Transtornos do Manguito Rotador

Patients › Shoulder

Rotator cuff disorders: common causes of shoulder pain, ranging from mild ache to debilitating injury.

Updated Jun 2026
Uma ilustração desenhada à mão dos tendões do manguito rotador do ombro com uma ruptura.
Ressonância magnética de uma ruptura completa do manguito rotador. A faixa brilhante na parte superior da cabeça do úmero representa o líquido preenchendo o espaço deixado pelo tendão rompido. Kieran Hirpara 4.0

Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e ainda não foi verificada por um médico. A versão em inglês é a versão oficial.

O que você está sentindo

A doença do manguito rotador é comum e torna-se mais provável à medida que você envelhece. Você pode sentir dor na parte da frente do ombro ou na parte externa do braço superior. Essa dor frequentemente origina-se dos tendões que ajudam a levantar o braço. Você também pode notar dor surda na parte da frente do ombro se o tendão do bíceps estiver envolvido. Esse tendão percorre a parte da frente do braço e trabalha em conjunto com o manguito rotador.

Seus sintomas podem parecer mecânicos, como travamento ou atrito na articulação. Essa é uma queixa comum. A dor frequentemente se intensifica à noite, dificultando o sono de lado. Você também pode sentir rigidez ao acordar. Após o uso do braço, a dor surda pode piorar. No entanto, o tempo que você tem esses sintomas não indica a gravidade do rompimento. Algumas pessoas têm rompimentos grandes com pouca dor, enquanto outras têm rompimentos pequenos com desconforto significativo.

As tarefas diárias podem tornar-se difíceis. Alcançar atrás das costas para fechar um sutiã ou guardar uma camisa pode parecer desconfortável ou doloroso. Levantar objetos acima da cabeça pode desencadear dor aguda. Você pode acabar evitando certos movimentos para proteger o ombro. Sensações subjetivas de instabilidade ou fraqueza também são comuns. Essas sensações podem fazer você sentir que seu ombro não está funcionando corretamente.

É importante saber que sua saúde mental desempenha um grande papel na intensidade da dor que você sente e no quão bem seu ombro funciona. Essa conexão pode ser mais forte do que o tamanho real do rompimento. Seu cirurgião avaliará seu quadro geral, incluindo sua idade e nível de atividade, para decidir o melhor caminho a seguir. Seja você escolher cirurgia ou tratamento não cirúrgico, ambas as opções podem ser eficazes. O objetivo é reduzir sua dor e ajudá-lo a retornar às atividades que você aprecia. Se seu diagnóstico não estiver claro, seu cirurgião pode focar no tratamento direto da dor no ombro para evitar procedimentos desnecessários.

O que está realmente acontecendo

O seu ombro é uma articulação do tipo bola e soquete. A bola assenta em um soquete raso. Um grupo de quatro tendões, chamado de manguito rotador, envolve a bola como uma manga. Esses tendões mantêm a bola no lugar e ajudam você a levantar o braço. Esta condição é comum e torna-se mais frequente com o avançar da idade.

Quando você rompe um tendão, o equilíbrio do seu ombro é alterado. A bola pode deslizar para cima em vez de permanecer centralizada no soquete. Isso é chamado de migração superior. Isso ocorre porque o tendão já não consegue puxar a bola para baixo. Com o tempo, esse desalinhamento causa atrito e desgaste. Rupturas crônicas não tratadas podem levar à artrose, que é a artrite por desgaste da articulação.

A dor e a fraqueza que você sente decorrem dessa instabilidade. A cápsula articular, que é a capa ao redor do ombro, pode esticar ou romper. Isso permite que os ossos esfreguem uns contra os outros. Em alguns casos, os músculos ao redor do ombro mudam de posição para compensar. Isso altera a forma como o seu ombro se move durante as tarefas do dia a dia.

Seu cirurgião analisa essas alterações mecânicas para decidir sobre o tratamento. Tanto as opções cirúrgicas quanto as não cirúrgicas podem ser eficazes. O objetivo é restaurar o movimento normal e reduzir a dor. Em alguns casos, os procedimentos visam restaurar a posição natural da bola no soquete. Isso ajuda a aliviar a pressão sobre a articulação.

A saúde mental desempenha um papel na forma como você experimenta essa dor. Pode ser tão importante quanto o tamanho da ruptura. Suas expectativas também influenciam diretamente o seu resultado. Compreender o que está acontecendo dentro do seu ombro ajuda você a se preparar para a recuperação.

O que podemos fazer a respeito

Você tem opções para gerenciar a doença do manguito rotador, e tanto as abordagens não cirúrgicas quanto as cirúrgicas podem ser eficazes. A escolha correta depende do seu rompimento específico, idade e saúde geral. Para muitos pacientes, iniciar com autocuidado e fisioterapia é um caminho viável. Aos 13 anos após o diagnóstico, cerca de 90% dos pacientes tratados de forma conservadora para rompimentos do manguito rotador não apresentavam dor ou apenas dor leve. Aos 13 anos após o diagnóstico, cerca de 70% dos pacientes tratados de forma conservadora para rompimentos do manguito rotador não apresentavam distúrbios nas atividades da vida diária.

A fisioterapia visa fortalecer os músculos ao redor do ombro para melhorar a função e reduzir a dor. Um protocolo específico de fisioterapia é eficaz no tratamento de rompimentos do manguito rotador de espessura total não traumáticos em aproximadamente 75% dos pacientes acompanhados por 2 anos. Se você tiver um rompimento do supraespinhal não traumático, o tratamento conservador deve ser considerado como o método primário de tratamento. Seu cirurgião pode aconselhá-lo a evitar movimentos do ombro que causem impingement, que é quando os tecidos ficam presos na articulação do ombro. A saúde mental também desempenha um papel significativo; ela tem uma associação mais forte com a dor e a função do ombro relatadas pelo paciente do que com o tamanho do rompimento em pacientes com rompimentos do manguito rotador de espessura total.

O manejo médico concentra-se no alívio da dor e na redução da inflamação. Embora as injeções de corticosteroides sejam às vezes usadas, há poucas evidências reproduzíveis que apoiem sua eficácia no manejo da doença do manguito rotador. Você deve ter cautela ao considerar essas injeções, pois elas devem ser evitadas se uma reparação do manguito rotador for realizada nos 6 meses seguintes. Evidências limitadas atuais sugerem que as injeções de plasma rico em plaquetas (PRP) podem não ser benéficas para o tratamento não operatório da doença crônica do manguito rotador a curto prazo. Medicamentos para dor e anti-inflamatórios podem ajudar a gerenciar os sintomas enquanto você se engaja na terapia.

A cirurgia é considerada quando o tratamento conservativo atingiu seu limite ou se você tem um rompimento traumático que não está cicatrizando. A reparação artroscópica do manguito rotador é uma opção eficaz e segura para tratar os sintomas dos rompimentos do manguito rotador, com resultados clínicos duradouros ao longo do tempo. Este procedimento é favorecido para melhorar a função do ombro, e outros procedimentos ou tratamentos intra-articulares não oferecem benefícios significativos em comparação com a reparação artroscópica do manguito rotador para esse objetivo. Para rompimentos maciços ou irreparáveis, a reparação parcial pode ser eficaz na redução da dor e na melhoria da função, restaurando o equilíbrio do par de forças. Nos casos em que a própria articulação está danificada, como na artropatia, uma prótese de ombro reversa pode ser reservada para o tratamento, embora seja contraindicada em pacientes com artrite reumatoide. Seu cirurgião considerará cuidadosamente seus fatores de risco para falha da reparação ao planejar seu tratamento.

O que esperar

O seu prognóstico depende em grande parte de optar pela cirurgia ou pelo tratamento conservador. Para roturas pequenas a médias, a cirurgia oferece um alívio da dor e uma função a longo prazo superiores aos da fisioterapia isoladamente, com benefícios que podem durar até 15 anos. Se tiver uma rotura grande ou maciça, a cirurgia ainda pode proporcionar um resultado satisfatório a longo prazo. Mesmo que necessite de cirurgia de revisão, os seus resultados a curto prazo são semelhantes aos da sua primeira reparação.

Se gerir a sua rotura sem cirurgia, o curso é frequentemente benigno. Cerca de 90% dos doentes não têm dor ou têm apenas dor ligeira 13 anos após o diagnóstico. Cerca de 70% não têm perturbação nas suas atividades diárias nesse mesmo período de 13 anos. No entanto, as roturas crónicas não tratadas podem eventualmente levar à artrose, que é uma artrose degenerativa. A cirurgia pode alterar este curso natural inicial, proporcionando diferenças clinicamente relevantes na dor e na função em comparação com o tratamento não cirúrgico.

Se submeter-se a uma reparação, a sua recuperação é um processo gradual. Experimentará aproximadamente 60% da sua recuperação funcional final aos 3 meses após a cirurgia. Aos 6 meses, terá atingido aproximadamente 75% da recuperação funcional. Um ano após a cirurgia não determina o seu resultado a longo prazo, pelo que a paciência é fundamental.

A sua idade e as suas expectativas moldam o seu resultado. Se tiver cinquenta anos ou menos, pode esperar um alívio da dor a longo prazo. No entanto, pode não observar uma melhoria significativa a longo prazo na amplitude de movimento. Uma grande proporção de doentes neste grupo etário tem um resultado a longo prazo insatisfatório. A sua saúde mental também desempenha um papel importante na forma como perceciona a dor e a função, por vezes mais do que o tamanho da própria rotura. Alinhar diretamente as suas expectativas com as do seu cirurgião ajuda a garantir um melhor resultado.

Quando procurar ajuda

Consulte o seu médico de família se tiver dor no ombro que não melhora com o repouso. Solicite uma avaliação especializada se notar fraqueza ou instabilidade na articulação. Procure atendimento se o ombro bloquear ou ceder. Entre em contato com o seu médico se os sintomas interferirem no seu sono ou no trabalho. A piora súbita da dor também é um motivo para procurar ajuda. Lembre-se de que o tempo de duração dos sintomas não indica a gravidade da lesão. Lesões crônicas não tratadas podem levar à osteoartrite por desgaste ao longo do tempo. A avaliação precoce ajuda a prevenir danos adicionais e garante que você receba o plano de tratamento adequado às suas necessidades específicas.


Evidence & references

Overview

  • The majority of rotator cuff disorders are amenable to conservative treatment [1].
  • Rotator cuff dysfunction may necessitate surgical treatment [1].
  • The major indication for revision rotator cuff repair is the persistence of clinical symptoms despite nonsurgical management in the absence of substantial risk factors for failure [2].
  • Rotator cuff injuries are most accurately diagnosed with a combination of cuff- and impingement-specific clinical tests [3].
  • Deltoid complications combined with rotator cuff pathology represent a rare but devastating complication with no well-described surgical option [4].
  • Treatment of chronic massive rotator cuff tears is challenging, and results are comparatively inferior to those of treating patients with smaller rotator cuff tears [17].
  • Shoulder arthroscopy literature remains controversial, with conclusions often unsupported due to bias and limitations [19].
  • No clinical guidelines for shoulder arthroscopy are definitive pending higher levels of evidence [19].
  • No recommendations regarding suprascapular nerve release in conjunction with rotator cuff repair can be made at this time [22].
  • Further research is necessary to better delineate the indications for suprascapular nerve release in conjunction with rotator cuff repair [22].
  • Open approaches for rotator cuff repairs continue to have indications in certain circumstances, such as complete rotator cuff tendon avulsion and glenohumeral joint incarceration after high-velocity trauma [23].
  • There is no statistically significant difference in subjective outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with or without acromioplasty at intermediate follow-up [26].
  • Critical shoulder angle and acromial index do not appear to influence 24-month functional outcomes postoperatively [47].
  • Critical shoulder angle and acromial index are not contraindications to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair [47].
  • Predictors of pain and functional outcomes after operative treatment for rotator cuff tears can be used to select optimal candidates for operative treatment [54].
  • Predictors of pain and functional outcomes after operative treatment for rotator cuff tears can assist with patient education and expectations before treatment [54].
  • There were no differences of clinically relevant size between arthroscopic and open rotator cuff surgery in postoperative pain in a comparative series [71].

Anatomy & Pathophysiology

  • Understanding the function and pathology surrounding the teres minor is paramount in comprehensive management of patients with shoulder pathology [6].
  • A systematic approach to magnetic resonance imaging interpretation of shoulder injuries describes the normal imaging appearance of each anatomical structure, the most useful pulse sequences and imaging planes, and signs of injury [28].
  • Imaging is an essential tool for evaluation of patients with shoulder pain, and understanding the extent of an injury with imaging is key to successful management [29].
  • Tears of the subscapularis have greater biomechanical consequences than do tears of the infraspinatus [31].
  • Dynamic superior migration of the humeral head during abduction occurs in patients with rotator cuff tears, as confirmed by in vivo 3D kinematic analysis [37].
  • In massive rotator cuff tears, the pectoralis major and latissimus dorsi muscles are effective in improving glenohumeral kinematics and reducing acromiohumeral pressures [40].
  • Biomechanical studies indicate that the long head of the biceps contributes to stability of the glenohumeral joint in all directions, although in vivo studies have not yet established this stabilizing effect or the physiologic load required [46].
  • Increasing supraspinatus tendon loading causes a mechanical interaction between the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons, paralleling the increase in supraspinatus tendon strain [51].
  • The physiopathology of symptomatic anterior instabilities is related to dysfunction of the anterosuperior glenohumeral capsular ligament rather than the inferior glenohumeral ligament [52].
  • Additional repair of a partial subscapularis tear combined with a supraspinatus tear did not affect external rotation or glenohumeral kinematics [53].
  • Shoulders with rotator cuff tears require considerable compensatory deltoid function to prevent abduction motion loss [57].
  • Pain reduction from subacromial injection causes shifts in scapulohumeral rhythm, resulting in increased glenohumeral motion and reduced reliance on scapular rotation [59].
  • The clinical evidence to support correction of the critical shoulder angle with lateral acromioplasty is insufficient, and further research is required to demonstrate an association between critical shoulder angle and clinical outcomes before treatment algorithms should be altered [61].
  • The critical shoulder angle, posterior acromial height, and posterior acromial tilt do not change significantly over a long-term follow-up of at least 10 years, supporting the hypothesis that these scapular morphologic parameters are stable anthropometric characteristics [62].
  • Simulated isolated supraspinatus cord and strap tears significantly reduced shoulder abduction force, with cord tears causing a larger decline than strap tears [63].
  • The critical shoulder angle may not be responsible for rotator cuff tears; rather, patient activities throughout several decades could induce both cuff lesions and bone remodeling at the acromial level [66].
  • The human scapula has two distinctive characteristics: a lateral orientation of the glenoid cavity and a narrow coraco-acromial arch [73].
  • Cervical spine position may cause decreased shoulder rotation strength, meaning clinicians should assess shoulder strength in the position the patient requires to use their shoulder because weakness may be missed in standard testing positions [78].

Classification

  • Rotator cuff disorders are recognized and managed conditions among patients with shoulder pain [1].
  • Rotator cuff dysfunction may necessitate surgical treatment [1].
  • The majority of rotator cuff conditions are amenable to conservative treatment [1].
  • The major indication for revision rotator cuff repair is the persistence of clinical symptoms despite nonsurgical management in the absence of substantial risk factors for failure [2].
  • Rotator cuff injuries are most accurately diagnosed with a combination of cuff- and impingement-specific clinical tests [3].
  • Deltoid complications combined with rotator cuff pathology represent a rare but devastating complication with no well-described surgical option [4].
  • Increasing knowledge about rotator cuff syndrome, including better imaging, has facilitated patient treatment for a stable spectrum of rotator cuff pathology [5].
  • The application of endoscopic surgery has facilitated patient treatment for a stable spectrum of rotator cuff pathology [5].
  • Rotator cuff disease, shoulder instability, and associated lesions are common pathologic conditions of the shoulder involving soft tissues [7].
  • In the context of rotator cuff disease, the etiology of anterior shoulder pain with macroscopic changes in the biceps tendon is related to the complex interaction of the tendon and surrounding soft tissues, rather than a single entity [8].
  • The Korean Shoulder Scoring System (KSS) is a useful measurement tool that combines subjective and objective evaluations for shoulder function related to rotator cuff disorders [9].
  • The acromial morphology classification system is an unreliable method to assess the acromion [14].
  • The acromial index shows no association with the presence of rotator cuff disease [14].
  • A classification system exists to divide coracoids according to their morphology and relative risk of associated subscapularis tears [30].
  • Comparing histopathological data with demographical information allows for the identification of rotator cuff tears at risk of repair failure [50].
  • Gene expression in human rotator cuff muscles varied according to tendon injury severity [67].

Clinical Presentation

  • Rotator cuff disorders are amenable to conservative treatment in the majority of cases [1].
  • Rotator cuff dysfunction may necessitate surgical treatment [1].
  • The major indication for revision rotator cuff repair is the persistence of clinical symptoms despite nonsurgical management in the absence of substantial risk factors for failure [2].
  • Rotator cuff injuries are most accurately diagnosed with a combination of cuff- and impingement-specific clinical tests [3].
  • Deltoid complications combined with rotator cuff pathology represent a rare but devastating complication with no well-described surgical option [4].
  • Increasing knowledge about rotator cuff syndrome, including better imaging, has facilitated patient treatment for a stable spectrum of rotator cuff pathology [5].
  • The application of endoscopic surgery has facilitated patient treatment for a stable spectrum of rotator cuff pathology [5].
  • Understanding the function and pathology surrounding the teres minor is paramount in comprehensive management of the patient with shoulder pathology [6].
  • Rotator cuff disease, shoulder instability, and associated lesions are common pathologic conditions of the shoulder involving soft tissues [7].
  • In the context of rotator cuff disease, the etiology of anterior shoulder pain with macroscopic changes in the biceps tendon is related to the complex interaction of the tendon and surrounding soft tissues, rather than a single entity [8].
  • The Korean Shoulder Scoring System (KSS) is a useful measurement tool that combines subjective and objective evaluations for shoulder function related to rotator cuff disorders [9].
  • In one-quarter of patients with painful cuff tears, pain developed in a contralateral asymptomatic cuff tear that resulted in a measurable decline in function within 3 years [10].
  • The acromial morphology classification system is an unreliable method to assess the acromion [14].
  • The acromial index shows no association with the presence of rotator cuff disease [14].
  • Ultrasound is an useful tool for discovering in pre-symptomatic stages subjects that may undergo shoulder symptomatic pathologies [15].
  • Rotator cuff injuries in adolescents may be overlooked as a cause of disability, leading to significant delays in diagnosis [32].
  • Intratendinous rotator cuff tears are difficult to diagnose preoperatively [34].
  • Current physiotherapy practice in relation to rotator cuff disorders is variable [35].
  • Current physiotherapy practice in relation to rotator cuff disorders is variable [36].
  • The Functional Shoulder Score (FSS) is a patient-reported outcome measure that can easily be incorporated into clinical practice [38].
  • The FSS provides a quick, reliable, valid and practical measure for rotator cuff problems [38].

Investigations

  • Rotator cuff dysfunction may necessitate surgical treatment [1].
  • Rotator cuff injuries are most accurately diagnosed with a combination of cuff- and impingement-specific clinical tests [3].
  • Better imaging has facilitated patient treatment for a stable spectrum of rotator cuff pathology [5].
  • Ultrasound is an useful tool for discovering subjects in pre-symptomatic stages that may undergo shoulder symptomatic pathologies [15].
  • The use of MRI before a trial of conservative management in patients with atraumatic shoulder pain, minimal to no strength deficits on physical examination, and suspected cuff tendinopathy other than full-thickness tears provides negative value in the management of these patients, at both the individual and population level [24].
  • A systematic approach to the interpretation of a magnetic resonance examination of the shoulder describes the normal imaging appearance of each anatomical structure, the most useful pulse sequences and imaging planes, and the signs of injury [28].
  • Imaging is an essential tool for evaluation of patients with shoulder pain [29].
  • Understanding the extent of an injury with imaging is key to successful management [29].
  • Most abnormal MRI findings were not different in frequency between symptomatic and asymptomatic shoulders [43].
  • MRI and US provide similar assessments of postoperative rotator cuff healing, although US is less sensitive [58].
  • Shoulder MRI may be warranted for preoperative planning in the select population of patients with chronic calcific tendinopathy and prolonged refractory pain, although the probability of identifying additional cuff pathology requiring surgical intervention is very low [64].
  • Preoperative MRI scans of the shoulder interpreted by orthopaedic surgeons with a systematic approach resulted in improved accuracy in diagnosing subscapularis tendon tears compared with previous studies [65].
  • The diagnostic accuracy of US, MRI and MRA in the characterisation of full-thickness rotator cuff tears is high with overall estimates of sensitivity and specificity over 0.90 [68].
  • A non-contrast shoulder MRI obtained in the community setting after non-dislocating shoulder trauma has a moderate sensitivity for most intraarticular pathologies when interpreted by musculoskeletal radiologists [70].
  • The MRI tendinosis grade is associated with stiffness assessed using sonoelastography in patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy [72].
  • Tendinosis severity assessed by preoperative MRI was the only factor associated with failure to heal in patients with partial-thickness and small full-thickness rotator cuff tears [75].
  • A 3 T MRI protocol can be applied to evaluate morphological tendon outcomes after different treatment modalities [77].
  • Shoulders with a symptomatic rotator cuff tear showed higher radioisotope uptake on bone scintigraphy than those with an asymptomatic tear [79].
  • Unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder in asymptomatic high performance throwing athletes reveals abnormalities that may encompass a spectrum of nonclinical findings [80].

Treatment

Non-Operative Management

  • The majority of rotator cuff disorders are amenable to conservative treatment [1].
  • MRI use before a trial of conservative management in patients with atraumatic shoulder pain, minimal to no strength deficits, and suspected cuff tendinopathy (other than full-thickness tears) provides negative value at both individual and population levels [24].
  • Nonoperative treatment is appropriate as initial therapy for partial-thickness rotator cuff tears [42].
  • There is little reproducible evidence to support the efficacy of subacromial corticosteroid injection in managing rotator cuff disease [33].
  • Orthobiologics offer a relatively safe management option for rotator cuff pathology, but evidence is inconclusive for or against its use [45].
  • Limited evidence suggests that platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections may not be beneficial in the short term for the nonoperative treatment of chronic rotator cuff disease [56].
  • Subacromial PRP injections produce significantly worse improvement in functional outcomes in patients with partial supraspinatus tears compared to patients with isolated tendinopathy [44].

Operative Management

  • Rotator cuff dysfunction may necessitate surgical treatment when conservative options are insufficient [1].
  • Early operative treatment appears to be better for rotator cuff tears with a sudden onset of symptoms and poor function to achieve maximal return of shoulder function [18].
  • Patients undergoing operative treatment for rotator cuff tears had significantly better pain and functional outcomes compared with patients undergoing nonoperative treatment in a prospective cohort study [76].
  • Treatment results for chronic massive rotator cuff tears are comparatively inferior to those for smaller rotator cuff tears [17].
  • Open approaches for rotator cuff repairs continue to have indications in certain circumstances, such as complete tendon avulsion and glenohumeral joint incarceration following high-velocity trauma [23].
  • Arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair is indicated for the persistence of clinical symptoms despite nonsurgical management in the absence of substantial risk factors for failure [2].
  • Repair of partial- and full-thickness rotator cuff tears using a bioinductive implant shows safety and efficacy at 1-year follow-up [11].
  • Arthroscopy is a safe and effective treatment for symptomatic calcific tendonitis of the shoulder, including or excluding patients with rotator cuff tears [48].
  • For patients with intact rotator cuffs and calcific tendonitis, needling or extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) may be beneficial alternatives to arthroscopy in some cases [48].

Arthroscopic Subacromial Decompression (SAD)

  • Following nonoperative treatment for at least 6 weeks, SAD is a viable and good surgical option for shoulder impingement with an intact rotator cuff [39].
  • SAD without cuff repair appears to be a safe, efficacious, and sustainable procedure for patients with partial rotator cuff tears [41].
  • Operative management for partial-thickness tears, including arthroscopic subacromial decompression, is considered when nonoperative treatment fails [42].

Adjunctive Procedures and Implants

  • PRP does not have an effect on overall retear rates or shoulder-specific outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair [21].
  • Routine arthroscopic suprascapular nerve release (SSNR) is not recommended when treating patients with rotator cuff tear [49].
  • No recommendations regarding suprascapular nerve release in conjunction with rotator cuff repair can be made at this time, and further research is necessary [22].

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (RTSA)

  • Severely impaired deltoid function is a contraindication to RTSA [13].
  • An isolated supraspinatus tear is a contraindication to RTSA [13].
  • The presence of full active shoulder elevation with a massive rotator cuff tear and arthritis is a contraindication to RTSA [13].

Evidence Quality

  • Conclusions in shoulder arthroscopy literature are often unsupported due to bias and limitations, and no clinical guidelines are definitive pending higher levels of evidence [19].

Complications

  • Rotator cuff dysfunction may necessitate surgical treatment [1].
  • Deltoid complications combined with rotator cuff pathology represent a rare but devastating complication with no well-described surgical option [4].
  • In one-quarter of patients with painful cuff tears, pain developed in a contralateral asymptomatic cuff tear that resulted in a measurable decline in function within 3 years [10].
  • Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair leads to a structural failure rate of 33% but satisfactory functional results with high patient satisfaction at midterm follow-up [27].

Recovery

  • The majority of rotator cuff disorders are amenable to conservative treatment, although rotator cuff dysfunction may necessitate surgical treatment [1].
  • Conservative versus surgical management for rotator cuff tears does not result in significantly improved shoulder function (evaluated by CMS) at a 2-year follow-up [12].
  • Arthroscopic decompression is not recommended in the treatment of rotator cuff tendinopathy [16].
  • The natural history of rotator cuff tendinopathy probably plays a significant role in long-term results [16].
  • Arthroscopic acromioplasty significantly improves long-term clinical outcomes up to 2 years for chronic rotator cuff tendinopathy when used with platelet-rich plasma injection [69].
  • Patients with rotator cuff disease treated without surgery experience a clinically important change in self-assessed outcome with a 2-point change in the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score or a 12 to 17-point change in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score [83].
  • Younger age, lower BMI, more functional capacity, a shorter symptomatic period, reversible changes on MRI, and higher Constant and ASES scores at the first evaluation are good prognostic factors for the natural course of subacromial impingement syndrome [84].
  • In one-quarter of patients with painful cuff tears, pain developed in a contralateral asymptomatic cuff tear that resulted in a measurable decline in function within 3 years [10].
  • Early operative treatment appears to be better for rotator cuff tears with a sudden onset of symptoms and poor function to achieve maximal return of shoulder function [18].
  • The major indication for revision rotator cuff repair is the persistence of clinical symptoms despite nonsurgical management in the absence of substantial risk factors for failure [2].
  • Outcomes after repair of partial- and full-thickness rotator cuff tears using a bioinductive implant show safety and efficacy at 1-year follow-up [11].
  • Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair leads to a structural failure rate of 33% but yields satisfactory functional results with high patient satisfaction at midterm follow-up [27].
  • Increased age and longer duration of follow-up were associated with lower healing rates after double-row rotator cuff repair [20].
  • The 'critical period' for healing following rotator cuff repair, during which risks of retears are high, extends to the first 6 months [85].
  • Although functional status improved with time after 6 months, the structural status of repaired cuffs remained unchanged between 6 and 19 months postoperatively [55].
  • Improvement in functional outcome after arthroscopic repair of a subscapularis tendon tear is maintained long-term [60].

Key Evidence

  • [L4] The majority of conditions are amenable to conservative treatment, although rotator cuff dysfunction may necessitate surgical treatment. [1] (10.1002/art.20668)
  • [L5] The major indication for revision rotator cuff repair is the persistence of clinical symptoms despite nonsurgical management in the absence of substantial risk factors for failure. [2] (10.5435/00124635-201111000-00002)
  • [L5] Current consensus suggests rotator cuff injuries are most accurately diagnosed with a combination of cuff- and impingement-specific clinical tests. [3] (10.1016/j.arthro.2013.07.265)
  • [Case_report] Deltoid complications combined with rotator cuff pathology represent a rare but devastating complication with no well-described surgical option. [4] (10.1016/j.jse.2011.09.023)
  • [L3] Increasing knowledge about this syndrome, including better imaging, has facilitated patient treatment for a stable spectrum of rotator cuff pathology, as has the application of endoscopic surgery. [5] (10.1016/j.arthro.2010.02.029)
  • [L5] Understanding the function and pathology surrounding the teres minor is paramount in comprehensive management of the patient with shoulder pathology. [6] (10.5435/jaaos-d-15-00258)
  • [L4] In the context of rotator cuff disease, the etiology of anterior shoulder pain with macroscopic changes in the biceps tendon is related to the complex interaction of the tendon and surrounding soft tissues, rather than a single entity. [8] (10.1016/j.jse.2008.05.044)
  • [L4] The KSS is a useful measurement tool that combines subjective and objective evaluations for shoulder function related to rotator cuff disorders. [9] (10.1016/j.jse.2008.11.019)
  • [L2] In one-quarter of patients with painful cuff tears, pain developed in a contralateral asymptomatic cuff tear that resulted in a measurable decline in function within 3 years. [10] (10.1016/j.jse.2023.09.008)
  • [L4] Outcomes after repair of partial- and full-thickness rotator cuff tears using a bioinductive implant show safety and efficacy at 1-year follow-up. [11] (10.1016/j.arthro.2019.02.019)
  • [L1] At a 2-year follow-up, shoulder function evaluated in terms of CMS was not significantly improved. [12] (10.1186/s12891-020-03872-4)
  • [L5] Severely impaired deltoid function, an isolated supraspinatus tear, and the presence of full active shoulder elevation with a massive rotator cuff tear and arthritis are contraindications to RTSA. [13] (10.1007/s11999-009-1188-9)
  • [L3] The acromial morphology classification system is an unreliable method to assess the acromion, and the acromial index shows no association with the presence of rotator cuff disease. [14] (10.1016/j.jse.2011.09.028)
  • [L3] Ultrasound is an useful tool for discovering in pre-symptomatic stages the subjects that may undergo shoulder symptomatic pathologies. [15] (10.1186/1471-2474-11-278)
  • [L1] The natural history of rotator cuff tendinopathy probably plays a significant role in the results in the long-term. [16] (10.1302/0301-620x.99b6.bjj-2016-0569.r1)
  • [L5] However, treatment of these patients is challenging, and results are comparatively inferior to those of treating patients with smaller rotator cuff tears. [17] (10.5435/00124635-200309000-00005)
  • [L3] Early operative treatment appears to be better for rotator cuff tears with a sudden onset of symptoms and poor function to achieve maximal return of shoulder function. [18] (10.1016/j.jse.2005.07.006)
  • [L5] The editorial states that shoulder arthroscopy literature remains controversial, conclusions are often unsupported due to bias and limitations, and no clinical guidelines are definitive pending higher levels of evidence. [19] (10.1016/j.arthro.2012.07.001)
  • [L4] Increased age and longer duration of follow-up were associated with lower healing rates after double-row rotator cuff repair. [20] (10.1177/0363546510382835)
  • [L1] PRP does not have an effect on overall retear rates or shoulder-specific outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. [21] (10.1016/j.arthro.2012.03.007)
  • [L4] No recommendations regarding suprascapular nerve release in conjunction with rotator cuff repair can be made at this time, and further research is necessary to better delineate the indications in the future. [22] (10.1016/j.jse.2011.11.033)
  • [Case_report] This case highlights the importance of the initial workup after high-velocity trauma and that open approaches for rotator cuff repairs continue to have indications in certain circumstances. [23] (10.1016/j.jse.2009.07.014)
  • [L4] The use of MRI before a trial of conservative management in patients with atraumatic shoulder pain, minimal to no strength deficits on physical examination, and suspected cuff tendinopathy other than full-thickness tears provides negative value in the management of these patients, at both the individual and population level. [24] (10.1016/j.jse.2019.04.003)
  • [L1] On the basis of the currently available literature, there is no statistically significant difference in subjective outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with or without acromioplasty at intermediate follow-up. [26] (10.1016/j.arthro.2011.11.022)
  • [L4] Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair leads to a structural failure rate of 33% but satisfactory functional results with high patient satisfaction at midterm follow-up. [27] (10.1016/j.jse.2015.05.051)
  • [L5] This article provides a systematic approach to the interpretation of a magnetic resonance examination of the shoulder, describing the normal imaging appearance of each anatomical structure, the most useful pulse sequences and imaging planes, and the signs of injury. [28] (10.1177/0363546505278255)
  • [L4] Imaging is an essential tool for evaluation of patients with shoulder pain; understanding the extent of an injury with imaging is key to successful management. [29] (10.1016/j.csm.2013.03.009)
  • [L3] This study was the first to create a classification system to divide coracoids according to their morphology and relative risk of associated subscapularis tears. [30] (10.1016/j.jse.2020.01.074)
  • [L5] Tears of the subscapularis have greater biomechanical consequences than do tears of the infraspinatus. [31] (10.1016/j.arthro.2009.09.007)
  • [L4] Rotator cuff injuries in adolescents may be overlooked as a cause of disability, leading to significant delays in diagnosis. [32] (10.1177/0363546504269033)
  • [L1] This systematic review of the available literature indicates that there is little reproducible evidence to support the efficacy of subacromial corticosteroid injection in managing rotator cuff disease. [33] (10.5435/00124635-200701000-00002)
  • [L4] Intratendinous rotator cuff tears are difficult to diagnose preoperatively. [34] (10.1016/j.jse.2010.01.013)
  • [L4] Current physiotherapy practice in relation to rotator cuff disorders is variable, which might reflect the lack of high-quality evidence available. [35] (10.1177/1758573217717103)
  • [L4] Current physiotherapy practice in relation to rotator cuff disorders is variable, which might reflect the lack of high-quality evidence available. [36] (10.1111/j.1758-5740.2011.00164.x)
  • [L3] This study confirms dynamic superior migration of the humeral head during abduction in patients with rotator cuff tears using in vivo 3D kinematic analysis. [37] (10.1016/j.arthro.2015.08.031)
  • [L2] The FSS is a patient-reported outcome measure that can easily be incorporated into clinical practice, providing a quick, reliable, valid and practical measure for rotator cuff problems. [38] (10.1177/1758573215578589)
  • [L5] Following nonoperative treatment for at least 6 weeks, SAD is a viable and good surgical option for the treatment of shoulder impingement with an intact rotator cuff. [39] (10.1016/j.arthro.2019.06.012)
  • [L5] In massive rotator cuff tear, the pectoralis major and latissimus dorsi muscles are effective in improving glenohumeral kinematics and reducing acromiohumeral pressures. [40] (10.1016/j.jse.2013.11.030)
  • [L4] ASD without cuff repair appears to be a safe, efficacious, and sustainable procedure for patients with partial rotator cuff tears. [41] (10.1016/j.arthro.2015.08.026)
  • [L5] Nonoperative treatment is appropriate as initial therapy, while operative management including arthroscopic subacromial decompression, debridement, or repair is considered when nonoperative treatment fails. [42] (10.5435/00124635-199901000-00004)
  • [L3] Most abnormal MRI findings were not different in frequency between symptomatic and asymptomatic shoulders. [43] (10.1016/j.jse.2019.04.001)
  • [L2] However, improvement in symptoms and functional outcomes was significantly worse in patients who had a partial-thickness rotator cuff tear compared with patients who had an isolated tendinopathy. [44] (10.1016/j.arthro.2023.03.019)
  • [L2] Orthobiologics offer a relatively safe management option with inconclusive evidence for or against its use for rotator cuff pathology. [45] (10.3233/bmr-201844)
  • [L5] Biomechanical studies indicate that the long head of the biceps contributes to stability of the glenohumeral joint in all directions, though in vivo studies have yet to establish this stabilizing effect and the physiologic load required remains unknown. [46] (10.1016/j.arthro.2010.10.014)
  • [L3] CSA and AI do not appear to influence 24-month functional outcomes postoperatively and hence are not contraindications to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. [47] (10.1177/0363546517717947)
  • [L5] Arthroscopy is a safe and effective treatment for symptomatic calcific tendonitis of the shoulder, excluding or including patients with rotator cuff tears, but patients with intact cuffs could benefit from needling or ESWT in some cases. [48] (10.1016/j.arthro.2015.11.003)
  • [L1] Routine arthroscopic SSNR is not recommended when treating patients with rotator cuff tear. [49] (10.1007/s00167-022-07066-4)
  • [L2] Comparing histopathological data with demographical information allows for the identification of rotator cuff tears at risk of repair failure. [50] (10.1007/s00167-011-1521-1)
  • [L5] Increasing supraspinatus tendon loading causes a mechanical interaction between the two tendons, paralleling the increase in supraspinatus tendon strain. [51] (10.1016/j.jse.2009.10.003)
  • [L3] The physiopathology is related to dysfunction of the anterosuperior glenohumeral capsular ligament rather than the inferior glenohumeral ligament. [52] (10.1016/j.jse.2022.10.005)
  • [L5] Additional repair of the partial subscapularis tear with supraspinatus tear did not affect external rotation or glenohumeral kinematics. [53] (10.1016/j.jse.2013.09.015)
  • [L2] These data can be used to select optimal candidates for operative treatment of rotator cuff tears and assist with patient education and expectations before treatment. [54] (10.1016/j.jse.2018.04.016)
  • [L4] Although functional status improved with time after 6 months, the structural status of repaired cuffs remained unchanged between 6 and 19 months. [55] (10.1016/j.jse.2011.05.027)
  • [L2] The currently limited available evidence on PRP for nonoperative treatment of chronic rotator cuff disease suggests that in the short term, PRP injections may not be beneficial. [56] (10.1016/j.arthro.2018.10.115)
  • [L5] Shoulders with rotator cuff tears require considerable compensatory deltoid function to prevent abduction motion loss. [57] (10.1177/0363546518768276)
  • [L3] MRI and US provide similar assessments of postoperative rotator cuff healing, although US is less sensitive. [58] (10.1016/j.otsr.2015.06.006)
  • [L3] Pain reduction caused shifts in scapulohumeral rhythm resulting in an increase in glenohumeral motion and a reduced reliance on scapular rotation. [59] (10.1016/j.jse.2007.05.010)
  • [L4] This study shows that improvement in functional outcome after arthroscopic repair of a subscapularis tendon tear is maintained long-term. [60] (10.1016/j.arthro.2012.02.031)
  • [L5] The clinical evidence to support correction of the critical shoulder angle with lateral acromioplasty is insufficient at this time, and further research is required to demonstrate an association between critical shoulder angle and clinical outcomes before treatment algorithms should be altered. [61] (10.1016/j.arthro.2018.06.020)
  • [L3] The critical shoulder angle, posterior acromial height, and posterior acromial tilt do not change significantly over a long-term follow-up of at least 10 years, supporting the hypothesis that these scapular morphologic parameters are stable anthropometric characteristics. [62] (10.1016/j.jse.2020.09.042)
  • [L5] Simulated isolated supraspinatus cord and strap tears significantly reduced shoulder abduction force, with cord tears causing a larger decline than strap tears. [63] (10.1016/j.jse.2023.07.003)
  • [Commentary] Shoulder MRI may be warranted for preoperative planning in the select population of patients with chronic calcific tendinopathy and prolonged refractory pain, although the probability of identifying additional cuff pathology requiring surgical intervention is very low. [64] (10.1016/j.arthro.2020.01.014)
  • [L3] Preoperative MRI scans of the shoulder interpreted by orthopaedic surgeons with the described systematic approach resulted in improved accuracy in diagnosing subscapularis tendon tears compared with previous studies. [65] (10.1016/j.arthro.2012.04.142)
  • [L5] The critical shoulder angle may not be responsible for rotator cuff tears; rather, patient activities throughout several decades could induce both cuff lesions and bone remodeling at the acromial level. [66] (10.1016/j.arthro.2020.04.030)
  • [L4] Gene expression in human rotator cuff muscles varied according to tendon injury severity. [67] (10.2106/jbjs.m.01585)
  • [L1] The diagnostic accuracy of US, MRI and MRA in the characterisation of full-thickness rotator cuff tears is high with overall estimates of sensitivity and specificity over 0.90. [68] (10.1136/bjsports-2014-094148)
  • [L1] Arthroscopic acromioplasty significantly improves long-term clinical outcomes up to 2 years. [69] (10.1177/0363546515608485)
  • [L4] A non-contrast shoulder MRI obtained in the community setting after non-dislocating shoulder trauma has a moderate sensitivity for most intraarticular pathologies when interpreted by musculoskeletal radiologists. [70] (10.1007/s00167-014-3102-6)
  • [L2] There were no differences of clinically relevant size between arthroscopic and open rotator cuff surgery in this comparative series. [71] (10.1007/s11999-014-3715-6)
  • [L3] The MRI tendinosis grade is associated with stiffness assessed using sonoelastography in patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy. [72] (10.1016/j.jse.2015.10.019)
  • [L5] The study identified two distinctive characteristics of the human scapula: a lateral orientation of the glenoid cavity and a narrow coraco-acromial arch. [73] (10.1016/j.otsr.2014.09.011)
  • [L3] Tendinosis severity assessed by preoperative MRI was the only factor associated with failure to heal in patients with partial-thickness and small full-thickness rotator cuff tears. [75] (10.1177/0363546514561004)
  • [L3] In this prospective cohort study, patients undergoing operative treatment had significantly better pain and functional outcomes as compared with patients undergoing nonoperative treatment for rotator cuff tears. [76] (10.1177/0363546519873840)
  • [L4] This rotator cuff MRI protocol can be applied to evaluate morphological tendon outcomes after different treatment modalities. [77] (10.1186/s13018-014-0128-x)
  • [L3] Clinicians should assess shoulder strength in the position the patient requires to use their shoulder because cervical spine position may cause weakness that would be missed in standard testing positions. [78] (10.1097/corr.0000000000002212)
  • [L3] Shoulders with a symptomatic rotator cuff tear showed higher radioisotope uptake on bone scintigraphy than those with an asymptomatic tear. [79] (10.1177/0363546513494741)
  • [L4] Unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder in asymptomatic high performance throwing athletes reveals abnormalities that may encompass a spectrum of nonclinical findings. [80] (10.1177/03635465020300012501)
  • [L2] Patients with rotator cuff disease who are treated without surgery and have a 2-point change in the SST score or a 12 to 17-point change in the ASES score experience a clinically important change in self-assessed outcome. [83] (10.2106/jbjs.h.01296)
  • [L2] Younger age, lower BMI, more functional capacity, a shorter symptomatic period, reversible changes on MRI, and higher Constant and ASES scores at the first evaluation were good prognostic factors for the natural course of subacromial impingement syndrome. [84] (10.1016/j.jse.2015.06.007)
  • [L3] The 'critical period' for healing following rotator cuff repair, during which risks of retears are high, extends to the first 6 months. [85] (10.1007/s00167-016-4276-x)

References

[1] Rotator cuff disorders: Recognition and management among patients with shoulder pain. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 2004. DOI: 10.1002/art.20668 [2] Arthroscopic Revision Rotator Cuff Repair. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeon. 2011. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-201111000-00002 [3] Management of Disorders of the Rotator Cuff: Proceedings of the ISAKOS Upper Extremity Committee Consensus Meeting. Arthroscopy. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.07.265 [4] Rotator cuff tear arthropathy and deltoid avulsion treated with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and latissimus dorsi transfer: case report and review of the literature. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.09.023 [5] Arthroscopy and the Dramatic Increase in Frequency of Anterior Acromioplasty From 1980 to 2005: An Epidemiologic Study. Arthroscopy. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.02.029 [6] Understanding the Importance of the Teres Minor for Shoulder Function: Functional Anatomy and Pathology. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2018. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-15-00258 [7] Chapter 24 Shoulder Instability, Rotator Cuff Disorders, Muscular Ruptures, Adhesive Capsulitis, Calcific Tendinitis. 2020. [8] Biceps tendinitis in chronic rotator cuff tears: A histologic perspective. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.05.044 [9] The development and validation of an appraisal method for rotator cuff disorders: The Korean Shoulder Scoring System. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.11.019 [10] Predictors of pain development for contralateral asymptomatic degenerative rotator cuff tears based on features of an ipsilateral painful cuff tear: a prospective longitudinal cohort study. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.09.008 [11] Patient‐Reported Outcomes After Use of a Bioabsorbable Collagen Implant to Treat Partial and Full‐Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears. Arthroscopy. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.02.019 [12] Conservative versus surgical management for patients with rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and META-analysis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2021. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03872-4 [13] Indications for Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Rotator Cuff Disease. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 2010. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-1188-9 [14] Relationship of radiographic acromial characteristics and rotator cuff disease: a prospective investigation of clinical, radiographic, and sonographic findings. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.09.028 [15] Sonographic evaluation of the shoulder in asymptomatic elderly subjects with diabetes. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2010. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-278 [16] Arthroscopic decompression not recommended in the treatment of rotator cuff tendinopathy. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2017. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.99b6.bjj-2016-0569.r1 [17] Chronic Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: Evaluation and Management. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2003. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200309000-00005 [18] Results of early operative treatment of rotator cuff tears with acute symptoms. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2005.07.006 [19] Shoulder Arthroscopy Literature Remains Controversial. Arthroscopy. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.07.001 [20] Factors Affecting Healing Rates after Arthroscopic Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2010. DOI: 10.1177/0363546510382835 [21] The Role of Platelet‐Rich Plasma in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review With Quantitative Synthesis. Arthroscopy. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.03.007 [22] Suprascapular neuropathy: what does the literature show?. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.11.033 [23] Complete rotator cuff tendon avulsion and glenohumeral joint incarceration in a young patient: A case report. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.07.014 [24] A value-based care analysis of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspected rotator cuff tendinopathy and the implicated role of conservative management. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.04.003 [26] The Role of Subacromial Decompression in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Repair of Full‐Thickness Tears of the Rotator Cuff: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis. Arthroscopy. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.11.022 [27] Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in the weight-bearing shoulder. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.05.051 [28] A Systematic Approach to Magnetic Resonance Imaging Interpretation of Sports Medicine Injuries of the Shoulder. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2005. DOI: 10.1177/0363546505278255 [29] Imaging of the Shoulder with Arthroscopic Correlation. Clinics in Sports Medicine. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.csm.2013.03.009 [30] Coracoid morphology and humeral version as risk factors for subscapularis tears. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.01.074 [31] The Effect of Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears and Biceps Loading on Glenohumeral Translation. Arthroscopy. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.09.007 [32] Rotator Cuff Tears in Adolescent Athletes. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2005. DOI: 10.1177/0363546504269033 [33] The Efficacy of Subacromial Corticosteroid Injection in the Treatment of Rotator Cuff Disease: A Systematic Review. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2007. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200701000-00002 [34] Surgical treatment of confirmed intratendinous rotator cuff tears: Retrospective analysis after an average of eight years of follow-up. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.01.013 [35] Rotator cuff disorders: a survey of current (2016) UK physiotherapy practice. Shoulder & Elbow. 2017. DOI: 10.1177/1758573217717103 [36] Rotator Cuff Disorders: A Survey of Current Uk Physiotherapy Practice. Shoulder & Elbow. 2012. DOI: 10.1111/j.1758-5740.2011.00164.x [37] Alterations in Glenohumeral Kinematics in Patients With Rotator Cuff Tears Measured With Biplane Fluoroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.08.031 [38] The development and validation of a questionnaire for rotator cuff disorders: The Functional Shoulder Score. Shoulder & Elbow. 2015. DOI: 10.1177/1758573215578589 [39] Indications for Arthroscopic Subacromial Decompression. A Level V Evidence Clinical Guideline. Arthroscopy. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.06.012 [40] The role of pectoralis major and latissimus dorsi muscles in a biomechanical model of massive rotator cuff tear. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.11.030 [41] Patients With Impingement Syndrome With and Without Rotator Cuff Tears Do Well 20 Years After Arthroscopic Subacromial Decompression. Arthroscopy. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.08.026 [42] Partial-Thickness Tears of the Rotator Cuff: Evaluation and Management. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 1999. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-199901000-00004 [43] Bilateral magnetic resonance imaging findings in individuals with unilateral shoulder pain. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.04.001 [44] Subacromial Platelet‐Rich Plasma Injections Produce Significantly Worse Improvement in Functional Outcomes in Patients With Partial Supraspinatus Tears Than in Patients With Isolated Tendinopathy. Arthroscopy. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.03.019 [45] Non-operative orthobiologic use for rotator cuff disorders and glenohumeral osteoarthritis: A systematic review. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation. 2021. DOI: 10.3233/bmr-201844 [46] Anatomy, Function, Injuries, and Treatment of the Long Head of the Biceps Brachii Tendon. Arthroscopy. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.10.014 [47] Critical Shoulder Angle and Acromial Index Do Not Influence 24-Month Functional Outcome After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2017. DOI: 10.1177/0363546517717947 [48] Editorial Commentary: Options Abound for Calcific Tendonitis of the Shoulder Without a Rotator Cuff Tear. Arthroscopy. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.11.003 [49] Suprascapular nerve release does not provide additional benefits in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-07066-4 [50] Rotator cuff re‐tear or non‐healing: histopathological aspects and predictive factors. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1521-1 [51] Effect of anterior supraspinatus tendon partial-thickness tears on infraspinatus tendon strain through a range of joint rotation angles. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.10.003 [52] Arthroscopic findings of the glenohumeral joint in symptomatic anterior instabilities: comparison between overhead throwing disorders and traumatic shoulder dislocation. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.10.005 [53] The influence of partial subscapularis tendon tears combined with supraspinatus tendon tears. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.09.015 [54] Predictors of pain and functional outcomes after operative treatment for rotator cuff tears. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.04.016 [55] Serial structural and functional assessments of rotator cuff repairs: do they differ at 6 and 19 months postoperatively?. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.05.027 [56] Nonoperative Treatment of Rotator Cuff Disease With Platelet‐Rich Plasma: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Arthroscopy. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.10.115 [57] Relationship Between Deltoid and Rotator Cuff Muscles During Dynamic Shoulder Abduction: A Biomechanical Study of Rotator Cuff Tear Progression. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2018. DOI: 10.1177/0363546518768276 [58] Evaluating postoperative rotator cuff healing: Prospective comparison of MRI and ultrasound. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.06.006 [59] Shoulder kinematics in patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears after a subacromial injection. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.05.010 [60] Long‐Term Outcome of a Consecutive Series of Subscapularis Tendon Tears Repaired Arthroscopically. Arthroscopy. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.02.031 [61] Editorial Commentary: Critical Shoulder Angle: Perhaps Not So “Critical” for Clinical Outcomes Following Rotator Cuff Repair. Arthroscopy. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.06.020 [62] The critical shoulder angle does not change over time: a radiographic study. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.09.042 [63] Relative contributions of the supraspinatus cord and strap tendons to shoulder abduction and translation. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.07.003 [64] Editorial Commentary: Is Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Shoulder Ever Appropriate in Evaluating Patients With Calcific Tendinopathy of the Rotator Cuff?. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.01.014 [65] A Systematic Approach for Diagnosing Subscapularis Tendon Tears With Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans. Arthroscopy. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.04.142 [66] The Law of Use and Disuse: Critical Shoulder Angle and Rotator Cuff Tears—Association Does Not Imply Causation. Arthroscopy. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.04.030 [67] Muscle Gene Expression Patterns in Human Rotator Cuff Pathology. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.m.01585 [68] Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography, MRI and MR arthrography in the characterisation of rotator cuff disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2015. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094148 [69] Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection With Arthroscopic Acromioplasty for Chronic Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2015. DOI: 10.1177/0363546515608485 [70] Moderate value of non‐contrast magnetic resonance imaging after non‐dislocating shoulder trauma. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2014. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3102-6 [71] No Difference in Postoperative Pain After Arthroscopic versus Open Rotator Cuff Repair. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 2014. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3715-6 [72] Real-time sonoelastography in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tendinopathy. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.10.019 [73] The human acromion viewed from an evolutionary perspective. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.09.011 [75] Arthroscopic Repair of Partial-Thickness and Small Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2014. DOI: 10.1177/0363546514561004 [76] Comparative Effectiveness of Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Rotator Cuff Tears: A Propensity Score Analysis From the ROW Cohort. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2019. DOI: 10.1177/0363546519873840 [77] Reliability of a 3 T MRI protocol for objective grading of supraspinatus tendonosis and partial thickness tears. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2014. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-014-0128-x [78] Altered Cervical Spine Position Results in Decreased Shoulder Rotation Strength. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 2022. DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000002212 [79] Symptomatic Rotator Cuff Tears Show Higher Radioisotope Uptake on Bone Scintigraphy Compared With Asymptomatic Tears. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2013. DOI: 10.1177/0363546513494741 [80] Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Shoulder in Asymptomatic Professional Baseball Pitchers. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2002. DOI: 10.1177/03635465020300012501 [83] Minimal Clinically Important Differences in ASES and Simple Shoulder Test Scores After Nonoperative Treatment of Rotator Cuff Disease. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 2010. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.h.01296 [84] Medium-term natural history of subacromial impingement syndrome. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.06.007 [85] Critical period and risk factors for retear following arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4276-x