SLAC e SNAC no punho Folheto In-depth

Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e ainda não foi verificada por um médico. A versão em inglês é a versão oficial.

O que você está sentindo

No caso de artrose do punho do tipo SLAC ou SNAC, a dor fica localizada profundamente no próprio punho, geralmente na parte dorsal da mão. Ela tende a se desenvolver ao longo dos anos, em vez de surgir de repente. As superfícies articulares desgastadas se esfregam uma contra a outra, e esse atrito é o que você percebe como dor contínua ou aguda.

Certos movimentos pioram a situação. Carregar peso com o punho estendido para trás — como ao se levantar de uma cadeira ou sair de uma piscina — costuma ser doloroso. A combinação de apertar algo e torcer também é um gatilho comum: girar uma chave, abrir um pote ou torcer um pano. O repouso alivia a dor, embora muitas pessoas percebam que o punho dói à noite ou fica rígido e demora a “descongelar” ao acordar.

À medida que a artrose avança, as tarefas cotidianas tornam-se mais difíceis. Você pode acabar evitando levantar pesos com aquela mão ou trocando a mão usada para carregar compras ou servir água da chaleira. A força de preensão geralmente diminui, fazendo com que potes, maçanetas e panelas pesadas exijam mais esforço do que antes. Algumas pessoas notam que o formato do punho muda ou que ele “cede” ao suportar carga.

A dor e a rigidez geralmente resultam do desgaste em articulações específicas do punho; o padrão dessas lesões determina quais tratamentos são viáveis. Se o desgaste se limitar a uma única região do punho, existem cirurgias que removem as superfícies danificadas mantendo o restante do movimento intacto. Quando o desgaste é mais generalizado, a fusão de alguns ou todos os ossos do punho pode eliminar a dor. O cirurgião examinará seu punho e solicitará exames de imagem para identificar esse padrão; essa avaliação definirá quais opções cirúrgicas são adequadas para você.

O que está realmente acontecendo

O seu pulso é formado por oito pequenos ossos dispostos em duas fileiras. A fileira mais próxima do antebraço contém um osso chamado escafoide, que fica do lado do polegar e suporta grande parte da carga quando você usa a mão. Dois desses pequenos ossos, o escafoide e o semilunar, são normalmente mantidos juntos por uma forte faixa de ligamento. Imagine essa faixa como uma “junta” que faz com que os dois ossos se movam como uma unidade.

Quando essa faixa se desgasta ou rompe, os dois ossos deixam de funcionar em conjunto. O escafoide sai da sua posição normal, e as superfícies articulares entre ele e o osso do antebraço começam a se desgastar de maneira irregular, da mesma forma que um pneu de carro se desgasta apenas em uma borda quando as rodas estão desalinhadas. Esse desgaste gera a artrose, que é a causa da dor profunda na parte de trás do pulso mencionada anteriormente.

Existem duas formas pelas quais esse quadro se inicia. Na artrose do tipo SLAC, a faixa de ligamento entre o escafoide e o semilunar se rompe com o tempo, às vezes sem nenhuma lesão aparente. Na artrose do tipo SNAC, o escafoide fraturou em algum momento e nunca cicatrizou; por isso, o osso permanece dividido em duas partes, e a articulação se desgasta da mesma maneira irregular. Em ambos os casos, o desgaste geralmente começa onde o escafoide se encontra com o osso do antebraço e depois se espalha para a articulação abaixo dele. Uma região do pulso, onde o semilunar se une ao osso do antebraço, geralmente permanece intacta.

Essa região preservada é importante. Como o desgaste segue um padrão definido, o cirurgião consegue determinar o estágio da doença: no estágio inicial, apenas uma articulação está desgastada; em estágios mais avançados, a articulação abaixo também está afetada. O estágio determina quais procedimentos cirúrgicos são viáveis. Se apenas uma área estiver desgastada, a cirurgia pode remover as superfícies danificadas, mantendo o restante do pulso funcional. Caso o desgaste seja mais generalizado, a fusão de alguns ou de todos os ossos do pulso pode aliviar a dor.

O que podemos fazer a respeito

O Dr. Kieran Hirpara, cirurgião de membros superiores no Mater Private Hospital Rockhampton, começa com as opções menos invasivas adequadas ao seu quadro clínico. Em geral, os pacientes são encaminhados à nossa clínica pelo médico de família; caso um fisioterapeuta tenha sugerido que você nos procure, ainda assim será necessário um encaminhamento do seu médico de família para ter direito ao reembolso do Medicare. Na primeira consulta, colhemos o histórico clínico, examinamos o punho e solicitamos exames de imagem, quando necessário, para identificar quais partes estão desgastadas.

Para um problema crônico como este, geralmente iniciamos com tratamento não cirúrgico. Modificar a forma como o punho é utilizado ajuda: evitar levantar cargas pesadas, usar a outra mão para algumas tarefas e adaptar ferramentas ou pegadas em casa e no trabalho. A fisioterapia ou a terapia da mão visa manter o movimento do punho, reduzir a irritação e fortalecer os músculos ao redor, de modo que as atividades diárias exijam menos esforço. Uma tala pode proporcionar repouso ao punho e aliviar a dor, especialmente durante a noite. Geralmente, testamos essas medidas por alguns meses antes de considerar outras alternativas.

Os analgésicos também podem ser úteis nesse contexto. Medicamentos simples para dor, tomados conforme a necessidade, ajudam a atenuar o desconforto. Os anti-inflamatórios reduzem o inchaço e a irritação na articulação desgastada, diminuindo a dor e a rigidez. Essas são opções a serem discutidas com o seu médico de família, que poderá indicar o que é mais adequado para você.

Caso essas medidas não tragam melhoria suficiente, a cirurgia passa a ser uma possibilidade a ser considerada. A escolha da abordagem depende de quais articulações do punho estão desgastadas e até que ponto esse desgaste se estendeu, conforme demonstrado nos exames de imagem e na avaliação clínica. Quando apenas parte do punho está afetada, a cirurgia pode remover os ossos danificados, permitindo que as demais articulações assumam a carga e preservem parte do movimento. Quando o desgaste é mais generalizado, a fusão de alguns ou de todos os ossos do punho elimina a dor, porém com perda de mobilidade. Em determinados casos, a prótese articular ou um implante que recobre um dos ossos do punho pode ser uma alternativa à fusão. Cada opção equilibra o alívio da dor com a manutenção do movimento; normalmente, o alívio da dor é a prioridade. Conversaremos sobre qual alternativa se adequa ao seu punho e tomaremos essa decisão juntos.

O que esperar

A condição de punho SLAC ou SNAC é crônica. O desgaste da articulação não se reverte sozinho; portanto, sem tratamento, a dor e a rigidez tendem a aumentar ao longo dos anos, em vez de desaparecerem por conta própria. Muitas pessoas conseguem conviver com a condição por muito tempo fazendo mudanças simples: evitando levantar pesos, utilizando a outra mão e usando uma tala quando o punho começa a doer. Contudo, se o desgaste continuar se espalhando, as tarefas cotidianas tornam-se mais difíceis e a dor tende a persistir ou reaparecer sempre que o punho é sobrecarregado.

Quando o tratamento é adequado ao estágio da doença, o prognóstico costuma ser estável. O tratamento não cirúrgico pode aliviar a dor e permitir que a pessoa continue realizando a maioria das atividades necessárias, embora não interrompa o desgaste subjacente. Caso seja necessária cirurgia, o objetivo é proporcionar alívio da dor de forma confiável, preservando ao máximo a mobilidade e a força da articulação já desgastada. As fusões parciais do punho são realizadas para reduzir a dor mantendo a movimentação; seguindo os princípios bem estabelecidos dessas operações, os resultados costumam ser bons. As cirurgias que preservam o movimento podem durar bastante tempo, desde que sejam indicadas para o tipo certo de punho e no estágio adequado.

É justo dizer que nem todos os resultados são perfeitos. Algumas pessoas ainda sentem alguma dor ou não conseguem retornar às atividades profissionais anteriores após a cirurgia. Em poucos casos, as fusões não cicatrizam ou os implantes metálicos tornam-se fonte de dor, exigindo outra operação para sua remoção. Em situações raras, a artrose avança nas articulações remanescentes, e uma fusão parcial pode, eventualmente, precisar ser convertida em uma fusão total do punho. Essa conversão é pouco comum: ocorre em uma pequena porcentagem das fusões parciais, e ambas as principais opções de cirurgias que preservam o movimento apresentam taxas semelhantemente baixas. Infecções após cirurgia no punho são pouco comuns, e a maioria dos problemas na ferida se resolve com tratamento simples.

A recuperação exige paciência. Após uma fusão parcial, o punho costuma ser protegido por uma tala ou gesso por cerca de dois meses, e o trabalho de movimentação começa cedo para prevenir rigidez. A melhora ocorre gradualmente ao longo dos meses, e a função do punho pode continuar melhorando por anos.

Quando procurar um especialista

Essa condição se desenvolve gradualmente; por isso, a maioria das pessoas procura ajuda quando o pulso deixa de responder a medidas simples. Consulte seu médico de família para uma avaliação especializada se a dor persistir há meses, se o repouso, as talas e os anti-inflamatórios não a aliviarem, ou se a força de preensão continuar a diminuir, tornando difícil segurar potes, maçanetas e panelas pesadas. Procure ajuda mais rapidamente se a dor o acordar quase todas as noites ou impedir que você faça o seu trabalho. Como o desgaste articular segue um padrão definido, procurar ajuda precocemente oferece mais opções de tratamento: as cirurgias que preservam a mobilidade do pulso são mais eficazes quando o desgaste ainda está limitado a uma única região da articulação. Caso você já tenha passado por cirurgia no pulso e apresente novo inchaço, calor ou vermelhidão ao redor da incisão, ou se sentir mal de forma geral e com febre, é necessário buscar avaliação no mesmo dia, em vez de aguardar uma consulta de rotina.

Em maior profundidade

Advanced reading: the deeper science (optional)

Esta seção aborda tópicos além do necessário para as suas próprias decisões de tratamento. O punho SLAC e SNAC merece uma leitura mais aprofundada, pois a escolha entre essas duas operações padrão de resgate representa um verdadeiro trade-off: uma oferece maior mobilidade, a outra maior força. As evidências mais recentes, analisadas de forma agregada, começam a favorecer uma delas de modo geral.

Duas cirurgias, dois compromissos distintos

Uma vez que o carpo entra em um padrão artrítico, as superfícies articulares não podem ser restauradas; portanto, ambas as cirurgias visam remover o contato artrítico em vez de repará-lo. A carpectomia da fileira proximal remove toda a primeira fileira de ossos do carpo, permitindo que a cabeça do osso capitato ocupe o espaço deixado pelo escafoide e pelo semilunar. Já a fusão dos quatro cantos remove o escafoide e funde os quatro ossos restantes num único bloco.

Ao comparar diretamente esses procedimentos em 240 pacientes, os compromissos envolvidos ficam evidentes. A artrodese dos quatro cantos proporcionou desvio radial e força de preensão significativamente maiores, em percentual em relação ao lado oposto; já a carpectomia da fileira proximal resultou em melhor flexão, extensão e amplitude total de flexão-extensão, além de uma taxa geral de complicações menor [1].

Isso se alinha com a própria estrutura de cada procedimento: a fusão de quatro ossos num bloco preserva as inserções responsáveis pela força de preensão, porém elimina o movimento entre eles. A remoção de uma fileira de ossos encurta o carpo e cria uma nova articulação mais móvel, mas ao custo da força proporcionada pelas estruturas removidas.

A análise agrupada mais abrangente favorece a carpectomia

Evidências mais recentes e muito mais numerosas mudaram o equilíbrio. Em 3.174 pacientes com lesões SLAC e SNAC no punho, a carpectomia da fileira proximal gerou resultados melhores e uma taxa de complicações menor do que a fusão dos quatro cantos [2].

A diferença nas complicações é o aspecto mais confiável dessa comparação, e possui uma explicação mecânica: a fusão dos quatro cantos precisa obter união óssea em quatro superfícies, e a não união, problemas com os implantes e a necessidade de sua remoção são complicações que, simplesmente, não ocorrem na carpectomia.

A análise das próprias variantes de fusão não altera essa diferença. Ao comparar a artrodese de dois cantos com a de quatro cantos, ambas as técnicas apresentaram resultados e taxas de complicações semelhantes, apesar da vantagem teórica da fusão mais restrita; portanto, ambas continuam sendo opções viáveis [3].

Quando a decisão ainda aponta para outro caminho

O resultado agregado não torna a carpectomia uma opção universalmente correta. Ela depende do fato de a cabeça do osso capitato e a superfície correspondente do rádio estarem intactas, pois essas duas superfícies passam a formar a nova articulação. Quando a artrose já atingiu o capitato — ou seja, quando o processo patológico já está em estágio mais avançado — a carpectomia não tem nenhuma estrutura sólida para se articular, e a fusão torna-se a opção.

A idade do paciente e as exigências impostas ao punho também são fatores relevantes. Para um paciente mais jovem que utiliza bastante o punho, a força preservada pela fusão pode ser preferível, aceitando-se a taxa maior de complicações.

Quando ambas as opções já foram esgotadas

Caso as medidas de resgate falhem, ou se a artrite estiver muito disseminada para que qualquer uma das opções seja viável, as alternativas restantes são a fusão total do punho e a artroplastia total do punho. Ambas são eficazes para aliviar a dor e melhorar a força de preensão; as taxas de complicações são comparáveis: 17% e 19%, respectivamente. Observa-se melhora funcional após a artroplastia, porém ainda faltam dados robustos a longo prazo sobre a prótese [4].

Essa equivalência é importante de se saber, pois a fusão e a artroplastia são frequentemente apresentadas como opções radicalmente distintas. A diferença entre elas reside naquilo que deixam a você, e não na frequência com que ocorrem complicações: um punho forte, indolor e imóvel, versus um punho móvel com uma prótese à qual você pode muito bem sobreviver, o que significa nova cirurgia mais tarde.

Referências

[1] Saltzman BM, Frank JM, Slikker W, Fernandez JJ, Cohen MS, Wysocki RW. Resultados clínicos da carpectomia da fileira proximal versus artrodese dos quatro cantos no tratamento da artropatia pós-traumática do punho: uma revisão sistemática. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2014;40(5):450-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193414554359

[2] Hones KM, Hao KA, Rakauskas TR, Densley S, Hampton H, Kim J, et al. Fusão dos quatro cantos versus carpectomia da fileira proximal no tratamento do colapso avançado escafossemilunar e do colapso avançado por pseudartrose do escafoide: uma revisão sistemática e meta-análise. J Hand Surg Am. 2024;49(7):633-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.01.011

[3] Hundepool CA, Duraku LS, Quanjel TJ, van Minnen LP, Jansen MC, Zuidam JM. Artrodese de dois, três ou quatro cantos no tratamento da osteoartrite mediocarpal: uma revisão sistemática e meta-análise. J Hand Surg Am. 2025;50(1):93.e1-93.e11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.04.018

[4] Zhu XM, Perera E, Gohal C, Dennis B, Khan M, Alolabi B. Revisão sistemática dos resultados da artrodese e artroplastia do punho em pacientes com artrite do punho. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2020;46(3):297-303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193420953683


Evidence & references

This is the clinical evidence summary written for health professionals. It is technical, and it lists the research this page was built from. You do not need to read it to understand your treatment or to make a decision about it.

Overview

Pathophysiology and Anatomy

  • Scapholunate interosseous ligament injury and extrinsic ligament complex attenuation lead to palmar flexion of the scaphoid and extension of the lunate, resulting in dorsal intercalated segment instability [12].
  • The radioscaphoid joint becomes incongruous following scaphoid flexion, leading to altered normal radioscaphoid contact forces and the development of arthrosis [12].
  • As the scaphoid flexes and the scapholunate diastasis increases, the capitate migrates proximally [12].
  • Altered intercarpal contact forces result in arthrosis at the capitolunate joint [12].
  • The styloscaphoid, radioscaphoid, and capitolunate joints are affected by SLAC wrist arthritic changes [12].
  • The radiolunate joint is typically spared in SLAC wrist due to its spheroid shape [12].
  • In SNAC wrist, the distal scaphoid articular surface with the radial styloid is affected first in stage I [12].
  • The proximal scaphoid pole and radioscaphoid fossa may be preserved in stage I SNAC wrist [12].
  • Bone density was greater at the capitolunate joint, the radial styloid, and the radiolunate joint in SNAC wrists compared to controls [7].

Clinical Presentation

  • SLAC wrist presents with reduced grip and pinch strength [12].
  • SLAC wrist presents with stiffness with extension and radial deviation [12].
  • SLAC wrist presents with localized tenderness at the radioscaphoid articulation [12].
  • SLAC wrist presents with decreased wrist motion on extension and radial deviation [12].
  • A positive Watson shift test in SLAC wrist occurs when pressure directed over the palmar scaphoid tuberosity while moving the wrist from ulnar to radial deviation causes the scaphoid to subluxate dorsally out of the scaphoid fossa and relocate when pressure is released [12].

Treatment Indications and Principles

  • Partial wrist fusion is indicated for painful posttraumatic and osteoarthritic conditions of the wrist that affect only part of the articulating system in a patient keen to have adequate pain control while preserving useful motion [10].
  • Common indications for partial wrist fusion include SLAC wrist, SNAC wrist, Kienböck disease, STT arthritis, and posttraumatic radiocarpal arthritis [10].
  • Chronic painful dissociative or nondissociative carpal instabilities with or without secondary arthritic change are good indications for partial wrist fusion [10].
  • In inflammatory arthritis, the disease should be in a quiescent stage to avoid ongoing clinical deterioration due to disease progression before partial wrist fusion [10].
  • Partial wrist fusion is contraindicated when there is active sepsis, panarthritis, and rapidly progressive joint destruction at a proliferative stage [10].
  • Partial wrist fusion is not a guarantee of pain relief [10].
  • The potential advantage of partial wrist fusion in preservation of a useful arc of motion may be offset by the risks of nonunion or by continued pain despite successful fusion [10].
  • Chronic smokers have a higher incidence of nonunion, so alternatives for pain control such as a wrist denervation can be considered [10].
  • Arthroscopic partial wrist fusions are technically demanding procedures and require extensive arthroscopic experience [10].
  • Patients with preexisting extensor tendon pathology over the wrist region may have a higher incidence of tendon complications associated with arthroscopic partial wrist fusion [10].
  • Arthrofibrosis and long-standing carpal collapse may pose additional difficulty and risk for arthroscopic partial wrist fusion [10].
  • Partial wrist fusion is a motion-preserving salvage procedure that allows fusion of painful segments while preserving motion in unaffected segments [18].
  • Partial wrist fusion helps to halt predictable mechanical collapse of the carpal central column and maintain carpal height in conditions caused by dissociative lesions or loss of bony integrity such as SNAC wrist [18].
  • Arthroscopic partial wrist fusion has the potential advantages of minimal surgical damage to supporting ligaments and capsular structures while allowing an unimpeded view of the joint [18].
  • Arthroscopic assessment ensures a more accurate staging of the arthritis and facilitates clinical decision making on the most appropriate choice of fusion [18].
  • Arthroscopic treatment is particularly attractive for a patient conscious of esthetic outcome [10].

Specific Procedures

  • Scaphoid excision and four-corner fusion is indicated for the treatment of the SLAC/SNAC wrist when significant pain is refractory to nonoperative measures [6].
  • Midcarpal arthrodesis is a reliable procedure for treating SLAC- and SNAC-wrists in stages II and III which preserves some range of motion [1].
  • Both proximal row carpectomy and four-corner fusion provide improvements in pain and subjective outcome measures for patients with symptomatic and appropriately staged SLAC or SNAC wrists [2].
  • Findings favor Limited Carpal Fusion compared to Proximal Row Carpectomy for SNAC and SLAC wrist conditions, except for flexion-extension and grip strength in women [3].
  • The authors prefer proximal row carpectomy for SLAC wrists with preserved capitate head cartilage due to socio-economic benefits, lower complication rates, and procedural ease [29].
  • Arthroscopic wrist debridement and radial styloidectomy is indicated for SLAC II or SLAC III wrists as an intermediate step to relieve pain and preserve functional motion [21].
  • Arthroscopic wrist debridement and radial styloidectomy may have advantages in relieving pain while preserving wrist motion for SLAC stage 2 or 3 disease [33].
  • Arthroscopic resection arthroplasty of the radial column (ARARC) may be a viable surgical option for patients with SLAC wrist who desire a minimally invasive procedure [58].
  • Scaphoidectomy and capsulodesis is mostly indicated as a palliative procedure in elderly patients with posttraumatic SNAC or SLAC wrist with limited functional demands [14].
  • Successful scaphoid reconstruction in SNAC wrists shifts the load back onto the proximal pole and interrupts the otherwise inevitable degenerative pattern in scaphoid nonunions [13].
  • Radial styloidectomy is suitable for stage I SLAC and SNAC wrist conditions [11].
  • Performing radial styloidectomy arthroscopically has the advantage of better visualization and can limit the potential injury of the RSC ligament [11].
  • Nakamura et al. recommended styloidectomy of no more than 3-4 mm as increased radial translation with ulnar and palmar carpal displacement had been demonstrated after 6-mm and 10-mm radial styloidectomy [11].
  • The dorsal rim of the radial styloid is a common site of occurrence of early SNAC and SLAC wrist changes and should be assessed in all cases at arthroscopic surveillance [11].
  • The origins of the RSC and LRL ligament on the distal radius mark the ulnar extent of the resection during arthroscopic radial styloidectomy [11].
  • The volar aspect of the radial styloid can be spared during arthroscopic radial styloidectomy as it is the important origin of the RSC ligament and impingement symptom seldom arises from this area [11].
  • Total or subtotal scaphoidectomy is a useful clinical technique as a concomitant procedure for midcarpal arthrodesis in SLAC wrist and SNAC wrist [11].

Anatomy & Pathophysiology

Bony Anatomy

  • The carpus comprises eight ossicles traditionally separated into a proximal row (scaphoid, lunate, triquetrum, pisiform) and a distal row (trapezium, trapezoid, capitate, hamate) [37].
  • The distal radius articular surface features two concave facets for the scaphoid and lunate, separated by the scapholunate ridge [37].
  • The capitate head often relies on a retrograde vascular supply [37].
  • The scaphoid's primary vascular supply is a branch of the radial artery at the dorsal ridge, with smaller vessels entering the palmar tubercle to supply the distal 30% [37].
  • The lunate is broader palmarly than dorsally [37].
  • The pisiform is a sesamoid bone within the flexor carpi ulnaris tendon [37].

Ligaments

  • The scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIL) is the primary stabilizer of the scapholunate joint [55].
  • The SLIL is composed of a proximal membranous portion with no significant strength, a dorsal portion that is the strongest and prevents translation, and a palmar portion that acts as a rotational constraint [55].
  • The SLIL is C-shaped in the sagittal plane, with the dorsal third being the thickest and strongest portion [37].
  • The volar portion of the lunotriquetral ligament is the thickest [37].
  • The radioscapholunate ligament (ligament of Testut) is a volar intra-articular neurovascular structure that provides little mechanical stability [55].
  • The radioscaphocapitate ligament, long radiolunate ligament, and short radiolunate ligament are palmar stabilizers considered secondary stabilizers of the scaphoid [55].
  • The dorsal radiocarpal ligament and dorsal intercarpal ligament serve as dorsal stabilizers of the scaphoid [55].
  • The triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) is formed by the central meniscus homolog, dorsal and volar radioulnar ligaments, the floor of the extensor carpi ulnaris tendon sheath, and volar ulnocarpal ligaments [37].
  • The dorsal and volar radioulnar ligaments are the primary stabilizers of the distal radioulnar joint [37].
  • Only the peripheral 10% to 40% of the volar, ulnar, and dorsal TFCC has a vascular supply [37].

Kinematics and Biomechanics

  • The wrist functions as a two-joint system linking the hand to the forearm around the mobile proximal carpal row [38].
  • The proximal carpal row has no muscular or tendinous attachments and is an intercalary segment [37].
  • With axial loading through the neutral wrist, approximately 80% of forces are transmitted through the distal radius (60% scaphoid facet, 40% lunate facet) and 20% through the distal ulna [37].
  • With wrist flexion, 60% of the motion is midcarpal and 40% is radiocarpal [37].
  • With wrist extension, 33% of the motion is midcarpal and 66% is radiocarpal [37].
  • The dart-thrower’s path of radial extension to ulnar flexion defines the transition between flexion and extension of the scaphoid and lunate [38].
  • Dart-thrower’s motion occurs almost exclusively through the midcarpal joint [38].

SLAC Pathophysiology

  • Scapholunate interosseous ligament injury and extrinsic ligament complex attenuation lead to palmar flexion of the scaphoid and extension of the lunate (DISI) [12].
  • The radioscaphoid joint becomes incongruous following SLIL injury, leading to altered radioscaphoid contact forces and development of arthrosis [12].
  • The radiolunate joint is typically spared in SLAC wrist because of its spheroid shape [12].
  • Carpal malalignment in SLAC wrists extends to the third carpometacarpal joint, with malalignment evident in both the sagittal and coronal planes [17].

SNAC Pathophysiology

  • Scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) shares a common etiology with SLAC: proximal carpal row disruption leading to a dramatic alteration of carpal kinematics [4].
  • In SNAC, the proximal scaphoid fragment remains attached to the lunate via the intact SLIL, whereas the distal fragment acts freely without restraint [4].
  • SNAC demonstrates lunate dorsal tilt early in the disease, yet the articulation between the distal radius and the lunate remains preserved [4].
  • SNAC wrists differ from SLAC wrists in exhibiting a decreased sagittal lunotriquetral angle, indicating a distinct pathomechanism of carpal instability [5].
  • The distal scaphoid articular surface with the radial styloid is affected first in stage I of SNAC [12].
  • The proximal scaphoid pole and radioscaphoid fossa may be preserved in stage I SNAC [12].

Clinical Presentation

  • SLAC wrist symptoms include reduced grip and pinch strength [12].
  • SLAC wrist symptoms include stiffness with extension and radial deviation [12].
  • Localized tenderness at the radioscaphoid articulation is a symptom of SLAC wrist [12].
  • Decreased wrist motion on extension and radial deviation is a symptom of SLAC wrist [12].
  • A positive Watson shift test occurs when pressure directed over the palmar scaphoid tuberosity while moving the wrist from ulnar to radial deviation causes the scaphoid to subluxate dorsally out of the scaphoid fossa and relocate when pressure is released [12].

Classification

SLAC Wrist

  • The Watson and Ballet classification of SLAC wrist osteoarthritis is widely accepted, simple, and a well-recognized guide to treatment [30].
  • The Watson and Ballet classification of SLAC wrist osteoarthritis has significant limitations [30].
  • Radiographic classification of SLAC wrist has moderate reliability and reproducibility [9].
  • Carpal malalignment in SLAC wrists affects the radio- and midcarpal joints [17].
  • Carpal malalignment in SLAC wrists extends to the third carpometacarpal joint [17].
  • Malalignment in SLAC wrists is evident in both the sagittal and coronal planes [17].

SNAC Wrist

  • In SNAC, the proximal scaphoid fragment remains attached to the lunate via the intact scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIL) [4].
  • In SNAC, the distal scaphoid fragment acts freely without restraint [4].
  • Vender et al. staging for SNAC includes arthritis involving the articulation between the radial styloid and distal scaphoid fragment [4].
  • Vender et al. staging for SNAC includes arthritis involving the articulation between the proximal scaphoid fragment and capitate [4].
  • Vender et al. staging for SNAC includes arthritis involving the capitolunate articulation [4].
  • Whether or not the radiolunate joint degenerates, comprising a fourth stage of SNAC, is debated [4].
  • SNAC demonstrates lunate dorsal tilt early in the disease [4].
  • The articulation between the distal radius and the lunate remains preserved in SNAC [4].
  • Differentiating between SLAC and SNAC is important because treatment options may differ [4].
  • SNAC wrists exhibit a decreased sagittal lunotriquetral angle compared to SLAC wrists [5].
  • The decreased sagittal lunotriquetral angle in SNAC indicates a distinct pathomechanism of carpal instability [5].
  • Bone density was greater at the capitolunate joint in SNAC wrists compared to controls [7].
  • Bone density was greater at the radial styloid in SNAC wrists compared to controls [7].
  • Bone density was greater at the radiolunate joint in SNAC wrists compared to controls [7].
  • Radiographic classification of SNAC wrist has limited reliability [9].
  • Staging systems for SNAC wrist lack agreement [16].
  • The classification of Vender et al. (1987) is still widely used today to describe SNAC severity [22].
  • The inter- and intra-observer reliability of the Vender et al. (1987) classification is poor [22].

Differential Diagnosis

  • Scaphoid nonunion collapse was first described by Vender et al. in a series of 64 patients who demonstrated a similar degenerative pattern as SLAC in the setting of a chronic scaphoid nonunion [4].
  • SOAC staging system can guide treatment decisions [19].
  • SOAC is differentiated from SLAC wrist [19].

Clinical Presentation

Symptoms and Physical Examination

  • Reduced grip and pinch strength is a symptom of SLAC wrist [12].
  • Stiffness with extension and radial deviation is a symptom of SLAC wrist [12].
  • Preoperatively, patients with SLAC or SNAC wrists complained of severe pain interfering with manual activities [20].
  • Mean preoperative pain values in a cohort of SLAC and SNAC wrists were 78 under stress and 45 under resting conditions [20].

Etiology and Demographics

  • Scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) is caused by trauma [8].
  • SLAC wrist may result from chronic pseudogout and can appear bilaterally without a clear history of injury [8].
  • Patients with SLAC wrist were more likely to be male and have a history of trauma compared to patients with first CMC OA [15].
  • In a cohort of 36 patients undergoing midcarpal arthrodesis for SLAC or SNAC wrist, 14 had a major work-related injury, 14 had a major injury outside work, and 6 had no history of trauma [20].

Pathophysiology and Anatomy

  • Scapholunate interosseous ligament injury and extrinsic ligament complex attenuation lead to palmar flexion of the scaphoid and extension of the lunate (DISI) in SLAC wrist [12].
  • The radioscaphoid joint becomes incongruous in SLAC wrist, leading to alteration in normal radioscaphoid contact forces and development of arthrosis [12].
  • As the scaphoid flexes and the scapholunate diastasis increases in SLAC wrist, the capitate migrates proximally [12].
  • Altered intercarpal contact forces in SLAC wrist result in arthrosis at the capitolunate joint [12].
  • SNAC shares a common etiology with SLAC: proximal carpal row disruption leading to a dramatic alteration of carpal kinematics [4].
  • SNAC wrists exhibit a decreased sagittal lunotriquetral angle compared to SLAC wrists, indicating a distinct pathomechanism of carpal instability [5].
  • Carpal malalignment in SLAC wrists affects the radio- and midcarpal joints and extends to the third carpometacarpal joint, with malalignment evident in both the sagittal and coronal planes [17].

Staging and Classification

  • The Watson and Ballet classification of SLAC wrist osteoarthritis is widely accepted, simple, and a well-recognized guide to treatment despite its significant limitations [30].
  • Vender et al's staging for SNAC includes arthritis involving the articulation between the radial styloid and distal scaphoid fragment, the articulation between the proximal scaphoid fragment and capitate, and the capitolunate articulation [4].

Investigations

Radiographic Assessment and Staging

  • Radiographic classification of SLAC wrist demonstrates moderate reliability and reproducibility [9].
  • Radiographic classification of SNAC wrist demonstrates limited reliability [9].
  • The Watson classification for SLAC wrist Stage I is characterized by arthrosis localized to the radial side of the scaphoid and the radial styloid, along with sharpening of the radial styloid [12].
  • The Watson classification for SLAC wrist Stage II is characterized by arthrosis of the entire radioscaphoid joint, with the radiolunate joint usually spared [12].
  • The Watson classification for SLAC wrist Stage III is characterized by arthrosis progressing to the capitolunate joint due to proximal migration of the capitate [12].
  • In SNAC wrist Stage I, the distal scaphoid articular surface with the radial styloid is affected first, while the proximal scaphoid pole and radioscaphoid fossa may be preserved [12].
  • Vender et al. described a degenerative pattern in SNAC involving arthritis at the articulation between the radial styloid and distal scaphoid fragment, the articulation between the proximal scaphoid fragment and capitate, and the capitolunate articulation [4].
  • Whether radiolunate joint degeneration constitutes a fourth stage of SNAC is debated [4].
  • SNAC wrists demonstrate lunate dorsal tilt early in the disease, yet the articulation between the distal radius and the lunate remains preserved [4].
  • A 10° degree of supination can drastically alter the developed posteroanterior radiograph of the wrist [26].

Advanced Imaging (CT, MRI, Arthroscopy)

  • Bone density is greater at the capitolunate joint, the radial styloid, and the radiolunate joint in SNAC wrists compared to controls [7].
  • MRI is useful for detecting marrow abnormalities in osteonecrosis of the scaphoid following fracture [42].
  • Asymmetry of marrow signal in proximal and distal fragments of a fractured scaphoid on MRI is suggestive of proximal pole ischemia [42].
  • Wrist arthroscopy is considered the "gold standard" for the evaluation of intercarpal ligament injuries and instability [43].
  • Arthroscopy has been found to be more accurate than arthrography in identifying the location and size of triangular fibrocartilage and interosseous ligament injuries [43].
  • Arthroscopy is more accurate than triple-injection cinearthrography in detecting tears of the dorsal sensory branch of the ulnar nerve during arthroscopic repair of the triangular fibrocartilage [43].
  • The dorsal rim of the radial styloid is a common site of early SNAC and SLAC wrist changes and should be assessed in all cases at arthroscopic surveillance [11].
  • Associated synovitis in the radial styloid area may obscure visualization of the cartilage during arthroscopy [11].

Clinical Examination

  • The Watson shift test involves directing pressure over the palmar scaphoid tuberosity while moving the wrist from ulnar to radial deviation [12].
  • A positive Watson shift test results when the scaphoid subluxates dorsally out of the scaphoid fossa and relocates when pressure is released [12].
  • Symptoms of SLAC wrist include reduced grip and pinch strength [12].
  • Symptoms of SLAC wrist include stiffness with extension and radial deviation [12].
  • Symptoms of SLAC wrist include localized tenderness at the radioscaphoid articulation [12].
  • Symptoms of SLAC wrist include decreased wrist motion on extension and radial deviation [12].

Nuclear Medicine

  • Fifteen-minute bone scintigraphy is useful as a second-line investigation for continuing wrist pain following trauma in the presence of normal radiography [63].

Treatment

Non-Operative and Diagnostic Considerations

  • Diagnostic arthroscopy is indicated for the staging of posttraumatic arthritis, including SLAC and SNAC wrists [27].

Arthroscopic Debridement and Styloidectomy

  • Arthroscopic radial styloidectomy is indicated for stage I SLAC and SNAC wrist conditions [11].
  • Arthroscopic radial styloidectomy may be performed as an isolated procedure or as an adjunct to scaphoid non-union or scapholunate reconstruction procedures [31].
  • The recommended depth of arthroscopic radial styloidectomy resection is no more than 3–4 mm to avoid increased radial translation and ulnar/palmar carpal displacement [11].
  • Arthroscopic wrist debridement and radial styloidectomy may relieve pain while preserving wrist motion for SLAC stage 2 or 3 disease [33].
  • Overaggressive arthroscopic radial styloidectomy may cause injury to the radioscaphocapitate (RSC) and lunotriquetral ligament (LRL) ligaments, leading to instability [31].
  • Injury to the sensory branch of the radial nerve is a potential complication at the 1-2 portal during arthroscopic radial styloidectomy [31].

Distal Scaphoid Resection

  • Arthroscopic distal scaphoidectomy is indicated for symptom control in selected cases of SNAC wrist [54].
  • Distal scaphoid resection is a durable procedure with good long-term results, with 94% of patients remaining satisfied and no further wrist collapse or radiocarpal arthritis developing [24].
  • The best indication for distal scaphoidectomy in SNAC wrist is when cartilage degeneration, osteophyte formation, and deformity are confined mainly to the distal scaphoid articular surface [54].
  • A significant dorsal lunate tilt deformity (DISI) is considered a relative contraindication to distal scaphoid excision [54].
  • Marked arthritis at the lunocapitate joint constitutes a relative contraindication to distal scaphoid excision [54].
  • In dorsal type scaphoid nonunion, simulated distal fragment resection aggravates pressure concentration around the capitate head, indicating a potential risk for worsening preexisting lunocapitate arthritis [54].

Scaphoid Reconstruction

Partial Wrist Fusion and Arthrodesis

  • Partial wrist fusion is indicated for painful posttraumatic and osteoarthritic conditions of the wrist, including SLAC and SNAC wrists, in patients seeking pain control while preserving useful motion [10].
  • Chronic smokers have a higher incidence of nonunion following partial wrist fusion [10].
  • Midcarpal arthrodesis is a reliable procedure for treating SLAC- and SNAC-wrists in stages II and III that preserves some range of motion [1].
  • Four-corner fusion retains 60% of wrist motion and 80% of grip strength [12].
  • Capitolunate arthrodesis is a satisfactory therapeutic alternative to four-corner fusion for SNAC wrist with osteoarthritis [51].
  • Capitolunate arthrodesis using headless compression screws allows for a higher union rate, short operative time, and short rehabilitation period [51].
  • Trapeziometacarpal joint arthritis and SLAC wrist may be treated either simultaneously or in stages [23].

Proximal Row Carpectomy (PRC)

  • Proximal row carpectomy (PRC) provides improvements in pain and subjective outcome measures for patients with symptomatic and appropriately staged SLAC or SNAC wrists [2].
  • PRC is indicated for stage II SLAC wrist, with the disadvantage of reduced wrist motion and grip strength [12].
  • PRC should be avoided if there are capitate head degenerative changes [12].
  • Limited carpal fusion is favored over proximal row carpectomy for SNAC and SLAC wrist conditions, except for flexion-extension and grip strength in women [3].
  • Proximal row carpectomy is preferred for SLAC wrists with preserved capitate head cartilage due to socio-economic benefits, lower complication rates, and procedural ease [29].

Complications

  • The potential advantage of partial wrist fusion in preservation of a useful arc of motion may be offset by the risks of nonunion [10].
  • The potential advantage of partial wrist fusion in preservation of a useful arc of motion may be offset by continued pain despite successful fusion [10].
  • Patients with preexisting extensor tendon pathology over the wrist region may have a higher incidence of tendon complications associated with complex partial wrist fusion procedures [10].
  • Arthrofibrosis and long-standing carpal collapse may pose additional difficulty and risk for partial wrist fusion [10].
  • Resection of 6 mm and 10 mm of the radial styloid was associated with radial, ulnar, and palmar carpal displacement [22].
  • Resection of 3 mm of the radial styloid was not associated with radial, ulnar, and palmar carpal displacement [22].
  • In a series of 43 patients undergoing midcarpal arthrodesis and complete scaphoid excision, total wrist arthrodesis was subsequently required in two patients to relieve severe pain [20].
  • In a series of 43 patients undergoing midcarpal arthrodesis and complete scaphoid excision, one patient required a revision midcarpal fusion with additional bone grafting [20].
  • In a series of 43 patients undergoing midcarpal arthrodesis and complete scaphoid excision, four patients reported moderate pain postoperatively [20].
  • In a series of 43 patients undergoing midcarpal arthrodesis and complete scaphoid excision, four patients felt that they were not improved postoperatively [20].

Recovery

  • Midcarpal arthrodesis preserves some range of motion in patients with SLAC- and SNAC-wrists in stages II and III [1].
  • Distal scaphoid resection is a durable procedure with good long-term results [24].
  • 94% of patients remained satisfied after distal scaphoid resection for arthritis secondary to scaphoid nonunion [24].
  • No further wrist collapse or radiocarpal arthritis developed in patients treated with distal scaphoid resection for arthritis secondary to scaphoid nonunion [24].
  • Functional results were good at long-term follow-up for 4-corner fusion in SLAC and SNAC wrists despite radiographic changes in the radiolunate joint in 73% of patients [62].

Key Evidence

  • [L4] Our data demonstrate that midcarpal arthrodesis is a reliable procedure for treating SLAC- and SNAC-wrists in stages II and III and, furthermore, one which preserves some range of motion. [1] (10.1097/01.sap.0000194245.94684.54)
  • [L4] Both procedures provide improvements in pain and subjective outcome measures for patients with symptomatic and appropriately staged SLAC or SNAC wrists. [2] (10.1177/1753193408100954)
  • [L3] Among patients treated for SNAC and SLAC wrist conditions, findings are in favour of Limited Carpal Fusion compared to Proximal Row Carpectomy, except for flexion-extension and grip strength in women. [3] (10.1186/s13018-023-04177-7)
  • [L5] [4] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.06.110)
  • [L4] SNAC wrists differ from SLAC wrists in exhibiting a decreased sagittal lunotriquetral angle, indicating a distinct pathomechanism of carpal instability. [5] (10.1186/s12891-025-08652-6)
  • [L4] Scaphoid excision and four-corner fusion is indicated for the treatment of the SLAC/SNAC wrist when significant pain is refractory to nonoperative measures. [6] (10.1053/otor.2003.36321)
  • [L3] Bone density was greater at the capitolunate joint, the radial styloid, and the radiolunate joint in SNAC wrists compared to controls. [7] (10.2106/jbjs.22.01350)
  • [L5] [8] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.01.018)
  • [L4] Radiographic classification of SLAC wrist has moderate reliability and reproducibility, whereas classification of SNAC wrist has limited reliability. [9] (10.1177/1753193413484629)
  • [L4] Successful scaphoid reconstruction in SNAC wrists shifts the load back onto the proximal pole and interrupts the otherwise inevitable degenerative pattern in scaphoid nonunions. [13] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.06.104)
  • [L4] It is mostly indicated as a palliative procedure in elderly patients with posttraumatic SNAC or SLAC wrist with limited functional demands. [14] (10.1055/s-0032-1329615)
  • [L3] Patients with SLAC wrist were more likely to be male and have a history of trauma compared to patients with first CMC OA. [15] (10.1177/1558944718788672)
  • [Paper] Staging systems for SNAC wrist lack agreement. [16] (10.1007/s12593-012-0062-2)
  • [L3] Carpal malalignment in SLAC wrists not only affects the radio- and midcarpal joints, but also extends to the third carpometacarpal joint, with malalignment evident in both the sagittal and coronal planes. [17] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.09.021)
  • [L4] It also differentiates SOAC from SLAC wrist and discusses how the SOAC staging system can guide treatment decisions. [19] (10.5435/jaaos-d-25-01408)
  • [L4] [20] (10.1054/jhsb.2000.0434)
  • [L4] The procedure is indicated for SLAC II or SLAC III wrists as an intermediate step to relieve pain and preserve functional motion. [21] (10.1016/j.arthro.2012.04.108)
  • [L3] [22] (10.1177/1753193417739519)
  • [L4] Trapeziometacarpal joint arthritis and SLAC wrist may be treated either simultaneously or in stages. [23] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.05.002)
  • [L4] Distal scaphoid resection is a durable procedure with good long-term results. 94% of patients remained satisfied, and no further wrist collapse or radiocarpal arthritis developed. [24] (10.1016/s0363-5023(11)60002-6)
  • [Paper] Our results highlight the significant effect of rotation on radiographic landmarks at the wrist, indicating that 10° of supination can drastically alter the developed radiograph. [26] (10.1177/15589447241255705)
  • [L3] The authors prefer proximal row carpectomy for SLAC wrists with preserved capitate head cartilage due to socio-economic benefits, lower complication rates, and procedural ease. [29] (10.1177/1753193408087116)
  • [L5] Despite its significant limitations, the Watson and Ballet classification of SLAC wrist osteoarthritis is widely accepted, simple, and a well-recognized guide to treatment. [30] (10.1097/corr.0000000000000451)
  • [L4] The procedure studied may have advantages in relieving pain while preserving wrist motion for SLAC stage 2 or 3 disease. [33] (10.1177/1558944717725383)
  • [Paper] [51] (10.1007/s12593-015-0182-6)
  • [L4] ARARC may be a viable surgical option for patients with SLAC wrist who desire a minimally invasive procedure. [58] (10.1055/s-0034-1373839)
  • [L4] Functional results were good at long-term follow-up despite radiographic changes in the radiolunate joint in 73% of patients. [62] (10.1177/1558944716681949)
  • [L4] We find this rapid version of the bone scan useful as a second line investigation for continuing wrist pain following trauma in the presence of normal radiography. [63] (10.1016/s0020-1383(99)00280-6)

References

[1] Long-Term Results of Midcarpal Arthrodesis in the Treatment of Scaphoid Nonunion Advanced Collapse (SNAC-Wrist) and Scapholunate Advanced Collapse (SLAC-Wrist). Annals of Plastic Surgery. 2006. DOI: 10.1097/01.sap.0000194245.94684.54

[2] Proximal Row Carpectomy vs Four Corner Fusion for Scapholunate (Slac) or Scaphoid Nonunion Advanced Collapse (Snac) Wrists: A Systematic Review of Outcomes. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2009. DOI: 10.1177/1753193408100954

[3] Limited intercarpal fusion versus proximal row carpectomy in the treatment of SLAC or SNAC wrist, results after 3.5 years. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2023. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-04177-7

[4] Scapholunate Advanced Collapse: Nomenclature and Differential Diagnosis. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.06.110

[5] Computer-aided three-dimensional analysis of carpal alignment in scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse wrists: A comparative study with scapholunate advanced collapse and healthy wrists. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-025-08652-6

[6] Scaphoid excision and four-corner fusion in the SLAC/SNAC wrist. Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics. 2003. DOI: 10.1053/otor.2003.36321

[7] Quantitative 3-D CT Demonstrates Distal Row Pronation and Translation and Radiolunate Arthritis in the SNAC Wrist. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2023. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.22.01350

[8] Scapholunate Advanced Collapse and Scaphoid Nonunion Advanced Collapse Arthritis—Update on Evaluation and Treatment. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.01.018

[9] Reproducibility of radiographic classification of scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) wrist. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2013. DOI: 10.1177/1753193413484629

[10] Green S Operative Hand Surgery. AUTHOR'S PREFERRED METHOD OF TREATMENT: ARTHROSCOPIC PARTIAL WRIST FUSION > Indications and Contraindications.

[11] Green S Operative Hand Surgery. AUTHOR'S PREFERRED METHOD OF TREATMENT: ARTHROSCOPIC PARTIAL WRIST FUSION > Osteotomy.

[12] Aaos Comprehensive Orthopaedic Review 3. Arthritides of the Hand and Wrist* > IV. Posttraumatic Arthritis.

[13] Long-Term Results of Scaphoid Grafting in 52 SNAC Wrists: Should We Cut Down on Salvage Procedures?. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.06.104

[14] Scaphoidectomy and Capsulodesis for SNAC or SLAC Stage II. Journal of Wrist Surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1329615

[15] The Epidemiology of Scapholunate Advanced Collapse. HAND. 2018. DOI: 10.1177/1558944718788672

[16] Scaphoid Nonunion Advanced Collapse Classifications: A Reliability Study. Journal of Hand and Microsurgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1007/s12593-012-0062-2

[17] Comparative Computer-Aided Analysis of Three-Dimensional Carpal Alignment in Scapholunate Advanced Collapse and Healthy Wrists. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.09.021

[18] Green S Operative Hand Surgery. AUTHOR'S PREFERRED METHOD OF TREATMENT: ARTHROSCOPIC PARTIAL WRIST FUSION > Partial Wrist Fusion.

[19] Scaphotrapeziotrapezoid Joint Osteoarthritis: Differentiating SOAC Wrist From SLAC Wrist. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2026. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-25-01408

[20] Midcarpal Arthrodesis with Complete Scaphoid Excision and Interposition Bone Graft in the Treatment of Advanced Carpal Collapse (SNAC/SLAC Wrist): Operative Technique and Outcome Assessment. Journal of Hand Surgery. 2000. DOI: 10.1054/jhsb.2000.0434

[21] Arthroscopic Wrist Debridement and Radial Styloidectomy for Late‐stage Scapholunate Advanced Collapse Wrist (SS‐49). Arthroscopy. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.04.108

[22] Radial styloidectomy for scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse – relevance of nonunion location. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2017. DOI: 10.1177/1753193417739519

[23] Combined Treatment of Trapeziometacarpal Joint Arthritis and Scapholunate Advanced Collapse Wrist. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.05.002

[24] Distal Scaphoid Resection for Arthritis Secondary to Scaphoid Nonunion: A Twenty-year Experience. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/s0363-5023(11)60002-6

[26] The Sensitivity of the Scapholunate Interval and Bony Landmarks to Wrist Rotation on Posteroanterior Radiographs. HAND. 2024. DOI: 10.1177/15589447241255705

[27] Green S Operative Hand Surgery. AUTHOR'S PREFERRED METHOD OF TREATMENT: ARTHROSCOPIC PARTIAL WRIST FUSION > SURGICAL TECHNIQUE FOR DIAGNOSTIC ARTHROSCOPY > Setup.

[29] Proximal Row Carpectomy Versus Four-Corner Arthrodesis as a Treatment for SLAC (Scapholunate Advanced Collapse) Wrist. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2008. DOI: 10.1177/1753193408087116

[30] Classifications in Brief: Watson and Ballet Classification of Scapholunate Advanced Collapse Wrist Arthritis. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 2018. DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000000451

[31] Green S Operative Hand Surgery. AUTHOR'S PREFERRED METHOD OF TREATMENT: ARTHROSCOPIC PARTIAL WRIST FUSION > Arthroscopic Radial Styloidectomy.

[33] Arthroscopic Wrist Debridement and Radial Styloidectomy for Advanced Scapholunate Advanced Collapse Wrist: Long-term Follow-up. HAND. 2017. DOI: 10.1177/1558944717725383

[37] Aaos Comprehensive Orthopaedic Review 3. Anatomy of the Hand and Wrist > VII. The Wrist.

[38] Green S Operative Hand Surgery. WRIST BIOMECHANICS > Carpal Kinematics.

[42] Campbell S Operative Orthopaedics 4 Volume Set. WRIST AND ELBOW.

[43] Campbell S Operative Orthopaedics 4 Volume Set. NERVE INJURIES AT THE LEVEL OF THE HAND AND WRIST > ARTHROSCOPY OF THE WRIST.

[51] Capitolunate Arthrodesis for Treatment of Scaphoid Nonunion Advanced Collapse (SNAC) Wrist Arthritis. Journal of Hand and Microsurgery. 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s12593-015-0182-6

[54] Green S Operative Hand Surgery. AUTHOR'S PREFERRED METHOD OF TREATMENT: ARTHROSCOPIC PARTIAL WRIST FUSION > Arthroscopic Distal Scaphoidectomy.

[55] Aaos Comprehensive Orthopaedic Review 3. Wrist Fractures and Dislocations, Carpal Dissociation, and Distal Radius Fractures > II. Carpal Ligament Injury and Perilunate Dislocation.

[58] Arthroscopic Resection Arthroplasty of the Radial Column for SLAC Wrist. Journal of Wrist Surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1373839

[62] Ten-Year Minimum Follow-Up of 4-Corner Fusion for SLAC and SNAC Wrist. HAND. 2016. DOI: 10.1177/1558944716681949

[63] Fifteen minutes bone scintigraphy in patients with clinically suspected scaphoid fracture and normal x-rays. Injury. 2000. DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(99)00280-6