Education · hand

Trigger Finger Info In-depth Evidence

Reviewed by Dr Kieran Hirpara, Specialist Orthopaedic Surgeon Last reviewed

What you're feeling

Trigger finger usually starts with pain and tenderness in the palm, at the base of the affected finger or thumb. Many people also feel aching on the back of the knuckle or middle finger joint, which can make it seem like the problem is in the joint itself. You may notice a small lump or knot in the palm. This is a thickened area in the tendon or its tunnel, and it moves as the finger bends.

The main symptom is catching or clicking. It often appears after you grip something firmly or make a tight fist. The finger may hesitate, then snap open. In more severe cases, it locks bent and you need your other hand to straighten it. Some people wake with the finger stuck curled and have to ease it open. If it becomes very advanced, the finger stays bent and will not straighten on its own.

Everyday tasks that need repeated gripping become difficult: holding a steering wheel, carrying shopping bags, wringing out a cloth, or using scissors or a jar opener. The catching tends to be worse after activity and first thing in the morning.

A few other things are worth knowing. Trigger finger is common, affecting about 3% of people at some point in their lives. It is more common in women than men, especially women over 50. The middle finger is the one most often affected. If more than one finger is triggering, it can be linked with diabetes. Trigger finger also often occurs alongside carpal tunnel syndrome, which causes pins and needles or numbness in the hand.

Children can get a trigger thumb too. It usually appears in early childhood rather than at birth, and the thumb end joint stays locked bent. It sometimes affects both thumbs.

What's actually happening

The tendons that bend your fingers work like ropes. They run from your forearm, through the palm, and attach to the finger bones. A tunnel of tissue called a pulley holds each rope close to the bone so it cannot bowstring away when you grip.

In trigger finger, the entrance of that tunnel, called the A1 pulley, becomes thickened and tight. The tendon itself can also develop a small thickened nodule. Now the rope has a knot trying to pass through a narrow gate. As you bend the finger, the knot slides under the pulley. When you straighten, it catches at the entrance and then pops through. That is the clicking and snapping you feel. If it cannot pass at all, the finger locks bent.

The thickening is a wear-and-tear change in the tissue, not an infection or a growth. It is linked with repeated firm gripping, and it is more common in people with diabetes and some inflammatory conditions. The tunnel becomes narrowed and the tendon becomes irritated where it rubs through it each time the finger moves.

Doctors describe how far the condition has progressed in four stages. In the first, there is pain and tenderness in the palm at the base of the finger, but no catching yet. In the second, the finger starts to catch or click. In the third, it locks bent but you can straighten it, often with your other hand. In the fourth, the finger is stuck bent and will not straighten even when helped. The earlier stages often settle with simpler treatments such as a splint or a steroid injection, which is a strong anti-inflammatory medicine placed near the tendon. The later stages, where the finger locks or stays bent, are the ones that usually need a small operation to open the narrowed tunnel.

This also explains why the problem can feel like it is in the knuckle or middle joint of the finger. The catching happens in the palm, but the pulling and snapping are felt further along the finger.

What we can do about it

Dr Kieran Hirpara, an upper-limb surgeon at Mater Private Hospital Rockhampton, starts with the least invasive options that suit your condition. Patients are generally referred to our clinic by their GP; if a physiotherapist has suggested you see us, you will still need a referral from your GP in order to be eligible for the Medicare rebate. At your first visit we take a history, examine your hand, and arrange imaging only if it is needed. Because trigger finger is a long-standing wear-and-tear problem, we usually begin with non-operative care before considering surgery.

The simplest step is changing how you use your hand. Cutting back on repeated firm gripping gives the irritated tendon a chance to settle. A splint can help too, by holding the finger still so the tendon stops rubbing through the narrowed tunnel each time it moves. Hand therapy aims to settle the pain and keep the finger moving smoothly. We usually give these measures a fair trial over several weeks before moving on.

If self-management has not settled things, an injection is often the next step. A cortisone injection is a strong anti-inflammatory medicine placed near the tendon in the palm. It works by calming the swelling so the tendon can glide through the tunnel more freely. About 60% of people find their trigger finger settles after an injection. People with diabetes tend to respond less well to injections, so we take that into account when planning your care. Some people need a second injection before surgery becomes the next step.

Surgery comes into the picture when injections and splinting have not given enough improvement, or when the finger has reached the later stages where it locks or stays bent. The operation is a small release: we open the tight entrance of the tunnel, the A1 pulley, so the tendon can glide through without catching. It is a short procedure aimed at stopping the clicking and locking for good. We will talk through whether surgery suits your situation and decide together.

What to expect

For many people, trigger finger does not settle on its own. The catching and locking tend to persist, and can slowly worsen over months if the hand keeps doing the same firm gripping. Early stages, where there is pain but little clicking, have the best chance of settling with simpler care such as a splint or rest. Once the finger starts locking, it usually stays that way or gets worse without treatment.

With well-chosen treatment, most people get lasting relief. Splinting alone can work, and it is the least invasive option. A steroid injection settles things for many people, and about 39% of second and third injections bring long-term relief. When those measures are not enough, a small release operation stops the catching and locking. Most people who have it are glad they did, though a mild, short-lived setback afterwards is fairly common: about 1 in 20 fingers will have a mild, temporary problem such as pain, stiffness or swelling, and about 1 in 200 need a second operation.

Recovery after treatment is usually straightforward. The finger or thumb can be used normally soon after a release, and stiffness is the thing most likely to slow you down, affecting about 8.6% of people. The triggering itself rarely comes back, at about 2.2%. Two things are worth knowing about longer-term outlooks. Some people keep an ache in the middle joint of the finger, especially if the problem was there a long time before treatment, and that ache may not fully go away. And people who have a surgical release are more likely than others to develop Dupuytren disease later, a condition where the palm tissue tightens and pulls fingers bent.

Leaving it alone has its own risks. A finger locked bent for a long time can develop permanent stiffness in that position, and the longer symptoms have been present, the less well treatment tends to work. If you have diabetes, injections tend to help less, so surgery may be the more reliable path. None of this is a promise about your individual result, but it is a fair picture of what usually happens.

When to see someone

See your GP if you have pain and tenderness in the palm at the base of a finger or thumb, or a small lump that moves as the finger bends. Ask for a specialist review if the finger starts catching, clicking or locking, especially if you need your other hand to straighten it. The same applies if a finger stays bent and will not straighten on its own, or if symptoms are stopping you gripping, working or sleeping. If more than one finger is triggering, mention it, as this can be linked with diabetes and is worth checking. Children with a thumb held locked bent should also be reviewed rather than left to wait.

In more depth

Advanced reading: the deeper science (optional)

This section goes further than you need for your own treatment decisions. Trigger finger is worth the extra reading because the first-line treatment works a little over half the time, a figure rarely quoted, and because in children the same clinical picture means something different enough to change the investigation.

The injection works, and the honest number is 57%

Corticosteroid injection is the standard first intervention, and it is usually described simply as effective. The pooled figure from level I and II studies is more specific: corticosteroid injections are effective in 57% of patients with trigger finger. Despite the limitations of the included studies, it remains a recommended first-line treatment on the basis of its simplicity and symptom relief [1].

Fifty-seven percent is worth knowing before you have one. It reframes a second injection, or a decision to proceed to surgery, as the expected path for a substantial minority rather than as something having gone wrong.

Splinting is a real alternative, and the duration is longer than most expect

Where injection is unsuitable, in diabetes, for instance, where injections can disturb glycaemic control, orthotic management has a reasonable evidence base. The consistent finding across studies is that results were similar regardless of which joint was immobilised, with a recommendation that a single joint be immobilised for 6 to 10 weeks [2].

That duration is the part people underestimate. A splint worn for a fortnight is not a trial of splinting.

Surgical release: the technique debate is settled, the approach question is not

Release of the A1 pulley can be done open, through a small incision under direct vision, or percutaneously with a needle or blade. Pooling 548 patients, there was no significant difference between open and percutaneous techniques in the need for revision, complications, or post-operative pain, so both are appropriate [3].

The larger analysis of percutaneous release across 2,114 digits found it effective and safe, and added two useful details: ultrasound guidance may improve success, while success rates were not affected by the instrument used or by whether cortisone was given alongside [4]. A 2025 review of 685 patients found combining percutaneous release with corticosteroid injection was well tolerated with a low complication rate [5].

Taken together: the pulley needs dividing, and how that is achieved matters less than that it is achieved completely. The instrument does not determine the result.

In a child, the same finding warrants a different response

Paediatric trigger finger is not simply the adult condition arriving early. The presence of bilateral or multiple trigger digits, or concurrent carpal tunnel syndrome, should raise suspicion of an atypical underlying pathology such as mucopolysaccharidosis [6].

This is the single most clinically consequential item in this section. A child with more than one triggering digit, or with triggering plus nerve symptoms, warrants investigation for a systemic storage disorder rather than a straightforward release, because the hand finding may be the presenting sign of a diagnosis that has implications well beyond the hand. A single triggering thumb in an otherwise well child is a different and far more common situation.


References for the advanced reading
  1. Fleisch SB, Spindler KP, Lee DH. Corticosteroid injections in the treatment of trigger finger: a level I and II systematic review. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15(3):166-71.
  2. Lunsford D, Valdes K, Hengy S. Conservative management of trigger finger: a systematic review. J Hand Ther. 2019;32(2):212-21.
  3. Casey JC, Daher M, Dworkin M, Cusano J, Garavito J, Gil JA. Open versus percutaneous fixation of trigger finger: meta-analysis of clinical outcomes. J Hand Surg Am. 2024;49(6):570-5.
  4. Zhao J, Kan S, Zhao L, Wang Z, Long L, Wang J, et al. Percutaneous first annular pulley release for trigger digits: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence. J Hand Surg Am. 2014;39(11):2192-202.
  5. Wen J, Syed B, Khalil R, Shehabat M, Alam M, Sedighi R, et al. Percutaneous A1 pulley with corticosteroid injection for trigger finger release: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2025;20(1).
  6. Wong AL, Wong MJ, Parker R, Wheelock ME. Presentation and aetiology of paediatric trigger finger: a systematic review. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2021;47(2):192-6.
Evidence & references

This is the clinical evidence summary written for health professionals. It is technical, and it lists the research this page was built from. You do not need to read it to understand your treatment or to make a decision about it.

Overview

Non-Operative Management

  • Female patients presenting with their first trigger finger have the highest rate of long-term treatment success after a single corticosteroid injection [1].
  • Management of trigger finger with 2 steroid injections before surgery is the least costly treatment strategy [14].
  • Patients' preferences for trigger finger treatment often change after consulting with a hand surgeon and during treatment, but these choices do not affect treatment satisfaction [4].
  • Comparing patients and hand surgeons, there were some differences in treatment preferences and perceived advantages and disadvantages regarding idiopathic trigger finger—differences that might be addressed by a decision aid [36].

Operative Management

  • Open trigger finger release is generally a low-risk procedure, although there is potential for complications, some requiring reoperation [2].
  • Patients who undergo open trigger finger release surgery in the clinic have complication rates similar to reported complication rates of surgery performed in the operating room [43].
  • The authors recommend open surgery for trigger finger and trigger thumb, citing excellent long-term results with no recurrence and no serious complications such as nerve transection or bowstringing [30].
  • Local anesthetic infiltration in the palm proximal to the incision site is preferred for open trigger finger release [6].
  • A transverse incision about 2 cm long several millimeters distal to the distal palmar crease is used for middle, ring, and small trigger finger releases [6].
  • A transverse incision about 2 cm long several millimeters distal to the proximal palmar crease is used for index trigger finger releases [6].
  • Trigger thumb releases can be done through incisions either distal or proximal to the metacarpophalangeal joint flexion crease [6].
  • The digital nerves on the thumb are more palmar and closer to the flexor sheath than might be anticipated [6].
  • The thumb radial digital nerve is especially vulnerable during trigger thumb release [6].
  • Trigger thumbs require release of only the A1 pulley, whereas trigger digits require division of the A1 and A0, or proximal palmar pulley [6].
  • Pulley division is usually accomplished with an initial opening of the pulley with a No. 15 knife blade and a pair of tenotomy scissors [6].
  • For trigger thumb release, the surgeon should avoid cutting too far distally and disrupting the oblique pulley [6].
  • The sheath is incised from proximal to distal, approximately 1 cm, and reassessed for triggering [6].
  • Persistent triggering implies that either the A1 and palmar pulleys are incompletely released or an alternate site of triggering is present [6].
  • When the distal A1 pulley edge is released, the divided pulley leaves are parallel rather than ending in a V-shaped pattern [6].
  • Other fingers can be found to trigger at the same surgical setting and can be managed at the same time [6].
  • The compression dressing is removed after 48 hours [6].
  • Sutures are removed at 10 to 14 days [6].
  • Normal use of the finger or thumb is encouraged after surgery [6].

Percutaneous Management

  • The study confirms the efficacy and safety of percutaneous trigger finger release but shows no clinical advantage in using pre- or postoperative ultrasonography [15].
  • Percutaneous release is permanent, safe, and cost-effective and should be considered as first-line treatment for demonstrable trigger fingers [18].
  • While the clinical significance of these findings is unclear, it raises questions regarding the safety and efficacy of percutaneous trigger finger release, even when adding ultrasound guidance [21].

General Clinical Guidance

  • The manuscript aims to provide an updated practical guide for clinicians and surgeons reviewing the state-of-art of both the assessment and the treatments of patients with trigger finger to plan tailored rehabilitation management taking advantage of the matching of traditional and novel techniques [3].

Anatomy & Pathophysiology

Demographics and Epidemiology

  • Trigger finger occurs in 2% to 3% of the general population [10].
  • Women are more commonly affected than men [10].
  • The most common demographic group is women older than 50 years of age [7, 8].
  • Middle and ring finger involvement is most common in adults [7, 8].
  • The order of decreasing prevalence for affected digits is thumb, ring, long, little, and index [10].
  • Trigger finger is more common in patients with systemic diseases such as diabetes mellitus (10% to 20% lifetime incidence), hypothyroidism, sarcoidosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and septic tenosynovitis [10].
  • Stenosing tenosynovitis is more common in diabetic patients than in nondiabetic patients [9].
  • When multiple digits are involved, the possibility of diabetes should be considered [9].
  • The average age of female patients with trigger finger was 62 years and of male patients was 64.5 years [70].

Etiology and Risk Factors

  • The precise etiology of trigger finger has not been elucidated [77].
  • Repetitive finger movements and local trauma are proposed causes of trigger finger [77].
  • Stress and degenerative force account for an increased incidence of trigger finger in the dominant hand [77].
  • Trigger finger is possibly associated with repetitive grasping activities [7, 8].
  • Repetitive power grip and flexion involved in rowing increase the prevalence of trigger finger [90].
  • Patients with greater volar migration of the flexor tendons after carpal tunnel release are at a higher risk of developing trigger finger [88].
  • Concomitant trigger finger and carpal tunnel syndrome occurs in 40% to 60% of patients [7, 8].

Pathology and Histology

  • Trigger finger is defined as stenosing tenosynovitis of the flexor tendons with mechanical impingement of the flexor tendons at the A1 pulley [10].
  • Pathologic examination of affected pulleys demonstrates a proliferation of chondrocytes and increased type III collagen [10].
  • The flexor digitorum profundus tendon often demonstrates a pathologic nodule, while the flexor digitorum superficialis is often unaffected [10].
  • Histology shows fibrocartilaginous metaplasia of the pulley and/or FDS tendon [7, 8].
  • Thickening and hypervascularization of the A1 pulley are the hallmarks of trigger fingers on sonography [52].
  • In the thumb, the flexor tendon and A1 pulley thickened significantly only after patients exhibited triggering [92].
  • A nodule or thickening in the flexor tendon becomes trapped proximal to the pulley, making finger extension difficult [10].
  • The lump palpable in the palm may be the thickened area in the first annular pulley or a nodule or fusiform swelling of the flexor tendon just distal to it [20].
  • The tendon nodule usually is just proximal to the anulus at the metacarpophalangeal joint level [20].
  • In a rheumatoid patient, a nodule distal to the metacarpophalangeal joint level may cause triggering [20].

Clinical Presentation

  • Patients present with pain and tenderness in the palm at the proximal edge of the digital A1 pulley [9].
  • Patients frequently note catching or triggering of the affected finger or thumb after forceful flexion [9].
  • In more severe cases, the opposite hand must be used to force the finger or thumb passively into extension [9].
  • In the most severe cases, the finger becomes locked in a flexed position [9].
  • Triggering is often more pronounced in the morning than later in the day [9].
  • Pain and tenderness in the distal palm progress to mechanical catching or locking, and may become fixed [7, 8].
  • A common complaint is referred pain at the dorsal MCP/PIP area [7, 8].
  • Physical examination findings include tenderness to palpation of the flexor tendon at the level of the A1 pulley [10].
  • Physical examination findings include palpable triggering or pain with flexion and extension of the finger [10].
  • Physical examination findings include nodularity of the flexor tendon just proximal to the A1 pulley [10].
  • Physical examination findings may include the presence of a volar retinacular ganglion cyst between the A1 and A2 pulleys [10].
  • Physical examination findings may include a fixed flexion deformity of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint [10].
  • Local tenderness may be present but is not a prominent complaint [20].
  • Pressure accentuates the apparent snapping or triggering of the more distal joints [20].
  • Patients frequently state that the problem is in the proximal interphalangeal joint with trigger finger or in the proximal interphalangeal joint with trigger thumb [20].

Anatomical Variations and Associations

  • Newer evidence has found a fourth pulley (variable annular pulley) in 75% of patients, which may contribute to stenosis in the thumb [7, 8].
  • Concurrent appearance of Dupuytren’s disease and trigger finger was observed in 16% of trigger finger cases [70].
  • When considering middle and ring fingers only, Dupuytren’s disease and trigger finger were present in 25% of cases [70].
  • The percentage of patients with combined trigger finger and Dupuytren’s disease strongly increases with age [84].
  • In the "80+" age group, 50% of trigger finger patients are suffering from both trigger finger and Dupuytren’s disease [84].
  • In more progressed stages of Dupuytren’s contracture (Stages II or III), the concomitant appearance of trigger finger and Dupuytren’s contracture is rarely seen [85].
  • Advanced extension deficit reduces the range of motion of the tendon and thus causes less mechanical irritation at the A1 pulley [85].
  • The tendon becomes slightly thinner distal to the chiasm of the deep and superficial flexor tendon [85].

Classification

  • Green Classification Grade I is defined as pain and tenderness at the A1 pulley [7, 8].
  • Green Classification Grade II is defined as catching of the finger [7, 8].
  • Green Classification Grade III is defined as locking of the finger that is passively correctable [7, 8].
  • Green Classification Grade IV is defined as a fixed, locked finger [7, 8].
  • Green Classification Grade I is defined as pain over the A1 pulley [10].
  • Green Classification Grade II is defined as mechanical catching of the digit without locking [10].
  • Green Classification Grade III is defined as mechanical locking of the digit which is passively correctable [10].

Classification

  • The Green classification of trigger finger includes four grades: Grade I (pain and tenderness at the A1 pulley), Grade II (catching of finger), Grade III (locking of finger; passively correctable), and Grade IV (fixed, locked finger) [7].
  • Clinical presentation of trigger finger involves pain or tenderness in the distal palm that progresses to mechanical catching or locking, and may become fixed [7].
  • A common complaint associated with trigger finger is referred pain at the dorsal MCP/PIP area [7].
  • In a retrospective review of 90 trigger digits, severity was graded according to Green's classification, with Grade I and II grouped as mild triggering and Grade III and IV grouped as severe triggering [74].
  • Percutaneous release for trigger finger is not indicated for Type I triggers because the procedure requires active demonstration of flexion-extension activity, which may not occur sporadically in Type I cases [50].

Clinical Presentation

Epidemiology and Risk Factors

  • Women are more commonly affected by trigger finger than men [10].
  • The lifetime risk for a trigger finger in the general population is approximately 3% [40].
  • Trigger finger is more common in patients with systemic diseases such as diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, sarcoidosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and septic tenosynovitis [10].
  • Diabetes mellitus is associated with a 10% to 20% lifetime incidence of trigger finger [10].
  • Trigger finger is seen in patients with gout, calcific tendinitis, pseudogout, and amyloidosis [10].
  • In patients with calcific tendinitis causing triggering, males are affected five times more frequently than females [10].
  • Trigger finger patients with metabolic syndrome are at risk of poorer functional outcomes and treatment failure after a single corticosteroid injection than age- and sex-matched controls [24].

Clinical Findings

  • Flexor tenosynovitis is characterized by pain and tenderness in the palm at the proximal edge of the digital A1 pulley [9].
  • Physical examination findings may include tenderness to palpation of the flexor tendon at the level of the A1 pulley [10].
  • Physical examination findings may include palpable triggering or pain with flexion and extension of the finger [10].
  • Physical examination findings may include nodularity of the flexor tendon just proximal to the A1 pulley [10].
  • Physical examination findings may include the presence of a fixed flexion deformity of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint [10].
  • Patients may note a lump or knot in the palm, which may be a thickened area in the first annular pulley or a nodule of the flexor tendon [20].
  • The tendon nodule can be palpated by the examiner’s fingertip and moves with the tendon [20].
  • Patients frequently state that the problem is in the proximal interphalangeal joint with trigger finger or trigger thumb [20].
  • Proximal interphalangeal joint pain in trigger finger patients results from long symptom duration and consequent joint pathology [22].

Classification

  • The Green classification for trigger finger includes Grade I: Pain over the A1 pulley [10].
  • The Green classification for trigger finger includes Grade II: Mechanical catching of the digit without locking [10].
  • The Green classification for trigger finger includes Grade III: Mechanical locking of the digit which is passively correctable [10].
  • The Green classification for trigger finger includes Grade IV: Fixed locked finger [10].

Differential Diagnosis and Associated Conditions

  • Other conditions such as intraarticular disorders (e.g., loose bodies, degenerative joint disease, and fractures) and common extensor tendon subluxation can cause similar symptoms to idiopathic trigger finger [20].
  • There is a predisposition for carpal tunnel syndrome and trigger finger to present in the same hand [54].
  • Carpal tunnel release does not cause new incidence of trigger finger in the operative hand [54].
  • Pediatric trigger finger is a distinct ailment from adult trigger finger [33].
  • A secondary cause must be sought whenever long fingers are affected in pediatric trigger finger [33].

Investigations

Clinical Examination and Classification

  • Trigger finger is characterized by pain and tenderness in the palm at the proximal edge of the digital A1 pulley [9].
  • The Green classification Grade I is defined as pain over the A1 pulley [7, 8, 10].
  • The Green classification Grade II is defined as catching of the finger or mechanical catching of the digit without locking [7, 8, 10].
  • The Green classification Grade III is defined as locking of the finger or mechanical locking of the digit which is passively correctable [7, 8, 10].
  • The Green classification Grade IV is defined as a fixed, locked finger [7, 8, 10].
  • Observing the triggering of the digit guides the patient's treatment and assists in diagnosing trigger finger [23].

Imaging

  • Ultrasound can detect various lesions in clinical trigger fingers, and some ultrasound findings correlated with clinical findings [66].
  • Advanced imaging is critical for identifying bony prominences causing locking when common etiologies are absent [71].
  • Metacarpal head osteochondroma is an atypical cause of "trigger finger" that supports the inclusion of this condition in the differential diagnosis [71].
  • Volar wrist ganglion can present as trigger finger and has been treated with interventional radiological measures rather than open surgery [68].

Treatment

Non-Operative Management

  • Corticosteroid injections are effective in 57% of patients with trigger finger [12].
  • Corticosteroid injections are effective in 60% of patients with trigger finger [20].
  • Corticosteroid injections are effective in 65% to 90% of patients without diabetes who receive one or two injections [10].
  • Steroid injections were an effective first-line intervention for the treatment of trigger finger [27].
  • The current evidence supports the use of corticosteroid injection as a first-line treatment for trigger finger [41].
  • A single corticosteroid injection for trigger finger has a 45% long-term success rate [29].
  • Diabetic patients are generally less responsive to corticosteroid injection for trigger finger [7, 8].
  • There is no difference in efficacy between soluble and insoluble corticosteroid preparations for trigger finger injection [7, 8].
  • Splinting is an effective short-term conservative treatment for trigger finger, offering symptom relief and functional improvement comparable to corticosteroid injections [28].
  • Initiating conservative treatment with the MCP joint blocking splint has positive outcomes in 77% of subjects with trigger finger [57].
  • Use of the DIP joint splint was effective in about half of subjects with trigger finger [57].
  • Orthoses are effective for non-surgical management of pediatric and adult trigger finger using various orthotic options [58].
  • A randomized trial found no differences in patient-reported outcomes for pain or function or in reduction of trigger finger severity at 52 weeks among splint alone, steroid alone, and combination treatments [56].
  • The authors of a trial comparing splint, steroid, and combination treatments recommend splinting alone as the least invasive option [56].
  • The use of an injection without lidocaine is recommended to treat trigger finger [55].

Operative Management

  • Surgical release of the A1 pulley provides satisfactory results in >90% of patients with trigger finger [10].
  • Approximately 97% of patients have complete resolution after operative treatment for trigger finger [20].
  • Open release is an effective treatment for trigger finger with limited need for nonprescription drugs, since almost all patients reported full resolution of triggering within 6 weeks [61].
  • In patients with rheumatoid arthritis, the preference is to excise a slip of the FDS tendon rather than to release the A1 pulley because these patients are at risk for ulnar drift at the MCP joint [7, 8].
  • The radial digital nerve is at risk of iatrogenic injury during thumb trigger finger release given its superficial location [7, 8].
  • Minor complications of open trigger finger release include wound dehiscence, scar tenderness, and decreased ROM [7, 8].
  • Management of diabetic trigger finger with immediate surgical release in the clinic is the most cost-effective treatment strategy, assuming a corticosteroid injection failure rate of at least 34% [64].
  • Procedure room-based treatment of trigger finger is less costly than release in the operating room [63].
  • Comparing patients and hand surgeons, there were some differences in treatment preferences and perceived advantages and disadvantages regarding idiopathic trigger finger [36].
  • In women with a trigger finger, the choice of treatment should take into account whether there are also one or more patient- or trigger-related factors that increase the risk of conversion to surgery [11].

Complications

Surgical Complications

  • Approximately 1 in 20 fingers will experience a mild, transient adverse event after surgical release of the A1 pulley for idiopathic trigger finger [49].
  • Approximately 1 in 200 patients have a second surgery after open A1 pulley release for idiopathic trigger finger [49].
  • Minor complications of trigger finger release are relatively high and include wound dehiscence, scar tenderness, and decreased range of motion [7].
  • Incomplete pulley release and damage to the flexor tendons and digital nerves remain of some concern, especially with limited exposure techniques [20].
  • Preoperative hypoglycemia increases infection risk after trigger finger injection and release [5].
  • There were no significant differences in scar quality or improvement in patient-reported disability with transverse or longitudinal incisions for trigger finger release [44].

Postoperative Outcomes and Recurrence

  • Persistence of triggering is more common than recurrence after operative treatment [20].
  • Subsequent release or injection in the same or another digit was common following an initial trigger finger release [51].
  • Patients with more lifetime trigger fingers and/or prior trigger finger releases for other fingers are more likely to need ulnar superficialis slip resection [48].
  • Proximal interphalangeal joint pain in trigger finger patients results from long symptom duration and consequent joint pathology, and is incompletely resolved after A1 pulley release, leading to worse surgical outcomes than expected [22].
  • Physicians should consider the duration of preoperative symptoms and preoperative flexion contracture of the PIP joint when deciding timing of surgery for trigger finger patients [13].
  • The incidence and treatment outcome of cases in which trigger finger occurred in conjunction with Dupuytren's disease appeared less predictable than that of ordinary trigger finger [47].

Non-Operative Complications and Risks

  • Corticosteroid injections may elevate serum glucose levels for 5 days or more [20].

Recovery

Non-Operative

  • Steroid injections are an effective first-line intervention for the treatment of trigger finger [27].
  • Success beyond two years following a single corticosteroid injection is likely to predict lasting symptom relief [29].
  • Long-term success rates for corticosteroid injections vary by sex and number of affected digits [29].
  • Thirty-nine percent of second and third corticosteroid injections for trigger finger yield long-term relief [38].
  • Splinting is an effective short-term conservative treatment for trigger finger [28].
  • Splinting offers symptom relief and functional improvement comparable to corticosteroid injections [28].

Operative

  • Open trigger finger release is generally a low-risk procedure [2].
  • Open trigger finger release has potential for complications, some requiring reoperation [2].
  • Percutaneous trigger finger release is an effective and safe procedure [15].
  • There is no clinical advantage in using pre- or postoperative ultrasonography for percutaneous trigger finger release [15].
  • Simultaneous steroid injection at the time of surgical release provides greater subjective improvement in the early period after percutaneous trigger finger release [89].
  • Open surgery for trigger finger and trigger thumb yields excellent long-term results with no recurrence [30].
  • Open surgery for trigger finger and trigger thumb yields excellent long-term results with no serious complications such as nerve transection or bowstringing [30].
  • About 1 in 20 fingers will experience a mild, transient adverse event after surgical release of the A1 pulley for idiopathic trigger finger [49].
  • About 1 in 200 fingers have a second surgery after surgical release of the A1 pulley for idiopathic trigger finger [49].
  • There are no significant differences in scar quality between transverse or longitudinal incisions for trigger finger release [44].
  • There are no significant differences in improvement in patient-reported disability between transverse or longitudinal incisions for trigger finger release [44].

Prognostic Factors and Complications

  • Physicians should consider the duration of preoperative symptoms when deciding timing of surgery for trigger finger patients [13].
  • Physicians should consider preoperative flexion contracture of the PIP joint when deciding timing of surgery for trigger finger patients [13].
  • Proximal interphalangeal joint pain is incompletely resolved after A1 pulley release [22].
  • Proximal interphalangeal joint pain leads to worse surgical outcomes than expected [22].
  • The incidence and treatment outcome of trigger finger occurring in conjunction with Dupuytren's disease appear less predictable than that of ordinary trigger finger [47].
  • Patients with more lifetime trigger fingers are more likely to need ulnar superficialis slip resection during trigger finger release [48].
  • Patients with prior trigger finger releases for other fingers are more likely to need ulnar superficialis slip resection during trigger finger release [48].
  • Patients requiring ulnar superficialis slip resection may benefit from hand therapy [48].

Key Evidence

  • [L4] Female patients presenting with their first trigger finger have the highest rate of long-term treatment success after a single corticosteroid injection. [1] (10.2106/jbjs.n.00004)
  • [L3] Open trigger finger release is generally a low-risk procedure, although there is potential for complications, some requiring reoperation. [2] (10.1007/s11552-014-9716-9)
  • [L5] The manuscript aims to provide an updated practical guide for clinicians and surgeons reviewing the state-of-art of both the assessment and the treatments of patients with trigger finger to plan tailored rehabilitation management taking advantage of the matching of traditional and novel techniques. [3] (10.1186/s12891-024-08192-5)
  • [Paper] Patients' preferences for trigger finger treatment often change after consulting with a hand surgeon and during treatment, but these choices do not affect treatment satisfaction. [4] (10.1007/s12593-015-0203-5)
  • [L3] In women with a trigger finger, the choice of treatment should take into account whether there are also one or more patient- or trigger-related factors that increase the risk of conversion to surgery. [11] (10.1302/0301-620x.104b10.bjj-2022-0058.r3)
  • [L1] Corticosteroid injections are effective in 57% of patients with trigger finger. [12] (10.5435/00124635-200703000-00006)
  • [L4] Physicians should consider the duration of preoperative symptoms and preoperative flexion contracture of the PIP joint when deciding timing of surgery for trigger finger patients. [13] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.06.023)
  • [L2] Management of trigger finger with 2 steroid injections before surgery is the least costly treatment strategy. [14] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.02.029)
  • [L4] The study confirms the efficacy and safety of percutaneous trigger finger release but shows no clinical advantage in using pre- or postoperative ultrasonography. [15] (10.1177/1753193413517992)
  • [L3] Percutaneous release is permanent, safe, and cost-effective and should be considered as first-line treatment for demonstrable trigger fingers. [18] (10.5435/jaaosglobal-d-25-00445)
  • [L5] While the clinical significance of these findings is unclear, it raises questions regarding the safety and efficacy of percutaneous trigger finger release, even when adding ultrasound guidance. [21] (10.1007/s11552-008-9137-8)
  • [L4] Proximal interphalangeal joint pain in trigger finger patients results from long symptom duration and consequent joint pathology, and is incompletely resolved after A1 pulley release, leading to worse surgical outcomes than expected. [22] (10.1177/1753193418809771)
  • [L4] Observing the triggering of the digit guides the patient's treatment, and the outlined technique assists in diagnosing and treating one of the most common hand conditions seen in practice. [23] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.12.014)
  • [L3] Trigger finger patients with metabolic syndrome are at risk of poorer functional outcomes and treatment failure after a single corticosteroid injection than age- and sex-matched controls. [24] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.07.091)
  • [L4] Steroid injections were an effective first-line intervention for the treatment of trigger finger. [27] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.09.006)
  • [L2] Splinting is an effective short-term conservative treatment for trigger finger, offering symptom relief and functional improvement comparable to corticosteroid injections. [28] (10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100881)
  • [L5] This commentary highlights that a single corticosteroid injection for trigger finger has a 45% long-term success rate, with success beyond two years likely predicting lasting symptom relief, though results vary by sex and number of affected digits. [29] (10.2106/jbjs.n.00832)
  • [L4] The authors recommend open surgery for trigger finger and trigger thumb, citing excellent long-term results with no recurrence and no serious complications such as nerve transection or bowstringing. [30] (10.1007/s00402-008-0802-8)
  • [L4] Pediatric trigger finger is a distinct ailment from adult trigger finger, and a secondary cause must be sought whenever long fingers are affected. [33] (10.1177/1558944715627634)
  • [L4] Comparing patients and hand surgeons, there were some differences in treatment preferences and perceived advantages and disadvantages regarding idiopathic trigger finger—differences that might be addressed by a decision aid. [36] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.08.010)
  • [L4] Thirty-nine percent of second and third corticosteroid injections for trigger finger yield long-term relief. [38] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.02.001)
  • [L2] [40] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.05.016)
  • [L4] The current evidence supports the use of corticosteroid injection as a first-line treatment for trigger finger. [41] (10.1177/175899830701200304)
  • [L4] Patients who undergo open trigger finger release surgery in the clinic have complication rates similar to reported complication rates of surgery performed in the operating room. [43] (10.1016/j.jhsg.2022.01.008)
  • [L2] There were no significant differences in scar quality or improvement in patient-reported disability with transverse or longitudinal incisions for trigger finger release. [44] (10.1177/1753193419859375)
  • [Textbook] The incidence and treatment outcome of cases in which trigger finger occurred in conjunction with Dupuytren's disease appeared less predictable than that of ordinary trigger finger. [47] (10.1007/978-3-642-22697-7_31)
  • [L3] Patients with more lifetime trigger fingers and/or prior TFRs for other fingers are more likely to need USSR, and these patients may benefit from hand therapy. [48] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.08.013)
  • [L4] This large retrospective series suggests that about 1 in 20 fingers will experience a mild, transient adverse event after surgical release of the A1 pulley for idiopathic trigger finger and that about 1 in 200 have a second surgery. [49] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.05.014)
  • [L1] [50] (10.1093/rheumatology/ker315)
  • [L4] Subsequent release or injection in the same or another digit was common following an initial trigger finger release. [51] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.02.009)
  • [L4] Thickening and hypervascularization of the A1 pulley are the hallmarks of trigger fingers on sonography. [52] (10.7863/jum.2008.27.10.1407)
  • [L4] There is a predisposition for carpal tunnel syndrome and trigger finger to present in the same hand; however, patients can be counseled that CTR does not cause new incidence of trigger finger in the operative hand. [54] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.10.003)
  • [L1] We recommend the use of an injection without lidocaine to treat trigger finger. [55] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.06.090)
  • [L5] The author notes that the referenced trial found no differences in patient-reported outcomes for pain or function or in reduction of trigger finger severity at 52 weeks among splint alone, steroid alone, and combination treatments, leading the trial authors to recommend splinting alone as the least invasive option. [56] (10.1097/corr.0000000000002726)
  • [L1] Initiating conservative treatment with the MCP joint blocking splint has value for patients with trigger finger and positive outcomes in 77% of subjects, whereas use of the DIP joint splint was effective in about half of subjects. [57] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.10.038)
  • [L1] Orthoses are effective for non-surgical management of pediatric and adult trigger finger using various orthotic options. [58] (10.1016/j.jht.2023.05.016)
  • [L2] Open release is an effective treatment for trigger finger with limited need for nonprescription drugs, since almost all patients reported full resolution of triggering within 6 weeks, and analgesic use was minimal. [61] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.12.006)
  • [L4] The study demonstrates that procedure room-based treatment of trigger finger is less costly than release in the OR. [63] (10.1097/gox.0000000000002509)
  • [L3] Management of diabetic trigger finger with immediate surgical release in the clinic is the most cost-effective treatment strategy, assuming a corticosteroid injection failure rate of at least 34%. [64] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.08.007)
  • [L4] US can detect various lesions in clinical trigger fingers, and some US findings correlated with clinical findings. [66] (10.1007/s00296-009-1165-3)
  • [L4] This is the first reported case of triggering pathology at the wrist to be treated with interventional radiological measures rather than open surgery and demonstrates the efficacy of the technique. [68] (10.1177/1753193412453699)
  • [L4] This case supports the inclusion of metacarpal head osteochondroma in the differential diagnosis of a 'trigger finger.' Advanced imaging is critical for identifying bony prominences causing locking when common etiologies are absent. [71] (10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.03.010)
  • [L4] [74] (10.4055/cios.2012.4.4.263)
  • [L5] [77] (10.1007/s12178-007-9012-1)
  • [L3] Patients with greater volar migration of the flexor tendons after CTR are at a higher risk of developing trigger finger. [88] (10.1177/1753193413479506)
  • [L1] Simultaneous steroid injection at the time of surgical release provides greater subjective improvement in the early period after percutaneous trigger finger release. [89] (10.1177/1753193418813771)
  • [L3] This study provides new conclusive evidence that the repetitive power grip and flexion involved in rowing increase the prevalence of trigger finger. [90] (10.1177/1558944720918321)
  • [L4] In the thumb, the flexor tendon and A1 pulley thickened significantly only after patients exhibited triggering. [92] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.06.027)

References

[1] Long-Term Outcomes Following a Single Corticosteroid Injection for Trigger Finger. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.n.00004

[2] Risk Factors for Complications of Open Trigger Finger Release. HAND. 2014. DOI: 10.1007/s11552-014-9716-9

[3] From diagnosis to rehabilitation of trigger finger: a narrative review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2024. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-08192-5

[4] Early Patient Satisfaction with Different Treatment Pathways for Trigger Finger and Thumb. Journal of Hand and Microsurgery. 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s12593-015-0203-5

[5] Campbell S Operative Orthopaedics 4 Volume Set. EXCISION OF NECROTIC MUSCLES COMBINED WITH NEUROLYSIS OF MEDIAN AND ULNAR NERVES FOR SEVERE CONTRACTURE > REFERENCES > TRIGGER THUMB AND TRIGGER FINGER.

[6] Campbell S Operative Orthopaedics 4 Volume Set. EXCISION OF NECROTIC MUSCLES COMBINED WITH NEUROLYSIS OF MEDIAN AND ULNAR NERVES FOR SEVERE CONTRACTURE > TRIGGER FINGER AND THUMB > SURGICAL RELEASE OF TRIGGER FINGER.

[7] Miller S Review Of Orthopaedics. SECTION 16 PATELLAR TRACKING IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY > 2. Flexor tendon injury > 3. Stenosing tenosynovitis (trigger finger).

[8] Miller S Review Of Orthopaedics. 2. Flexor tendon injury > 3. Stenosing tenosynovitis (trigger finger).

[9] A Lange Medical Book Current Diagnosis Treatment In Orthopedics Fifth Edition. 9Hand Surgery > 2. Flexor Tenosynovitis (Trigger Finger and Trigger Thumb).

[10] Aaos Comprehensive Orthopaedic Review 3. Tendinopathy of the Hand and Wrist* > II. Trigger Finger.

[11] Factors associated with conversion to surgical release after a steroid injection in patients with a trigger finger. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2022. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.104b10.bjj-2022-0058.r3

[12] Corticosteroid Injections in the Treatment of Trigger Finger: A Level I and II Systematic Review. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2007. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200703000-00006

[13] Factors Causing Prolonged Postoperative Symptoms Despite Absence of Complications After A1 Pulley Release for Trigger Finger. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.06.023

[14] Using Evidence to Minimize the Cost of Trigger Finger Care. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.02.029

[15] A study of 60 patients with percutaneous trigger finger releases: clinical and ultrasonographic findings. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2014. DOI: 10.1177/1753193413517992

[18] Percutaneous Release of Trigger Finger: Long-Term Review of Outcomes Using 18-Gauge Needle. JAAOS: Global Research and Reviews. 2026. DOI: 10.5435/jaaosglobal-d-25-00445

[20] Campbell S Operative Orthopaedics 4 Volume Set. EXCISION OF NECROTIC MUSCLES COMBINED WITH NEUROLYSIS OF MEDIAN AND ULNAR NERVES FOR SEVERE CONTRACTURE > TRIGGER FINGER AND THUMB.

[21] Ultrasound-Assisted Percutaneous Trigger Finger Release: Is it Safe?. HAND. 2008. DOI: 10.1007/s11552-008-9137-8

[22] Clinical significance of proximal interphalangeal joint pain in patients with trigger fingers. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2018. DOI: 10.1177/1753193418809771

[23] An Observation on Trigger Fingers. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.12.014

[24] Effect of Metabolic Syndrome on the Outcome of Corticosteroid Injection for Trigger Finger: Matched Case-Control Study. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.07.091

[27] Long-Term Effectiveness of Corticosteroid Injections for Trigger Finger and Thumb. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.09.006

[28] Efficacy of Splinting in Managing Adult Trigger Finger: A Systematic Review of Short-Term Outcomes. Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100881

[29] Doc, Will This Injection Make My Trigger Finger Go Away?. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.n.00832

[30] Long-term results of surgical release of trigger finger and trigger thumb in adults. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2009. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-008-0802-8

[33] Pediatric Trigger Finger due to Osteochondroma. HAND. 2016. DOI: 10.1177/1558944715627634

[36] Trigger Finger: Assessment of Surgeon and Patient Preferences and Priorities for Decision Making. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.08.010

[38] Long-Term Effectiveness of Repeat Corticosteroid Injections for Trigger Finger. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.02.001

[40] Corticosteroid Injection With and Without Local Anesthetic for the Treatment of Trigger Finger: A Randomized Clinical Trial. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.05.016

[41] The Use Of Corticosteroid Injections In The Treatment Of Stenosing Tendovaginits (Trigger Finger): Three Comparative Case Studies. The British Journal of Hand Therapy. 2007. DOI: 10.1177/175899830701200304

[43] Office-Based Open Trigger Finger Release Has a Low Complication Rate. Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2022.01.008

[44] A prospective, randomized clinical trial of transverse versus longitudinal incisions for trigger finger release. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1753193419859375

[47] 31. The Influence of Dupuytren’s Disease on Trigger Fingers and Vice Versa. Dupuytren’s Disease and Related Hyperproliferative Disorders. 2012. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-22697-7_31

[48] Risk Factors for Requiring Ulnar Superficialis Slip Resection During Trigger Finger Release. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.08.013

[49] Adverse Events of Open A1 Pulley Release for Idiopathic Trigger Finger. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.05.014

[50] Treatment of trigger finger: randomized clinical trial comparing the methods of corticosteroid injection, percutaneous release and open surgery. Rheumatology. 2011. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker315

[51] Incidence and Predictors of Subsequent Triggering Requiring Treatment After Trigger Finger Release. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.02.009

[52] Sonographic Appearance of Trigger Fingers. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2008. DOI: 10.7863/jum.2008.27.10.1407

[54] Relationship of Carpal Tunnel Release and New Onset Trigger Finger. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.10.003

[55] Trigger Finger Corticosteroid Injection With and Without Lidocaine—A Randomized, Double-Blind Controlled Trial. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.06.090

[56] CORR Insights®: Are There Differences in Pain Reduction and Functional Improvement Among Splint Alone, Steroid Alone, and Combination for the Treatment of Adults With Trigger Finger?. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 2023. DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000002726

[57] Trigger Finger Treatment: A Comparison of 2 Splint Designs. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.10.038

[58] Orthotic intervention options to non-surgically manage adult and pediatric trigger finger: A systematic review. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2023.05.016

[61] Patient-Reported Symptom Relief and Use of Analgesics After Open Release of Trigger Finger: A Prospective, Multicenter Cohort Study With 6 Months Follow-Up. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.12.006

[63] A Cost and Efficiency Analysis of the WALANT Technique for the Management of Trigger Finger in a Procedure Room of a Major City Hospital. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open. 2019. DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000002509

[64] Cost of Immediate Surgery Versus Non-operative Treatment for Trigger Finger in Diabetic Patients. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.08.007

[66] Ultrasonographic assessment of clinically diagnosed trigger fingers. Rheumatology International. 2009. DOI: 10.1007/s00296-009-1165-3

[68] Volar wrist ganglion presenting as trigger finger. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2012. DOI: 10.1177/1753193412453699

[70] Dupuytren S Disease And Related Hyperproliferative Disorders. 31. The Influence of Dupuytren’s Disease on Trigger Fingers and Vice Versa > 31.3 Patients Characteristics and Incidence of Concurrent Disease.

[71] Metacarpal Neck Osteochondroma: An Atypical Cause of “Trigger Finger”. Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.03.010

[74] The Efficacy of Steroid Injection in the Treatment of Trigger Finger. Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.4055/cios.2012.4.4.263

[77] Trigger finger: etiology, evaluation, and treatment. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine. 2007. DOI: 10.1007/s12178-007-9012-1

[84] Dupuytren S Disease And Related Hyperproliferative Disorders. 31. The Influence of Dupuytren’s Disease on Trigger Fingers and Vice Versa > 31.5 Discussion.

[85] Dupuytren S Disease And Related Hyperproliferative Disorders. 31. The Influence of Dupuytren’s Disease on Trigger Fingers and Vice Versa > 31.5 Discussion > 31.5.1 Why Is DD Concurring with TF?.

[88] The relationship of trigger finger and flexor tendon volar migration after carpal tunnel release. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2013. DOI: 10.1177/1753193413479506

[89] Effects of simultaneous steroid injection after percutaneous trigger finger release: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2018. DOI: 10.1177/1753193418813771

[90] Trigger Finger From Ocean Rowing: An Observational Study. HAND. 2020. DOI: 10.1177/1558944720918321

[92] Sonographic Appearance of the Flexor Tendon, Volar Plate, and A1 Pulley With Respect to the Severity of Trigger Finger. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.06.027