen shoulder treated with manipulation under ultrasound-guided cervical nerve root block. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.06.019

[88] Brief Note The Natural History of 'Idiopathic' Frozen Shoulder. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1978. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-197860040-00030

[89] The natural history of 'idiopathic' frozen shoulder.. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1978. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-197860040-00029

[90] Does the timing of shoulder manipulation under ultrasound-guided cervical nerve root block for frozen shoulder affect the clinical outcome?. Journal of Orthopaedic Science. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2020.11.002