ਰੇਡੀਅਲ ਟਨਲ ਸਿੰਡਰੋਮ ਜਾਣਕਾਰੀ

Overview

• Radial tunnel syndrome is a compression neuropathy of the radial nerve [2].
• Most publications regarding uncommon upper extremity compression neuropathies, including radial tunnel syndrome, are small retrospective series or case reports [2].
• Treatment decisions for uncommon upper extremity compression neuropathies are not typically based on high levels of evidence [2].
• Nonsurgical management is the first-line treatment for radial tunnel syndrome [1].
• Surgical decompression is a viable option for refractory cases of radial tunnel syndrome [1].
• There is ongoing controversy regarding the diagnosis and outcomes of radial tunnel syndrome [1].
• Surgery is advocated for high radial nerve entrapment neuropathy cases resistant to conservative treatment [14].
• Dissection of the entire length of the fibrous tunnel is important in the surgical management of high radial nerve entrapment neuropathy [14].

Anatomy & Pathophysiology

• The humeral trochlea protrudes into the cubital tunnel during elbow flexion, causing dynamic morphologic changes in the ulnar nerve [38].
• Shoulder position increases ulnar nerve strain at the elbow of patients with cubital tunnel syndrome [47].
• Increased elbow flexion in patients with cubital tunnel syndrome influences the intraneural blood flow of the ulnar nerve [49].
• The mechanism of symptom provocation in cubital tunnel syndrome by the elbow flexion test is not explained simply by dynamic pressure in the cubital tunnel, suggesting other pathophysiological factors contribute [54].
• Ulnar nerve gliding is most severe during passive wrist movement in elbow flexion and forearm supination [55].
• Dynamic ulnar nerve compression at the elbow due to the anconeus epitrochlearis muscle is an uncommon disorder with unknown incidence and pathophysiologic mechanisms [66].
• The throwing elbow is a common source of nerve injuries due to the unique combination of anatomy, high forces, and sheer repetition associated with throwing sports [60].
• The study documents the incidence and distribution pattern of motor damage in patients with radiohumeral epicondylopathy and illustrates variations in topographical and functional neuroanatomy to describe a pathoanatomic substrate for this clinical picture [61].
• A cadaveric study could not detect a definitive effect of elbow deformity (cubitus valgus/varus) on ulnar nerve strain or demonstrate the extent of acceptable clinical elbow deformity [59].
• No significant relationships were found between chronic structural adaptations of the shoulder (strength or ROM) and chronic structural adaptations of the elbow in professional baseball pitchers [34].

Classification

• Radial tunnel syndrome is defined as a pain syndrome caused by compression of the posterior interosseous nerve at the proximal forearm [10].
• Radial tunnel syndrome is considered an illness construct based on speculative pathophysiology with no verifiable pathophysiology or accepted reference standard for diagnosis [5].
• Radial tunnel syndrome and posterior interosseous nerve syndrome are viewed as a single condition presenting along a spectrum of nerve entrapment [37].
• Radial tunnel syndrome is distinguished from posterior interosseous nerve syndrome and superficial radial nerve compression (Wartenberg's syndrome) within the context of unusual compression neuropathies of the forearm [11].
• Radial neuropathies are rare compared to other entrapment neuropathies [3].
• Radial tunnel syndrome is classified as an uncommon compression syndrome of the upper extremity [2].

Clinical Presentation

• Radial tunnel syndrome is characterized as a pain syndrome caused by compression of the posterior interosseous nerve at the proximal forearm [10].
• Radial tunnel syndrome is an illness construct based on a speculative pathophysiology with no verifiable pathophysiology or accepted reference standard for diagnosis [5].
• Radial neuropathies are rare [3].
• Radial tunnel syndrome and posterior interosseous nerve syndrome are distinct clinical entities that share overlapping clinical presentations [6].

Investigations

• Radial tunnel syndrome is an illness construct based on a speculative pathophysiology with no verifiable pathophysiology or accepted reference standard for diagnosis [5].
• Radial tunnel syndrome is a pain syndrome caused by compression of the posterior interosseous nerve at the proximal forearm [10].
• Dynamic ultrasonographic assessment of changes in the anteroposterior (AP) diameter and cross-sectional area (CSA) is an effective diagnostic tool for identifying radial tunnel syndrome [68].
• Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) may depict coexistent or alternative conditions such as lateral epicondylitis, which may explain the patient's symptoms or may identify compressive lesions that may be amenable to surgical resection or decompression [45].
• MRI has emerged as the imaging modality of choice for the evaluation of elbow pain in the athlete due to its high spatial resolution, excellent soft tissue contrast, and multiplanar imaging capabilities [70].
• Most clinicians order preoperative tests before offering surgery for cubital tunnel syndrome, but only 6% order both electrodiagnostic (EDX) testing and ultrasound as per expert consensus [7].
• Clinical evaluation is paramount in the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome because electrodiagnostic testing often is not sufficiently sensitive to detect changes associated with the syndrome [9].
• Ultrasound may be able to better identify patients with early stages of ulnar neuropathy with negative electrodiagnostic findings [72].
• MRI is an effective diagnostic modality, and clinicians should be aware of primary synovial chondromatosis as a causative factor of cubital tunnel syndrome [20].
• Only a small number of individuals with MRI evidence of an anconeus epitrochlearis muscle (AEM) had clinical evidence of ulnar neuropathy [48].

Treatment

Non-Operative Management

• Nonsurgical management is the first-line treatment for radial tunnel syndrome [1].
• Initial treatment of most compressive neuropathies at the elbow is nonoperative, consisting of rest and avoidance of elbow flexion [35].
• Most cases of ulnar nerve compression improve with nonsurgical treatment [43].
• A prolonged nonsurgical approach is warranted in most cases for median nerve or anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) compression [46].

Operative Management: Indications and Outcomes

• Surgical decompression remains a viable option for radial tunnel syndrome cases refractory to nonsurgical management [1].
• Surgery is advocated for high radial nerve entrapment neuropathy cases resistant to conservative treatment [14].
• Reoperation after primary surgery of cubital tunnel syndrome gives satisfactory results for patients who fail conservative treatment [28].
• The majority of ulnar nerve compression cases get better with surgical decompression [43].
• Surgery is effective in treating cubital tunnel syndrome, with more than 90% of patients cured or showing improvement [19].
• Patient-reported outcomes of surgical treatment for cubital tunnel syndrome are good but are affected by preoperative symptom severity [13].
• In situ decompression of the ulnar nerve is a reliable treatment for cubital tunnel syndrome with a low failure rate [39].

Operative Techniques: Decompression vs. Transposition

• Current evidence suggests that different surgical methods to treat ulnar neuropathy at the elbow do not differ in their clinical outcomes [15].
• Simple decompression and anterior subcutaneous and submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome have been compared in a meta-analysis [18].
• Both minimal medial epicondylectomy and anterior subcutaneous transposition of the ulnar nerve can be used for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome with a high rate of satisfaction [36].
• In situ decompression and partial epicondylectomy both represent efficient and safe methods for cubital tunnel syndrome management [56].
• Medial epicondylectomy is recommended for patients with cubital tunnel syndrome associated with abnormal nerve-conduction velocity [25].

Operative Techniques: Endoscopic vs. Open

• Endoscopic and open cubital tunnel release techniques demonstrate similar effectiveness, outcomes, complication profiles, and reoperation rates for idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome [40].
• An open randomized controlled trial (EVOCU) aims to provide evidence-based recommendations on the efficacy, patient treatment experience, and safety profile of endoscopic versus open release for cubital tunnel syndrome [24].
• The endoscopic technique has proven effective in the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome [42].

Operative Technical Considerations

• Clinical evaluation is paramount in the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome because electrodiagnostic testing often is not sufficiently sensitive to detect changes associated with the syndrome [9].
• For high radial nerve entrapment neuropathy, it is important to dissect the entire length of the fibrous tunnel during surgery [14].

Complications

• Radial tunnel syndrome is an illness construct based on a speculative pathophysiology with no verifiable pathophysiology or accepted reference standard for diagnosis [5].
• Most publications regarding uncommon compression syndromes of the radial, ulnar, and median nerves are small retrospective series or case reports [2].
• Treatment decisions for uncommon compression syndromes are not typically based on high levels of evidence [2].
• Radial neuropathies are rare [3].
• The short-term complication rates of cubital tunnel surgery are low (3.2%) [27].
• Short-term complication rates for cubital tunnel surgery are higher for patients with chronic kidney disease [27].
• Results of revision surgery for recurrent or persistent cubital tunnel syndrome are less predictable and satisfying than primary surgery [29].
• The risk of revision surgery following in situ ulnar nerve decompression for idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome is low [69].
• The risk of revision surgery following in situ ulnar nerve decompression for idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome is increased in patients younger than 50 years [69].

Recovery

• Surgical decompression is a viable option for refractory cases of radial tunnel syndrome, despite ongoing controversy regarding diagnosis and outcomes [1].
• Most publications on uncommon compression syndromes of the radial nerve are small retrospective series or case reports, and treatment decisions are not typically based on high levels of evidence [2].
• Radial neuropathies are rare [3].

Key Evidence

• [L4] The article reviews the anatomy, diagnosis, and treatment of radial tunnel syndrome, noting that while nonsurgical management is first-line, surgical decompression remains a viable option for refractory cases despite ongoing controversy regarding diagnosis and outcomes. [1] (10.5435/jaaos-d-23-00314)
• [L4] This article reviews uncommon compression syndromes of the radial, ulnar, and median nerves, noting that most publications are small retrospective series or case reports and treatment decisions are not typically based on high levels of evidence. [2] (10.1016/j.hcl.2013.04.014)
• [L3] Ulnar and radial neuropathies were less common, with ulnar neuropathies more frequent in men and radial neuropathies being rare. [3] (10.1177/1753193419886741)
• [L5] Radial tunnel syndrome is an illness construct based on a speculative pathophysiology with no verifiable pathophysiology or accepted reference standard for diagnosis. [5] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.03.020)
• [Paper] This article is a review of the history, anatomy, and clinical presentation of radial tunnel syndrome (RTS) and posterior interosseous nerve syndrome (PINS). [6] (10.1016/s0749-0712(21)00357-7)
• [L4] Most clinicians order preoperative tests before offering surgery for cubital tunnel syndrome, but only 6% order both EDX and ultrasound as per expert consensus. [7] (10.1177/17531934261434155)
• [L4] Clinical evaluation is paramount in the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome because electrodiagnostic testing often is not sufficiently sensitive to detect changes associated with the syndrome. [9] (10.1016/j.hcl.2013.08.019)
• [L5] Radial tunnel syndrome is a pain syndrome caused by compression of the posterior interosseous nerve at the proximal forearm. [10] (10.1016/j.ocl.2012.07.022)
• [L5] This article is a review examining unusual compression neuropathies of the forearm, specifically focusing on the radial nerve, including posterior interosseous nerve syndrome, radial tunnel syndrome, and superficial radial nerve compression (Wartenberg's syndrome). [11] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.10.016)
• [L3] The patient-reported outcome of surgical treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome is good but is affected by preoperative symptom severity. [13] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.05.014)
• [Case_report] The authors advocate for surgery in high radial nerve entrapment neuropathy cases resistant to conservative treatment, emphasizing the importance of dissecting the entire length of the fibrous tunnel. [14] (10.1016/j.jse.2025.02.060)
• [L4] Current evidence suggests that different surgical methods to treat ulnar neuropathy at the elbow do not differ in their clinical outcomes. [15] (10.1016/j.hcl.2013.04.013)
• [L1] This report represents the best cumulative evidence to date examining the surgical management of cubital tunnel syndrome. [18] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.03.006)
• [L4] Surgery was effective in treating cubital tunnel syndrome with more than 90% of patients cured or showing improvement. [19] (10.1016/j.otsr.2014.03.009)
• [Case_report] MRI is an effective diagnostic modality, and clinicians should be aware of primary synovial chondromatosis as a causative factor of cubital tunnel syndrome. [20] (10.1177/1758573216683396)
• [L2] This study aims to provide an evidence-based recommendation on which method has the best efficacy, patient treatment experience, and safety profile for cubital tunnel syndrome by comparing open and endoscopic release. [24] (10.1186/s12891-023-06234-y)
• [L4] The procedure is recommended for patients with cubital tunnel syndrome associated with abnormal nerve-conduction velocity. [25] (10.2106/00004623-198062060-00016)
• [L4] The short-term complication rates of cubital tunnel surgery are low (3.2%), but higher for patients with chronic kidney disease. [27] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.01.020)
• [L4] Results of revision surgery for recurrent or persistent cubital tunnel syndrome are less predictable and satisfying than primary surgery. [29] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.11.024)
• [L3] However, no significant relationships between adaptations in shoulder strength or ROM were related to chronic structural adaptations of the elbow. [34] (10.1177/03635465251317509)
• [L5] Initial treatment of most compressive neuropathies at the elbow is nonoperative, consisting of rest and avoidance of elbow flexion. [35] (10.5435/00124635-199809000-00004)
• [L3] Both methods can be used for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome with a high rate of satisfaction. [36] (10.1016/j.jse.2005.10.007)
• [L5] The authors advocate for consistent use of the terminology distinguishing the deep branch of the radial nerve (DBRN) and the posterior interosseous nerve (PIN), and recommend viewing radial tunnel syndrome and posterior interosseous nerve syndrome as a single condition presenting along a spectrum of nerve entrapment. [37] (10.1177/17531934241254706)
• [L5] The humeral trochlea protrudes into the cubital tunnel during elbow flexion, causing dynamic morphologic changes in the ulnar nerve. [38] (10.1016/j.jse.2022.05.026)
• [L4] In situ decompression of the ulnar nerve is a reliable treatment for cubital tunnel syndrome with a low failure rate. [39] (10.1177/1753193408101467)
• [L1] The current study demonstrates similar effectiveness between the endoscopic (ECTuR) and open (OCTuR) techniques for treatment of idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome with similar outcomes, complication profiles, and reoperation rates. [40] (10.1177/1558944715616097)
• [L4] The technique has proven effective in the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. [42] (10.1177/1753193408094443)
• [L4] MR imaging may depict coexistent or alternative conditions such as lateral epicondylitis, which may explain the patient's symptoms or may identify compressive lesions that may be amenable to surgical resection or decompression. [45] (10.1148/radiol.2401050028)
• [L5] Surgical decompression of the median nerve or the AIN in the forearm is rarely indicated; a prolonged nonsurgical approach is warranted in most cases. [46] (10.5435/jaaos-d-16-00010)
• [L4] To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study showing that shoulder position changes the ulnar nerve strain around the elbow in living patients with CubTS. [47] (10.1016/j.jse.2015.01.014)
• [L4] Only a small number of individuals with MRI evidence of an AEM had clinical evidence of ulnar neuropathy. [48] (10.1016/j.jse.2018.03.021)
• [L3] Increased elbow flexion in patients with CuTS influences the intraneural blood flow of the ulnar nerve. [49] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.06.024)
• [L3] The mechanism of provocation of symptoms of cubital tunnel syndrome by the elbow flexion test could not be explained simply by dynamic pressure in the cubital tunnel, and other pathophysiological factors could also be contributing. [54] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.11.013)
• [L4] Ulnar nerve gliding was most severe during passive wrist movement in elbow flexion and forearm supination. [55] (10.5397/cise.2024.00934)
• [L3] In situ decompression and partial epicondylectomy both represent efficient and safe methods for cubital tunnel syndrome management. [56] (10.1016/j.jse.2009.10.014)
• [L5] The study could not detect a definitive effect of elbow deformity on ulnar nerve strain or demonstrate the extent of acceptable clinical elbow deformity. [59] (10.1186/s12891-022-05786-9)
• [L5] The throwing elbow is a common source of nerve injuries due to the unique combination of anatomy, high forces, and sheer repetition associated with throwing sports. [60] (10.1016/j.csm.2004.04.012)
• [L4] Dynamic ulnar nerve compression at the elbow due to the anconeus epitrochlearis muscle is an uncommon, little-known disorder with much remaining to be elucidated about its incidence and pathophysiologic mechanisms. [66] (10.1016/j.jhsg.2022.11.002)
• [L4] Dynamic ultrasonographic assessment of changes in the AP diameter and CSA is an effective diagnostic tool for identifying radial tunnel syndrome. [68] (10.1177/17531934261443138)
• [L3] For patients with idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome, the risk of revision surgery following in situ ulnar nerve decompression is low, but increased in patients younger than 50 years. [69] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.12.012)
• [L5] MRI has emerged as the imaging modality of choice for the evaluation of elbow pain in the athlete due to its high spatial resolution, excellent soft tissue contrast, and multiplanar imaging capabilities. [70] (10.1016/j.csm.2010.06.004)
• [L4] Ultrasound may be able to better identify patients with early stages of ulnar neuropathy with negative electrodiagnostic findings. [72] (10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.08.014)

References

[1] Radial Tunnel Syndrome: Review and Best Evidence. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2023. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-23-00314 [2] Uncommon Upper Extremity Compression Neuropathies. Hand Clinics. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2013.04.014 [3] Incidence and operations of median, ulnar and radial entrapment neuropathies in Finland: a nationwide register study. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1753193419886741 [5] Radial Tunnel Syndrome. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.03.020 [6] RADIAL TUNNEL SYNDROME. Hand Clinics. 1996. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-0712(21)00357-7 [7] Preoperative tests before cubital tunnel decompression in 2025. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2026. DOI: 10.1177/17531934261434155 [9] Minimal-Incision In Situ Ulnar Nerve Decompression at the Elbow. Hand Clinics. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2013.08.019 [10] Radial Tunnel Syndrome. Orthopedic Clinics of North America. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2012.07.022 [11] Unusual Compression Neuropathies of the Forearm, Part I: Radial Nerve. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.10.016 [13] Patient-Rated Outcome of Ulnar Nerve Decompression: A Comparison of Endoscopic and Open In Situ Decompression. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.05.014 [14] High radial nerve entrapment neuropathy: an anatomical cadaver study and case report. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2025.02.060 [15] Ulnar Neuropathy at the Elbow. Hand Clinics. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2013.04.013 [18] Simple Decompression Versus Anterior Subcutaneous and Submuscular Transposition of the Ulnar Nerve for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.03.006 [19] Cubital tunnel syndrome: Comparative results of a multicenter study of 4 surgical techniques with a mean follow-up of 92 months. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.03.009 [20] Ulnar nerve palsy caused by synovial protrusion in synovial chondromatosis of the elbow: a case report and literature review. Shoulder & Elbow. 2016. DOI: 10.1177/1758573216683396 [24] Protocol for Endoscopic Versus Open Cubital tunnel release (EVOCU): an open randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2023. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06234-y [25] Cubital tunnel syndrome. Treatment by medial epicondylectomy.. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1980. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-198062060-00016 [27] Rates of Complications and Secondary Surgeries After In Situ Cubital Tunnel Release Compared With Ulnar Nerve Transposition: A Retrospective Review. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.01.020 [28] 10.1055-s-2001-19937. 2001. [29] Recurrent or Persistent Cubital Tunnel Syndrome. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.11.024 [34] Chronic Structural Adaptations of the Shoulder and Elbow Are Correlated in Professional Baseball Pitchers. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2025. DOI: 10.1177/03635465251317509 [35] Compressive Ulnar Neuropathies at the Elbow: II. Treatment. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 1998. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-199809000-00004 [36] Comparative study between minimal medial epicondylectomy and anterior subcutaneous transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2005.10.007 [37] Nomenclature of the radial nerve: distinguishing between the deep branch of the radial nerve and the posterior interosseous nerve. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2024. DOI: 10.1177/17531934241254706 [38] Dynamic analysis of the ulnar nerve and cubital tunnel morphology using ultrasonography: a cadaveric study. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.05.026 [39] Incidence of Re-Operation and Subjective Outcome Following in Situ Decompression of the Ulnar Nerve at the Cubital Tunnel. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2009. DOI: 10.1177/1753193408101467 [40] Endoscopic Versus Open Cubital Tunnel Release. HAND. 2016. DOI: 10.1177/1558944715616097 [42] Endoscopic Anatomical Nerve Observation and Minimally Invasive Management of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2008. DOI: 10.1177/1753193408094443 [43] 10.1007-s12593-009-0020-9. n.d.. [45] MR Imaging Features of Radial Tunnel Syndrome: Initial Experience. Radiology. 2006. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2401050028 [46] Ulnar Tunnel Syndrome, Radial Tunnel Syndrome, Anterior Interosseous Nerve Syndrome, and Pronator Syndrome. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2017. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-16-00010 [47] Shoulder position increases ulnar nerve strain at the elbow of patients with cubital tunnel syndrome. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.01.014 [48] Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging analysis of the cross-sectional areas of the anconeus epitrochlearis muscle, cubital tunnel, and ulnar nerve with the elbow in extension in patients with and without ulnar neuropathy. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.03.021 [49] Dynamic Evaluation of Intraneural Microvascularity of the Ulnar Nerve Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Patients With Cubital Tunnel Syndrome. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.06.024 [54] Association Between the Elbow Flexion Test and Extraneural Pressure Inside the Cubital Tunnel. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.11.013 [55] Biomechanical analysis of ulnar nerve gliding and elongation: implications for nonsurgical ulnar nerve release in cubital tunnel syndrome. Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow. 2025. DOI: 10.5397/cise.2024.00934 [56] Comparative study of surgical treatment of ulnar nerve compression at the elbow. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.10.014 [59] A cadaveric study of ulnar nerve strain at the elbow associated with cubitus valgus/varus deformity. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2022. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05786-9 [60] Nerve injuries in the throwing elbow. Clinics in Sports Medicine. 2004. DOI: 10.1016/j.csm.2004.04.012 [61] 10.1007-bf00426065. n.d.. [66] Dynamic Compression of the Ulnar Nerve Associated With the Anconeus Epitrochlearis Muscle: Do We Really Know Everything?. Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2022.11.002 [68] Role of high-resolution dynamic ultrasonography in the evaluation of posterior interosseous nerve compression at radial tunnel: a prospective case-control study. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2026. DOI: 10.1177/17531934261443138 [69] Predicting Revision Following In Situ Ulnar Nerve Decompression for Patients With Idiopathic Cubital Tunnel Syndrome. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.12.012 [70] Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Elbow in Athletes. Clinics in Sports Medicine. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.csm.2010.06.004 [72] Diagnosis of Ulnar Neuropathy at the Elbow Using Ultrasound — A Comparison to Electrophysiologic Studies. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.08.014