Education · shoulder

AC Joint Osteoarthritis Info Evidence

Reviewed by Dr Kieran Hirpara, Specialist Orthopaedic Surgeon Last reviewed

What you're feeling

You likely feel pain at the very top of your shoulder, where your collarbone meets your shoulder blade. This is called the acromioclavicular joint. The ache often starts after you lift your arm above your head. It may also flare up when you reach across your body to grab something from a shelf.

The pain can be sharp or dull. It tends to worsen with activity. You might notice it hurts more when you sleep on that side. Many patients find the discomfort is most noticeable when they first wake up in the morning. Resting your arm by your side usually helps calm the irritation.

Daily tasks can become difficult. Simple movements like buttoning a shirt or putting on a jacket may feel stiff or painful. Reaching for items in the back seat of a car can trigger a flare-up. Even carrying a heavy bag on that shoulder can strain the joint.

It is important to know that not everyone with wear-and-tear arthritis on an X-ray feels pain. In fact, ninety percent of people with asymptomatic AC-OA remained pain-free over a seven-year period. If you have no symptoms, your surgeon will likely not recommend surgery. Preventive removal of the bone end is not recommended for those without pain.

However, if you do have pain, it is real and valid. You do not need to distinguish between what an X-ray shows and what you feel. Patients with and without visible arthritis on scans reported equal satisfaction with preoperative injections. This means your symptoms matter more than the image alone.

Some people experience persistent pain after previous shoulder surgeries. If you have had a rotator cuff repair or a shoulder replacement, the arthritis in this joint can sometimes cause ongoing issues. In rare cases, severe arthritis here is linked to stress fractures in the shoulder blade after reverse shoulder replacement.

If conservative treatments do not help, your surgeon may discuss surgery. Both open and arthroscopic techniques can provide predictable pain relief. These procedures involve removing a small part of the collarbone to create more space. This reduces friction and allows your shoulder to move more freely.

What's actually happening

Your acromioclavicular joint sits at the very top of your shoulder. It is where the collarbone meets the shoulder blade. Think of this joint as a small shock absorber. It cushions the movement between these two bones.

Over time, the protective cartilage in this joint can wear down. This is called osteoarthritis, or wear-and-tear arthritis. When the cartilage thins, the bones may rub together. This causes pain and stiffness. You might feel this when reaching across your body or lifting your arm overhead.

In many cases, this wear-and-tear does not cause symptoms. Research shows that asymptomatic osteoarthritis remained symptom-free in 90% of patients over a 7-year period. If you have mild changes on an X-ray but no pain, you may not need treatment.

However, if the joint becomes painful, it can affect your daily life. The joint may become unstable. This means the bones shift out of their normal position. This shift can change how your shoulder moves. These kinematic changes can be a source of pain and dysfunction.

Sometimes, this joint issue is found during other shoulder surgeries, such as rotator cuff repair. In these cases, untreated osteoarthritis is associated with a low percentage of failure. It does not usually ruin the outcome of the main surgery.

If conservative treatments like rest or injections do not help, surgery may be considered. A common option is resection arthroplasty. This involves removing a small part of the collarbone. This creates more space for movement. Both open and arthroscopic techniques provide predictable pain relief for symptomatic cases.

Limited distal clavicle excision has been shown to reduce pain and improve shoulder function at midterm follow-up in patients resistant to conservative treatment. Your surgeon will decide if this is right for you based on your specific symptoms and anatomy.

What we can do about it

How Dr Kieran Hirpara, an upper-limb surgeon at Mater Private Hospital Rockhampton, approaches this in our clinic reflects a step-by-step plan. Patients reach our clinic by GP or physiotherapist referral. A clinic assessment (history, examination, and imaging where needed) establishes the diagnosis. For degenerative or long-standing problems we usually try non-operative care — activity change, physiotherapy or hand therapy, splinting, and injections — and consider surgery when that has not given enough improvement. For structural or acute problems, surgery may be recommended straight away, without a preceding non-operative trial.

You can start by changing how you use your shoulder. Avoid heavy lifting or movements that cause pain. Physiotherapy helps strengthen the muscles around the joint to support it better. This conservative therapy is a valid initial treatment option. Most patients find nonoperative treatment helpful for painful conditions of the acromioclavicular joint. You may need to modify your activities if you have osteolysis, which is bone loss in the area. Give this approach time to work before moving to the next step.

If pain persists, we discuss medical management. Pain medication and anti-inflammatories can reduce swelling and discomfort. Acromioclavicular injections offer a 1-year success rate of 47% in patients with acromioclavicular osteoarthritis. These injections use steroid medicine to calm inflammation. Research is still comparing intra-articular versus extra-articular steroid injections for isolated acromioclavicular osteoarthritis. We use these tools to manage symptoms while you continue with your daily life.

Surgery is considered when conservative care has reached its limit. Both open and arthroscopic resection arthroplasty techniques provide predictable pain relief for symptomatic acromioclavicular osteoarthritis. Limited distal clavicle excision reduces pain and improves shoulder function at midterm follow-up in patients with acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis resistant to conservative treatment. This procedure removes a small part of the collarbone to stop bone-on-bone rubbing. We discuss this option only after non-operative methods have not given enough improvement.

What to expect

If you have wear-and-tear arthritis in the acromioclavicular joint but no pain, it is likely to stay that way. Research shows that 90% of people with this condition remain symptom-free over a 7-year period. You do not need to worry about it suddenly becoming painful if you are currently comfortable.

If you are experiencing pain, the outlook depends on how you manage it. Injections into the joint offer a 1-year success rate of 47%. This means nearly half of patients find lasting relief from this treatment. If injections do not help, your surgeon may discuss a limited removal of the end of the collarbone. This procedure reduces pain and improves shoulder function for those who do not respond to conservative care.

You might wonder if you need surgery right away. A distinction between symptomatic and asymptomatic radiographic acromioclavicular osteoarthritis is unnecessary, as all patients were equally satisfied with the outcome of preoperative acromioclavicular injection. Both open and arthroscopic resection arthroplasty techniques provide predictable pain relief for symptomatic AC osteoarthritis. Each approach has a unique set of potential complications that may be minimized with improved understanding of anatomy, biomechanics, and meticulous surgical technique.

If you leave the condition untreated, it generally does not cause major problems during other shoulder surgeries. Untreated acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis, whether symptomatic or not, encountered during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is associated with a low percentage of failure. However, osteoarthritis is associated with poorer final clinical outcomes after rotator cuff repair. An unhealed or re-torn rotator cuff increases the risk of developing osteoarthritis.

In some cases, severe acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis is associated with acromial stress fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Radiographic ACJ osteoarthritis is common in patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Some persistent pain and osteoarthritis progression remain concerns in the arthroscopic revision of failed open anterior stabilization of the shoulder.

Your surgeon will help you navigate these options. We aim to provide clear, honest guidance on what to expect. Our goal is to ensure you feel confident in your care plan.

When to see someone

See your GP if you have persistent pain at the top of your shoulder that does not improve with rest. Ask for a specialist review if you notice weakness, instability, or a feeling of locking or giving way. Symptoms that interfere with your sleep or work also warrant attention. Sudden worsening of pain is another reason to seek care. While many cases of wear-and-tear arthritis remain painless for years, ongoing discomfort affects your quality of life. Your surgeon can help distinguish between mild changes that need no treatment and those requiring intervention. Do not ignore signs that limit your daily activities or cause significant distress. Early assessment helps determine the best path forward for your specific situation.


Evidence & references

Overview

  • Asymptomatic AC-OA remained asymptomatic in 90% of patients over a 7-year period [2].
  • Untreated ACJ osteoarthritis, whether symptomatic or not, encountered during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is associated with a low percentage of failure [3].
  • Radiographic ACJ osteoarthritis is common in patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty [7].
  • Severe acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis is associated with acromial stress fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty [7].
  • Both open and arthroscopic resection arthroplasty techniques provide predictable pain relief for symptomatic AC osteoarthritis [8].
  • Open and arthroscopic resection arthroplasty techniques have unique sets of potential complications that may be minimized with improved understanding of anatomy, biomechanics, and meticulous surgical technique [8].
  • Limited distal clavicle excision reduced pain and improved shoulder function at midterm follow-up in patients with AC joint osteoarthritis resistant to conservative treatment [9].
  • A distinction between symptomatic and asymptomatic radiographic AC OA is unnecessary as all patients were equally satisfied with the outcome of preoperative acromioclavicular injection [6].
  • Further characterisation of patients in whom mild arthroscopic findings of OA of the AC joint are clinically significant and warrant resection is needed [1].
  • Acromioclavicular joint arthritis is not an indication for routine distal clavicle excision in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair [3].
  • Clinicians should consider overreduction of the AC joint because it may lead to favorable radiological results [5].
  • The authors recommend anatomic reconstruction procedures for the treatment of chronic complete AC dislocations [21].

Anatomy & Pathophysiology

  • Anatomic techniques that address both coracoclavicular ligaments and the AC capsule are recommended to restore horizontal and vertical stability while allowing physiological rotation [10].
  • None of the reconstruction strategies completely restored the shoulder girdle to its preinjured state [26].
  • Kinematic changes resulting from AC joint dislocation could be a potential source of pain and dysfunction in the shoulder [27].
  • Scapular and clavicular kinematics were affected in AC separation models [28].
  • The position of the hook portion of a clavicle hook plate can predispose anatomic structures to post-operative complications of subacromial impingement and bony erosion [29].
  • Future research should focus on addressing horizontal and rotational instability to restore native physiological and biomechanical properties of the AC joint [35].
  • Coracoclavicular reconstruction with augmentation of the acromioclavicular joint provides improved horizontal stability compared to isolated coracoclavicular reconstruction [41].
  • Adding a fixation of the AC joint minimizes lateral tilting of the scapula and maintains a more anatomic reposition result over time [45].

Classification

  • Asymptomatic acromioclavicular osteoarthritis diagnosed by MRI remained asymptomatic in 90% of patients over a 7-year period [2].
  • Untreated acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis, whether symptomatic or not, encountered during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is associated with a low percentage of failure [3].
  • Mild arthroscopic findings of acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis may be clinically significant and warrant resection, but further characterization of such patients is needed [1].
  • Severe acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis is associated with acromial stress fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty [7].
  • Radiographic acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis is common in patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty [7].
  • Osteolytic changes in the acromioclavicular joint seemed to be associated with incongruity of the joint but did not correlate with clinical results [11].
  • The acromial center line to dorsal clavicle radiographic measurement and the use of the Alexander view provide a more realistic appreciation of true acromioclavicular joint displacement, especially in defining watershed cases (Rockwood types IIIA, IIB, and IV) [12].
  • Evaluating the integrity of the capsuloligamentous structures stabilizing the acromioclavicular joint is reproducible and provides additional information on the severity of the injury [24].
  • Injuries to the sternoclavicular joint are uncommon, and recognition and classification are critical to proper management to minimize long-term sequelae [16].
  • Some persistent pain and osteoarthritis progression remain concerns in the arthroscopic revision of failed open anterior stabilization of the shoulder [4].

Clinical Presentation

  • Asymptomatic AC-OA remained asymptomatic in 90% of patients over a 7-year period [2].
  • Untreated ACJ osteoarthritis, whether symptomatic or not, encountered during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is associated with a low percentage of failure [3].
  • Preventive arthroscopic distal clavicle resection is not recommended in patients with radiological but asymptomatic ACJ arthritis [19].
  • Further characterisation of patients in whom mild arthroscopic findings of OA of the AC joint are clinically significant and warrant resection is needed [1].
  • A distinction between symptomatic and asymptomatic radiographic AC OA is unnecessary, as all patients were equally satisfied with the outcome of preoperative acromioclavicular injection [6].
  • Osteolytic changes seemed to be associated with incongruity of the AC joint, but did not correlate with clinical results [11].
  • Additional research is needed to determine the main cause of pain in isolated acromioclavicular osteoarthritis and to compare clinical outcomes of intra-articular versus extra-articular injections [13].
  • Risk factors for subsequent distal clavicle excision after rotator cuff repair include tenderness to palpation at the AC joint, female sex, and surgery on the dominant side [18].
  • Subsequent distal clavicle excision was performed in 40% of cases with a combination of the three identified risk factors (tenderness to palpation, female sex, dominant side surgery) [18].
  • Recurrence of the initial dislocation after arthroscopically assisted reduction appears to be related to the onset of degenerative ACJ arthropathy [14].
  • Some persistent pain and osteoarthritis progression remain concerns in the revision of failed open anterior stabilization of the shoulder [4].

Investigations

  • Asymptomatic AC-OA remained asymptomatic in 90% of patients over a 7-year period [2].
  • Untreated ACJ osteoarthritis, whether symptomatic or not, encountered during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is associated with a low percentage of failure [3].
  • Preventive arthroscopic distal clavicle resection (DCR) is not recommended in patients with radiological but asymptomatic ACJ arthritis [19].
  • Further characterization is needed to determine which patients with mild arthroscopic findings of AC joint OA are clinically significant and warrant resection [1].
  • Radiographic ACJ osteoarthritis is common in patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) [7].
  • Severe ACJ osteoarthritis is associated with acromial stress fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty [7].
  • Osteolytic changes in the AC joint seemed to be associated with incongruity but did not correlate with clinical results [11].
  • Patients with edema on MRI were more likely to present with pain than patients without edema [43].
  • Subchondral bone edema on histologic examination was more frequent in patients with pain [43].
  • The outcomes of a preoperative AC injection suggest that a distinction between symptomatic and asymptomatic radiographic AC OA is unnecessary, as all patients were equally satisfied with the outcome [6].
  • Additional research is needed to determine the main cause of pain and to compare clinical outcomes of intra-articular versus extra-articular steroid injections for isolated AC osteoarthritis [13].
  • Risk factors for subsequent distal clavicle excision after rotator cuff repair include tenderness to palpation at the AC joint, female sex, and surgery on the dominant side [18].
  • Subsequent distal clavicle excision was performed in 40% of cases with a combination of the three identified risk factors (tenderness, female sex, dominant side) [18].
  • The arthroscopic approach offers an advantage in diagnosing and treating occult intra-articular pathology during distal clavicle excision [20].
  • Some persistent pain and osteoarthritis progression remain concerns in the revision of failed open anterior stabilization of the shoulder using arthroscopy [4].
  • Evaluating the integrity of the capsuloligamentous structures stabilizing the AC joint is reproducible and provides additional information on injury severity, which may influence treatment decisions [24].
  • The AC-DC measurement and use of the Alexander view provide a more realistic appreciation of true AC joint displacement, particularly in defining watershed cases (IIIA/IIB/IV) [12].
  • Radiological failures were observed in 41% of cases in a prospective multicenter study of arthroscopic acute AC dislocation fixation [50].

Treatment

Non-Operative Management

  • Conservative therapy is a valid initial treatment option for Rockwood Type V acromioclavicular dislocations [15].
  • Non-operative reduction and stabilization is a valuable treatment option for acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations [33].
  • Nonoperative treatment is helpful for most patients with painful conditions of the acromioclavicular joint, although those with osteolysis may need to modify their activities [44].
  • Conservative and surgical treatments are both effective in the management of acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis [17].
  • Acromioclavicular injections offer a 1-year success rate of 47% in patients with acromioclavicular osteoarthritis [22].
  • Additional research is needed to determine the main cause of pain and to compare clinical outcomes of intra-articular versus extra-articular steroid injections for isolated acromioclavicular osteoarthritis [13].

Operative Management

  • Both open and arthroscopic resection arthroplasty techniques provide predictable pain relief for symptomatic acromioclavicular osteoarthritis [8].
  • Limited distal clavicle excision reduces pain and improves shoulder function at midterm follow-up in patients with acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis resistant to conservative treatment [9].
  • Untreated acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis, whether symptomatic or not, encountered during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is associated with a low percentage of failure [3].
  • Further characterization is needed to identify patients in whom mild arthroscopic findings of acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis are clinically significant and warrant resection [1].
  • Conversion to anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction shows similar clinical outcomes compared to successful non-operative treatment in chronic primary type III to V acromioclavicular joint injuries at a minimum 5-year follow-up [49].
  • The authors recommend anatomic reconstruction procedures for the treatment of chronic complete acromioclavicular dislocations [21].
  • Osteoarthritis is associated with poorer final clinical outcomes after rotator cuff repair, and an unhealed or re-torn cuff increases the risk of osteoarthritis [23].

Diagnostic Considerations

  • A distinction between symptomatic and asymptomatic radiographic acromioclavicular osteoarthritis appears unnecessary, as all patients were equally satisfied with the outcome of preoperative acromioclavicular injection [6].
  • Asymptomatic acromioclavicular osteoarthritis diagnosed by MRI remained asymptomatic in 90% of patients over a 7-year course [2].
  • Some persistent pain and osteoarthritis progression remain concerns following arthroscopy in the revision of failed open anterior stabilization of the shoulder [4].

Complications

  • Asymptomatic AC-OA remained asymptomatic in 90% of patients over a 7-year period [2].
  • Untreated ACJ osteoarthritis, whether symptomatic or not, encountered during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is associated with a low percentage of failure [3].
  • Osteoarthritis is associated with poorer final clinical outcomes after rotator cuff repair [23].
  • An unhealed or re-torn rotator cuff increases the risk of developing osteoarthritis [23].
  • Severe AC joint osteoarthritis is associated with acromial stress fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty [7].
  • Radiographic ACJ osteoarthritis is common in patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty [7].
  • Some persistent pain and osteoarthritis progression remain concerns following arthroscopy in revision of failed open anterior stabilization of the shoulder [4].
  • Recurrence of the initial dislocation after arthroscopically assisted reduction of acute AC joint dislocation appears to be related to the onset of degenerative ACJ arthropathy [14].
  • Treatment of acute grade III and IV AC dislocations by synthetic ligament reconstruction carries a risk of significant early osteolysis [25].
  • Open and arthroscopic AC joint reconstruction techniques have no differences in loss of reduction, complication rate, or revision rate [38].
  • Both open and arthroscopic resection arthroplasty techniques provide predictable pain relief for symptomatic AC osteoarthritis but each has a unique set of potential complications [8].

Recovery

  • Asymptomatic acromioclavicular osteoarthritis diagnosed by MRI remained asymptomatic in 90% of patients over a 7-year period [2].
  • Untreated acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis, whether symptomatic or not, encountered during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is associated with a low percentage of failure [3].
  • Limited distal clavicle excision for acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis resistant to conservative treatment reduced pain and improved shoulder function at midterm follow-up [9].
  • Acromioclavicular injections offer a 1-year success rate of 47% in patients with acromioclavicular osteoarthritis [22].
  • A preoperative acromioclavicular injection study suggested that distinguishing between symptomatic and asymptomatic radiographic acromioclavicular osteoarthritis is unnecessary, as all patients were equally satisfied with the outcome [6].
  • Osteolytic changes in the acromioclavicular joint seemed to be associated with incongruity but did not correlate with clinical results [11].
  • Recurrence of initial acromioclavicular joint dislocation appears to be related to the onset of degenerative acromioclavicular joint arthropathy [14].
  • Treatment of acute grade III and IV acromioclavicular dislocations using synthetic ligament reconstruction gave satisfactory results in terms of recovery of strength, but evolution is not risk-free due to the onset of significant early osteolysis [25].
  • Arthroscopic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction with double-bundle soft tissue allograft for chronic type V acromioclavicular dislocations showed sustained and statistically significant improvements in functional outcomes, high rates of return to sport, and maintenance of active-duty military status at minimum 10-year follow-up [39].
  • Minimally invasive coracoclavicular ligament augmentation with a flip button/polydioxanone repair for total acromioclavicular joint dislocation revealed excellent radiologic and clinical results with no subluxations or dislocations noted in short-term follow-up [48].
  • Some persistent pain and osteoarthritis progression remain concerns in the arthroscopic revision of failed open anterior stabilization of the shoulder [4].
  • Type V acromioclavicular dislocations may be given a trial of conservative therapy [15].

Key Evidence

  • [L2] Further characterisation of patients in whom mild arthroscopic findings of OA of AC joint are clinically significant and warrant resection is needed. [1] (10.1007/s00167-014-3114-2)
  • [L2] Asymptomatic AC-OA remained asymptomatic in 90% over 7 years. [2] (10.1016/j.jse.2019.04.004)
  • [L2] Untreated ACJ osteoarthritis, symptomatic or not, encountered during arthroscopic RCR is associated with a low percentage of failure. [3] (10.1007/s00167-020-06098-y)
  • [L4] Some persistent pain and osteoarthritis progression remain concerns. [4] (10.1016/j.arthro.2009.04.073)
  • [L3] Clinicians should consider overreduction of the AC joint because it may lead to favorable radiological results. [5] (10.1177/0363546519862850)
  • [L4] The outcomes of this study seem to suggest that a distinction between symptomatic and asymptomatic radiographic AC OA is unnecessary, as all patients were equally satisfied with the outcome. [6] (10.5397/cise.2023.00073)
  • [L3] Radiographic ACJ osteoarthritis is common in patients undergoing RSA. [7] (10.1016/j.jseint.2021.11.008)
  • [L5] Both open and arthroscopic resection arthroplasty techniques provide predictable pain relief for symptomatic AC osteoarthritis, though each has a unique set of potential complications that may be minimized with improved understanding of anatomy, biomechanics, and meticulous surgical technique. [8] (10.1177/0363546513485359)
  • [L4] Limited distal clavicle excision of patients with AC joint osteoarthritis resistant to conservative treatment reduced pain and improved shoulder function at midterm follow-up. [9] (10.1016/j.otsr.2016.01.008)
  • [L5] Anatomic techniques that address both coracoclavicular ligaments and the AC capsule are recommended to restore horizontal and vertical stability while allowing physiological rotation. [10] (10.1016/j.arthro.2019.01.038)
  • [L4] The AC-DC measurement and use of the Alexander view provides the clinician with a more realistic appreciation of true AC joint displacement, especially in defining watershed cases (ie, IIIA/IIB/IV) and may better inform the decision-making process regarding management options and recommendations. [12] (10.1016/j.jse.2019.12.014)
  • [L4] Additional research is needed to determine the main cause of pain and compare clinical outcomes of intra-articular versus extra-articular injections. [13] (10.5397/cise.2023.00311)
  • [L4] Recurrence of the initial dislocation appears to be related to onset of degenerative ACJ arthropathy. [14] (10.1016/j.otsr.2017.11.001)
  • [L4] This suggests that Type V AC dislocations may be given a trial of conservative therapy. [15] (10.1177/2325967115s00017)
  • [L1] Injuries to the SC joint are uncommon, and recognition and classification are critical to proper management to minimize long-term sequelae. [16] (10.1177/0363546513498990)
  • [L4] Conservative and surgical treatments are both effective in acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis management. [17] (10.1007/s00167-020-06377-8)
  • [L3] Risk factors for subsequent DCE included tenderness to palpation at the AC joint, female sex, and surgery on the dominant side, with subsequent DCE performed in 40% of cases with a combination of these 3 factors. [18] (10.1177/2325967119844295)
  • [L1] Preventive arthroscopic DCR is not recommended in patients with radiological but asymptomatic ACJ arthritis. [19] (10.1177/0363546514547254)
  • [L1] The arthroscopic approach offers a unique advantage in diagnosing and treating occult intra-articular pathology. [20] (10.1016/j.jse.2006.10.006)
  • [L4] The authors recommend this procedure for the treatment of chronic complete AC dislocations. [21] (10.1016/j.injury.2010.09.023)
  • [L4] AC injections offer a 1-year success rate of 47%. [22] (10.5397/cise.2023.00031)
  • [L4] Osteoarthritis is associated with poorer final clinical outcomes, and an unhealed or re-torn cuff increases the risk of osteoarthritis. [23] (10.1016/j.otsr.2017.03.007)
  • [L1] Evaluating the integrity of the capsuloligamentous structures stabilizing the AC joint is reproducible and gives additional information on the severity of the injury, which might also influence the treatment decision. [24] (10.1016/j.jse.2020.10.026)
  • [L4] Treatment of ACD by synthetic ligament reconstruction gave satisfactory results, notably in terms of recovery of strength, but evolution is not risk-free with onset of significant early osteolysis. [25] (10.1016/j.otsr.2010.06.004)
  • [L5] Although each technique was able to restore different elements of the joint kinematics, none of the strategies completely restored the shoulder girdle to its preinjured state. [26] (10.1177/03635465221095231)
  • [L5] The kinematic changes could be a potential source of pain and dysfunction in the shoulder with AC joint dislocation. [27] (10.1177/0363546512458571)
  • [L5] Scapular and clavicular kinematics were affected in AC separation models. [28] (10.1016/j.jse.2013.01.004)
  • [L5] The observed frequency of hook contact with surrounding subacromial structures in a static shoulder confirms that the position of the hook portion of the implant can predispose anatomic structures to the post-operative complications of subacromial impingement and bony erosion. [29] (10.1016/j.injury.2009.12.012)
  • [L4] Non-operative reduction and stabilization of high-grade AC joint separations seems to be a valuable treatment option. [33] (10.1007/s00402-020-03630-0)
  • [L5] Future research should focus on addressing horizontal and rotational instability, to restore native physiological and biomechanical properties of the AC joint. [35] (10.1186/s12891-022-05935-0)
  • [L1] Open and arthroscopic AC joint reconstruction techniques have no differences in loss of reduction, the complication rate, and the revision rate based on the available literature. [38] (10.1177/0363546518795147)
  • [L4] Outcomes after arthroscopic CC reconstruction for chronic, type V AC dislocations in an active-duty military patient population show sustained and statistically significant improvements in functional outcomes as well as high rates of return to sport and maintenance of active-duty military status at long-term follow-up. [39] (10.1016/j.arthro.2025.05.008)
  • [L1] Coracoclavicular reconstruction with augmentation of the acromioclavicular joint has been shown to provide improved horizontal stability in both biomechanical and clinical studies compared to isolated coracoclavicular reconstruction. [41] (10.1007/s00167-018-5152-7)
  • [L4] Patients with edema on MRI were more likely to present pain than patients without edema, and subchondral bone edema on histologic examination was more frequent in patients with pain. [43] (10.1016/j.jseint.2020.03.007)
  • [L5] Nonoperative treatment is helpful for most patients, although those with osteolysis may have to modify their activities. [44] (10.5435/00124635-199905000-00004)
  • [L3] The presented data suggest adding a fixation of the AC joint to minimize lateral tilting of the scapula and maintain a more anatomic reposition result over time. [45] (10.1007/s00402-021-03761-y)
  • [L4] The short-term follow-up of 15 recently operated patients reveals excellent radiologic and clinical results, with no subluxations or dislocations of the acromioclavicular joint noted. [48] (10.1016/j.arthro.2006.12.015)
  • [L4] At a minimum 5-year follow-up, patients with successful non-operative treatment for type III-V ACJ injuries achieved similar clinical outcomes compared to those who were converted to ACCR. [49] (10.1007/s00167-020-06159-2)
  • [L4] Surgery for AC dislocations is difficult with radiological results that must still be improved, as radiological failures were observed in 41% of cases. [50] (10.1016/j.otsr.2015.09.012)

References

[1] Outcome of distal clavicle resection in patients with acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis and full‐thickness rotator cuff tear. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2014. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3114-2 [2] Seven-year course of asymptomatic acromioclavicular osteoarthritis diagnosed by MRI. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.04.004 [3] Acromioclavicular joint arthritis is not an indication for routine distal clavicle excision in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06098-y [4] The Role of Arthroscopy in Revision of Failed Open Anterior Stabilization of the Shoulder. Arthroscopy. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.04.073 [5] Factors Predicting the Outcome After Arthroscopically Assisted Stabilization of Acute High-Grade Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2019. DOI: 10.1177/0363546519862850 [6] Diagnostic value of a preoperative acromioclavicular injection for symptomatic acromioclavicular osteoarthritis: a retrospective study of cross-sectional midterm outcomes. Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow. 2024. DOI: 10.5397/cise.2023.00073 [7] Severe acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis is associated with acromial stress fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. JSES International. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.11.008 [8] Degenerative Joint Disease of the Acromioclavicular Joint. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2013. DOI: 10.1177/0363546513485359 [9] Limited distal clavicle excision of acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.01.008 [10] Editorial Commentary: Why We Have To Respect The Anatomy In Acromioclavicular Joint Surgery And Why Clinical Shoulder Scores Might Not Give Us The Information We Need!. Arthroscopy. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.01.038 [11] 10.1016-0020-1383-83-90092-x. n.d.. [12] Improved identification of unstable acromioclavicular joint injuries in a clinical population using the acromial center line to dorsal clavicle radiographic measurement. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.12.014 [13] Isolated acromioclavicular osteoarthritis and steroid injection. Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow. 2023. DOI: 10.5397/cise.2023.00311 [14] Arthroscopically assisted reduction of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation using a single double-button device: Medium-term clinical and radiological outcomes. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.11.001 [15] Successful Conservative Therapy in Rockwood Type V Acromioclavicular Dislocations. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2015. DOI: 10.1177/2325967115s00017 [16] Instability and Degenerative Arthritis of the Sternoclavicular Joint. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2013. DOI: 10.1177/0363546513498990 [17] No differences between conservative and surgical management of acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis: a scoping review. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06377-8 [18] Preoperative Factors Associated With Subsequent Distal Clavicle Resection After Rotator Cuff Repair. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2019. DOI: 10.1177/2325967119844295 [19] Is Arthroscopic Distal Clavicle Resection Necessary for Patients With Radiological Acromioclavicular Joint Arthritis and Rotator Cuff Tears?. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2014. DOI: 10.1177/0363546514547254 [20] Arthroscopic versus open distal clavicle excision: Comparative results at six months and one year from a randomized, prospective clinical trial. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2006.10.006 [21] Surgical treatment of chronic acromioclavicular dislocation: Comparison between two surgical procedures for anatomic reconstruction. Injury. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.09.023 [22] Mid- to long-term success rate and functional outcomes of acromioclavicular injections in patients with acromioclavicular osteoarthritis. Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow. 2023. DOI: 10.5397/cise.2023.00031 [23] Osteoarthritis after rotator cuff repair: A 10-year follow-up study. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.03.007 [24] The ligamentous injury pattern in acute acromioclavicular dislocations and its impact on clinical and radiographic parameters. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.10.026 [25] Acute grade III and IV acromioclavicular dislocations: Outcomes and pitfalls of reconstruction procedures using a synthetic ligament. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2010.06.004 [26] Differences between Coracoclavicular, Acromioclavicular, or Combined Reconstruction Techniques on the Kinematics of the Shoulder Girdle. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2022. DOI: 10.1177/03635465221095231 [27] The Function of the Acromioclavicular and Coracoclavicular Ligaments in Shoulder Motion. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2012. DOI: 10.1177/0363546512458571 [28] Acromioclavicular joint ligamentous system contributing to clavicular strut function: a cadaveric study. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.01.004 [29] Subacromial morphometric assessment of the clavicle hook plate. Injury. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.12.012 [33] Can an acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separation be reduced and stabilized without surgery? A surgeon’s experience. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03630-0 [35] Current concepts in acromioclavicular joint (AC) instability – a proposed treatment algorithm for acute and chronic AC-joint surgery. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2022. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05935-0 [38] Current Concepts in the Operative Management of Acromioclavicular Dislocations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Operative Techniques. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2018. DOI: 10.1177/0363546518795147 [39] Arthroscopic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction With Double‐Bundle Soft Tissue Allograft for Chronic Type V Acromioclavicular Dislocations Shows Excellent Patient Outcomes and Return to Duty and Sport at Minimum 10‐Year Follow‐Up. Arthroscopy. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2025.05.008 [41] Acromioclavicular joint augmentation at the time of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction fails to improve functional outcomes despite significantly improved horizontal stability. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-5152-7 [43] Histologic and magnetic resonance image evaluation in acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis. JSES International. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.03.007 [44] Painful Conditions of the Acromioclavicular Joint. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 1999. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-199905000-00004 [45] Additional acromioclavicular cerclage limits lateral tilt of the scapula in patients with arthroscopically assisted coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-03761-y [48] Minimally Invasive Coracoclavicular Ligament Augmentation With a Flip Button/Polydioxanone Repair for Treatment of Total Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation. Arthroscopy. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.12.015 [49] Conversion to anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (ACCR) shows similar clinical outcomes compared to successful non‐operative treatment in chronic primary type III to V acromioclavicular joint injuries. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06159-2 [50] Complication rates and types of failure after arthroscopic acute acromioclavicular dislocation fixation. Prospective multicenter study of 116 cases. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.09.012