肩峰骨 资料 In-depth

本页面由机器翻译,尚未经临床医生审核。英文版本为权威版本。

您的感受

大多数肩胛冈骨(os acromiale)患者不会有任何感觉。它是肩峰顶部的一块小骨,在生长发育期间未与肩胛骨其余部分融合。当它引起问题时,疼痛位于肩部顶部的前方和外侧,正好在那块未融合的骨头上方。该区域按压时通常有压痛。

疼痛往往在您将手臂举过头顶时加剧。够取高处的架子、晾晒衣物或粉刷天花板都可能诱发疼痛。游泳运动员和投掷类运动员在运动时会注意到这一点。疼痛源于未融合的骨头在使用肩部时轻微移动,或在您抬起手臂时压迫附近组织。

除了疼痛,您可能会感到肩部无力。将手臂向前抬起时,可能无法达到以往的高度。有些人还会注意到活动时出现卡顿感。

稳定的未融合骨块在肩部受到撞击或跌倒后可能变得疼痛。

如果休息、改变活动或皮质类固醇注射未能缓解疼痛,则值得检查未融合的骨块。从特定角度拍摄的X光片可以显示它,但在标准视图中容易遗漏。扫描也可以显示该部位的肿胀,这表明它是您疼痛的来源。

大多数未融合的骨块不会引起症状,完全不需要治疗。

实际发生了什么

您的肩胛骨顶部有一个骨性突起,称为肩峰。它在肩关节上方形成“屋顶”。在您的生长发育过程中,这个突起由三块独立的骨片构成:基底部、中部和尖端。在大多数人中,这些骨片在成年后会融合成一块完整的骨骼。但在某些人中,其中一块骨片始终未能融合。这块未融合的骨片即为肩峰骨(os acromiale)。

骨片之间的间隙填充着坚韧的纤维组织,而非骨骼。可以将其想象为一个从未拧紧螺栓的铰链。当肩部大肌肉牵拉时,该骨片可能会轻微移动。每次您抬起手臂时,这些肌肉都会拉扯松动的骨片,使其轻微弯曲。这种运动及其对下方组织施加的压力,正是您疼痛的来源。

肩部的“屋顶”对于其下方的结构也至关重要。肩袖是由肌腱纤维组成的“绳索”,用于稳定关节,它运行在这个“屋顶”下方。当您抬起手臂时,如果松动的骨片发生移动或向下压迫,可能会挤占肌腱所需的空间。这种挤压称为撞击(impingement)。这也是您手臂在活动时可能感觉无力或卡顿的原因。

未融合的骨片也可能多年保持静止,不引起任何症状。对该肩部的一次撞击或跌倒可能会使其“苏醒”,使原本安静的间隙突然变得疼痛。

还有一点值得了解。许多人同时患有肩峰骨和肩袖问题。这两种情况经常同时出现,但患有其中一种并不自动意味着另一种是导致您疼痛的原因。这就是为什么您的外科医生在决定实际导致您症状的原因之前,会审视整体情况,包括压痛点的位置以及您的扫描结果。

我们能做什么

Mater Private Hospital Rockhampton 的上肢外科医生 Kieran Hirpara 博士会从适合您病情的最微创方案入手。患者通常由全科医生转诊至我们的诊所;如果物理治疗师建议您就诊,您仍需获得全科医生的转诊,才有资格享受 Medicare 报销。在您的首次就诊时,我们会采集病史,检查您的肩部,并在必要时安排影像学检查。从特定角度拍摄的 X 光片通常能显示未融合的骨片。扫描可以补充关于肌腱及关节周围组织的细节。

对于疼痛性肩峰骨未融合(os acromiale),治疗通常从非手术方式开始。您可以让肩部短暂休息,并改变其使用方式,在可能的情况下将手臂保持在肩部高度以下。物理治疗旨在缓解疼痛并增强支撑肩部的肌肉力量。我们通常建议您先充分尝试这些方法,再考虑其他选择。

止痛药和抗炎药物(即有助于减轻肿胀的药物)可以帮助您度过疼痛发作期。您的全科医生可以指导您选择适合您的药物。

如果这些步骤未能提供足够的缓解,手术便值得讨论。该手术将未融合的骨片与肩胛骨的其余部分连接起来,使其在您抬起手臂时不再移动。我们在愈合过程中将其固定,使用小型金属板或环绕骨骼的组织条带。目标是形成牢固的连接,使肌肉能够再次牵拉稳定的骨面。我们将与您讨论该手术是否适合您的肩部,这一决定将由您与我们共同做出。

预期情况

大多数未融合的骨碎片通常不会引起问题,也完全无需治疗。如果您的症状多年来一直平静,它可以继续保持这种状态。对该肩部的一次撞击或跌倒可能会使其再次活跃,随后的疼痛可能会通过休息和简单措施再次缓解。

对于有症状的肩峰骨(os acromiale),治疗通常从非手术方式开始。给予休息、活动调整以及物理治疗充分的尝试,通常能让许多人得到缓解。如果这些步骤未能提供足够的缓解,通过手术将未融合的骨碎片与肩胛骨的其余部分连接起来,可以减轻您的症状并改善肩部的功能。当骨碎片较大或活动度过大时,该手术的效果通常较为可靠。

如果您将来需要进行反向全肩关节置换术(一种球窝位置互换的关节置换类型),有一件事值得了解。大约四分之一的患者在手术后会在未融合骨碎片局部感到压痛。对于这些人中的大多数,这种不适会随时间自行消退。肩峰骨的存在似乎也不会阻碍该手术的效果。

手术并不适合所有人,对于运动员而言,它也不总是答案。某些伴有未融合骨碎片和肩袖问题的肩部,其术后效果可能不如其他患者理想,因此您的外科医生会在建议任何方案之前,与您仔细权衡这一点。

实际情况是这样的。如果放任不管,有症状的未融合骨碎片可能会在您每次将手臂举过头顶时反复发作。如果管理得当,大多数人会获得缓解,无论是通过非手术治疗,还是在需要时通过手术。您的外科医生会向您说明哪条路径适合您的肩部、您的活动水平以及您的目标。

何时就医

如果您肩部前上方及外侧出现持续不缓解的疼痛,尤其是在手臂上举过头顶时疼痛加剧,请咨询您的全科医生。如果按压该区域有压痛、肩部感觉无力,或手臂前举变得困难,请要求专科医生评估。如果休息、改变活动方式或皮质类固醇注射均未见效,或者疼痛是在该肩部受到撞击或跌倒后开始的,同样适用此建议。患有肩部疼痛且经物理治疗无效的游泳运动员和投掷类运动员也应咨询此病症。大多数未融合的骨碎片通常不会引起问题,因此确诊并不意味着您需要紧急治疗。

深入探讨

Advanced reading: the deeper science (optional)

本节内容超出了您做出自身治疗决策所需的深度。肩峰骨(Os acromiale)值得额外阅读,因为它是相当一部分人群中的正常解剖变异,通常不引起任何症状,且常被错误地归咎于其并非责任方的肩部疼痛。

定义与患病率

肩峰是肩关节上方的骨性顶盖,由多个独立的骨化中心形成,这些中心通常在青少年晚期或二十岁出头时融合。在部分人群中,其中一个中心未能融合,从而留下一个永久的纤维性连接。这就是肩峰骨(os acromiale),它自青春期起即存在,而非后天获得。

患病率因人群而异。一项针对 6,842 名患者的多中心研究发现,肩峰骨与肩袖损伤相关,所研究的日本人群中该病的患病率低于非亚洲人群,且骨碎片尺寸往往较小 [1]。

这种与肩袖损伤的关联值得仔细解读。它确立的是两者共同发生的频率高于随机概率,而非肩峰骨导致撕裂。合理的机制是双向的:未融合的碎片在三角肌牵拉下可能轻微移动,从而刺激其下方的肌腱——或者,导致肩袖疾病的相同肩部生物力学机制使得不稳定的碎片出现症状。

是否为疼痛来源才是核心问题

由于肩峰骨在影像学上可见、呈永久性且外观异常,它往往被直接报告为肩痛的病因。大多数肩峰骨无症状,且大多数携带者终生对此毫不知情。

有症状的肩峰骨的特征是:骨片正上方存在局限性压痛,按压该处可诱发疼痛;若使用诊断性注射,则特异性地表现为向该骨性连接处(而非其下方的肩峰下间隙)注射后疼痛缓解。若缺乏上述表现,该影像学发现最好被视为偶然发现。

亚型通常根据所涉及的融合部位进行分类 [2],这在外科上具有重要意义,因为活动性骨片的大小决定了是将其切除还是进行固定。

为何使其他肩部手术复杂化

肩峰骨(os acromiale)的实际重要性往往不在于其自身的症状,而在于它对为其他目的而计划的手术所产生的影响。

三角肌附着于肩峰,因此未融合的骨片会在可活动的连接处承受该牵拉力。在肩峰成形术中,从下表面去除骨质会使本已不稳定的骨片变薄,可能将无症状的变异转化为有症状的病变,或导致骨不连。这是术前影像学检查中识别肩峰骨的最强理由:并非为了治疗它,而是为了避免使其不稳定。

当确实需要治疗时,选择在于切除小骨片还是固定大骨片。已知跨越此连接处的固定具有挑战性,因为骨片较薄,三角肌持续对其施加牵拉力,且骨不连率相当可观。这种困难本身就是一个理由,要求在对其实施手术前,确信肩峰骨确实是疼痛的真正来源。

参考文献

[1] Kozono N, Nishii A, Ishitani E, Mizuki Y, Kimura T, Yamamoto S, et al. 肩胛冈骨(os acromiale)的患病率及相关因素:一项多中心研究. JSES Int. 2025;9(5):1541-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2025.05.015

[2] Boehm TD, Matzer M, Brazda D, Gohlke FE. 肩胛冈骨(os acromiale)伴肩袖撕裂的手术治疗。33例患者回顾. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85(4):545-9. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.85B4.13634


Evidence & references

This is the clinical evidence summary written for health professionals. It is technical, and it lists the research this page was built from. You do not need to read it to understand your treatment or to make a decision about it.

Overview

  • In Thai patients with shoulder problems who required MRI evaluation, the prevalence of os acromiale was 2.13% [1].
  • Os acromiale is associated with rotator cuff injuries [5].
  • A multicenter study determined the prevalence of and factors associated with os acromiale in the Japanese population [6].
  • Surgical treatment is usually not indicated for os acromiale in the professional tennis player [7].
  • The presence of os acromiale does not appear to have a negative impact on the clinical outcomes after surgery, and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty remains a safe and effective treatment option [4].
  • The outcome of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty does not seem to be negatively affected by the presence of an os acromiale [9].
  • Postoperative local tenderness at the os acromiale can be expected in 1 out of 4 patients but resolves spontaneously over time in the majority of patients [3].
  • Ipsilateral os acromiale may be a relative contraindication to the clavicle hook plate [13].
  • Operative management of a symptomatic os acromiale that has failed initial nonoperative treatment leads to decreased symptoms and improvement in clinical outcomes [2].
  • Surgical options for symptomatic os acromiale include arthroscopic sub-total excision, arthroscopic subacromial decompression of stable fragments, and open reduction and internal fixation of unstable fragments [10].

Anatomy & Pathophysiology

Bony Anatomy

  • The acromion has three ossification centers: the metacromion (base), the mesoacromion (middle), and the preacromion (tip) [28].
  • Failure of fusion of the acromial ossification centers results in os acromiale [28].
  • The unfused segment in os acromiale is most commonly the meso-acromion, a configuration often termed a meso-type os acromiale [14].
  • The scapula is attached to the axial skeleton by the clavicle, specifically via the acromioclavicular (AC) and sternoclavicular (SC) joints [27].
  • The acromion is a flattened bony process that curves forwards from the scapular spine [27].
  • The acromion, coracoacromial ligament, and coracoid process form the coracoacromial arch, a rigid bony-ligamentous structure that imparts stability to the shoulder girdle [25].
  • The rotator cuff, subacromial bursa, and subdeltoid bursa pass underneath the coracoacromial arch [25].

Pathophysiology

  • Most diagnoses of os acromiale are made incidentally on axillary view radiographs of the shoulder [14].
  • Primary shoulder pain is usually unrelated to the unfused os acromiale [14].
  • When os acromiale drives symptoms, the two principal causes are motion at the non-union site or an impingement-type syndrome resulting from flexion of the os fragment during deltoid contraction and arm elevation [14].
  • Pain from os acromiale via these mechanisms has been reported in a variety of sports, particularly among throwing athletes and swimmers [14].
  • Previously stable non-unions can become unstable following an episode of blunt trauma to the region, such as direct impact to the shoulder during American football [14].
  • A tear of the rotator cuff may often be associated with os acromiale, likely due to impingement from abnormal motion at the fibrous union site [8].
  • Extrinsic impingement occurs when the space available for the rotator cuff is diminished, with examples including subacromial spurring, acromial fracture, or pathologic os acromiale [37].
  • The synchondrosis of an os acromiale can be injured following trauma, though rarely [15].
  • The presence of os acromiale does not appear to have a negative impact on the clinical outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) [4].
  • The outcome of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) does not seem to be negatively affected by the presence of an os acromiale [9].
  • Postoperative local tenderness at the os acromiale can be expected in 1 out of 4 patients following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty but resolves spontaneously over time in the majority of patients [3].

Classification

  • Meta–os acromiale is the rarest subtype of os acromiale [18].
  • Meso-type os acromiale is a recognized classification variant for which biomechanical evaluation of internal fixation has been performed [23].

Clinical Presentation

  • Liberson reviewed 1800 shoulder girdles and identified an incidence of os acromiale of 1.4% [16].
  • In Liberson's review of 1800 shoulder girdles, the lesion was bilateral in 62% of patients [16].
  • The unfused segment in os acromiale is most commonly the meso-acromion [14].
  • Any primary shoulder pain is usually unrelated to the unfused os acromiale [14].
  • When os acromiale drives symptoms, one principle cause is motion at the non-union site [14].
  • When os acromiale drives symptoms, another principle cause is an impingement-type syndrome resulting from flexion of the os fragment during deltoid contraction and arm elevation [14].
  • Pain from os acromiale by the mechanism of impingement has been reported in a variety of sports, particularly among throwing athletes and swimmers [14].
  • Previously stable non-unions of os acromiale can become unstable following an episode of blunt trauma to the region [14].
  • Multicenter study findings support that os acromiale is associated with rotator cuff injuries [5].
  • Awareness of os acromiale in the young athlete, appropriate clinical examination, and image studies are crucial to confirm diagnosis [12].
  • Postoperative local tenderness at the os acromiale can be expected in 1 out of 4 patients following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty [3].
  • Postoperative local tenderness at the os acromiale resolves spontaneously over time in the majority of patients following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty [3].
  • The presence of os acromiale does not appear to have a negative impact on the clinical outcomes after surgery and rTSA remains a safe and effective treatment option [4].
  • The outcome of RTSA does not seem to be negatively affected by the presence of an os acromiale [9].

Investigations

  • Liberson reviewed 1800 shoulder girdles and identified an incidence of os acromiale of 1.4%, with the lesion being bilateral in 62% of patients [16].
  • Awareness of the os acromiale in the young athlete, appropriate clinical examination, and image studies are crucial to confirm diagnosis [12].
  • The synchondrosis of an os acromiale can be injured following trauma, though rarely, and emphasizes the need for appropriate radiographic investigation including axillary views [15].
  • At least two X-ray views should be obtained: an anteroposterior in the plane of the glenoid and an axillary projection with the arm in abduction to show the relationship of the humeral head to the glenoid [33].
  • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is useful to identify labral tears and rotator cuff tears, although the accuracy for these is enhanced by combining the scan with arthrography [33].
  • Ultrasound is a simple and accurate test for identifying rotator cuff tears and calcific tendinitis [33].
  • The purpose of imaging of the shoulder is to help establish the diagnosis, determine the severity of the pathoanatomy, assist in surgical planning, and enable the surgeon to illustrate the condition of the shoulder to the patient [21].
  • Unless a specific research protocol is in place, the temptation to “overimage” should be resisted, obtaining only the scans or reconstructions that are necessary for the care of the patient [21].
  • Standardized plain films are almost always sufficient to garner the information needed, and there is information that can be gathered from properly taken plain films that cannot be obtained from CT scans [21].
  • The first key view is the anteroposterior (AP) in the plane of the scapula taken so that the x-ray beam passes through the glenohumeral joint [21].
  • The second key view is the axillary view taken with the arm in the functional position of elevation in the plane of the scapula and oriented so that both the spinoglenoid notch and the scapular neck are visible [21].
  • The axillary view is referred to as the “truth view” because it demonstrates the glenohumeral relationships in the functional position of elevation [21].
  • CT scans have the disadvantage of being taken with the arm in the adducted position, whereas the axillary truth view is taken with the arm in elevation [21].
  • A robust approach to imaging the shoulder needs to recognize that the shoulder is a three-dimensional structure that cannot be represented by a single planar view [35].
  • Critical relationships—such as the degree of centering of the humeral head—change with the position of the arm [35].
  • Shoulder pathology may be found in a large number of different bones and soft tissues [35].
  • Overlying and superimposed structures as well as metallic implants may complicate imaging the structures of interest [35].
  • Surgeons need to develop a judicious approach that yields the information necessary to treat the patient while avoiding the tendency to "over-image" [35].

Treatment

Non-Operative

  • Any primary shoulder pain is usually unrelated to the unfused os [14].
  • Conservative treatment for symptomatic os acromiale can include physical therapy with ice and infiltration of the os acromial joint with Kenacort and Xylocaine 2% [40].

Operative

  • Meta–os acromiale is the rarest subtype of os acromiale, and special consideration must be given to the type of tension-band construct used to achieve adequate compression and fixation [18].
  • Arthroscopic fixation of os acromiale with absorbable screws provides promising clinical, cosmetic, and radiologic results with high patient satisfaction [22].
  • A symptomatic os acromiale in a competitive female fastball pitcher was treated successfully with open reduction and internal fixation [41].
  • For symptomatic os acromiale treated with osteosynthesis, nine screws (2.7- and 3.5-mm) were used in one case, including six anterior angle-stable screws, two posterior cortical screws, and two angle-stable locking screws [40].
  • In cases of congenital or primary pseudarthrosis of os acromiale treated with osteosynthesis, an osteotomy of 1 mm was performed on each side of the osseous non-union including the cranial osteophytes [40].

Complications

  • Postoperative local tenderness at the os acromiale resolves spontaneously over time in the majority of patients [3].
  • Previously stable non-unions of the os acromiale can become unstable following an episode of blunt trauma to the region [14].

Key Evidence

  • [L3] In Thai patients with shoulder problems who required MRI evaluation, the prevalence of os acromiale was 2.13%. [1] (10.1177/23259671221078806)
  • [L4] Operative management of a symptomatic os acromiale that has failed initial nonoperative treatment leads to decreased symptoms and improvement in clinical outcomes. [2] (10.1016/j.jse.2019.05.047)
  • [L3] Postoperative local tenderness at the os acromiale can be expected in 1 out of 4 patients but resolves spontaneously over time in the majority of patients. [3] (10.1177/2325967120965131)
  • [L4] The presence of os acromiale does not appear to have a negative impact on the clinical outcomes after surgery and rTSA remains a safe and effective treatment option. [4] (10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.01.002)
  • [L3] The study supports previous findings that os acromiale is associated with rotator cuff injuries. [5] (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.05.015)
  • [L3] This multicenter study aimed to determine the prevalence of and factors associated with os acromiale in the Japanese population. [6] (10.1016/j.jse.2025.01.008)
  • [L4] Surgical treatment is usually not indicated for os acromiale in the professional tennis player. [7] (10.1177/2325967118773723)
  • [L4] A tear of the rotator cuff may often be associated with os acromiale, likely due to impingement from abnormal motion at the fibrous union site. [8] (10.2106/00004623-198466080-00029)
  • [L4] The outcome of RTSA does not seem to be negatively affected by the presence of an os acromiale. [9] (10.1016/j.jse.2017.02.012)
  • [L5] Surgical options for symptomatic os acromiale include arthroscopic sub-total excision, arthroscopic subacromial decompression of stable fragments, and open reduction and internal fixation of unstable fragments. [10] (10.5435/jaaos-d-17-00011)
  • [L4] Awareness of the os acromiale in the young athlete, appropriate clinical examination, and image studies are crucial to confirm diagnosis. [12] (10.1016/j.jseint.2020.02.008)
  • [L4] Ipsilateral os acromiale may be a relative contraindication to the clavicle hook plate. [13] (10.1186/s12891-021-04841-1)
  • [L4] [14] (10.1302/2058-5241.4.180100)
  • [L4] This case highlights that the synchondrosis of an os acromiale can be injured following trauma, though rarely, and emphasizes the need for appropriate radiographic investigation including axillary views and a flexible surgical approach. [15] (10.1016/j.jse.2008.02.012)
  • [L4] Meta–os acromiale is the rarest subtype of os acromiale, and special consideration must be given to the type of tension-band construct used to achieve adequate compression and fixation. [18] (10.1177/03635465211028238)
  • [L4] This new arthroscopic technique of fixation of os acromiale with absorbable screws provides promising clinical, cosmetic, and radiologic results with high patient satisfaction. [22] (10.1016/j.jse.2011.12.011)
  • [L5] Surgical repair of a simulated, unstable meso-type os acromiale by a combination of cannulated screws inserted in the A-P direction with a tension band leads to significantly improved repair strength at time zero compared with cannulated screws alone. [23] (10.1016/j.jse.2014.09.040)
  • [L4] [40] (10.1186/s40634-017-0111-7)
  • [L4] A symptomatic os acromiale in a competitive female fastball pitcher was treated successfully with open reduction and internal fixation. [41] (10.1177/0363546506288305)

References

[1] Prevalence of Os Acromiale in Thai Patients With Shoulder Problems: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2022. DOI: 10.1177/23259671221078806

[2] Os acromiale: systematic review of surgical outcomes. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.05.047

[3] Os Acromiale in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Cohort Study. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2020. DOI: 10.1177/2325967120965131

[4] Clinical implications of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with an os acromiale: a systematic review. JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.01.002

[5] Prevalence and factors associated with os acromiale: a multicenter study. JSES International. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.05.015

[6] The prevalence and associated factors of os acromiale: a multicenter study. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2025.01.008

[7] Os Acromiale in Professional Tennis Players. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2018. DOI: 10.1177/2325967118773723

[8] Rotator cuff tears associated with os acromiale.. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1984. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-198466080-00029

[9] Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with os acromiale. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.02.012

[10] Symptomatic, Unstable Os Acromiale. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2018. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-17-00011

[12] The unstable os acromiale: a cause of pain in the young athlete. JSES International. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.02.008

[13] Os acromiale may be a contraindication of the clavicle hook plate: case reports and literature review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2021. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04841-1

[14] Os acromiale: a review of its incidence, pathophysiology, and clinical management. EFORT Open Reviews. 2019. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180100

[15] Fracture of an os acromiale with associated rupture of the coracoclavicular ligaments. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.02.012

[16] Types of os acromiale according to Liberson. 2006.

[18] Rare Symptomatic Meta–Os Acromiale in an Athlete. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2021. DOI: 10.1177/03635465211028238

[21] Rockwood And Matsen S The Shoulder. Arthroscopic Management of Prearthritic and Arthritic Conditions of the Shoulder and the Postarthroplasty Shoulder > Radiographic Evaluation.

[22] Arthroscopically assisted internal fixation of the symptomatic unstable os acromiale with absorbable screws. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.12.011

[23] Biomechanical evaluation of internal fixation techniques for unstable meso-type os acromiale. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.09.040

[25] Rockwood And Matsen S The Shoulder. Shoulder and Elbow Specialty Clinic Workers’ Survey > ANATOMY.

[27] Rockwood And Green S Fractures In Adults. 29: Principles of Nonunion and Bone Defect Treatment > Applied Anatomy Related to Scapular Fractures.

[28] Aaos Comprehensive Orthopaedic Review 3. Anatomy of the Shoulder, Arm, and Elbow > I. Shoulder.

[33] Apley And Solomon S Concise System Of Orthopaedics And Trauma. INVESTIGATION.

[35] Rockwood And Matsen S The Shoulder. Developmental Anatomy of the Shoulder and Anatomy of the Glenohumeral Joint > SENIOR EDITOR COMMENTARY.

[37] Campbell S Operative Orthopaedics 4 Volume Set. ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION WITH BONE-PATELLAR TENDON-BONE GRAFT > Developmental Stages of Impingement Syndrome.

[40] Prebending of osteosynthesis plate using 3D printed models to treat symptomatic os acromiale and acromial fracture. Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics. 2017. DOI: 10.1186/s40634-017-0111-7

[41] Surgical Stabilization of Os Acromiale in a Fast-Pitch Softball Pitcher. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2006. DOI: 10.1177/0363546506288305